Reliability of Point-of-care INR Measurements in Patients With Antiphospholipid-antibody Syndrome Treated With Warfarin

NCT ID: NCT00878137

Last Updated: 2012-10-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

63 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-03-31

Study Completion Date

2009-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The antiphospholipid-antibody syndrome (APLA), which includes lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin, and anti-beta-2-glycoproteinI antibodies, is a thrombophilic disorder associated with arterial thrombosis, venous thrombosis or both. Patients diagnosed with APLA have a higher risk of recurrent thrombosis than do patients without known antibodies. Currently, warfarin is considered the anticoagulant of choice for prophylactic antithrombotic treatment for APLA patients after their first episode of thrombosis. In some patients with APLA who are treated with warfarin, the INR values determined on plasma are unreliable due to an influence of the APLA on the INR. In these individuals, alternative monitoring methods, such as factor II activity, chromogenic factor X activity or prothrombin-proconvertin time should be used to assess adequate anticoagulation. These tests are expensive and not widely available to some clinicians. Point-of-care (POC) instruments, on the other hand, are readily accessible to clinicians. Previous research has shown that INR values from 3 older point-of-care (POC) instruments are unreliable in 1/3 of APLA patients (CoaguChekTM, ProTimeTM, INRatioTM). However, there are now newer versions of these POC instruments available (CoaguChek XSTM, an investigational ProTime device, and a newer INRatioTM device) and it is unknown if these newer POC instruments are reliable in patients with APLA. The purpose of this study is to determine whether newer POC instruments are reliable in patients with APLA.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

APLA

Patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome.

INR by point-of-care instruments and venopuncture

Intervention Type DEVICE

Three fingersticks will be performed and from each one drop of capillary or venous whole blood collected from a fingerstick performed by the primary investigator to measure PT/INR using the CoaguChekXSTM (10 microliters), ProTimeTM (27 microliters), the investigational ProTime, and INRatioTM 15 microliters) point-of-care instruments and one i.v. blood draw (20 mL of blood) will be performed by a phlebotomist.

Control

Patients on warfarin therapy but without antiphosphilipid antibody syndrome.

INR by point-of-care instruments and venopuncture

Intervention Type DEVICE

Three fingersticks will be performed and from each one drop of capillary or venous whole blood collected from a fingerstick performed by the primary investigator to measure PT/INR using the CoaguChekXSTM (10 microliters), ProTimeTM (27 microliters), the investigational ProTime, and INRatioTM 15 microliters) point-of-care instruments and one i.v. blood draw (20 mL of blood) will be performed by a phlebotomist.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

INR by point-of-care instruments and venopuncture

Three fingersticks will be performed and from each one drop of capillary or venous whole blood collected from a fingerstick performed by the primary investigator to measure PT/INR using the CoaguChekXSTM (10 microliters), ProTimeTM (27 microliters), the investigational ProTime, and INRatioTM 15 microliters) point-of-care instruments and one i.v. blood draw (20 mL of blood) will be performed by a phlebotomist.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Prolongation of a phospholipid-dependent screening assay, 2) lack of correction of a prolonged screening assay after a 1:1 mix with pooled normal plasma, and 3) correction of a prolonged screening assay by the addition of excess phospholipid. Two positive lupus anticoagulant confirmations at least 3 months apart will be required.
* Diagnosis of anticardiolipin antibodies defined as elevated levels of ACA-IgG (\>30) and/or ACA-IgM (\>15) on two separate occasions at least 3 months apart.
* Stable warfarin therapy, defined as the maintenance of a warfarin dose for a minimal of 2 weeks regardless of INR.


* No evidence of either a positive LA or ACA diagnosis by confirmation of negative laboratory values and/or documentation of no clinical signs and symptoms concurrent with these conditions.
* Stable warfarin therapy, defined as the maintenance of a warfarin dose for a minimal of 2 weeks regardless of INR.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients whose warfarin dose has changed within the past 2 weeks.


* Patients whose warfarin dose has changed within the past 2 weeks.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

International Technidyne Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lauren McKnight, PharmD, CPP

Clinical Pharmacist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lauren B McKnight, PharmD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

POC Comparison 08-1883

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id