Comparison of Fetal Fibronectin (fFN) Specimen Collection Methodologies: With Speculum Versus Without Speculum

NCT ID: NCT00883324

Last Updated: 2011-06-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

329 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Observational study to determine whether the proposed method of fFN specimen collection without a speculum is substantially equivalent to the approved method with a speculum examination when obtained at the gestational age of ≥ 24 weeks and ≤ 34, 6 days in symptomatic women and at the gestational age of ≥ 22 weeks, 0 days and ≤ 30, 6 days in asymptomatic women. A finding of substantial equivalency would support a modification to the labeling to allow the collection of specimens for fFN determination with or without a speculum examination.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study population will include pregnant women who may be at risk for preterm delivery and require the fFN test, as determined by their doctor to aid in patient management. The subjects may or may not present with symptoms related to preterm labor and must satisfy the device's approved labeling and the eligibility criteria.

For pregnant women with signs of labor, the Fetal Fibronectin (fFN) test is approved for use as an aid to assess the risk of preterm delivery in ≤ 7 or ≤ 14 days from cervicovaginal sample collection that have intact amniotic membranes and minimal cervical dilation (\< 3 cm) and are sampled between 24 weeks, 0 days and 34 weeks, 6 days. It is also approved for use with additional clinical information in asymptomatic women with singleton pregnancies when a sample is obtained during a routine prenatal visit between 22 weeks, 0 days and 30 weeks, 6 days of gestation.

The fFN test is run on The Rapid fFN for the TLiIQ® System and a positive fFN result occurs with concentrations ≥50ng/mL and a negative fFN test with concentrations \<50ng/mL.

The current FDA-approved labeling for the collection of the fFN specimen requires a speculum examination; however, the collection of the fFN specimen is often needed when the women first arrives at the hospital labor and delivery unit, where nurses often are not trained or credentialed to perform speculum examinations and a physician may not be readily available to perform the collection. Therefore, there is an unmet need for a simpler collection method.

The test article in this study is the collection of cervicovaginal samples for fFN determination using a standardized collection method without a speculum. The control article in this study is the collection of a cervicovaginal sample for fFN determination using the approved collection method requiring a speculum examination. Both the test and control fFN specimen samples will be collected and evaluated using the approved Rapid fFN for the TLiIQ® System.

The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the proposed method of fFN specimen collection without a speculum is substantially equivalent to the approved method with a speculum examination when obtained at the gestational age of ≥ 24 weeks and ≤ 34, 6 days in symptomatic women and at the gestational age of ≥ 22 weeks, 0 days and ≤ 30, 6 days in asymptomatic women. A finding of substantial equivalency would support a modification to the labeling to allow the collection of specimens for fFN determination with or without a speculum examination.

Hypothesis: The method of fFN specimen collection without a speculum is not inferior to collection with a speculum within a 5% margin of non-inferiority.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Preterm Delivery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

fetal fibronectin specimens collected with a speculum

No interventions assigned to this group

2

fetal fibronectin specimens collected without a speculum

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Maternal age \> 18 years.
* Subject has signed and dated an Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Research Ethics Board (REB) approved consent form to participate in the study.
* Specimen Collection Kit and the Rapid fFN for the TLiIQ® System are currently utilized as standard of care (SOC).
* Gestational age of ≥ 24 weeks, 0 days and ≤ 34 weeks, 6 days for symptomatic subjects. (As defined by ACOG.)
* Gestational age of ≥ 22 weeks, 0 days and ≤ 30 weeks, 6 days for asymptomatic subjects with singleton pregnancies. (As defined by ACOG.)
* Intact amniotic membranes.

Exclusion Criteria

* Placenta previa or abruptio placenta.
* Cervical cerclage.
* Digital examination, vaginal intercourse, or transvaginal ultrasound within 24 hours prior to the fFN sample collection.
* Moderate or gross vaginal bleeding at the time of fFN sample collection. Cervical dilatation ≥ 3 centimeters.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hologic, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hologic

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

James D. Byrne, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Santa Clara Valley Medical Health & Hospital System

Michael Paidas, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Yale University

Larry Matsumoto, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Northside Hospital Center for Perinatal Medicine

Janice Whitty, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Meharry Medical College

John Allbert, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Presbyterian Hospital

Annette E. Bombrys, DO

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kettering Health Network

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Santa Clara Valley Medical Health & Hospital System

San Jose, California, United States

Site Status

Yale University Medical Center

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Northside Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Presbyterian Hospital

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Kettering Health Network of Kettering Medical Center

Kettering, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

D0108001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.