Efficacy and Toxicity of Bicalutamide and Dutasteride vs. Standard Care for Prostate Cytoreduction for Brachytherapy

NCT ID: NCT00866554

Last Updated: 2023-06-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-03-31

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine if a combination of neoadjuvant dutasteride and bicalutamide has the same efficacy and less toxicity than standard treatment with an LHRH agonist and bicalutamide for prostate cytoreduction prior to permanent implant brachytherapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Permanent implant prostate brachytherapy is recognized as the treatment method for prostate cancer that results in the least amount of sexual side effects including erectile dysfunction (ED). However prostate brachytherapy is often limited to patients with a prostate volume less than 50cc because of dosimetric and technical considerations. To counter this fact patients with a prostate larger than 50cc are offered neoadjuvant hormonal therapy to reduce their prostate volume to a value less than 50cc. The pharmacological method most often employed involves treatment with an LHRH agonist, which also involves multiple adverse effects for patients including ED in the majority of patients.

This approach may also involve other disadvantages including a possibility of increased cardiovascular mortality a possible increase in urinary toxicity and a reduction in health-related quality of life in patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Despite theses facts, neoadjuvant hormonal therapy remains essentially the sole method used to reduce prostate volume prior to prostate brachytherapy. One study has evaluated the efficacy of a neoadjuvant regimen without an LHRH agonist, comprised of Dutasteride and Bicalutamide to reduce prostate volume. This treatment could theoretically have fewer effects on sexual function and quality of life and could also possibly reduce urinary toxicity of brachytherapy. Nonetheless, these factors have never been evaluated. The cytoreductive efficacy of Bicalutamide and Dutasteride have never been directly compared to standard treatments. The current study is necessary to determine the effects of a neoadjuvant regimen of Bicalutamide and Dutasteride on prostate volume, sexual function, urinary toxicity and quality of life as compared to standard treatment. If it can be determined that there is an advantage with Bicalutamide and Dutasteride this regimen could become a standard of care for prostate cytoreduction prior to brachytherapy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer Erectile Dysfunction Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

LHRH agonist

Administration of a 3-month treatment with an LHRH agonist (chosen by the treating radiation oncologist) and Bicalutamide 50 mg daily for the first month of treatment with the LHRH agonist.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

administration of a LHRH agonist and Bicalutamide

Intervention Type DRUG

3-month treatment with an LHRH agonist chosen by the treating radiation oncologist and Bicalutamide 50 mg daily for the first month of treatment with the LHRH agonist.

Dutasteride, Bicalutamide, Tamoxifen

Administration of Dutasteride given at dose of 0.5 mg daily starting three months prior to day of implant procedure and continued for 3 months up until procedure.

Bicalutamide: given at a dose of 50 mg daily for 3 the same 3 month period as dutasteride

Tamoxifen: given at dose of 10 mg daily for 3 months that dutasteride and bicalutamide are administered.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

administration of Bicalutamide, Dutasteride and Tamoxifen

Intervention Type DRUG

Dutasteride given at dose of 0.5 mg daily starting three months prior to day of implant procedure and continued for 3 months up until procedure.

Bicalutamide: given at a dose of 50 mg daily for 3 the same 3 month period as dutasteride

Tamoxifen: given at dose of 10 mg daily for 3 months that dutasteride and bicalutamide are administered.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

administration of a LHRH agonist and Bicalutamide

3-month treatment with an LHRH agonist chosen by the treating radiation oncologist and Bicalutamide 50 mg daily for the first month of treatment with the LHRH agonist.

Intervention Type DRUG

administration of Bicalutamide, Dutasteride and Tamoxifen

Dutasteride given at dose of 0.5 mg daily starting three months prior to day of implant procedure and continued for 3 months up until procedure.

Bicalutamide: given at a dose of 50 mg daily for 3 the same 3 month period as dutasteride

Tamoxifen: given at dose of 10 mg daily for 3 months that dutasteride and bicalutamide are administered.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Bicalutamide(Casodex) Bicalutamide (Casodex) Dutasteride (Avodart) Tamoxifen (Nolvadex)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male sex
* Diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma as confirmed by prostate biopsy
* Prostate cancer with stage T1a, T1b T2a or T2b Nx Mx as determined by clinical examination
* Gleason score of 6 or less or 7 (3+4)\*

\* If Gleason score is 7(3+4) patient must have less than 30% of biopsied tissue positive
* Serum PSA of ≤ 15ng/ml during the month before study entry
* Prostate volume ≥ 45cc
* Normal serum testosterone during the month before study entry
* Availability for treatment and follow-up visits
* Having signed required consent form before study entry

Exclusion Criteria

* Abnormal Liver Function tests (\>2x normal AST or ALT and/or \>1.5x normal bilirubin)
* Prostate volume less than 50 cc
* History of hormonal treatment including any of the above: LHRH agonists, antiandrogens during the year before study entry
* Use of a 5 alpha reductase inhibitor for more than one month during the year prior to study entry
* History of pelvic irradiation
* History of past chemotherapy
* History of TURP
* History of past treatment for prostate cancer
* Known hypersensitivity to Dutasteride or Bicalutamide
* Co-morbid disease possibly compromising treatment compliance
* History of DVT or pulmonary embolism
* Anticoagulation with coumarin
* Inability to give consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

GlaxoSmithKline

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

André-Guy Martin

MD MSC FRCP(C) Radio-oncologue, Curiethérapeute Professeur Associé, Université Laval

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andre-Guy Martin, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHUQ-Hotel-Dieu de Québec

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHUQ- Hotel-Dieu de Quebec

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Health Canada-112661

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

DUT112661

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.