VA Gastrointestinal (GI) Quality of Life Survey

NCT ID: NCT00860990

Last Updated: 2015-06-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-04-30

Study Completion Date

2010-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Spinal cord injury (SCI) often results in reduced bowel function and regularity, leading to a decrease in quality of life for those who are affected. Evidence-based research has indicated that, when surveyed, individuals with SCI express a greater reduction in quality of life derived from their bowel routine than able-bodied subjects. In addition, the extent of reduction in quality of life has a direct relationship with the level of Injury. Those with tetraplegia score worse than those with paraplegia and paraplegics score worse than controls. The development of an adequate quality of life questionnaire is needed to effectively identify the impact of bowel care on quality of life in patients with SCI compared to able-bodied controls. The purpose of this study is to determine the discriminatory ability of the survey for various diagnoses such as SCI, CVA, TBI, chronic back pain, radiculopathy from the Rehabilitation Service and able bodied persons.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In an abstract " A Bowel Care Survey to Assess Quality of Life in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury" in Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine in 2006, JP Lirio, et al surveyed 20 subjects (10 controls, 5 para, 5 tetra). The survey consisted of 42 items relating to GI function, bowel program/routine and quality of life. Survey items were weighted across a range of outcomes (e.g., complete continence=0 to frequent incontinence of solid evacuate=5). Total survey scores were compared among the groups by ANOVA with a Scheffe post hoc test. In those with SCI, level of injury (LOI) was converted to a numeric value and the relationship between LOI and total score was determined by simple regression.

The range of scores across the groups was 2 to 111 points. The controls scored significantly lower than those in the Para group who were significantly lower than those in the Tetra group (6 5 vs. 46 38 vs. 92 24, P\<0.01, respectively). Within SCI, 43% of the variance of the total score was explained by level of injury. (r2=42.5, P\<0.05), which is suggestive for the potential of good content validity of this tool. The authors concluded that the preliminary results of this survey show that persons with greater degrees of neurological impairment also manifest a greater negative impact from bowel care on their QoL. These results are encouraging for being able to develop a sensitive tool that will capture changes in bowel care status after therapeutic intervention that would be expected to influence QoL.

Innovative and potentially efficacious treatments for bowel care are being developed. There is a clinical/investigative need for a valid survey that is sensitive to quality of life (QoL) changes relating to interventions for bowel care in those with spinal cord injury (SCI). This is an ongoing project to develop a self-reported gastrointestinal (GI) survey that measures the impact of bowel function on QoL in individuals with SCI. This research seeks to develop a quality of life questionnaire that can be used to assess bowel function in able bodied individuals as well as spinal cord patients. This tool is essential for measuring change in bowel function due to an intervention or aging, rehabilitation, medications, etc.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

SCI

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

SCI or disabled

Completion of GI quality of life survey

Intervention Type OTHER

Subjects are asked to complete a survey related to bowel care and its effects on various variables related to quality of life.

2

Able-bodied

Completion of GI quality of life survey

Intervention Type OTHER

Subjects are asked to complete a survey related to bowel care and its effects on various variables related to quality of life.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Completion of GI quality of life survey

Subjects are asked to complete a survey related to bowel care and its effects on various variables related to quality of life.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18+ years of age
* Able to understand English

Exclusion Criteria

* Diagnosed dementia, severe TBI or other conditions which limit the ability to provide acute information in the judgment of the investigators.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

US Department of Veterans Affairs

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Department of Veterans Affairs

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mark A. Korsten, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Medical Center, Bronx

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VA Medical Center, Bronx

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2380-07-042

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

B4162C-4

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cardiovascular Disease Study
NCT00857194 COMPLETED
Stimulation for Colonic Motility
NCT02641483 COMPLETED NA