OPT-821 With or Without Vaccine Therapy in Treating Patients With Ovarian Epithelial Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer, or Peritoneal Cancer in Second or Third Complete Remission
NCT ID: NCT00857545
Last Updated: 2017-09-13
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
171 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Vaccine Therapy and OPT-821 or OPT-821 Alone in Treating Patients With Ovarian Epithelial Cancer, Fallopian Tube Cancer, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer in Complete Remission
NCT00693342
Polyvalent Vaccine-KLH Conjugate + Opt-821 Given in Combination With Bevacizumab
NCT01223235
Vaccine Therapy in Treating Patients With Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Peritoneal Cancer
NCT00006041
Vaccine Therapy in Treating Patients With Ovarian Epithelial, Primary Peritoneal, or Fallopian Tube Cancer
NCT00066729
Carboplatin and Paclitaxel With or Without Bevacizumab Compared to Docetaxel, Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel in Treating Patients With Stage II, Stage III, or Stage IV Ovarian Epithelial, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cavity Carcinoma (Cancer)
NCT00085358
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. To determine if a polyvalent vaccine (including GM2-keyhole limpet hemocyanin \[KLH\], Globo-H-KLH, Tn-mucin 1 \[MUC1\]-32mer-KLH, and Thompson Friedreich antigen \[TF\]-KLH plus OPT-821) decreases the hazard of progression or death compared to a vaccine containing OPT-821 alone in women with epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer in second or third complete clinical remission.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare the treatment arms with respect to the incidence of toxicities. II. To determine if the polyvalent vaccine decreases the hazard of death compared to a vaccine containing OPT-821 alone in women with epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer in second or third complete clinical remission.
TERTIARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate the immune response (by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay \[ELISA\]) in participants, in order to determine if the outcome correlates with antigen-specific immune titers.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM I: Patients receive polyvalent antigen-KLH conjugate vaccine and immunological adjuvant OPT-821 subcutaneously (SC) once in weeks 1, 2, 3, 7, 11, 23, 35, 47, 59, 71, and 83 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM II: Patients receive immunological adjuvant OPT-821 SC as in Arm I.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm I (vaccine therapy and adjuvant)
Patients receive polyvalent antigen-KLH conjugate vaccine and immunological adjuvant OPT-821 subcutaneously (SC) once in weeks 1, 2, 3, 7, 11, 23, 35, 47, 59, 71, and 83 in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Correlative studies
Polyvalent Antigen-KLH Conjugate Vaccine
Given SC
Saponin-based Immunoadjuvant OBI-821
Given SC
Arm II (adjuvant)
Patients receive immunological adjuvant OPT-821 SC as in arm I.
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Correlative studies
Saponin-based Immunoadjuvant OBI-821
Given SC
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Correlative studies
Polyvalent Antigen-KLH Conjugate Vaccine
Given SC
Saponin-based Immunoadjuvant OBI-821
Given SC
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who recurred on or after initial therapy, and are now in a second or third complete clinical remission and who are within four months of their last treatment are eligible; complete clinical remission is defined as serum cancer antigen (CA)-125 within institutional normal limits, negative physical examination, and no definite evidence of disease by computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis; lymph nodes and/or soft tissue abnormalities =\< 1.0 cm are often present in the pelvis and will not be considered definite evidence of disease; eligibility is determined by anatomical imaging only (ie. magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\] or CT); a positive positron emission tomography (PET) image (if performed) will not exclude a patient if other criteria are met and anatomical imaging is negative
* Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 1,000/mm\^3, equivalent to Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version \[v\]4.0) grade 1
* Platelets greater than or equal to 100,000/mm\^3
* Serum creatinine less than or equal to 1.5 x institutional upper limit normal (ULN), CTCAE v4.0 grade 1
* Bilirubin less than or equal to 2.5 x ULN
* Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), serum glutamate pyruvate transaminse (SGPT) less than or equal to 2.5 x ULN
* Alkaline phosphatase less than or equal to 2.5 x ULN
* Patients must have a Gynecological Oncology Group (GOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2
* Patients who have signed the informed consent document and signed the authorization permitting release of personal health information
* Patients of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test prior to study entry and must be practicing an effective form of birth control; nursing mothers are excluded
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients whose circumstances at the time of entry onto the protocol would not permit completion of study or required follow up
* Patients who have an allergy to shellfish
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Gynecologic Oncology Group
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paul Sabbatini
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NRG Oncology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute
Mobile, Alabama, United States
UC Irvine Health/Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
Orange, California, United States
Stanford Cancer Institute
Palo Alto, California, United States
UCSF Medical Center-Mount Zion
San Francisco, California, United States
Beebe Medical Center
Lewes, Delaware, United States
Christiana Care Health System-Christiana Hospital
Newark, Delaware, United States
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine-Sylvester Cancer Center
Miami, Florida, United States
Northside Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Warrenville
Warrenville, Illinois, United States
Saint Vincent Oncology Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Greater Baltimore Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Johns Hopkins University/Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Union Hospital of Cecil County
Elkton, Maryland, United States
Gynecologic Oncology of West Michigan PLLC
Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Women's Cancer Center of Nevada
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Center of Hope at Renown Medical Center
Reno, Nevada, United States
The Women's Institute for Gynecologic Cancer and Special Pelvic Surgery
Phillipsburg, New Jersey, United States
University of New Mexico Cancer Center
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Southwest Gynecologic Oncology Associates Inc
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
University of New Mexico Cancer Center
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Winthrop University Hospital
Mineola, New York, United States
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, United States
Carolinas Medical Center/Levine Cancer Institute
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium NCORP
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Summa Akron City Hospital/Cooper Cancer Center
Akron, Ohio, United States
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Miami Valley Hospital
Dayton, Ohio, United States
Kettering Medical Center
Kettering, Ohio, United States
Lake University Ireland Cancer Center
Mentor, Ohio, United States
University of Toledo
Toledo, Ohio, United States
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Abington Memorial Hospital
Abington, Pennsylvania, United States
Fox Chase Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Women and Infants Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
AnMed Health Cancer Center
Anderson, South Carolina, United States
Saint Francis Hospital
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
Greenville Health System Cancer Institute-Faris
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
Greenville Health System Cancer Institute-Eastside
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
Greenville Health System Cancer Institute-Spartanburg
Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States
Huntsman Cancer Institute/University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Virginia Commonwealth University/Massey Cancer Center
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Carilion Clinic Gynecological Oncology
Roanoke, Virginia, United States
Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
O'Cearbhaill RE, Deng W, Chen LM, Lucci JA 3rd, Behbakht K, Spirtos NM, Muller CY, Benigno BB, Powell MA, Berry E, Tewari KS, Hanjani P, Lankes HA, Aghajanian C, Sabbatini PJ. A phase II randomized, double-blind trial of a polyvalent Vaccine-KLH conjugate (NSC 748933 IND# 14384) + OPT-821 versus OPT-821 in patients with epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer who are in second or third complete remission: An NRG Oncology/GOG study. Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Dec;155(3):393-399. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.09.015. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2009-01176
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CDR0000636384
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
GOG-0255
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
GOG-0255
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
GOG-0255
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.