HDS Plus PBPC Transplant Vs 4 More Courses of FrontLine Therapy in Pts With Aggressive NHL in PR After Induction Therapy

NCT ID: NCT00866203

Last Updated: 2009-03-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

441 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2000-10-31

Study Completion Date

2008-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study is planned to compare the outcome of aggressive NHL patients in partial remission after four courses of front-line therapy, randomly assigned to receive either additional four courses of the same regimen or a modified HDS program.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

High-Grade Lymphomas

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HDS

modified high dose sequential therapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

HDS vs ProMECE/CytaBOM

Intervention Type DRUG

ProMECE/CytaBOM

four additional courses of standard ProMECE/CytaBOM

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

HDS vs ProMECE/CytaBOM

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HDS vs ProMECE/CytaBOM

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Newly diagnosed, untreated patients with histologically documented aggressive lymphoma;
* Age between 18 and 65 years;
* Clinical stage at diagnosis: I A bulky - IV B;
* Reduction of tumoral masses, after four courses of induction therapy, between 50 and 75%;
* Serum negativity for HIV, HbsAg and HCV;
* ECOG performance status 0 through 4;
* Adequate bone marrow function;
* Adequate renal and hepatic functions;
* Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \> 50%;
* No previous malignant disease;
* No previous chemo-radiotherapy;
* No cerebral or CNS involvement, assessed by clinical history, physical examination and CSF examination through lumbar puncture;
* Written informed consent given at time of randomization.

Exclusion Criteria

* Clinical stage I no bulky, or CS IIA-B with less than three sites of disease involved;
* Patients with CR, unconfirmed complete remission (uCR), very good PR (\>75%) and clinical response less than 50%, as defined by Cheson et al., following four courses of induction therapy;
* Tumor involvement of CNS (except patients with peridural masses without liquor involvement , who can be enrolled in this study);
* Indolent lymphoma transformed in more aggressive histologic type, even if never previously treated;
* Aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in pre-transplanted patient;
* Clinically significant secondary cardiovascular disease e.g. uncontrolled hypertension, (resting diastolic blood pressure \> 115 mmHg), uncontrolled multifocal cardiac arrhythmias, symptomatic angina pectoris or congestive cardiac failure NYHA class III-IV;
* Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 50%;
* Evidence of any severe active acute or chronic infection;
* Concurrent malignancy of history of other malignancy, except basal cell carcinoma of the skin (BCC) and in situ cervical carcinoma (CIN);
* myelodisplastic syndrome;
* HbsAg, HIV-positive, or HCV-RNA-positive patients;
* Patient with psychiatric, or any disorder that compromises ability to give truly informed consent for participation in this study;
* Pregnant woman; potential child-bearing women can be enrolled if adequate contraceptive precautions are used before entering this trial and for the duration of the trial;
* Concerns for patient's compliance with the protocol procedures.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Gruppo Italiano Studio Linfomi

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gruppo Italiano Studio Linfomi

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nicola Di Renzo, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

GISL

Massimo Federico, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

GISL

Maura Brugiatelli, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

GISL

Mario Petrini, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

GISL

Paolo G Gobbi, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

GISL

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

GISL Trial Office

Modena, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LA05

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.