Trial Outcomes & Findings for LCZ696 Compared to Valsartan in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Preserved Left-ventricular Ejection Fraction (NCT NCT00887588)
NCT ID: NCT00887588
Last Updated: 2015-08-25
Results Overview
Evaluation of NT-proBNP was performed by a central laboratory. Change from baseline in NT-proBNP was presented as a ratio where the ratio was calculated as the NT-proBNP value at 12 weeks over the NT-proBNP value at baseline. A ratio \< 1 indicates improvement.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
307 participants
Baseline, 12 weeks
2015-08-25
Participant Flow
A total of 308 participants were randomized to the core 12 week period, but 7 participants were excluded due to major Good Clinical Practice (GCP) violation. Of the 261 participants who completed the core, 252 participants entered the extension period.
Eight participants, who completed the core, could not continue in the extension because the 36 week protocol amendment was not yet approved by health authorities; 1 participant, who completed the core, discontinued before the extension start due to an adverse event.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
LCZ696
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Core Period
STARTED
|
149
|
152
|
|
Core Period
Extension Efficacy Set
|
127
|
125
|
|
Core Period
Full Analysis Set
|
148
|
146
|
|
Core Period
Arterial Stiffness Set
|
86
|
94
|
|
Core Period
COMPLETED
|
130
|
131
|
|
Core Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
19
|
21
|
|
Extension Period
STARTED
|
127
|
125
|
|
Extension Period
Arterial Stiffness Set
|
86
|
94
|
|
Extension Period
COMPLETED
|
121
|
120
|
|
Extension Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
5
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
LCZ696
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Core Period
Death
|
1
|
1
|
|
Core Period
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
1
|
|
Core Period
Withdrawal by Subject
|
6
|
8
|
|
Core Period
Adverse Event
|
9
|
11
|
|
Extension Period
Adverse Event
|
4
|
4
|
|
Extension Period
Death
|
0
|
1
|
|
Extension Period
Protocol deviation
|
1
|
0
|
|
Extension Period
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
LCZ696 Compared to Valsartan in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Preserved Left-ventricular Ejection Fraction
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=149 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=152 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
Total
n=301 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
70.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.38 • n=5 Participants
|
71.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.94 • n=7 Participants
|
71.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.15 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
85 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
85 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
170 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
64 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
67 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
131 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 12 weeksPopulation: Participants from the full analysis set (FAS), who had both baseline and 12 week values, were included in the analysis. The FAS consisted of all randomized participants who had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement during the double blind period.
Evaluation of NT-proBNP was performed by a central laboratory. Change from baseline in NT-proBNP was presented as a ratio where the ratio was calculated as the NT-proBNP value at 12 weeks over the NT-proBNP value at baseline. A ratio \< 1 indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=134 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=132 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)
|
0.83 ratio: endpoint/baseline (pg/mL)
Interval 0.68 to 1.01
|
1.08 ratio: endpoint/baseline (pg/mL)
Interval 0.89 to 1.32
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 36 weeksPopulation: Participants from the extension efficacy set, who had both baseline and 36 week values for each parameter, were included in the analysis for that parameter. The extension efficacy set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement during the extension period.
Evaluation of NT-proBNP and BNP was performed by a central laboratory. Change from baseline in NT-proBNP and in BNP was presented as a ratio where the ratio for NT-proBNP was calculated as the NT-proBNP value at 36 weeks over the NT-proBNP value at baseline, and the ratio for BNP was calculated as the BNP value at 36 weeks over the BNP value at baseline. A ratio \< 1 indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=127 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=125 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in NT-proBNP and Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)
NT-proBNP (n=115,116)
|
0.78 ratio: endpoint/baseline (pg/mL)
Interval 0.59 to 1.02
|
0.92 ratio: endpoint/baseline (pg/mL)
Interval 0.7 to 1.21
|
|
Change From Baseline in NT-proBNP and Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP)
BNP (n=116,113)
|
1.14 ratio: endpoint/baseline (pg/mL)
Interval 0.88 to 1.47
|
0.95 ratio: endpoint/baseline (pg/mL)
Interval 0.73 to 1.23
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 36 weeksPopulation: Participants from the extension efficacy set, who had both baseline and 36 week values, were included in the analysis for that parameter. The extension efficacy set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement during the extension period.
Evaluation of cGMP was performed by a central laboratory. Change from baseline in cGMP was presented as a ratio where the ratio was calculated as the cGMP value at 36 weeks over the cGMP value at baseline. A ratio \< 1 indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=56 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=54 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Plasma Cyclic Guanine Monophosphate (cGMP)
|
0.90 ratio: endpoint/baseline (nmol/L)
Interval 0.78 to 1.03
|
0.85 ratio: endpoint/baseline (nmol/L)
Interval 0.73 to 0.99
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 36 weeksPopulation: Participants from the extension efficacy set, who had both baseline and 36 week values for each parameter, were included in the analysis for that parameter. The extension efficacy set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement during the extension period.
A limited two-dimensional and Doppler ECHO examination was done to assess ECHO parameters. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=127 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=125 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Echocardiography (ECHO) Parameters: Left Ventricular End (LVE) Diastolic Diameter, LVE Systolic Diameter, Septal End Diastolic Thickness, Posterior LV Wall End Diastolic Thickness, Relative Wall Thickness, Left Atrial Dimension
LVE diastolic diameter (n=98,107)
|
-0.23 cm
Standard Error 0.051
|
-0.19 cm
Standard Error 0.051
|
|
Change From Baseline in Echocardiography (ECHO) Parameters: Left Ventricular End (LVE) Diastolic Diameter, LVE Systolic Diameter, Septal End Diastolic Thickness, Posterior LV Wall End Diastolic Thickness, Relative Wall Thickness, Left Atrial Dimension
LVE systolic diameter (n=98,107)
|
-0.12 cm
Standard Error 0.044
|
-0.11 cm
Standard Error 0.044
|
|
Change From Baseline in Echocardiography (ECHO) Parameters: Left Ventricular End (LVE) Diastolic Diameter, LVE Systolic Diameter, Septal End Diastolic Thickness, Posterior LV Wall End Diastolic Thickness, Relative Wall Thickness, Left Atrial Dimension
Septal end diastolic thickness (n=98,106)
|
0.01 cm
Standard Error 0.020
|
0.01 cm
Standard Error 0.020
|
|
Change From Baseline in Echocardiography (ECHO) Parameters: Left Ventricular End (LVE) Diastolic Diameter, LVE Systolic Diameter, Septal End Diastolic Thickness, Posterior LV Wall End Diastolic Thickness, Relative Wall Thickness, Left Atrial Dimension
Post. LV wall end diastolic thickness (n=99,107)
|
0.00 cm
Standard Error 0.015
|
0.01 cm
Standard Error 0.015
|
|
Change From Baseline in Echocardiography (ECHO) Parameters: Left Ventricular End (LVE) Diastolic Diameter, LVE Systolic Diameter, Septal End Diastolic Thickness, Posterior LV Wall End Diastolic Thickness, Relative Wall Thickness, Left Atrial Dimension
Relative wall thickness (n=98,107)
|
0.02 cm
Standard Error 0.008
|
0.02 cm
Standard Error 0.008
|
|
Change From Baseline in Echocardiography (ECHO) Parameters: Left Ventricular End (LVE) Diastolic Diameter, LVE Systolic Diameter, Septal End Diastolic Thickness, Posterior LV Wall End Diastolic Thickness, Relative Wall Thickness, Left Atrial Dimension
Left atrial dimension (n=99,108)
|
-0.21 cm
Standard Error 0.043
|
-0.12 cm
Standard Error 0.042
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 36 weeksPopulation: Participants from the extension efficacy set, who had both baseline and 36 week values for each parameter, were included in the analysis for that parameter. The extension efficacy set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement during the extension period.
A limited two-dimensional and Doppler ECHO examination was done to assess ECHO parameters. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=127 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=125 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Echocardiography Parameters: LVE Diastolic Volume, LVE Systolic Volume, Left Ventricular Stroke Volume, Left Atrial Volume
LVE diastolic volume (n=94,111)
|
-12.66 ml
Standard Error 2.094
|
-14.31 ml
Standard Error 2.027
|
|
Change From Baseline in Echocardiography Parameters: LVE Diastolic Volume, LVE Systolic Volume, Left Ventricular Stroke Volume, Left Atrial Volume
LVE systolic volume (n=95,111)
|
-8.49 ml
Standard Error 1.251
|
-9.64 ml
Standard Error 1.215
|
|
Change From Baseline in Echocardiography Parameters: LVE Diastolic Volume, LVE Systolic Volume, Left Ventricular Stroke Volume, Left Atrial Volume
LV stroke volume (n=94,111)
|
-4.34 ml
Standard Error 1.448
|
-4.63 ml
Standard Error 1.400
|
|
Change From Baseline in Echocardiography Parameters: LVE Diastolic Volume, LVE Systolic Volume, Left Ventricular Stroke Volume, Left Atrial Volume
Left atrial volume (n=96,112)
|
-8.08 ml
Standard Error 2.133
|
-2.38 ml
Standard Error 2.057
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 36 weeksPopulation: Participants from the extension efficacy set, who had both baseline and 36 week values, were included in the analysis. The extension efficacy set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement during the extension period.
A limited two-dimensional and Doppler ECHO examination was done to assess ECHO parameters. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=94 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=111 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Echocardiography Parameters: Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction
|
2.62 Percent ejection fraction
Standard Error 0.778
|
2.90 Percent ejection fraction
Standard Error 0.755
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 36 weeksPopulation: Participants from the extension efficacy set, who had both baseline and 36 week values, were included in the analysis. The extension efficacy set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement during the extension period.
A limited two-dimensional and Doppler ECHO examination was done to assess ECHO parameters. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=97 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=106 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Echocardiography Parameters: Left Ventricular Mass
|
-11.26 grams (g)
Standard Error 4.145
|
-8.00 grams (g)
Standard Error 4.106
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 36 weeksPopulation: Participants from the extension efficacy set, who had both baseline and 36 week values, were included in the analysis. The extension efficacy set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement during the extension period.
A limited two-dimensional and Doppler ECHO examination was done to assess ECHO parameters. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=91 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=100 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Echocardiography Parameters: Left Ventricular Mass Index
|
-3.95 g/m^2
Standard Error 2.249
|
-1.94 g/m^2
Standard Error 2.283
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 36 weeksPopulation: Participants from the extension efficacy set, who had both baseline and 36 week values, were included in the analysis. The extension efficacy set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement during the extension period.
A limited two-dimensional and Doppler ECHO examination was done to assess ECHO parameters. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=90 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=106 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Echocardiography Parameters: Left Atrial Volume Index
|
-4.02 ml/m^2
Standard Error 1.260
|
-0.88 ml/m^2
Standard Error 1.237
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 36 weeksPopulation: Participants from the extension efficacy set, who had both baseline and 36 week values for each parameter, were included in the analysis for that parameter. The extension efficacy set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement during the extension period.
A limited two-dimensional and Doppler ECHO examination was done to assess ECHO parameters. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=127 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=125 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Echocardiography Parameters: Ewave Velocity, A Wave Velocity, e' at Septal Mitral Annulus, e' at Lateral Mitral Annulus
E wave velocity (n=100,112)
|
-0.60 cm/s
Standard Error 2.947
|
4.12 cm/s
Standard Error 2.897
|
|
Change From Baseline in Echocardiography Parameters: Ewave Velocity, A Wave Velocity, e' at Septal Mitral Annulus, e' at Lateral Mitral Annulus
A wave velocity (n=60,68)
|
-0.39 cm/s
Standard Error 4.199
|
0.59 cm/s
Standard Error 4.265
|
|
Change From Baseline in Echocardiography Parameters: Ewave Velocity, A Wave Velocity, e' at Septal Mitral Annulus, e' at Lateral Mitral Annulus
e' at septal mitral annulus (n=79,98)
|
1.00 cm/s
Standard Error 0.266
|
0.98 cm/s
Standard Error 0.260
|
|
Change From Baseline in Echocardiography Parameters: Ewave Velocity, A Wave Velocity, e' at Septal Mitral Annulus, e' at Lateral Mitral Annulus
e' at lateral mitral annulus (n=84,96)
|
0.71 cm/s
Standard Error 0.307
|
0.95 cm/s
Standard Error 0.296
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 36 weeksPopulation: Participants from the extension efficacy set, who had both baseline and 36 week values for each parameter, were included in the analysis for that parameter. The extension efficacy set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement during the extension period.
A limited two-dimensional and Doppler ECHO examination was done to assess ECHO parameters. A ratio \< 1 indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=127 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=125 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Echocardiography Parameters: Ratio of E to A Velocity, E/e' Ratio
E to A velocity (n=60,68)
|
0.01 ratio
Standard Error 0.080
|
0.07 ratio
Standard Error 0.081
|
|
Change From Baseline in Echocardiography Parameters: Ratio of E to A Velocity, E/e' Ratio
E/e' (n=83,95)
|
-1.18 ratio
Standard Error 0.561
|
-0.75 ratio
Standard Error 0.543
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 36 weeksPopulation: Participants from the extension efficacy set, who had both baseline and 36 week values, were included in the analysis. The extension efficacy set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement during the extension period.
A limited two-dimensional and Doppler ECHO examination was done to assess ECHO parameters. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=35 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=42 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Echocardiography Parameters: Isovolumic Relaxation Time
|
0.01 ms
Standard Error 0.002
|
0.01 ms
Standard Error 0.002
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 36 weeksPopulation: Participants from the extension efficacy set, who had both baseline and 36 week values, were included in the analysis. The extension efficacy set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement during the extension period.
A limited two-dimensional and Doppler ECHO examination was done to assess ECHO parameters. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=35 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=42 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Echocardiography Parameters: Tricuspid Regurgitation Velocity
|
-0.05 m/s
Standard Error 0.081
|
0.00 m/s
Standard Error 0.079
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 36 weeksPopulation: Participants from the extension efficacy set, who had both baseline and 36 week values for each domain, were included in the analysis for that domain. The extension efficacy set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement during the extension period.
The KCCQ is a self-administered questionnaire. It contains 23 items, covering physical function, clinical symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life, each with different Likert scale wording, including limitations, frequency, bother, change in condition, understanding, levels of enjoyment and satisfaction. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=127 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=125 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score and Individual Domain Summary Scores
Physical limitation (n=117,114)
|
9.27 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.528
|
9.88 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.516
|
|
Change From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score and Individual Domain Summary Scores
Symptom stability (n=118,116)
|
6.43 score on a scale
Standard Error 3.171
|
7.94 score on a scale
Standard Error 3.167
|
|
Change From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score and Individual Domain Summary Scores
Symptom frequency (n=118,116)
|
10.38 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.582
|
9.16 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.577
|
|
Change From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score and Individual Domain Summary Scores
Symptom burden (n=118,116)
|
9.23 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.528
|
9.45 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.527
|
|
Change From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score and Individual Domain Summary Scores
Total symptom score (n=118,116)
|
9.83 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.386
|
9.32 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.384
|
|
Change From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score and Individual Domain Summary Scores
Self efficacy (n=118,116)
|
11.24 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.427
|
8.77 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.419
|
|
Change From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score and Individual Domain Summary Scores
Quality of life (n=118,116)
|
13.13 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.706
|
12.50 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.702
|
|
Change From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score and Individual Domain Summary Scores
Social limitation (n=113,107)
|
9.99 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.878
|
11.04 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.936
|
|
Change From Baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score and Individual Domain Summary Scores
Overall summary score (n=118,116)
|
11.25 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.185
|
11.31 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.183
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 36 weeksPopulation: Extension efficacy set: the extension efficacy set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement during the extension period.
The clinical composite assessment is defined as follows: Improved = a) participant improved (markedly or moderately) in the global assessment of disease activity with no worsening of NYHA functional class and no major adverse cardiovascular event or b) participant improved in NYHA functional class with no worsening (markedly or moderately) in the global assessment of disease activity and no major adverse cardiovascular event. Worsened = participant worsened (markedly or moderately) in the global assessment of disease activity or in NYHA functional class or experienced a major adverse cardiovascular event. Unchanged = participant does not meet the definition for improved or worsened.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=127 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=125 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Composite Assessment of Improved, Unchanged or Worsened
Improved
|
41.7 Percentage of participants
|
32.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Composite Assessment of Improved, Unchanged or Worsened
Unchanged
|
45.7 Percentage of participants
|
53.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Composite Assessment of Improved, Unchanged or Worsened
Worsened
|
12.6 Percentage of participants
|
13.6 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 36 weeksPopulation: Extension efficacy set: the extension efficacy set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement during the extension period.
The NYHA Functional Classification classifies patients' heart failure according to the severity of their symptoms. The classification is as follows: Class I: no limitation of physical activity, ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea (shortness of breath); Class II: slight limitation to physical activity, comfortable at rest, ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation or dyspnea; Class III: marked limitation of physical activity, comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation or dyspnea; Class IV: unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort, symptoms of heart failure at rest, if any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=127 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=125 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class I, II, II or IV
Baseline, Class I
|
0.8 Percentage of participants
|
0.8 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class I, II, II or IV
Baseline, Class II
|
78.7 Percentage of participants
|
81.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class I, II, II or IV
Baseline, Class III
|
20.5 Percentage of participants
|
17.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class I, II, II or IV
Baseline, Class IV
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class I, II, II or IV
Week 36, Class I
|
12.6 Percentage of participants
|
7.2 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class I, II, II or IV
Week 36, Class II
|
74.0 Percentage of participants
|
78.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class I, II, II or IV
Week 36, Class III
|
13.4 Percentage of participants
|
14.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class I, II, II or IV
Week 36, Class IV
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 36 weeksPopulation: Participants from the extension efficacy set, who had both baseline and 36 week values, were included in the analysis for that parameter. The extension efficacy set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement during the extension period.
eGFR was calculated from the serum creatinine concentration determined by central laboratory assessment. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=126 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=123 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)
|
-3.68 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Error 1.493
|
-7.14 mL/min/1.73m^2
Standard Error 1.517
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 36 weeksPopulation: Extension efficacy set: the extension efficacy set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement during the extension period.
Evaluation of serum creatinine was performed by central laboratory. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=127 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=125 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine
|
5.82 µmol/L
Standard Error 2.136
|
10.65 µmol/L
Standard Error 2.183
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 36 weeksPopulation: Participants from the extension efficacy set, who had both baseline and 36 week values, were included in the analysis for that parameter. The extension efficacy set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement during the extension period.
Evaluation of albumin/creatinine was performed by central laboratory. A ratio \< 1 indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=100 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=101 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Albumin/Creatinine Ratio
|
1.19 ratio
Interval 0.85 to 1.66
|
0.74 ratio
Interval 0.52 to 1.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 36 weeksPopulation: Participants from the arterial stiffness set, who had values for both baseline and week 36, were analyzed. The arterial stiffness set included randomized participants who participated in the arterial stiffness sub-study.
A vascular arterial stiffness sub-study was conducted in a subset of participants. Noninvasive arterial tonometry was assessed using the Sphygmor device. Participants had arterial stiffness, pulse wave velocity and central pressures measured. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=86 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=94 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Arterial Stiffness Parameters: Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Brachial Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Central Augmentation Pressure, Central Pressure at T1-DP, Central SBP, Central DBP, Central Mean Pressure
Brachial SBP(n=36,44)
|
-1.27 mmHg
Standard Error 3.935
|
1.47 mmHg
Standard Error 3.670
|
|
Change From Baseline in Arterial Stiffness Parameters: Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Brachial Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Central Augmentation Pressure, Central Pressure at T1-DP, Central SBP, Central DBP, Central Mean Pressure
Brachial DBP (n=36,44)
|
1.68 mmHg
Standard Error 2.279
|
0.79 mmHg
Standard Error 2.165
|
|
Change From Baseline in Arterial Stiffness Parameters: Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Brachial Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Central Augmentation Pressure, Central Pressure at T1-DP, Central SBP, Central DBP, Central Mean Pressure
Central augmentation pressure (n=36,44)
|
-0.21 mmHg
Standard Error 1.824
|
-0.24 mmHg
Standard Error 1.705
|
|
Change From Baseline in Arterial Stiffness Parameters: Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Brachial Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Central Augmentation Pressure, Central Pressure at T1-DP, Central SBP, Central DBP, Central Mean Pressure
Central pressure at T1-DP (n=36,44)
|
-1.92 mmHg
Standard Error 2.071
|
0.02 mmHg
Standard Error 1.941
|
|
Change From Baseline in Arterial Stiffness Parameters: Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Brachial Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Central Augmentation Pressure, Central Pressure at T1-DP, Central SBP, Central DBP, Central Mean Pressure
Central SBP (n=36,44)
|
-0.71 mmHg
Standard Error 3.856
|
0.86 mmHg
Standard Error 3.594
|
|
Change From Baseline in Arterial Stiffness Parameters: Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Brachial Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Central Augmentation Pressure, Central Pressure at T1-DP, Central SBP, Central DBP, Central Mean Pressure
Central DBP (n=36,44)
|
1.40 mmHg
Standard Error 2.319
|
0.24 mmHg
Standard Error 2.204
|
|
Change From Baseline in Arterial Stiffness Parameters: Brachial Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Brachial Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Central Augmentation Pressure, Central Pressure at T1-DP, Central SBP, Central DBP, Central Mean Pressure
Central mean pressure (n=36,44)
|
0.84 mmHg
Standard Error 2.565
|
-0.13 mmHg
Standard Error 2.436
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 36 weeksPopulation: Participants from the arterial stiffness set, who had values for both baseline and week 36, were analyzed. The arterial stiffness set included randomized participants who participated in the arterial stiffness sub-study.
A vascular arterial stiffness sub-study was conducted in a subset of participants. Noninvasive arterial tonometry was assessed using the Sphygmor device. Participants had arterial stiffness, pulse wave velocity and central pressures measured. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=36 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=43 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Arterial Stiffness Parameters: Heart Rate Correct Cen Aug/Pulse Ht
|
-0.74 Percent
Standard Error 2.392
|
-2.16 Percent
Standard Error 2.250
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 36 weeksPopulation: Participants from the arterial stiffness set, who had values for both baseline and week 36, were analyzed. The arterial stiffness set included randomized participants who participated in the arterial stiffness sub-study.
A vascular arterial stiffness sub-study was conducted in a subset of participants. Noninvasive arterial tonometry was assessed using the Sphygmor device. Participants had arterial stiffness, pulse wave velocity and central pressures measured. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=36 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=44 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Arterial Stiffness Parameters: Heart Rate
|
-0.64 bpm
Standard Error 2.026
|
-1.32 bpm
Standard Error 1.905
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 36 weeksPopulation: Participants from the arterial stiffness set, who had values for both baseline and week 36, were analyzed. The arterial stiffness set included randomized participants who participated in the arterial stiffness sub-study.
A vascular arterial stiffness sub-study was conducted in a subset of participants. Noninvasive arterial tonometry was assessed using the Sphygmor device. Participants had arterial stiffness, pulse wave velocity and central pressures measured. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=32 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=42 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Arterial Stiffness Parameters: Pulse Wave Velocity
|
-0.44 cm/s
Standard Error 0.731
|
-0.74 cm/s
Standard Error 0.631
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline, 36 weeksPopulation: Extension efficacy set: The extension efficacy set included all randomized participants who had baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement during the extension period.
Sitting blood pressure and sitting pulse pressure were assessed. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=125 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=127 Participants
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Sitting SBP, Sitting DBP and Sitting Pulse Pressure (PP)
mean SBP
|
-7.47 mmHg
Standard Error 1.909
|
-2.18 mmHg
Standard Error 1.936
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sitting SBP, Sitting DBP and Sitting Pulse Pressure (PP)
mean DBP
|
-5.28 mmHg
Standard Error 1.188
|
-1.39 mmHg
Standard Error 1.204
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sitting SBP, Sitting DBP and Sitting Pulse Pressure (PP)
Pulse pressure
|
-2.24 mmHg
Standard Error 1.482
|
-1.17 mmHg
Standard Error 1.497
|
Adverse Events
LCZ696
Valsartan
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=149 participants at risk
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=152 participants at risk
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
1.3%
2/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.67%
1/149
|
1.3%
2/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
|
2.0%
3/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block complete
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradyarrhythmia
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
2.0%
3/149
|
1.3%
2/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure acute
|
0.67%
1/149
|
2.0%
3/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardio-respiratory arrest
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiogenic shock
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery stenosis
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sick sinus syndrome
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachyarrhythmia
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea haemorrhagic
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Duodenal ulcer
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/149
|
1.3%
2/152
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis erosive
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileus
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Melaena
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
1.3%
2/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
General disorders
Chest discomfort
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
General disorders
Device malfunction
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/149
|
1.3%
2/152
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacterial sepsis
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Infections and infestations
Endocarditis
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Infections and infestations
Postoperative wound infection
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/149
|
1.3%
2/152
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Humerus fracture
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lower limb fracture
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal fracture
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus inadequate control
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
1.3%
2/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteonecrosis
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Adrenal carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pancreatic carcinoma
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery stenosis
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular insufficiency
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hyperuricosuria
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal colic
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
|
1.3%
2/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute pulmonary oedema
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchiectasis
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
1.3%
2/149
|
2.6%
4/152
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Productive cough
|
0.00%
0/149
|
2.0%
3/152
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary oedema
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/149
|
1.3%
2/152
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Angioedema
|
0.67%
1/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arterial thrombosis limb
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Vascular disorders
Femoral arterial stenosis
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
1.3%
2/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral arterial occlusive disease
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral embolism
|
0.00%
0/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
LCZ696
n=149 participants at risk
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 50 mg LCZ696 for 1- 2 weeks, then uptitrated to 100 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 200 mg bid.
|
Valsartan
n=152 participants at risk
During a single blind, run-in period, participants received placebo. Then at randomization (double blind treatment period), participants started with 40 mg Valsartan twice daily (bid) for 1 - 2 weeks, then were uptitrated to 80 mg bid for 1 -2 weeks, and thereafter, uptitrated to 160 mg bid.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
1.3%
2/149
|
3.3%
5/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
2.7%
4/149
|
1.3%
2/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
1.3%
2/149
|
5.3%
8/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
0.00%
0/149
|
2.6%
4/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
2.0%
3/149
|
2.6%
4/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure chronic
|
0.67%
1/149
|
2.6%
4/152
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
3.4%
5/149
|
3.3%
5/152
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
3.4%
5/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
2.0%
3/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
2.0%
3/149
|
2.0%
3/152
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
1.3%
2/149
|
3.3%
5/152
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
6.0%
9/149
|
2.6%
4/152
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
2.7%
4/149
|
1.3%
2/152
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
2.0%
3/149
|
2.6%
4/152
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
4.7%
7/149
|
6.6%
10/152
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
2.0%
3/149
|
3.9%
6/152
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
2.0%
3/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
2.7%
4/149
|
5.9%
9/152
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
2.7%
4/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
4.0%
6/149
|
1.3%
2/152
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
2.7%
4/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
2.7%
4/149
|
3.3%
5/152
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
2.0%
3/149
|
3.3%
5/152
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
0.67%
1/149
|
2.6%
4/152
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
2.0%
3/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
4.0%
6/149
|
5.9%
9/152
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dyslipidaemia
|
2.0%
3/149
|
0.00%
0/152
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Gout
|
0.00%
0/149
|
2.6%
4/152
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
6.7%
10/149
|
5.3%
8/152
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
2.0%
3/149
|
0.66%
1/152
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
3.4%
5/149
|
1.3%
2/152
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
3.4%
5/149
|
2.6%
4/152
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
3.4%
5/149
|
1.3%
2/152
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
7.4%
11/149
|
4.6%
7/152
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
2.0%
3/149
|
2.6%
4/152
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.67%
1/149
|
2.6%
4/152
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal impairment
|
0.67%
1/149
|
3.3%
5/152
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
6.0%
9/149
|
5.3%
8/152
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
2.7%
4/149
|
7.2%
11/152
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
1.3%
2/149
|
3.3%
5/152
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
2.0%
3/149
|
3.9%
6/152
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
12.8%
19/149
|
9.2%
14/152
|
|
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic hypotension
|
1.3%
2/149
|
3.3%
5/152
|
Additional Information
Study Director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (i.e., data from all sites) in the clinical trial or disclosure of trial results in their entirety.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER