Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Additional Doses of AZX100 Drug Product Following Excision of Keloid Scars (NCT NCT00892723)
NCT ID: NCT00892723
Last Updated: 2012-10-11
Results Overview
Efficacy was based on the difference between mean POSAS scores of placebo, 0.3 mg AZX100, and 1 mg AZX100 12 months after surgery. This gave four comparisons to placebo: patient or observer and 0.3 mg and 1 mg AZX100. PSAS included patients' ratings on a scale of 1-10 (1 was normal skin or no complaints and 10 was the worst imaginable scar or the worst difference) for the following: Is the scar painful? Is the scar itching? Is the color of the scar different? Is the scar more stiff? Is the thickness of the scar different? Is the scar irregular? The possible minimum score was 6 and the maximum (worst) score was 60. OSAS included observers' ratings on a scale of 1-10 (1 was normal skin and 10 was the worst scar imaginable) for vascularization, pigmentation, thickness, relief, and pliability. The possible minimum score was 5 and the possible maximum (worst) score was 50.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
59 participants
12 Months
2012-10-11
Participant Flow
Enrollment in the study began in June 2009 and was completed in September 2010. All patients were enrolled in dermatological medical clinics.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Low Dose
AZX100 Drug Product 0.3 mg was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
High Dose
AZX100 Drug Product 1 mg was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Placebo
Placebo (0.9% saline) was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
21
|
19
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
19
|
15
|
17
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Low Dose
AZX100 Drug Product 0.3 mg was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
High Dose
AZX100 Drug Product 1 mg was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Placebo
Placebo (0.9% saline) was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Additional Doses of AZX100 Drug Product Following Excision of Keloid Scars
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Low Dose
n=21 Participants
AZX100 Drug Product 0.3 mg was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
High Dose
n=19 Participants
AZX100 Drug Product 1 mg was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Placebo (0.9% saline) was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Total
n=59 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
21 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
37.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 • n=93 Participants
|
36.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 • n=4 Participants
|
37.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4 • n=27 Participants
|
36.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 • n=483 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
11 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
10 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
21 participants
n=93 Participants
|
19 participants
n=4 Participants
|
19 participants
n=27 Participants
|
59 participants
n=483 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 MonthsPopulation: In this early phase study, the efficacy and safety analyses were performed using an evaluable subject sample, which included all subjects who received study agent and provided some efficacy or safety data.
Efficacy was based on the difference between mean POSAS scores of placebo, 0.3 mg AZX100, and 1 mg AZX100 12 months after surgery. This gave four comparisons to placebo: patient or observer and 0.3 mg and 1 mg AZX100. PSAS included patients' ratings on a scale of 1-10 (1 was normal skin or no complaints and 10 was the worst imaginable scar or the worst difference) for the following: Is the scar painful? Is the scar itching? Is the color of the scar different? Is the scar more stiff? Is the thickness of the scar different? Is the scar irregular? The possible minimum score was 6 and the maximum (worst) score was 60. OSAS included observers' ratings on a scale of 1-10 (1 was normal skin and 10 was the worst scar imaginable) for vascularization, pigmentation, thickness, relief, and pliability. The possible minimum score was 5 and the possible maximum (worst) score was 50.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PSAS Results for Placebo
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for those patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
PSAS Results for 0.3 mg AZX100
n=21 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for those patients who received 0.3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
PSAS Results for 1 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for those patients who received 1 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for Placebo
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for those patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for 0.3 mg AZX100
n=21 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for those patients who received 0.3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for 1 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for those patients who received 1 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - Placebo
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - 0.3 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received 0.3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - 1 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation measurements f(mm) or those patients who received 1 mg/ AZX100linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - Placebo
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation measurements f(mm) or those patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - 0.3 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received 0.3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - 1 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received 1 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - Placebo
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - 0.3 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received 0.3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - 1 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received 1 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Differences Among the 3 Dosage Groups in the Patient (PSAS) and Observer (OSAS) Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) Scores
|
23.29 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.06
|
24.11 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.75
|
21.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.36
|
18.53 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.07
|
23.47 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.78
|
18.33 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.00
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 MonthsPopulation: In this early phase study, the efficacy and safety analyses were performed using an evaluable subject sample, which included all subjects who received study agent and provided some efficacy or safety data.
At 12 months, two independent dermatologists who were blinded to study treatment evaluated the scar images using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0-100 mm, with 0 being normal skin and 100 being the worst scar imaginable. The scars were presented in a scrambled order. Efficacy was based on the difference between VAS scores of placebo and 0.3 mg AZX100, and placebo and 1 mg AZX100, for each of the two raters separately. Data from the two raters was not combined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PSAS Results for Placebo
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for those patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
PSAS Results for 0.3 mg AZX100
n=21 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for those patients who received 0.3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
PSAS Results for 1 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for those patients who received 1 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for Placebo
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for those patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for 0.3 mg AZX100
n=21 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for those patients who received 0.3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for 1 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for those patients who received 1 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - Placebo
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - 0.3 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received 0.3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - 1 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation measurements f(mm) or those patients who received 1 mg/ AZX100linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - Placebo
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation measurements f(mm) or those patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - 0.3 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received 0.3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - 1 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received 1 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - Placebo
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - 0.3 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received 0.3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - 1 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received 1 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Between-group Mean Differences in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scores by Independent Blinded Raters
|
71.9 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 21.2
|
77.0 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 20.3
|
68.1 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 23.3
|
56.1 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 12.8
|
62.2 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 10.9
|
54.3 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 13.2
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 MonthsPopulation: In this early phase study, the efficacy and safety analyses were performed using an evaluable subject sample, which included all subjects who received study agent and provided some efficacy or safety data.
This secondary outcome included measurements based on 3D photography of the scar surface at Month 12 and included maximum length, maximum width perpendicular to the maximum length, and minimum, maximum and mean elevation. All elevation measurements were made relative to the interpolated smooth skin surface. A value closest to zero was preferred, because zero was equal to the normal skin surface. The minimum elevation value was calculated as the lowest point of the scar below the interpolated smoooth skin surface and was always a negative number. A more negative number was worse, because it indicated a deeper measurement below the interpolated smooth skin surface. The maximum elevation value was calculated as the highest point of the scar above the interpolated smooth skin surface. A larger number was worse because it indicated a higher peak above the interpolated smooth skin surface. The mean elevation of the scar relative to the interpolated smooth skin surface was also calculated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PSAS Results for Placebo
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for those patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
PSAS Results for 0.3 mg AZX100
n=21 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for those patients who received 0.3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
PSAS Results for 1 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for those patients who received 1 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for Placebo
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for those patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for 0.3 mg AZX100
n=21 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for those patients who received 0.3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for 1 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for those patients who received 1 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - Placebo
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - 0.3 mg AZX100
n=21 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received 0.3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - 1 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation measurements f(mm) or those patients who received 1 mg/ AZX100linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - Placebo
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation measurements f(mm) or those patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - 0.3 mg AZX100
n=21 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received 0.3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - 1 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received 1 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - Placebo
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - 0.3 mg AZX100
n=21 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received 0.3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - 1 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received 1 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Between-group Mean Differences in Objective Measures Obtained Via 3D Photography (Elevation, Length, Width)
|
27.71 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 6.76
|
27.90 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 7.67
|
27.51 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 5.63
|
13.48 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 4.82
|
15.67 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 5.03
|
12.52 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 4.28
|
-0.86 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
-0.57 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.62
|
-0.38 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
2.01 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
2.44 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 1.36
|
1.74 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
0.40 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.40
|
0.51 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.34
|
0.31 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.25
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: In this early phase study, the efficacy and safety analyses were performed using an evaluable subject sample, which included all subjects who received study agent and provided some efficacy or safety data.
This secondary outcome included measurements based on 3D photography of the scar surface at Month 12 and included positive volume, negative volume and total volume. All volume measurements were made relative to the interpolated smooth skin surface. A value closer to zero was preferred, because zero was equal to the normal skin surface. Positive volume was calculated as the volume of the scar above the interpolated smooth skin surface. Negative volume was calculated as the volume of the scar below the interpolated smooth skin surface, and was always a negative number. Total volume was calculated as the sum of the positive volume and the absolute value of the negative volume.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PSAS Results for Placebo
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for those patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
PSAS Results for 0.3 mg AZX100
n=21 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for those patients who received 0.3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
PSAS Results for 1 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for those patients who received 1 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for Placebo
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for those patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for 0.3 mg AZX100
n=21 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for those patients who received 0.3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for 1 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for those patients who received 1 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - Placebo
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - 0.3 mg AZX100
n=21 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received 0.3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - 1 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation measurements f(mm) or those patients who received 1 mg/ AZX100linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - Placebo
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation measurements f(mm) or those patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - 0.3 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received 0.3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - 1 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received 1 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - Placebo
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - 0.3 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received 0.3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - 1 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation measurements (mm) for those patients who received 1 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Between-group Mean Differences in Objective Measures Obtained Via 3D Photography (Volume)
|
0.42 Millimeters cubed
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
0.65 Millimeters cubed
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
0.37 Millimeters cubed
Standard Deviation 0.25
|
-0.04 Millimeters cubed
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
-0.06 Millimeters cubed
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.06 Millimeters cubed
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
0.45 Millimeters cubed
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
0.71 Millimeters cubed
Standard Deviation 0.53
|
0.43 Millimeters cubed
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Low Dose
High Dose
Placebo
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Low Dose
n=21 participants at risk
AZX100 Drug Product 0.3 mg was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
High Dose
n=19 participants at risk
AZX100 Drug Product 1 mg was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Placebo
n=19 participants at risk
Placebo (0.9% saline) was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Pain
|
9.5%
2/21 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
10.5%
2/19 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
23.8%
5/21 • Number of events 12 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
21.1%
4/19 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
21.1%
4/19 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
9.5%
2/21 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
|
General disorders
Injection Site Erythema
|
28.6%
6/21 • Number of events 10 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
42.1%
8/19 • Number of events 14 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
26.3%
5/19 • Number of events 9 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
|
General disorders
Injection Site Irritation
|
38.1%
8/21 • Number of events 13 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
26.3%
5/19 • Number of events 11 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
26.3%
5/19 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
|
General disorders
Injection Site Pain
|
28.6%
6/21 • Number of events 15 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
57.9%
11/19 • Number of events 19 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
42.1%
8/19 • Number of events 17 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
|
General disorders
Injection Site Pruritus
|
19.0%
4/21 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
15.8%
3/19 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
21.1%
4/19 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
|
General disorders
Injection Site Reaction
|
9.5%
2/21 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
|
General disorders
Injection Site Urticaria
|
28.6%
6/21 • Number of events 11 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
47.4%
9/19 • Number of events 15 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
21.1%
4/19 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
9.5%
2/21 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
15.8%
3/19 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/21 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
10.5%
2/19 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in Extremity
|
9.5%
2/21 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
19.0%
4/21 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
10.5%
2/19 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
21.1%
4/19 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months). The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for a period of 15 months.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60