Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety Study of Transvenous Limb Perfusion in Human Muscular Dystrophy (NCT NCT00873782)
NCT ID: NCT00873782
Last Updated: 2015-03-09
Results Overview
Number of Participants with all of the following three: 1. Unchanged Doppler ultrasound to assess venous and arterial damage pre-and post perfusion based on report 2. Without clinically significant changes in electrodiagnostic testing using standard neurographic techniques pre-and post perfusion:\>1 mSec change in baseline distal motor latency; \<75% baseline compound muscle action potential amplitude, \<75% baseline conduction velocity, sensory nerve action potential 3. Without clinically significant changes in Quantitative muscle testing (QMT) strength assessments pre-and post perfusion:\< 85% baseline
COMPLETED
PHASE1
16 participants
Measured within 2 weeks after limb perfusion procedure
2015-03-09
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
High Pressure Transvenous Limb Perfusion
Participants will undergo retrograde high pressure transvenous limb perfusion of an arm or a leg with normal saline through an 18g or 20g peripheral catheter with a tourniquet on the upper part of the limb: The volume of saline as % of perfused limb volume was escalated beginning at 5%. Safety was determined by Doppler ultrasound to assess venous and arterial damage electrodiagnostic neurographic testing quantitative muscle testing strength assessments, the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), basic metabolic panel (Na+, K+, Cl-, CO2, BUN, and creatinine), serum creatine kinase \[CK\], plasma and urine myoglobin. Some subjects underwent MRI to assess whether saline went subcutaneously or intramuscularly.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Safety Study of Transvenous Limb Perfusion in Human Muscular Dystrophy
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
High Pressure Transvenous Limb Perfusion
n=16 Participants
Participants will undergo retrograde high pressure transvenous limb perfusion of an arm or a leg with normal saline through an 18g or 20g peripheral catheter with a tourniquet on the upper part of the limb: The volume of saline as % of perfused limb volume was escalated beginning at 5%. Safety was determined by Doppler ultrasound to assess venous and arterial damage electrodiagnostic neurographic testing quantitative muscle testing strength assessments, the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), basic metabolic panel (Na+, K+, Cl-, CO2, BUN, and creatinine), serum creatine kinase \[CK\], plasma and urine myoglobin. Some subjects underwent MRI to assess whether saline went subcutaneously or intramuscularly.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
31 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Measured within 2 weeks after limb perfusion procedureNumber of Participants with all of the following three: 1. Unchanged Doppler ultrasound to assess venous and arterial damage pre-and post perfusion based on report 2. Without clinically significant changes in electrodiagnostic testing using standard neurographic techniques pre-and post perfusion:\>1 mSec change in baseline distal motor latency; \<75% baseline compound muscle action potential amplitude, \<75% baseline conduction velocity, sensory nerve action potential 3. Without clinically significant changes in Quantitative muscle testing (QMT) strength assessments pre-and post perfusion:\< 85% baseline
Outcome measures
| Measure |
High Pressure Transvenous Limb Perfusion
n=16 Participants
Participants will undergo retrograde high pressure transvenous limb perfusion of an arm or a leg with normal saline through an 18g or 20g peripheral catheter with a tourniquet on the upper part of the limb: The volume of saline as % of perfused limb volume was escalated beginning at 5%. Safety was determined by Doppler ultrasound to assess venous and arterial damage electrodiagnostic neurographic testing quantitative muscle testing strength assessments, the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), basic metabolic panel (Na+, K+, Cl-, CO2, BUN, and creatinine), serum creatine kinase \[CK\], plasma and urine myoglobin. Some subjects underwent MRI to assess whether saline went subcutaneously or intramuscularly.
|
|---|---|
|
Muscle, Nerve, or Vascular Damage
|
16 participants
|
Adverse Events
High Pressure Transvenous Limb Perfusion
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
High Pressure Transvenous Limb Perfusion
n=16 participants at risk
Participants will undergo retrograde high pressure transvenous limb perfusion of an arm or a leg with normal saline through an 18g or 20g peripheral catheter with a tourniquet on the upper part of the limb: The volume of saline as % of perfused limb volume was escalated beginning at 5%. Safety was determined by Doppler ultrasound to assess venous and arterial damage electrodiagnostic neurographic testing quantitative muscle testing strength assessments, the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), basic metabolic panel (Na+, K+, Cl-, CO2, BUN, and creatinine), serum creatine kinase \[CK\], plasma and urine myoglobin. Some subjects underwent MRI to assess whether saline went subcutaneously or intramuscularly.
|
|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Ankle pain
|
12.5%
2/16 • 1 month
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Elevated Muscle Compartment pressures
|
62.5%
10/16 • 1 month
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Reduced Compound Muscle Action Potentials
|
6.2%
1/16 • 1 month
|
Additional Information
William J. Powers, MD
University of North Carolina at Chapel HIll
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place