A Comparison of Crotalinae Equine Immune F(ab)2 Antivenom (Anavip) and Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab,

NCT ID: NCT00868309

Last Updated: 2016-04-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-01-31

Study Completion Date

2007-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This phase II study was a prospective, randomized, open-label, multi-center study in the United States, involving patients from 18 to 70 years of age, comparing Anavip (Antivenin Crotalinae \[pit viper\] equine immune F(ab)2; Instituto Bioclon, Mexico City, Mexico) against CroFab (Protherics Inc., Nashville, Tennessee), the only currently approved product for treatment of Crotalinae (pit viper) envenomation in the US.

The study was designed to evaluate the hypothesis that lasting correction of snakebite induced thrombocytopenia and hypofibrinogenemia are possible following correction with F(ab)2 antivenom, by analyzing in detail the relationships among platelet count, fibrinogen, venom levels, and antivenom levels in subjects presenting with thrombocytopenia following crotaline viper envenomation. In the study we expected to see a fall in platelet count following Fab treatment, commensurate with that reported in the past. We hypothesized that following F(ab)2 treatment there would be a slower drop in post-treatment platelet counts, with a relatively higher platelet count at any given point in the follow-up period. We further hypothesized that an initial rise and later fall in platelet count would correspond with rise and fall in antivenom levels, and would be mirrored by concurrent drop and rise in levels of unbound circulating venom.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The overall objective of this Phase 2 open-label comparative study was to demonstrate that the F(ab)2 antivenom Anavip has significantly longer plasma persistence than does Fab, and that this is associated with a slower rise in venom levels and slower decline in platelet count and fibrinogen following hospital discharge of envenomated subjects. The effectiveness of F(ab)2 in preventing the recurrence of coagulopathies after the subject's discharge from hospital will indicate that, inherently, F(ab)2 antivenom has an improved safety profile relative to the Fab antivenom CroFab in treating envenomation by crotaline vipers.

Each subject was assessed for quantitative serum venom levels. Relatively few historical data exist to support the use of venom levels as a surrogate endpoint in envenomation. However, changes in venom levels have been correlated with coagulopathic effects, during both the acute phase of venom toxicity and the post treatment period of recurrent venom effect. Validation of this surrogate endpoint via correlation of venom effect with platelet count and fibrinogen level in this phase II study is intended to support future studies.

The secondary endpoints were the determination of coagulation abnormalities during the follow up period.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Snake Bite Blood Coagulation Disorders

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Anavip

The initial dose of study drug was administered in a total volume of 500 mL (initial doses only) IV over 30 minutes for Anavip

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Anavip

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Anavip, 10 vials Intravenous (IV) every 2 hours until initial control has been achieved; then 3 maintenance doses of 4 vials every 6 hrs

CroFab

The initial dose of study drug was administered in a total volume of 500 mL (initial doses only) IV over 60 minutes for CroFab, or as permitted by IV access.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

CroFab

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

CroFab, 5 vials Intravenous (IV) every 2 hours until initial control has been achieved; then 3 maintenance doses of 2 vials every 6 hrs

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Anavip

Anavip, 10 vials Intravenous (IV) every 2 hours until initial control has been achieved; then 3 maintenance doses of 4 vials every 6 hrs

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

CroFab

CroFab, 5 vials Intravenous (IV) every 2 hours until initial control has been achieved; then 3 maintenance doses of 2 vials every 6 hrs

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Antivenin Crotalinae (pit viper) equine immune F(ab)2

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* men and women 18 to 70 years of age
* presenting for emergency treatment of pit viper bite
* informed consent document read and signed by subject

Exclusion Criteria

* allergy to horse serum, sheep serum, or papaya
* current use of any antivenom, or use within the last month
* current participation in a clinical drug study, or participation within the last month
* pregnancy or breast-feeding
* underlying medical conditions that significantly alter blood coagulation: thrombocytopenia, hemophilia, familial dysfibrinogenemia, leukemia, recent ingestion of superwarfarin compounds (rat poison)
* use of any medication expected to affect platelet count, coagulation factors, or fibrinogen: chemotherapeutic agents, warfarin, heparin, aspirin
* No clinical indications of snake bite envenomation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Arizona

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Instituto Bioclon S.A. de C.V.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Walter García, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Instituto Bioclon

Leslie Boyer, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Arizona

Alejandro Alagón, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Instituto de Biotecnología UNAM

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tucson snakebite investigational site

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AN-03/02

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

AN-03/02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Non-Invasive Hemoglobin Study
NCT02206399 COMPLETED