Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
148 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-09-30
2009-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Use of a Patient Decision Aid for Gastrologic Endoscopy in a Pediatric Setting
NCT00813033
Multi-institutional Trial of Non-operative Management of Appendicitis
NCT02271932
Microbiological Examination of Children Operated for Congenital Lacrimal Stenosis
NCT00312689
Feasibility Study of a Guided Imagery Therapy Mobile Application for Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders in Children
NCT07222943
Paediatric Resident Complex Care Curriculum RCT
NCT03349541
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Between 24 and 48 hours prior to endoscopy, the participant will have the option to access the web-based module outside the hospital or through a hospital-based kiosk. The web address used is http://www.pedsgiconsent.com. Just prior to starting the module, a five-minute electronic pre-intervention test will be given and its results recorded in an electronic database. This will gather demographic and pre-intervention state anxiety without personal identifying information. After the survey is complete, the educational module will be accessed. Upon completion, the subjects will print a confirmatory document of completion and a list of questions to hand to their physician at time of endoscopy. Hand written questions will also be permitted. Non-EAIC participants will perform a non-educational web program not related to gastroenterology and also have their endoscopy questions printed to give to their physician. The questions and confirmation sheet will also be presented to their physician at time of procedure. Participants will also have space to write further questions by hand on the form. The questions collected will be used to assess number and complexity of questions asked as influenced by the education program. The web module will record time duration taken for the program. After completing the program, the participants will report to the GI suite as previously scheduled. The procedure will occur without either the practitioner or nursing staff knowing in which arm of the study the participants are enrolled. After the questions are answered and formal GI endoscopy procedural consent is obtained, the question sheet will be deposited in a lock box in the endoscopy suite for review at a later time. Total time spent in the endoscopy suite will be recorded. Prior to the patient's endoscopy, but after formal consent is obtained, the participant will then take a ten minute electronic post-test to ascertain satisfaction (mGHAA-modified-Group Health Association of America Survey-9), change in state anxiety \[s-STAI-(Spielberger-State Trait Anxiety Inventory (state section)\], and change in understanding of consent parameters achieved. Satisfaction will be measured using the validated modified Group Health Association of America-9 Survey (mGHAA-9). It is a well-validated instrument used to measure patient satisfaction in adult endoscopy. Probing questions to evaluate the attainment of consent will be based on a modified survey taken from Woodrow's study titled, "How Thorough is the Process of Informed Consent Prior to Outpatient Gastroscopy?"(Consent-20)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Electronic Assisted Consent
Standard procedural consent performed by pediatric gastroenterologist plus assistance from computerized emmi module.
Emmi Pediatric Upper Endoscopy Patient Education Module
Emmi Pediatric Upper Endoscopy Patient Education Module as designed by EMMI SOLUTIONS, LLC
Control Consent
Standard procedural consent as performed by pediatric gastroenterologists
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Emmi Pediatric Upper Endoscopy Patient Education Module
Emmi Pediatric Upper Endoscopy Patient Education Module as designed by EMMI SOLUTIONS, LLC
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subject gives consent to participate
* Child of parent does not have a planned endoscopy intervention.
Exclusion Criteria
* Does not give consent to participate
* Does not complete consent instrument at a minimum during study
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Midwestern University
OTHER
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Petar Mamula, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Joel Friedlander, D.O., M.Be.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Children's Hospital of Phildelphia
Greg Loeben, Ph.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Midwestern University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chidren's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Woodrow SR, Jenkins AP. How thorough is the process of informed consent prior to outpatient gastroscopy? A study of practice in a United Kingdom District Hospital. Digestion. 2006;73(2-3):189-97. doi: 10.1159/000094528. Epub 2006 Jul 11.
Gros DF, Antony MM, Simms LJ, McCabe RE. Psychometric properties of the State-Trait Inventory for Cognitive and Somatic Anxiety (STICSA): comparison to the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Psychol Assess. 2007 Dec;19(4):369-81. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.369.
Yacavone RF, Locke GR 3rd, Gostout CJ, Rockwood TH, Thieling S, Zinsmeister AR. Factors influencing patient satisfaction with GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Jun;53(7):703-10. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.115337.
Standards of Practice Committee; Zuckerman MJ, Shen B, Harrison ME 3rd, Baron TH, Adler DG, Davila RE, Gan SI, Lichtenstein DR, Qureshi WA, Rajan E, Fanelli RD, Van Guilder T. Informed consent for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Aug;66(2):213-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.029. No abstract available.
Friedlander JA, Loeben GS, Finnegan PK, Puma AE, Zhang X, de Zoeten EF, Piccoli DA, Mamula P. A novel method to enhance informed consent: a prospective and randomised trial of form-based versus electronic assisted informed consent in paediatric endoscopy. J Med Ethics. 2011 Apr;37(4):194-200. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.037622. Epub 2011 Jan 18.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
The Study Web Site
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2008-6-6053
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.