Gene-expression Profiles in CNS-metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT ID: NCT00862173
Last Updated: 2012-06-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
120 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2008-03-31
2012-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Analysis of Brain Metastasis in Patients With Lung Cancer
NCT00071344
Study on Prevalence and Impact of Brain Metastases on Survival in Lung Cancer by Line of Treatment
NCT06557967
A Study of the Gene Mutation Status in Cerebrospinal Fluid, Blood and Tumor Tissue of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Brain Metastases
NCT03257735
Risk and Prognosis of Brain Metastasis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT07034365
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Central Nervous System Metastasis
NCT06026735
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Introduction.Lung cancer is the first cause of cancer death in the world. Eighty five percent of patients are diagnosed yearly with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite efforts, innovations, and progress in diagnosis and treatment of these patients, overall survival (OS) at 5 years of diagnosis is only 15%. The central nervous system (CNS) is a devastating and frequent site of metastasis development in NSCLC. The reported incidence of CNS metastasis in patients with NSCLC is 54% with an OS of \<1 year after diagnosis. Age, clinical stage, gender, and initial treatment period are some of the reported with CNS metastasis development-related factors in patients with NSCLC. We recently described that high carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) serum levels (\>40 ng/dL) at diagnosis and adenocarcinoma histological type are independently associated with higher risk if brain metastasis development. However, due to their lack of specificity of all this reported factors, we are required to detect biomarkers to predict brain metastasis in patients with NSCLC with the objective to prevent their development.Metastasis process is complex it involves well-defined molecular-printed steps, as invasion, vascular intravasation, implantation and growing at the new specific organ. Higher motility, capacity for extracellular matrix degradation, immune system evasion, and adhesion at the new specific organ are some of the tumoral cell characteristics required to metastasize. In particular, molecular events for brain metastasis development from primary NSCLC even if no at al described, are currently well understood. Gene-expression microarray allow analyzing the expression changes of thousands of genes simultaneously, distinguishing the altered expression of neoplastic cell genes from normal tissue. Identification of biological patterns, pharmacological molecular targets, and biomarkers for prognosis and evaluation for therapeutic response, and even a more specific neoplasia classification are some of the results of gene-expression microarray studies in hematological, breast and NSCLC cancer. Determination of tobacco-smoke transcriptional changes in oncogenes and antioncogenes had been determined by the use microarray data. A gene-expression profile of 20 genes differentiates health lung tissue and lung cancer with higher specificity than histopathologic evaluation. Furthermore, gene-expression microarray studies had been developed for predicting survival and recurrence in early NSCLC stages for identification of patients who could have benefit of adjuvant therapy, with promising result.The objective of this study was to identify a gene-expression profile from primary lung adenocarcinoma related with brain metastasis, and to evaluate in a prospective manner their prognostic significance on survival in patients with advanced disease.Experimental Design These study used clinical, longitudinal, prospective, observational, and analytical cohort s with the selection of a nonprobabalistic-type sample.In a prospective manner, from January 2009 to June 2011, patients admitted to our Institute confirmed histologically confirmed stage IIIb and IV of LAC were eligible for study inclusion. Analyzed clinical variables comprised smoking history, gender, age, general condition and brain metastasis development. Primary tumor core-biopsy was performed prior to any treatment and snap-frozen. A single pathologist evaluated all tumors. Standard platinum-based chemotherapy was employed for all patients. All patients were submitted to Magnetic resonance imaging (RM) to evidence the presence or absence of brain metastasis (BM). During follow-up, we carried out Computed tomography (CT) of the brain stem for this purpose. Preliminary statistical analysis was performed utilizing the Student t, the Mann-Whitney U, the χ2, or the Fisher exact test. Once the study ends, we will conduct logistic-regression multivariate analysis. Global survival time will be analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier technique, and comparisons among groups will be performed with the log-rank test. High Risk characteristics as gender, histology, and age related with greater frequency of development of metastasis to CNS were analyzed.The study was carried out according to the principles of ClinicalTrials and accepted by the INCan Bioethical and Scientific Committees (reference numbers INCAN/CC/067/08). A collaboration agreement was signed with the INMEGEN and was approved within the Health Research Sectorial Fund (FSIS) CONACyT-México (SALUD-2009-01-115552).
Selection for obtaining tumor biopsies depended on the characteristics of the patient and of the tumor. The biopsy could be taken by means of CT guided tru-cut needle, open thoracoscopy, or bronchoscopy with optic fiber. Each tumor sample was divided into two; one sample was analyzed by the INCan Pathology Service (by a sole observer blinded to the clinical variables) for their histological clinical diagnosis and quantification of neoplastic cellularity, and the remaining half was immediately stored at -80°C until processing for RNA extraction.RNA Extraction:RNA was extracted from frozen tumor biopsies, weighted and cryofractured in liquid nitrogen. Extraction and purification of total RNA from tissue (up to 5 mg tissue) procedure was done using RNeasy Micro Kit (QIAGEN, Germany) (cat. 217084). RNA was analyzed using the Agilent 6000 Chip (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, C.A.). RNA quality consisted on the obtention of RNA Integrity Number (RIN) \> 8. RNA samples were chosen for microarray analysis when quality and concentration were obtained for this purpose. Microarray Expression:We are using an Affymetrix platform, which consists of an in situ synthesized oligonucleotide microarray. The GeneChip® that we are employing is the Human Gene 1.0 ST Array, which allows analyzing the expression of 28,869 different genes (each transcript is represented by 26 disperse probes along its entire length, present in the human genome, which covers 99% of the sequences present in the RefSeq data bank of the GenBank. The Two-Cycle Target Labeling protocol is followed as suggested by the manufacturer and described succinctly as follows and shown graphically in the figure at the end of this Materials and Methods section: Total RNA (100 ng/uL) is retro-transcribed using T7-Oligo(dT) Promoter primers in the synthesis reaction of the first complementary DNA chain (cDNA). After treatment with RNAase H, the second cDNA chain is synthesized, which will serve as template in the Transcription reaction in vitro (TVI). The first TVI reaction is carried out with T7 polymerase RNA and unmarked ribonucleotides for the amplification of complementary RNA (cRNA). These cRNAs are retro-transcribed in the synthesis step of the first cDNA chain of the second cycle using random primers. Subsequently, T7-Oligo(dT)-Promoter primers are employed for the synthesis of the second chain of cDNA, generating the double-helix cDNA template that contains the promoter T7 sequence. This cDNA is amplified and marked in a second TVI reaction using the T7 polymerase DNA and a mixture of ribonucleotides/biotinylated nucleotide analog. These target biotinylated cDNAs are cleaned, fragmented, and hybridized to the GeneChip® expression microarrays. After hybridization, fluorescent marking was performed with a streptavidin-phycoerythrin and biotinylated anti-streptavidin antibody amplifier system. Fluorescence is detected with a high-resolution laser scanner.Reading and Analysis of Expression Microarrays:We will utilize the Expression Console of Affymetrix software to evaluate the quality of the microarrays and will correct the background signal with standard methods \[49,50\]. For signal intensity-level normalization, we will employ "non-supervised" methods, which use the data of all of the experiment's microarrays; this will allow us to render these comparable among themselves, because what a microarray assay evaluates is gene expression by means of fluorescence intensities; thus, it is important to establish cut-off points from which we can consider under- or overexpression. Once the data are normalized, the final stage is to resume the values of all the probes that exist for each gene in the microarray in a sole value, which is the gene's expression level. For detection of differentially expressed genes, we will construct a linear model that includes all of the experiment's microarrays simultaneously; in this manner, we will be able to analyze contrasts between group A (patients with metastasis to CNS during the follow-up period) and group B (patients without metastasis to CNS during the same period). As internal control, we will prove the differential expression of some genes by RT-PCR in real time. Results will be represented in blocks of heat maps and in tables, in which the most active genes are listed along with their functional description. For risk-profile validation, we will perform leave-one-out cross validation method and will postulate a second cohort for this objective.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with NSCLC with CNS Metastasis
Patients who developed CNS metastasis of NSCLC during the treatment.
No interventions assigned to this group
Patients with NSCLC without CNS Metastasis
Patients with NSCLC that does not develop CNS metastasis during the treatment.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* With auto-sufficiency
* Biopsy procedure approved
* Any TNM status
* Consulting at the National Institutes of Cancerology or Respiratory Diseases
* Informed consent signed
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous treatment with adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemo- or radiotherapy
* No specimen availability
* No diagnosis of non-small-cell lung cancer at histopathology sample
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Cancerología
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
DR. MYRNA CANDELARIA
Gene expression Profiles in CNS metastasic Non small Cell Lung Cancer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Saavedra-Pérez, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico
Oscar Arrieta, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico
Enrique Guzmán, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias
Gabriela Mercado, MSc
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Instituto Nacional de Medicina Genómica
Elena Aréchaga, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico
Claudia González, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Metropolitan Autonomous University
Digna Pachuca, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología
Mexico City, , Mexico
Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias
Mexico City, , Mexico
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
008/025/OMI
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.