The Effectiveness of the Screening Inventory of Psychosocial Problems (SIPP) in Cancer Patients
NCT ID: NCT00859768
Last Updated: 2011-03-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
568 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-04-30
2010-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Online Psychosocial Cancer Screening, Monitoring and Stepped Treatment in Cancer Survivors
NCT04372459
Improving Psychosocial Quality of Life in Women With Advanced Breast Cancer
NCT01811264
The Effectiveness of Patient Navigation in Cancer Care
NCT03305965
Psychological Interventions for Gynecologic Cancer
NCT01951807
Stepped Care - Optimising Psycho-oncological Care Provision by Structured Screening and Diagnosis
NCT01859429
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim: The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that using the SIPP may prevent underdiagnosis of early symptoms reflecting psychosocial problems, should facilitate communication between physicians and patients about psychosocial distress and may contribute to adequate referral to relevant psychosocial caregivers.
Methods: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trail (CRCT) is developed using a Solomon four-group design (two intervention and two control groups) to evaluate the effects of using the SIPP. Radiotherapists instead of patients are at random allocated to experimental or control groups. All included patients are randomized into the groups with and without pre-measurement. Psychosocial distress, quality of life, patients' satisfaction about communication with their radiotherapist during first consultation and the number and type of referred patients to psychosocial caregivers are assessed. Self-administered assessments are conducted at four times: pre-test before first consultation (T1), and post-tests directly following the first consultation (T2), three months (T3) and one year after (T4) the first measurement. Medical information are gathered from patients' medical records. Furthermore, a process evaluation is carried out.
Relevance: Using the SIPP may lead to a reduction of psychosocial problems and better quality of life, both on the short and long term. If the SIPP proves to be effective, the results of this project may contribute to motivate health care workers to use the SIPP as a standard method for early detection of psychosocial distress in oncology departments in the Netherlands and abroad.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention group 1
Pre-test measures are assessed. The patient receives the SIPP twice during their RT period. The first time is before the first consultation with the radiotherapist and the second time is before the last consultation at the end of the RT period. At both time points, the SIPP is handed over to the radiotherapist at the start of the consultation. The radiotherapist screens the scores of the SIPP to get an overview of potential psychosocial problems and patient's needs of psychosocial care. Follow-up measures are directly after first consultation (T2) and at three (T3) and twelve months (T4) after first measurement.
Questionnaire administration
The patient receives the SIPP at two different time points during their RT period. The first time point is before the first consultation with the radiotherapist (before starting RT) and the second time point is before the last consultation with the radiotherapist at the end of the RT period. At both time points, the SIPP is handed over to the radiotherapist at the start of the consultation. The radiotherapist screens the scores of the SIPP to get an overview of potential psychosocial problems and patient's needs of psychosocial care.
Intervention group 2
No pre-test measures are assessed. The patient receives the SIPP twice during their RT period. The first time is before the first consultation with the radiotherapist and the second time is before the last consultation at the end of the RT period. At both time points, the SIPP is handed over to the radiotherapist at the start of the consultation. The radiotherapist screens the scores of the SIPP to get an overview of potential psychosocial problems and patient's needs of psychosocial care. Follow-up measures are directly after first consultation (T2) and at three (T3) and twelve months (T4) after first measurement.
Questionnaire administration
The patient receives the SIPP at two different time points during their RT period. The first time point is before the first consultation with the radiotherapist (before starting RT) and the second time point is before the last consultation with the radiotherapist at the end of the RT period. At both time points, the SIPP is handed over to the radiotherapist at the start of the consultation. The radiotherapist screens the scores of the SIPP to get an overview of potential psychosocial problems and patient's needs of psychosocial care.
Control group 1
Pre-test measures are assessed. Enhanced usual care. Follow-up measures are directly after first consultation (T2) and at three (T3) and twelve months (T4) after first measurement.
No interventions assigned to this group
Control group 2
No pre-test measures are assessed. Enhanced usual care. Follow-up measures are directly after first consultation (T2) and at three (T3) and twelve months (T4) after first measurement.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Questionnaire administration
The patient receives the SIPP at two different time points during their RT period. The first time point is before the first consultation with the radiotherapist (before starting RT) and the second time point is before the last consultation with the radiotherapist at the end of the RT period. At both time points, the SIPP is handed over to the radiotherapist at the start of the consultation. The radiotherapist screens the scores of the SIPP to get an overview of potential psychosocial problems and patient's needs of psychosocial care.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Lung Cancer
* Prostate cancer
* Bladder Cancer
* Colorectal Cancer
* Cervix Cancer
* Cancer of endometrium
* Cancer of Skin
* Hodgkin Lymphoma
* Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
* Must receive radiotherapy treatment (RT)
* 18 years of age or older
Exclusion Criteria
* Less than 10 fractions of radiotherapy treatment (RT)
* Unable to read, and speak Dutch
* Unable to complete questionnaires
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dutch Cancer Society
OTHER
Maastricht University Medical Center
OTHER
Institute Verbeeten
OTHER
Maastro Clinic, The Netherlands
OTHER
Netherlands Open University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Netherlands Open University
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lilian Lechner, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Netherlands Open University, Faculty of Psychology
Gertrudis I Kempen, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Maastricht University, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and life Sciences, Department of Health Care and Nursing Science, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institute Verbeeten
Tilburg, North Brabant, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Braeken AP, Kempen GI, Eekers D, van Gils FC, Houben RM, Lechner L. The usefulness and feasibility of a screening instrument to identify psychosocial problems in patients receiving curative radiotherapy: a process evaluation. BMC Cancer. 2011 Nov 8;11:479. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-479.
Braeken AP, Lechner L, van Gils FC, Houben RM, Eekers D, Ambergen T, Kempen G. The effectiveness of the Screening Inventory of Psychosocial Problems (SIPP) in cancer patients treated with radiotherapy: design of a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2009 Jun 9;9:177. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-177.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Dutch Cancer Society
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
MB254
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.