Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of SilverHawk®/TurboHawk® in Lower Extremity Vessels (DEFINITIVE™ LE) (NCT NCT00883246)
NCT ID: NCT00883246
Last Updated: 2019-06-04
Results Overview
The primary endpoint analysis for claudication subjects was primary patency rate at one year, defined by duplex ultrasound measurement of peak systolic velocity ratio ≤ 3.5 at the target lesion(s) with no clinically-driven reintervention within the treated segment in subjects who had claudication (RCC of 1 - 3) at time of enrollment.
COMPLETED
NA
800 participants
One year
2019-06-04
Participant Flow
Subjects with all severities of peripheral arterial disease were recruited for this single-arm study. Outcome measures may apply to all subjects or be specific to level of disease severity (ie subjects w/claudication RCC1-3, subjects w/critical limb ischemia RCC4 (no wounds) or RCC5-6 (with wounds)). These are specified in the Arm/Group titles.
800 subjects were enrolled. One subject was excluded from all data analyses due to an invalid informed consent and was not considered started.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Atherectomy
All patients enrolled in this single-arm study were treated with directional atherectomy.
SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System: Removal of atherosclerotic plaque from artery walls.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
799
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
626
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
173
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Study of SilverHawk®/TurboHawk® in Lower Extremity Vessels (DEFINITIVE™ LE)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Atherectomy
n=799 Participants
All patients enrolled in this single-arm study were treated with directional atherectomy.
SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System: Removal of atherosclerotic plaque from artery walls.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
259 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
540 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
70.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7 • n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
363 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
436 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Europe
|
107 participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
692 participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Diabetes
Diabetes
|
418 participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Diabetes
No Diabetes
|
381 participants
n=93 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: One yearPopulation: Kaplan-Meier estimate of the freedom from loss of primary patency in lesions (N=743 lesions)
The primary endpoint analysis for claudication subjects was primary patency rate at one year, defined by duplex ultrasound measurement of peak systolic velocity ratio ≤ 3.5 at the target lesion(s) with no clinically-driven reintervention within the treated segment in subjects who had claudication (RCC of 1 - 3) at time of enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Claudicant Subgroup
n=743 Number of Lesions Analyzed
Subjects who had claudication (RCC of 1 - 3) at time of enrollment.
|
Claudicant Subgroup (One Year)
All claudicant subjects (RCC 1-3) enrolled in this single-arm study were treated with directional atherectomy and walking distance measured at the one year follow-up visit.
SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System: Removal of atherosclerotic plaque from artery walls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Primary Patency Rate (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)
|
81.6 percentage of lesions by Kaplan Meier
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: One YearThe primary endpoint for CLI was amputation-free survival at one year, defined as freedom from a major, unplanned amputation of the target limb through the 1-year visit in subjects who have CLI (RCC 4 - 6) at time of enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Claudicant Subgroup
n=201 Participants
Subjects who had claudication (RCC of 1 - 3) at time of enrollment.
|
Claudicant Subgroup (One Year)
All claudicant subjects (RCC 1-3) enrolled in this single-arm study were treated with directional atherectomy and walking distance measured at the one year follow-up visit.
SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System: Removal of atherosclerotic plaque from artery walls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Amputation-Free Survival at 1 Year (in Patients Treated for Critical Limb Ischemia RCC 4-6)
|
95.1 percentage of subjects by Kaplan-Meier
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately following use of the SilverHawk devicePopulation: Lesions with core angiographic laboratory measurements of residual stenosis
Device success was defined as ≤ 30% residual stenosis following use of the SilverHawk device, as measured by angiography, without adjunctive endovascular interventions or periprocedural complications.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Claudicant Subgroup
n=999 Number of Lesions Analyzed
Subjects who had claudication (RCC of 1 - 3) at time of enrollment.
|
Claudicant Subgroup (One Year)
All claudicant subjects (RCC 1-3) enrolled in this single-arm study were treated with directional atherectomy and walking distance measured at the one year follow-up visit.
SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System: Removal of atherosclerotic plaque from artery walls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Device Success (in All Patients Enrolled)
|
70.5 percentage of Lesions
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately following use of the SilverHawk and adjunctive devicesPopulation: All lesions with angiographic core lab assessment of residual stenosis at the end of the procedure were included
Procedure success was defined as ≤ 30% residual stenosis following use of SilverHawk device and adjunctive endovascular interventions (if required) as measured by angiography without periprocedural complications.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Claudicant Subgroup
n=1015 Number of Lesions Analyzed
Subjects who had claudication (RCC of 1 - 3) at time of enrollment.
|
Claudicant Subgroup (One Year)
All claudicant subjects (RCC 1-3) enrolled in this single-arm study were treated with directional atherectomy and walking distance measured at the one year follow-up visit.
SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System: Removal of atherosclerotic plaque from artery walls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Procedural Success (in All Patients Enrolled)
|
84.0 percentage of lesions
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 DaysMajor Adverse Event Rate (MAE) at 30 Days was defined as clinically-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR), major unplanned amputation of treated limb, or all-cause mortality within 30 days post procedure, as classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Claudicant Subgroup
n=799 Participants
Subjects who had claudication (RCC of 1 - 3) at time of enrollment.
|
Claudicant Subgroup (One Year)
All claudicant subjects (RCC 1-3) enrolled in this single-arm study were treated with directional atherectomy and walking distance measured at the one year follow-up visit.
SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System: Removal of atherosclerotic plaque from artery walls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Major Adverse Event Rate (in All Patients Enrolled)
|
1.6 percentage of patients
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: One YearMajor Adverse Event Rate at One Year was defined as clinically-driven target vessel revascularization, major unplanned amputation of the treated limb, or all-cause mortality within one year, as classified by the Clinical Events Committee (CEC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Claudicant Subgroup
n=799 Participants
Subjects who had claudication (RCC of 1 - 3) at time of enrollment.
|
Claudicant Subgroup (One Year)
All claudicant subjects (RCC 1-3) enrolled in this single-arm study were treated with directional atherectomy and walking distance measured at the one year follow-up visit.
SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System: Removal of atherosclerotic plaque from artery walls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Major Adverse Event Rate (in All Patients Enrolled)
|
20.9 percentage of patients
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 YearPopulation: All subjects treated for claudication RCC 1-3 with completed WIQ forms
WIQ includes a measurement for walking distance, walking speed, and climbing stairs collected at baseline and one year, presented for subjects who have claudication. The Walking Improvement Questionnaire (WIQ) is a validated method to assess objective improvement in functional walking ability of subjects with intermittent claudication. Difficulty walking a distance was self-assessed at baseline by the patient (prior to treatment) and at the one year follow up visit. Speed and stair climbing ability were assessed by the treating physician. Scale ranges from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), with larger numbers representing better outcomes. An increase in WIQ scores at 1 year represents an improvement over baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Claudicant Subgroup
n=590 Participants
Subjects who had claudication (RCC of 1 - 3) at time of enrollment.
|
Claudicant Subgroup (One Year)
n=464 Participants
All claudicant subjects (RCC 1-3) enrolled in this single-arm study were treated with directional atherectomy and walking distance measured at the one year follow-up visit.
SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System: Removal of atherosclerotic plaque from artery walls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Improvement in Walking Impairment Questionnaire Score (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)
Walking Distance Score
|
19.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.2
|
49.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 38.0
|
|
Improvement in Walking Impairment Questionnaire Score (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)
Walking Speed Score
|
20.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.7
|
39.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.8
|
|
Improvement in Walking Impairment Questionnaire Score (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)
Stair Climbins Score
|
32.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.0
|
53.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 YearPopulation: All patients with RCC data at baseline and 1 year
Change in RCC at One Year was assessed and percentage of subjects with an improvement in clinical status indicated by a decrease of one or more in RCC at one year compared to baseline, that is attributable to the treated limb (in cases of bilateral disease), was calculated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Claudicant Subgroup
n=616 Participants
Subjects who had claudication (RCC of 1 - 3) at time of enrollment.
|
Claudicant Subgroup (One Year)
All claudicant subjects (RCC 1-3) enrolled in this single-arm study were treated with directional atherectomy and walking distance measured at the one year follow-up visit.
SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System: Removal of atherosclerotic plaque from artery walls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Improvement in Rutherford Clinical Category (in All Patients Enrolled)
|
82.3 percentage of patients
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 YearPopulation: All patients with compressible arteries and a baseline ABI \< 0.9.
Change in Ankle-Brachial Index at One Year was calculated and percentage of subjects with an increase (improvement) in the ankle-brachial index (ABI) at one year compared to baseline in subjects with compressible arteries and baseline ABI \< 0.9 was calculated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Claudicant Subgroup
n=429 Participants
Subjects who had claudication (RCC of 1 - 3) at time of enrollment.
|
Claudicant Subgroup (One Year)
All claudicant subjects (RCC 1-3) enrolled in this single-arm study were treated with directional atherectomy and walking distance measured at the one year follow-up visit.
SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System: Removal of atherosclerotic plaque from artery walls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Ankle-Brachial Index (in All Patients Enrolled)
|
76 percentage of patients improved
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: One YearPopulation: All claudicants.
Secondary patency was defined as measured by duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio ≤ 3.5 maintained by repeat percutaneous intervention in subjects who have claudication; estimated as freedom from loss of patency by the Kaplan-Meier method at one year.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Claudicant Subgroup
n=743 Number of Lesions Analyzed
Subjects who had claudication (RCC of 1 - 3) at time of enrollment.
|
Claudicant Subgroup (One Year)
All claudicant subjects (RCC 1-3) enrolled in this single-arm study were treated with directional atherectomy and walking distance measured at the one year follow-up visit.
SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System: Removal of atherosclerotic plaque from artery walls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Secondary Patency (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)
|
93.5 percentage of lesions
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: One YearPopulation: All patients with CLI.
The primary patency for CLI was defined by duplex ultrasound measurement of peak systolic velocity ratio ≤ 3.5 at the target lesion(s) with no clinically-driven reintervention within the treated segment in subjects who have CLI at time of enrollment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Claudicant Subgroup
n=279 Number of Lesions Analyzed
Subjects who had claudication (RCC of 1 - 3) at time of enrollment.
|
Claudicant Subgroup (One Year)
All claudicant subjects (RCC 1-3) enrolled in this single-arm study were treated with directional atherectomy and walking distance measured at the one year follow-up visit.
SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System: Removal of atherosclerotic plaque from artery walls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Primary Patency (in Patients Treated for Critical Limb Ischemia RCC 4-6)
|
74.1 percentage of lesions
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: One YearPopulation: All claudicants.
Amputation-Free Survival in Claudicants at One Year was defined as freedom from a major, unplanned amputation of the target limb through the one year visit in subjects who have claudication at time of enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Claudicant Subgroup
n=598 Participants
Subjects who had claudication (RCC of 1 - 3) at time of enrollment.
|
Claudicant Subgroup (One Year)
All claudicant subjects (RCC 1-3) enrolled in this single-arm study were treated with directional atherectomy and walking distance measured at the one year follow-up visit.
SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System: Removal of atherosclerotic plaque from artery walls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Amputation-Free Survival (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)
|
99.6 percentage of patients by Kaplan-Meier
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsPopulation: Patients with wounds at baseline who had wound assessment scores at baseline and at 3 months.
Wound healing at three months was defined as a decrease of at least one Wagner Classification grade of the wound at three months compared to baseline in subjects who have Rutherford Clinical Category score of 5 or 6 at the time of enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Claudicant Subgroup
n=103 Participants
Subjects who had claudication (RCC of 1 - 3) at time of enrollment.
|
Claudicant Subgroup (One Year)
All claudicant subjects (RCC 1-3) enrolled in this single-arm study were treated with directional atherectomy and walking distance measured at the one year follow-up visit.
SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System: Removal of atherosclerotic plaque from artery walls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Improvement in Wound Healing (in Patients Treated for Critical Limb Ischemia and With Wounds RCC 5-6)
|
61.2 percentage of patients
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 yearPopulation: Lesions in patients with claudication at baseline
Defined by the duplex ultrasound measurement of peak systolic velocity ration ≤ 2.4 at the target lesion (s) with no clinically-driven re- intervention with the treated segment in subjects who have claudication at time of enrollment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Claudicant Subgroup
n=743 Number of Lesions Analyzed
Subjects who had claudication (RCC of 1 - 3) at time of enrollment.
|
Claudicant Subgroup (One Year)
All claudicant subjects (RCC 1-3) enrolled in this single-arm study were treated with directional atherectomy and walking distance measured at the one year follow-up visit.
SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System: Removal of atherosclerotic plaque from artery walls.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Alternative Patency Rate (Peak Systolic Velocity ≤ 2.4) at 1 Year (in Patients Treated for Claudication RCC 1-3)
|
77.5 percentage of lesions by Kaplan-Meier
|
—
|
Adverse Events
All Patients
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
All Patients
n=799 participants at risk
All patients enrolled in this single-arm study were treated with directional atherectomy.
SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System: Removal of atherosclerotic plaque from artery walls.
|
|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
Abrupt closure
|
0.38%
3/799 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Access site complication
|
2.0%
16/799 • Number of events 16 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arterial dissection (Grade D or greater)
|
0.63%
5/799 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arterial Spasm
|
0.38%
3/799 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arterial thrombosis
|
1.1%
9/799 • Number of events 10 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arterio-venous fistula
|
0.13%
1/799 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Bleeding complications
|
1.4%
11/799 • Number of events 12 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Cellulitis
|
0.63%
5/799 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.13%
1/799 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotention
|
0.50%
4/799 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection (not at access site)
|
6.0%
48/799 • Number of events 70 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Myocardial Infarction
|
2.1%
17/799 • Number of events 18 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Other
|
34.9%
279/799 • Number of events 458 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Pseudoaneurysm not at the access site
|
0.13%
1/799 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
renal failure
|
1.0%
8/799 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal Insufficiency
|
0.13%
1/799 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Restenosis
|
21.3%
170/799 • Number of events 218 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.88%
7/799 • Number of events 9 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
|
Vascular disorders
stroke
|
0.88%
7/799 • Number of events 7 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Sub-acute Closure
|
0.13%
1/799 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
|
Vascular disorders
Tansient ischemic attack
|
0.75%
6/799 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
|
Infections and infestations
Wound abscess
|
0.13%
1/799 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
wound debridement
|
0.25%
2/799 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
All Patients
n=799 participants at risk
All patients enrolled in this single-arm study were treated with directional atherectomy.
SilverHawk Peripheral Plaque Excision System: Removal of atherosclerotic plaque from artery walls.
|
|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
Arterial perforation
|
5.1%
41/799 • Number of events 42 • Adverse events were collected throughout the 12 month follow-up of the study.
Adverse events were reviewed and classified by a third party clinical events committee. AEs were classified as device-related and/or procedure-related, as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Major Adverse Events (MAEs).
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60