Trial Outcomes & Findings for Activating Collaborative CIS Support Via Targeted Provider Mailing (NCT NCT00873288)
NCT ID: NCT00873288
Last Updated: 2023-03-21
Results Overview
Patient satisfaction with provider-patient communication was assessed via administration of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) satisfaction questionnaire which rates satisfaction on a 1 to 3 scale. Scores are added together, with minimum score being 4 and the maximum score being 12, with a higher score indicating greater satisfaction.
COMPLETED
NA
254 participants
within 6 months of PAP
2023-03-21
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Usual Care Mailing Intervention
routine colposcopy reminder letter mailed
|
CIS Support Mailing Intervention
Mailed reminder plus provider recommendation to call CIS and sample questions to ask
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
127
|
127
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
127
|
127
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Activating Collaborative CIS Support Via Targeted Provider Mailing
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Usual Care Mailing Intervention
n=127 Participants
routine colposcopy reminder letter mailed
|
CIS Support Mailing Intervention
n=127 Participants
Mailed reminder plus provider recommendation to call CIS and sample questions to ask
|
Total
n=254 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
127 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
127 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
254 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
28.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1 • n=5 Participants
|
27.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3 • n=7 Participants
|
27.95 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
127 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
127 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
254 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
127 participants
n=5 Participants
|
127 participants
n=7 Participants
|
254 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: within 6 months of PAPPatient satisfaction with provider-patient communication was assessed via administration of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) satisfaction questionnaire which rates satisfaction on a 1 to 3 scale. Scores are added together, with minimum score being 4 and the maximum score being 12, with a higher score indicating greater satisfaction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Mailing Intervention
n=127 Participants
routine colposcopy reminder letter mailed
|
CIS Support Mailing Intervention
n=127 Participants
Mailed reminder plus provider recommendation to call CIS and sample questions to ask
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Satisfaction in the 2 Interventions
|
11.79 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .563
|
11.68 score on a scale
Standard Deviation .912
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: within 6 months of PAPPopulation: The apparatus that Boeing built to identify which CIS callers were from the study did not function correctly. Therefore, we could not determine whether participants called CIS or not.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: within 6 months of PAPOutcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Mailing Intervention
n=127 Participants
routine colposcopy reminder letter mailed
|
CIS Support Mailing Intervention
n=127 Participants
Mailed reminder plus provider recommendation to call CIS and sample questions to ask
|
|---|---|---|
|
Attendance at a Follow-up Colposcopy Appointment Within 6 Months of Their Pap Test
|
107 Participants
|
102 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: within 6 months of PAPOutcome measures
| Measure |
Usual Care Mailing Intervention
n=127 Participants
routine colposcopy reminder letter mailed
|
CIS Support Mailing Intervention
n=127 Participants
Mailed reminder plus provider recommendation to call CIS and sample questions to ask
|
|---|---|---|
|
Latency Between the Pap Test and the Colposcopy Appointment
|
39.5 days
Interval 29.0 to 55.0
|
42.5 days
Interval 30.0 to 66.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF PAPPopulation: The apparatus that Boeing built to identify which CIS callers were from the study did not function correctly. Therefore, we could not determine whether participants called CIS or not.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Usual Care Mailing Intervention
CIS Support Mailing Intervention
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place