Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of Neutropenia and Anemia Management in Patients With Solid Tumors Receiving Myelotoxic Chemotherapy (NCT NCT00883181)
NCT ID: NCT00883181
Last Updated: 2017-03-15
Results Overview
Febrile neutropenia was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of \< 500 cells/mm² or \< 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm².
COMPLETED
1370 participants
Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)
2017-03-15
Participant Flow
A total of 1370 patients were enrolled at 87 sites in Europe, 5 sites in Canada, and 10 sites in Australia from December 2007 to October 2009. Of these, 1347 participants were included in the full analysis set (FAS) consisting of all enrolled patients who met protocol defined eligibility criteria and started at least 1 cycle of chemotherapy.
Eligible patients were enrolled sequentially. Upon completion of all planned chemotherapy cycles, or following cessation of chemotherapy for any reason, patients were followed-up annually for 5 years or until disease progression or death.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Full Analysis Set
Participants diagnosed with breast, ovarian, or lung cancer and receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
1347
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
1069
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
278
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Full Analysis Set
Participants diagnosed with breast, ovarian, or lung cancer and receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Hematological Adverse Event
|
26
|
|
Overall Study
Non-hematological Adverse Event
|
55
|
|
Overall Study
Disease Progression
|
94
|
|
Overall Study
Administrative Reason
|
24
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
31
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
38
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Deviation
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Noncompliance
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of Neutropenia and Anemia Management in Patients With Solid Tumors Receiving Myelotoxic Chemotherapy
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Full Analysis Set
n=1347 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast, ovarian, or lung cancer and receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
56.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1072 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
275 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White or Caucasian
|
1324 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Applicable
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
0 - Normal Activity
|
874 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
1 - Symptoms but Ambulatory
|
346 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
2 - Confined to Bed ≤ 50% of Time
|
99 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
3 - Confined to Bed ≥ 50% of Time
|
9 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
4 - 100% Bedridden
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status
Missing
|
19 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Tumor Type
Ovarian cancer
|
157 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Tumor Type
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
|
224 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Tumor Type
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC)
|
137 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Tumor Type
Breast cancer
|
829 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior Treatment
None
|
647 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior Treatment
Chemotherapy only
|
88 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior Treatment
Radiotherapy only
|
19 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior Treatment
Chemotherapy and radiotherapy
|
62 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior Treatment
Surgery
|
449 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior Treatment
Other
|
80 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior Treatment
Missing
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior Febrile Neutropenia Episodes
Any prior FN episodes
|
35 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior Febrile Neutropenia Episodes
No prior FN episodes
|
213 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior Febrile Neutropenia Episodes
Missing
|
450 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Hemoglobin Level
< 11 g/dL
|
175 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Hemoglobin Level
≥ 11 g/dL
|
1091 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Hemoglobin Level
Missing
|
81 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Anemia Symptoms
Fatigue/tiredness
|
197 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Anemia Symptoms
Pallor/Pale skin
|
86 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Anemia Symptoms
Headache
|
53 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Anemia Symptoms
Dyspnea
|
101 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Anemia Symptoms
Tachycardia and/or palpitations
|
48 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Anemia Symptoms
Dizziness and/or vertigo
|
49 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Anemia Symptoms
Irritability
|
66 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Anemia Symptoms
Depression
|
113 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Anemia Symptoms
Nausea
|
38 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Anemia Symptoms
Anorexia
|
65 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Anemia Symptoms
Impaired cognitive function
|
17 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Anemia Symptoms
Impaired immune system
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Anemia Symptoms
Metabolic dysfunction
|
32 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Anemia Symptoms
Sexual dysfunction
|
54 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set; Note: One participant with breast cancer had disease stage missing.
Febrile neutropenia was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of \< 500 cells/mm² or \< 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm².
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=157 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=224 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=137 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=738 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=90 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=829 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia (FN)
|
8 percentage of participants
Interval 4.0 to 13.0
|
8 percentage of participants
Interval 5.0 to 12.0
|
15 percentage of participants
Interval 10.0 to 21.0
|
9 percentage of participants
Interval 7.0 to 11.0
|
11 percentage of participants
Interval 6.0 to 19.0
|
9 percentage of participants
Interval 7.0 to 11.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set participants who received no prophylaxis or treatment with any G-CSF
FN was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of \< 500 cells/mm² or \< 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm². Assignment to G-CSF use groups was programmatically derived rather than assigned by the investigator. Participants in the No G-CSF use group received no G-CSF prophylaxis or treatment at any time during cycles 1 to 8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=82 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=120 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=56 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=147 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=28 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=175 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Received No Prophylaxis or Treatment With Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factors (G-CSF) Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia
|
4 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 10.0
|
3 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 7.0
|
5 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 15.0
|
1 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 4.0
|
0 percentage of participants
Not calculated when n=0
|
1 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 3.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set participants who received primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim
FN was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of \< 500 cells/mm² or \< 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm². Primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim was defined as receiving pegfilgrastim starting in cycle 1 on day 1 to 7 if chemotherapy completed by day 7 and day 1 to 11 if chemotherapy completed after day 7. Assignment to G-CSF use groups was programmatically derived rather than assigned by the investigator. Participants were assigned to a G-CSF use group that represented the 'best' G-CSF therapy they received at any point in the study. Participants who received G-CSF support from the beginning of Cycle 1 were assigned to primary prophylaxis regardless of whether they continued to receive G-CSF support in subsequent cycles.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=24 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=22 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=33 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=360 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=32 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=393 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Receiving Primary Prophylaxis With Pegfilgrastim Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia
|
0 percentage of participants
Not calculated when n=0
|
0 percentage of participants
Not calculated when n=0
|
21 percentage of participants
Interval 11.0 to 38.0
|
9 percentage of participants
Interval 7.0 to 13.0
|
9 percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 24.0
|
9 percentage of participants
Interval 7.0 to 13.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set participants who received primary prophylaxis with any daily G-CSF
FN was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of \< 500 cells/mm² or \< 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm². Primary prophylaxis was defined as receiving any daily G-CSF (e.g. filgrastim or lenograstim) starting in cycle 1 on day 1 to 7 if chemotherapy completed by day 7 and day 1 to 11 if chemotherapy completed after day 7. Assignment to G-CSF use groups was programmatically derived rather than assigned by the investigator. Participants were assigned to a G-CSF use group that represented the 'best' G-CSF therapy they received at any point in the study. Participants who received G-CSF support from the beginning of cycle 1 were assigned to primary prophylaxis regardless of whether they continued to receive G-CSF support in subsequent cycles.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=6 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=20 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=11 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=51 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=6 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=57 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Receiving Primary Prophylaxis With Any Daily G-CSF Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia
|
0 percentage of participants
Not calculated when n=0
|
20 percentage of participants
Interval 8.0 to 42.0
|
9 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 38.0
|
6 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 16.0
|
17 percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 56.0
|
7 percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 17.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set participants who received secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim
FN was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of \< 500 cells/mm² or \< 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm². Secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim was defined as receiving pegfilgrastim starting in cycle 2 onwards on day 1 to 7 if chemotherapy completed by day 7 and day 1 to 11 if chemotherapy completed after day 7. Assignment to G-CSF use groups was programmatically derived rather than assigned by the investigator. Participants were assigned to a G-CSF use group that represented the 'best' G-CSF therapy they received at any point in the study. Adherence of G-CSF support in subsequent cycles was not required for secondary prophylaxis; just an initiation of pegfilgrastim support in the beginning of cycle 2 or later. Results include the FN event that may have triggered the secondary prophylaxis treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=11 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=14 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=15 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=92 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=9 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=101 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Receiving Secondary Prophylaxis With Pegfilgrastim Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia
|
0 percentage of participants
Not calculated when n=0
|
36 percentage of participants
Interval 16.0 to 61.0
|
40 percentage of participants
Interval 20.0 to 64.0
|
14 percentage of participants
Interval 8.0 to 23.0
|
33 percentage of participants
Interval 12.0 to 65.0
|
16 percentage of participants
Interval 10.0 to 24.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set participants who received secondary prophylaxis with any daily G-CSF
FN was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of \< 500 cells/mm² or \< 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm². Secondary prophylaxis was defined as receiving any daily G-CSF starting in cycle 2 onwards on day 1 to 7 if chemotherapy completed by day 7 and day 1 to 11 if chemotherapy completed after day 7. Assignment to G-CSF use groups was programmatically derived rather than assigned by the investigator. Participants were assigned to a G-CSF use group that represented the 'best' G-CSF therapy they received at any point in the study. Adherence of G-CSF support in subsequent cycles was not required for secondary prophylaxis; just an initiation of G-CSF support in the beginning of cycle 2 or later. Results include the FN event that may have triggered the secondary prophylaxis treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=15 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=24 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=13 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=64 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=9 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=73 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Receiving Secondary Prophylaxis With Any Daily G-CSF Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia
|
27 percentage of participants
Interval 11.0 to 52.0
|
13 percentage of participants
Interval 4.0 to 31.0
|
15 percentage of participants
Interval 4.0 to 42.0
|
20 percentage of participants
Interval 12.0 to 32.0
|
22 percentage of participants
Interval 6.0 to 55.0
|
21 percentage of participants
Interval 13.0 to 31.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set participants who received primary prophylaxis with other G-CSF
FN was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of \< 500 cells/mm² or \< 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm². Primary prophylaxis was defined as receiving any other G-CSF starting in cycle 1 on day 1 to 7 if chemotherapy completed by day 7 and day 1 to 11 if chemotherapy completed after day 7. Assignment to G-CSF use groups was programmatically derived rather than assigned by the investigator. Participants were assigned to a G-CSF use group that represented the 'best' G-CSF therapy they received at any point in the study. Participants who received G-CSF support from the beginning of cycle 1 were assigned to primary prophylaxis regardless of whether they continued to receive G-CSF support in subsequent cycles.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=1 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=3 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=6 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=1 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=7 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Receiving Primary Prophylaxis With an Other G-CSF Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia
|
0 percentage of participants
Not calculated when n=0
|
0 percentage of participants
Not calculated when n=0
|
—
|
17 percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 56.0
|
0 percentage of participants
Not calculated when n=0
|
14 percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 51.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set participants who received secondary prophylaxis with other G-CSF
FN was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of \< 500 cells/mm² or \< 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm². Secondary prophylaxis was defined as receiving any daily G-CSF starting in cycle 2 onwards on day 1 to 7 if chemotherapy completed by day 7 and day 1 to 11 if chemotherapy completed after day 7. Assignment to G-CSF use groups was programmatically derived rather than assigned by the investigator. Participants were assigned to a G-CSF use group that represented the 'best' G-CSF therapy they received at any point in the study. Adherence of G-CSF support in subsequent cycles was not required for secondary prophylaxis; just an initiation of G-CSF support in the beginning of cycle 2 or later. Results include the FN event that may have triggered the secondary prophylaxis treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=4 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=3 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=1 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=1 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=2 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Receiving Secondary Prophylaxis With an Other G-CSF Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia
|
25 percentage of participants
Interval 5.0 to 70.0
|
0 percentage of participants
Not calculated when n=0
|
—
|
0 percentage of participants
Not calculated when n=0
|
0 percentage of participants
Not calculated when n=0
|
0 percentage of participants
Not calculated when n=0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set participants who received treatment with pegfilgrastim
FN was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of \< 500 cells/mm² or \< 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm². Treatment with pegfilgrastim is defined as participants who started pegfilgrastim treatment after day 7 of any cycle if chemotherapy completed by day 7 and after day 11 of any cycle if chemotherapy completed after day 7.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=5 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=2 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=1 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Receiving Treatment With Pegfilgrastim Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia
|
0 percentage of participants
Not calculated when n=0
|
0 percentage of participants
Not calculated when n=0
|
0 percentage of participants
Not calculated when n=0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set participants who received treatment with any daily G-CSF
FN was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of \< 500 cells/mm² or \< 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm². Treatment with any daily G-CSF is defined as participants who started daily G-CSF treatment after day 7 of any cycle if chemotherapy completed by day 7 and after day 11 of any cycle if chemotherapy completed after day 7.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=9 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=15 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=8 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=17 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=4 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=21 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Receiving Treatment With Any Daily G-CSF Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia
|
44 percentage of participants
Interval 19.0 to 73.0
|
13 percentage of participants
Interval 4.0 to 38.0
|
13 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 47.0
|
12 percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 34.0
|
25 percentage of participants
Interval 5.0 to 70.0
|
14 percentage of participants
Interval 5.0 to 35.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set participants who received treatment with any other G-CSF
FN was defined as a single oral temperature ≥ 38.3°C, or a temperature of ≥ 38.0°C for ≥ 1 hour with a neutrophil count of \< 500 cells/mm² or \< 1000 cells/mm² and predicted to fall below 500 cells/mm². Treatment with any other G-CSF is defined as participants who started other G-CSF treatment after day 7 of any cycle if chemotherapy completed by day 7 and after day 11 of any cycle if chemotherapy completed after day 7.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=1 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Receiving Treatment With Any Other G-CSF Who Experienced Febrile Neutropenia
|
—
|
100 percentage of participants
Not calculated when n=100
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=157 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=224 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=137 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=738 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=90 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=829 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Received G-CSF During Cycles 1 to 8
Primary Prophylaxis - Pegfilgrastim
|
24 participants
|
22 participants
|
33 participants
|
360 participants
|
32 participants
|
393 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received G-CSF During Cycles 1 to 8
Primary Prophylaxis - Any Daily G-CSF
|
6 participants
|
20 participants
|
11 participants
|
51 participants
|
6 participants
|
57 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received G-CSF During Cycles 1 to 8
Primary Prophylaxis - Other G-CSF
|
1 participants
|
3 participants
|
0 participants
|
6 participants
|
1 participants
|
7 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received G-CSF During Cycles 1 to 8
Secondary Prophylaxis - Pegfilgrastim
|
11 participants
|
14 participants
|
15 participants
|
92 participants
|
9 participants
|
101 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received G-CSF During Cycles 1 to 8
Secondary Prophylaxis - Any Daily G-CSF
|
15 participants
|
24 participants
|
13 participants
|
64 participants
|
9 participants
|
73 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received G-CSF During Cycles 1 to 8
Secondary Prophylaxis - Other G-CSF
|
4 participants
|
3 participants
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received G-CSF During Cycles 1 to 8
Treatment - Pegfilgrastim
|
5 participants
|
2 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received G-CSF During Cycles 1 to 8
Treatment - Any Daily G-CSF
|
9 participants
|
15 participants
|
8 participants
|
17 participants
|
4 participants
|
21 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received G-CSF During Cycles 1 to 8
Treatment - Other G-CSF
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Received G-CSF During Cycles 1 to 8
No G-CSF Used
|
82 participants
|
120 participants
|
56 participants
|
147 participants
|
28 participants
|
175 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set participants who received primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim
The average number of days of pegfilgrastim use per cycle was calculated across all administered cycles.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=24 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=22 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=33 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=360 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=32 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=393 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Days of Prophylaxis in Participants Receiving Primary Prophylaxis With Pegfilgrastim
|
1.00 days
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
1.00 days
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
1.01 days
Standard Deviation 0.03 • Interval 11.0 to 38.0
|
1.00 days
Standard Deviation 0.05 • Interval 7.0 to 13.0
|
1.01 days
Standard Deviation 0.03 • Interval 3.0 to 24.0
|
1.00 days
Standard Deviation 0.04 • Interval 7.0 to 13.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set participants who received primary prophylaxis with any daily G-CSF
The average number of days of daily G-CSF use per cycle was calculated across all administered cycles.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=6 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=20 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=11 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=51 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=6 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=57 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Days of Prophylaxis in Participants Receiving Primary Prophylaxis With Any Daily G-CSF
|
3.67 days
Standard Deviation 1.63
|
3.95 days
Standard Deviation 1.18 • Interval 8.0 to 42.0
|
4.95 days
Standard Deviation 1.31 • Interval 2.0 to 38.0
|
4.77 days
Standard Deviation 1.72 • Interval 2.0 to 16.0
|
5.85 days
Standard Deviation 2.64 • Interval 3.0 to 56.0
|
4.88 days
Standard Deviation 1.84 • Interval 3.0 to 17.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set participants who received secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim
The average number of days of pegfilgrastim use per cycle was calculated across all administered cycles.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=11 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=14 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=15 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=92 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=9 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=101 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Days of Prophylaxis in Participants Receiving Secondary Prophylaxis With Pegfilgrastim
|
1.00 days
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
1.00 days
Standard Deviation 0.00 • Interval 16.0 to 61.0
|
1.04 days
Standard Deviation 0.12 • Interval 20.0 to 64.0
|
1.02 days
Standard Deviation 0.21 • Interval 8.0 to 23.0
|
1.00 days
Standard Deviation 0.00 • Interval 12.0 to 65.0
|
1.02 days
Standard Deviation 0.20 • Interval 10.0 to 24.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set participants who received secondary prophylaxis with any daily G-CSF.
The average number of days of daily G-CSF use per cycle was calculated across all administered cycles.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=15 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=24 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=13 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=64 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=9 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=73 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Days of Prophylaxis in Participants Receiving Secondary Prophylaxis With Any Daily G-CSF
|
3.66 days
Standard Deviation 1.82 • Interval 11.0 to 52.0
|
4.28 days
Standard Deviation 0.87 • Interval 4.0 to 31.0
|
4.04 days
Standard Deviation 1.61 • Interval 4.0 to 42.0
|
4.74 days
Standard Deviation 2.64 • Interval 12.0 to 32.0
|
3.50 days
Standard Deviation 0.95 • Interval 6.0 to 55.0
|
4.58 days
Standard Deviation 2.53 • Interval 13.0 to 31.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set participants who received treatment with pegfilgrastim
The average number of days of pegfilgrastim use per cycle was calculated across all administered cycles.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=5 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=2 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=1 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Days of Treatment in Participants Receiving Treatment With Pegfilgrastim
|
1.40 days
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
1.00 days
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
1.00 days
Standard Deviation NA
Not calculated as N=1
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set participants who received treatment with any daily G-CSF
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=9 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=15 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=8 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=17 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=4 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=21 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Days of Treatment in Participants Receiving Treatment With Any Daily G-CSF
|
3.11 days
Standard Deviation 1.92 • Interval 19.0 to 73.0
|
4.45 days
Standard Deviation 1.18 • Interval 4.0 to 38.0
|
2.83 days
Standard Deviation 1.21 • Interval 2.0 to 47.0
|
2.95 days
Standard Deviation 1.50 • Interval 3.0 to 34.0
|
2.38 days
Standard Deviation 0.75 • Interval 5.0 to 70.0
|
2.84 days
Standard Deviation 1.39 • Interval 5.0 to 35.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 2 - 8 (approximately 21 weeks)Population: Full analysis set participants who received more than 1 cycle of chemotherapy
A dose delay is defined as a delay of more than 3 days in the start of chemotherapy measured since the start of the previous cycle. The percentage of participants with delays in chemotherapy administration are summarized by the length of delay (\> 3 days, \> 5 days, and \> 7 days) across cycles 2 through 8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=147 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=204 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=124 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=734 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=87 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=822 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Chemotherapy Dose Delays in Cycles 2 Through 8
> 3 Days Delay in One or More Cycles
|
48 percentage of participants
Interval 40.0 to 56.0
|
46 percentage of participants
Interval 39.0 to 52.0
|
52 percentage of participants
Interval 44.0 to 61.0
|
29 percentage of participants
Interval 26.0 to 32.0
|
47 percentage of participants
Interval 37.0 to 58.0
|
31 percentage of participants
Interval 28.0 to 34.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Chemotherapy Dose Delays in Cycles 2 Through 8
> 5 Days Delay in One or More Cycles
|
39 percentage of participants
Interval 32.0 to 48.0
|
39 percentage of participants
Interval 33.0 to 46.0
|
47 percentage of participants
Interval 38.0 to 56.0
|
22 percentage of participants
Interval 19.0 to 25.0
|
40 percentage of participants
Interval 31.0 to 51.0
|
24 percentage of participants
Interval 21.0 to 27.0
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Chemotherapy Dose Delays in Cycles 2 Through 8
> 7 Days Delay in One or More Cycles
|
24 percentage of participants
Interval 18.0 to 31.0
|
23 percentage of participants
Interval 18.0 to 29.0
|
26 percentage of participants
Interval 19.0 to 34.0
|
9 percentage of participants
Interval 7.0 to 11.0
|
21 percentage of participants
Interval 14.0 to 30.0
|
10 percentage of participants
Interval 8.0 to 12.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 2 - 8 (approximately 21 days)Population: Full analysis set participants who received more than 1 cycle of chemotherapy
A dose delay is defined as a delay of \> 3 days in the start of chemotherapy measured since the start of the previous cycle. The percentage of cycles delayed are summarized by the length of delay (\> 3 days, \> 5 days, and \> 7 days) across cycles 2 through 8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=622 Total cycles
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=585 Total cycles
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=473 Total cycles
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=3697 Total cycles
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=402 Total cycles
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=4104 Total cycles
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Cycles With Chemotherapy Dose Delays
> 3 Days Delay in One or More Cycles
|
20 percentage of cycles
|
24 percentage of cycles
|
24 percentage of cycles
|
7 percentage of cycles
|
17 percentage of cycles
|
8 percentage of cycles
|
|
Percentage of Cycles With Chemotherapy Dose Delays
> 5 Days Delay in One or More Cycles
|
16 percentage of cycles
|
19 percentage of cycles
|
19 percentage of cycles
|
5 percentage of cycles
|
14 percentage of cycles
|
6 percentage of cycles
|
|
Percentage of Cycles With Chemotherapy Dose Delays
> 7 Days Delay in One or More Cycles
|
7 percentage of cycles
|
9 percentage of cycles
|
8 percentage of cycles
|
2 percentage of cycles
|
6 percentage of cycles
|
2 percentage of cycles
Interval to 12.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set participants with actual regimens as planned (17 participants received a different regimen to what was planned and are thus excluded)
A participant is considered to have a dose reduction in a given cycle if there was a ≥ 15% reduction in dose of any chemotherapy agent planned for that cycle, relative to the dose planned at the baseline visit for that cycle.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=152 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=219 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=137 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=732 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=89 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=822 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Chemotherapy Dose Reductions
|
34 percentage of participants
Interval 27.0 to 42.0
|
25 percentage of participants
Interval 20.0 to 31.0
|
22 percentage of participants
Interval 16.0 to 30.0
|
16 percentage of participants
Interval 13.0 to 19.0
|
29 percentage of participants
Interval 21.0 to 39.0
|
17 percentage of participants
Interval 15.0 to 20.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set participants with actual regimens as planned (17 participants received a different regimen to what was planned and are thus excluded)
A dose reduction in a given cycle is defined as a ≥ 15% reduction in dose of any chemotherapy agent planned for that cycle, relative to the dose planned at the baseline visit for that cycle.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=757 Total cycles
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=791 Total cycles
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=610 Total cycles
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=4399 Total cycles
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=486 Total cycles
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=4891 Total cycles
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Cycles With Chemotherapy Dose Reductions
|
16 percentage of cycles
Interval 27.0 to 42.0
|
13 percentage of cycles
Interval 20.0 to 31.0
|
12 percentage of cycles
Interval 16.0 to 30.0
|
6 percentage of cycles
Interval 13.0 to 19.0
|
16 percentage of cycles
Interval 21.0 to 39.0
|
7 percentage of cycles
Interval 15.0 to 20.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 2 - 8 (approximately 21 weeks)Population: Full analysis set participants who received more than 1 cycle of chemotherapy and had \> 3 days delay in one or more cycles
A dose delay is defined as a delay of \> 3 days in the start of chemotherapy measured since the start of the previous cycle.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=124 Cycles with > 3 days delay
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=142 Cycles with > 3 days delay
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=113 Cycles with > 3 days delay
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=268 Cycles with > 3 days delay
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=70 Cycles with > 3 days delay
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=338 Cycles with > 3 days delay
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Reasons for Cycles With > 3 Days Chemotherapy Dose Delays in Cycles 2 to 8
Gastrointestinal Toxicity
|
3 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
2 cycles
|
3 cycles
|
1 cycles
|
4 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With > 3 Days Chemotherapy Dose Delays in Cycles 2 to 8
Missing
|
18 cycles
|
16 cycles
|
14 cycles
|
18 cycles
|
10 cycles
|
28 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With > 3 Days Chemotherapy Dose Delays in Cycles 2 to 8
Hepatic Toxicity
|
1 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
1 cycles
|
4 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
4 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With > 3 Days Chemotherapy Dose Delays in Cycles 2 to 8
Other Non-Hematological Reason
|
14 cycles
|
21 cycles
|
20 cycles
|
44 cycles
|
6 cycles
|
50 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With > 3 Days Chemotherapy Dose Delays in Cycles 2 to 8
Dose Administration Error
|
0 cycles
|
3 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With > 3 Days Chemotherapy Dose Delays in Cycles 2 to 8
Participant Preference
|
19 cycles
|
19 cycles
|
15 cycles
|
51 cycles
|
16 cycles
|
67 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With > 3 Days Chemotherapy Dose Delays in Cycles 2 to 8
Other
|
24 cycles
|
33 cycles
|
34 cycles
|
78 cycles
|
19 cycles
|
97 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With > 3 Days Chemotherapy Dose Delays in Cycles 2 to 8
Febrile Neutropenia
|
1 cycles
|
6 cycles
|
6 cycles
|
12 cycles
|
3 cycles
|
15 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With > 3 Days Chemotherapy Dose Delays in Cycles 2 to 8
Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia
|
27 cycles
|
34 cycles
|
14 cycles
|
41 cycles
|
9 cycles
|
50 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With > 3 Days Chemotherapy Dose Delays in Cycles 2 to 8
Chemotherapy Induced Anemia
|
5 cycles
|
7 cycles
|
1 cycles
|
3 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
3 cycles
Interval to 12.0
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With > 3 Days Chemotherapy Dose Delays in Cycles 2 to 8
Chemotherapy Induced Thrombocytopenia
|
7 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
4 cycles
|
1 cycles
|
1 cycles
|
2 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With > 3 Days Chemotherapy Dose Delays in Cycles 2 to 8
Other Hematological Reason
|
2 cycles
|
1 cycles
|
1 cycles
|
8 cycles
|
2 cycles
|
10 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With > 3 Days Chemotherapy Dose Delays in Cycles 2 to 8
Neurological Toxicity
|
3 cycles
|
2 cycles
|
1 cycles
|
5 cycles
|
3 cycles
|
8 cycles
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set participants with actual regimens as planned and with ≥ 15% chemotherapy dose reduction in any cycle.
A dose reduction in a given cycle is defined as a ≥ 15% reduction in dose of any chemotherapy agent planned for that cycle, relative to the dose planned at the baseline visit for that cycle.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=123 Cycles with ≥ 15% dose reduction
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=99 Cycles with ≥ 15% dose reduction
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=71 Cycles with ≥ 15% dose reduction
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=256 Cycles with ≥ 15% dose reduction
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=77 Cycles with ≥ 15% dose reduction
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=333 Cycles with ≥ 15% dose reduction
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Reasons for Cycles With ≥ 15% Chemotherapy Dose Reductions in Cycles 1-8
Chemotherapy induced neutropenia
|
15 cycles
|
16 cycles
|
3 cycles
|
41 cycles
|
11 cycles
|
52 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With ≥ 15% Chemotherapy Dose Reductions in Cycles 1-8
Chemotherapy induced anemia
|
3 cycles
|
7 cycles
|
2 cycles
|
2 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
2 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With ≥ 15% Chemotherapy Dose Reductions in Cycles 1-8
Other
|
16 cycles
|
19 cycles
|
11 cycles
|
20 cycles
|
10 cycles
|
30 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With ≥ 15% Chemotherapy Dose Reductions in Cycles 1-8
Participant preference
|
2 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With ≥ 15% Chemotherapy Dose Reductions in Cycles 1-8
Febrile neutropenia
|
4 cycles
Interval 27.0 to 42.0
|
4 cycles
Interval 20.0 to 31.0
|
3 cycles
Interval 16.0 to 30.0
|
15 cycles
Interval 13.0 to 19.0
|
6 cycles
Interval 21.0 to 39.0
|
21 cycles
Interval 15.0 to 20.0
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With ≥ 15% Chemotherapy Dose Reductions in Cycles 1-8
Chemotherapy induced thrombocytopenia
|
5 cycles
|
4 cycles
|
2 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
1 cycles
|
1 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With ≥ 15% Chemotherapy Dose Reductions in Cycles 1-8
Other hematological reason
|
1 cycles
|
1 cycles
|
2 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With ≥ 15% Chemotherapy Dose Reductions in Cycles 1-8
Gastrointestinal toxicity
|
4 cycles
|
2 cycles
|
1 cycles
|
12 cycles
|
2 cycles
|
14 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With ≥ 15% Chemotherapy Dose Reductions in Cycles 1-8
Neurological toxicity
|
2 cycles
|
2 cycles
|
2 cycles
|
17 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
17 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With ≥ 15% Chemotherapy Dose Reductions in Cycles 1-8
Hepatic toxicity
|
0 cycles
|
1 cycles
|
2 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With ≥ 15% Chemotherapy Dose Reductions in Cycles 1-8
Other non-hematological reason
|
31 cycles
|
13 cycles
|
10 cycles
|
33 cycles
|
8 cycles
|
41 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With ≥ 15% Chemotherapy Dose Reductions in Cycles 1-8
Weight loss
|
1 cycles
|
1 cycles
|
5 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
1 cycles
|
1 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With ≥ 15% Chemotherapy Dose Reductions in Cycles 1-8
Dose administration error
|
1 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
0 cycles
|
1 cycles
|
2 cycles
|
3 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With ≥ 15% Chemotherapy Dose Reductions in Cycles 1-8
Reduced to assess dose/tolerability
|
2 cycles
|
6 cycles
|
1 cycles
|
6 cycles
|
1 cycles
|
7 cycles
|
|
Reasons for Cycles With ≥ 15% Chemotherapy Dose Reductions in Cycles 1-8
Missing
|
36 cycles
|
23 cycles
|
27 cycles
|
109 cycles
|
35 cycles
|
144 cycles
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set
Number of participants with systemic anti-infective use, including antibiotics, anti-fungal and virostatic for prophylaxis or treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=157 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=224 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=137 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=738 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=90 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=829 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Systemic Anti-infective Use in Cycles 1 to 8
|
23 participants
|
46 participants
|
53 participants
|
198 participants
|
20 participants
|
218 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set
Unplanned hospitalizations included only those which involved an overnight stay and occurred in cycles 1 to 8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=157 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=224 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=137 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=738 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=90 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=829 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Unplanned Hospitalizations
|
26 participants
|
52 participants
|
41 participants
|
107 participants
|
18 participants
|
125 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: End of treatment (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=157 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=224 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=137 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=738 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=90 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=829 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Investigator Assessed Clinical Response at End of Treatment
Complete response
|
49 participants
|
8 participants
|
17 participants
|
218 participants
|
4 participants
|
222 participants
|
|
Investigator Assessed Clinical Response at End of Treatment
Partial response
|
29 participants
|
60 participants
|
38 participants
|
77 participants
|
36 participants
|
114 participants
|
|
Investigator Assessed Clinical Response at End of Treatment
Stable disease/No response
|
23 participants
|
41 participants
|
29 participants
|
35 participants
|
11 participants
|
46 participants
|
|
Investigator Assessed Clinical Response at End of Treatment
Progressive disease
|
31 participants
|
64 participants
|
33 participants
|
8 participants
|
18 participants
|
26 participants
|
|
Investigator Assessed Clinical Response at End of Treatment
Not done
|
25 participants
|
51 participants
|
20 participants
|
383 participants
|
21 participants
|
404 participants
|
|
Investigator Assessed Clinical Response at End of Treatment
Missing
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
17 participants
|
0 participants
|
17 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set
The number of participants experiencing treatment related grade 3 and 4 hematological toxicities during cycles 1 to 8. Participants experiencing both Grade 3 and Grade 4 toxicities are reported under Grade 4 only (maximum toxicity). Toxicity grades for hematology data are defined according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) - Grade 3: \< 1.0 - 0.5 x 10\^9/L; ANC - Grade 4: \< 0.5 x 10\^9/L; White blood cells (WBC) - Grade 3: \< 2.0 - 1.0 x 10\^9/L; WBC - Grade 4: \< 1.0 x 10\^9/L; Hemoglobin - Grade 3: \< 8.0 - 6.5 g/dL; Hemoglobin - Grade 4: \< 6.5 g/dL; Platelets - Grade 3: \< 50 - 25 x 10\^9/L; Platelets - Grade 4: \< 25 x 10\^9/L.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=157 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=224 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=137 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=738 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=90 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=829 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities
Grade 4 hemoglobin
|
1 participants
|
6 participants
|
5 participants
|
9 participants
|
3 participants
|
12 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities
Grade 3 platelets
|
8 participants
|
2 participants
|
3 participants
|
6 participants
|
3 participants
|
9 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities
Grade 4 platelets
|
3 participants
|
3 participants
|
4 participants
|
3 participants
|
0 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities
Grade 3 absolute neutrophil count
|
19 participants
|
7 participants
|
9 participants
|
45 participants
|
5 participants
|
50 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities
Grade 4 absolute neutrophil count
|
23 participants
|
18 participants
|
13 participants
|
89 participants
|
18 participants
|
107 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities
Grade 3 white blood cells
|
17 participants
|
11 participants
|
5 participants
|
71 participants
|
8 participants
|
79 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities
Grade 4 white blood cells
|
6 participants
|
8 participants
|
11 participants
|
38 participants
|
12 participants
|
50 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Hematological Toxicities
Grade 3 hemoglobin
|
6 participants
|
12 participants
|
15 participants
|
47 participants
|
7 participants
|
54 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From cycle 1, day 1 until end of the long-term follow-up; median time on follow-up from cycle 1, day 1 was 52 months.Population: Full analysis set
Time to disease progression was calculated from cycle 1 day 1 to a date at which disease progression was first recorded. Participants who died due to causes other than disease progression were censored at the date of death. Participants who were alive and whose disease had not progressed at the most recent contact, or who were lost to follow-up, or with missing data, were censored at the date of last contact. Median time to disease progression was estimated from the Kaplan-Meier survival function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=157 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=224 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=137 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=738 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=90 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=829 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Disease Progression
|
12.4 months
Interval 9.9 to 16.4
|
6.5 months
Interval 4.5 to 7.8
|
6.8 months
Interval 6.4 to 7.9
|
NA months
Not estimable due to the low number of events
|
11.8 months
Interval 9.1 to 16.4
|
NA months
Not estimable due to the low number of events
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Participants who received treatment with an ESA
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=147 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Treatment With Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agents (ESAs)
|
5.3 weeks
Standard Deviation 4.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Participants who received treatment with an ESA
The reason treatment with an ESA was initiated as recorded by the investigator; participants may have more than one reason for initiating treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=147 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Reason for Treatment With Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agents
Hemoglobin level
|
134 participants
4.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Reason for Treatment With Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agents
Risk of chemotherapy induced anemia
|
10 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Reason for Treatment With Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agents
Evidence based guidelines
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Reason for Treatment With Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agents
Other anemia-related symptoms
|
3 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Participants who received treatment with an ESA
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=147 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hemoglobin Level at Initiation of Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agent Treatment
Hemoglobin > 11 g/dL
|
29 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Hemoglobin Level at Initiation of Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agent Treatment
Hemoglobin < 9 g/dL
|
19 participants
4.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Hemoglobin Level at Initiation of Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agent Treatment
Hemoglobin 9 - 11 g/dL
|
95 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Hemoglobin Level at Initiation of Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agent Treatment
Missing
|
4 participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set
The average number of clinical visits per month (28 day period) during cycles 1 to 8 and during the period of ESA treatment in cycles 1 to 8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=147 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=1200 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Clinical Visits in Cycles 1-8 by ESA Use
Visits per month during cycles 1 - 8
|
3.1 visits per month
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
2.8 visits per month
Standard Deviation 1.7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Clinical Visits in Cycles 1-8 by ESA Use
Visits per month during period of ESA treatment
|
3.9 visits per month
Standard Deviation 3.2
|
NA visits per month
Standard Deviation NA
Participants in this group did not receive any ESA treatment
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From 5 weeks post initiation of ESA treatment to the end of ESA treatment phase (EOTP) during cycles 1 - 8; maximum duration of ESA treatment was 23 weeks.Population: Participants who received treatment with an ESA and still on study 5 weeks after initiation of ESA treatment.
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants with RBC transfusions from five weeks post initiation of ESA treatment until the end of ESA treatment during cycles 1 to 8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=105 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Received ESAs and Required a Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion After 5 Weeks of ESA Treatment
|
11 percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval 4.6 • Interval 3.0 to 19.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Initiation of ESA treatment (last assessment on or prior to ESA day 1) and at end of ESA treatment; median duration of ESA treatment was 4 weeks, maximum was 23 weeks.Population: Participants who received treatment with an ESA and with hemoglobin measurements available at both time points.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=121 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Hemoglobin During ESA Treatment Phase
|
0.38 g/dL
Standard Deviation 1.30
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Participants who received treatment with an ESA
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants in cycles 1 to 8 receiving ESA treatment who achieved a hematopoietic response during the ESA treatment phase, defined as a hemoglobin concentration ≥ 12 g/dL or a ≥ 2 g/dL rise in hemoglobin after starting ESA treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=147 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Received ESAs and Achieved Hematopoietic Response
|
45 percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval 4.6 • Interval 29.0 to 61.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From 5 weeks post initiation of ESA treatment to the end of ESA treatment phase (EOTP) during cycles 1 - 8; maximum duration of ESA treatment was 23 weeks.Population: Participants who received treatment with an ESA and with hemoglobin \< 9 g/dL at initiation of ESA treatment and still on study 5 weeks after initiation of ESA treatment.
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants achieving a hemoglobin level ≥ 9 g/dL during the period from five weeks after initiation of ESA treatment until the end of ESA treatment during cycles 1 to 8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=14 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Received ESAs and Achieved Hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL After 5 Weeks ESA Treatment
|
58 percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval 4.6 • Interval -1.0 to 118.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From 5 weeks post initiation of ESA treatment to the end of ESA treatment phase (EOTP) during cycles 1 - 8; maximum duration of ESA treatment was 23 weeks.Population: Participants who received treatment with an ESA, and with hemoglobin \< 10 g/dL at initiation of ESA treatment and still on study 5 weeks after initiation of ESA treatment.
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants achieving a hemoglobin level ≥ 10 g/dL during the period from five weeks after initiation of ESA treatment until the end of ESA treatment during cycles 1 to 8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=41 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Received ESAs and Achieved Hemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dL After 5 Weeks ESA Treatment
|
85 percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval 4.6 • Interval 61.0 to 108.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From 5 weeks post initiation of ESA treatment to the end of ESA treatment phase (EOTP) during cycles 1 - 8; maximum duration of ESA treatment was 23 weeks.Population: Participants who received treatment with an ESA, and with hemoglobin \< 11 g/dL at initiation of ESA treatment and still on study 5 weeks after initiation of ESA treatment.
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants achieving a hemoglobin level ≥ 11 g/dL during the period from five weeks after initiation of ESA treatment until the end of ESA treatment during cycles 1 to 8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=82 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Received ESAs and Achieved Hemoglobin ≥ 11 g/dL After 5 Weeks ESA Treatment
|
66 percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval 4.6 • Interval 51.0 to 82.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From 5 weeks post initiation of ESA treatment to the end of ESA treatment phase (EOTP) during cycles 1 - 8; maximum duration of ESA treatment was 23 weeks.Population: Participants who received treatment with an ESA, and with hemoglobin \< 12 g/dL at initiation of ESA treatment and still on study 5 weeks after initiation of ESA treatment.
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants achieving a hemoglobin level ≥ 12 g/dL during the period from five weeks after initiation of ESA treatment until the end of ESA treatment during cycles 1 to 8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=97 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Received ESAs and Achieved Hemoglobin ≥ 12 g/dL After 5 Weeks ESA Treatment
|
35 percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval 4.6 • Interval 17.0 to 53.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From 5 weeks post initiation of ESA treatment to the end of ESA treatment phase (EOTP) during cycles 1 - 8; maximum duration of ESA treatment was 23 weeks.Population: Participants who received treatment with an ESA, and with hemoglobin \< 10 g/dL at initiation of ESA treatment and still on study 5 weeks after initiation of ESA treatment.
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants achieving a hemoglobin level from 10 to 12 g/dL during the period from five weeks after initiation of ESA treatment until the end of ESA treatment during cycles 1 to 8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=41 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Received ESAs and Achieved Hemoglobin From 10 to 12 g/dL After 5 Weeks ESA Treatment
|
84 percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval 4.6 • Interval 58.0 to 109.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From 5 weeks post initiation of ESA treatment to the end of ESA treatment phase (EOTP) during cycles 1 - 8; maximum duration of ESA treatment was 23 weeks.Population: Participants who received treatment with an ESA, and with hemoglobin \< 12 g/dL at initiation of ESA treatment and still on study 5 weeks after initiation of ESA treatment.
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants achieving a hemoglobin level from 12 to 13 g/dL during the period from five weeks after initiation of ESA treatment until the end of ESA treatment during cycles 1 to 8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=97 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Received ESAs and Achieved Hemoglobin From 12 to 13 g/dL After 5 Weeks ESA Treatment
|
30 percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval 4.6 • Interval 15.0 to 45.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 9 weeks post initiation of ESA treatmentPopulation: Participants who received treatment with an ESA
The percentage of participants achieving a hemoglobin level from 10 to 12 g/dL after 9 weeks of ESA treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=147 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Received ESAs and Achieved Hemoglobin From 10 to 12 g/dL 9 Weeks After Initiation of ESA Treatment
|
15 percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval 4.6 • Interval 10.0 to 22.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set
Number of participants who received transfusions, including platelets, packed red blood cells, whole blood, or other, during cycles 1 to 8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=157 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=224 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=137 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=738 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=90 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=829 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Systemic Transfusions in Cycles 1 to 8
|
20 participants
|
23 participants
|
26 participants
|
25 participants
|
4 participants
|
29 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Cycles 1 - 8 (approximately 24 weeks)Population: Full analysis set
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=157 Participants
Participants diagnosed with ovarian cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
NSCLC
n=224 Participants
Participants diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
SCLC
n=137 Participants
Participants diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=738 Participants
Participants diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Metastatic
n=90 Participants
Participants diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and receiving chemotherapy.
|
Breast Total
n=829 Participants
Participants diagnosed with breast cancer (any stage) and receiving chemotherapy.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Transfusions Per Participant in Cycles 1 to 8
No Transfusions
|
137 participants
|
201 participants
|
111 participants
|
713 participants
|
86 participants
|
800 participants
|
|
Number of Transfusions Per Participant in Cycles 1 to 8
1 Transfusion
|
8 participants
|
16 participants
|
17 participants
|
19 participants
|
2 participants
|
21 participants
|
|
Number of Transfusions Per Participant in Cycles 1 to 8
2 Transfusions
|
4 participants
|
4 participants
|
5 participants
|
3 participants
|
1 participants
|
4 participants
|
|
Number of Transfusions Per Participant in Cycles 1 to 8
> 2 Transfusions
|
8 participants
|
3 participants
|
4 participants
|
3 participants
|
1 participants
|
4 participants
|
Adverse Events
Ovarian
NSCLC
SCLC
Breast Stage I-III
Breast Metastatic
Breast Total
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=157 participants at risk
Ovarian Cancer
|
NSCLC
n=224 participants at risk
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
|
SCLC
n=137 participants at risk
Small Cell Lung Cancer
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=738 participants at risk
Breast Cancer, Stages I-III
|
Breast Metastatic
n=90 participants at risk
Breast Cancer, Metastatic
|
Breast Total
n=829 participants at risk
All Breast Cancer
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
CHEST PAIN
|
0.00%
0/157 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
0.00%
0/137 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
0.14%
1/738 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
0.00%
0/90 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
0.12%
1/829 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BACK PAIN
|
0.00%
0/157 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
0.00%
0/137 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
0.14%
1/738 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
0.00%
0/90 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
0.12%
1/829 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN
|
0.00%
0/157 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
0.45%
1/224 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
0.00%
0/137 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
0.00%
0/738 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
0.00%
0/90 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
0.00%
0/829 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Ovarian
n=157 participants at risk
Ovarian Cancer
|
NSCLC
n=224 participants at risk
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
|
SCLC
n=137 participants at risk
Small Cell Lung Cancer
|
Breast Stage I-III
n=738 participants at risk
Breast Cancer, Stages I-III
|
Breast Metastatic
n=90 participants at risk
Breast Cancer, Metastatic
|
Breast Total
n=829 participants at risk
All Breast Cancer
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN
|
0.64%
1/157 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
0.00%
0/224 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
0.73%
1/137 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
5.0%
37/738 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
1.1%
1/90 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
4.6%
38/829 • Approximately 24 weeks (8 treatment cycles)
Only adverse drug reactions (ADRs) considered by the investigator to be related to Amgen products were collected. Any ADRs relating to pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, and darbepoetin alfa are reported. Other Adverse Events summarizes the non-serious occurrences of ADRs that exceed the 5% frequency threshold.
|
Additional Information
Study Director
Amgen Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Clinical Trial Agreement generally does not restrict an investigator's discussion of trial results after completion. The Agreement permits Amgen a limited period of time to review material discussing trial results (typically up to 45 days and possible extension). Amgen may remove confidential information, but authors have final control and approval of publication content. For multicenter studies, the investigator agrees not to publish any results before the first multi-center publication.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER