Trial Outcomes & Findings for Long Term Safety Study of Study Drug (Eszopiclone) in Children and Adolescents With ADHD -Associated Insomnia (NCT NCT00857220)
NCT ID: NCT00857220
Last Updated: 2017-10-26
Results Overview
COMPLETED
PHASE3
304 participants
12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)
2017-10-26
Participant Flow
The participant flow section includes all subjects randomized. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. One subject did not receive study medication.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)
Eszopiclone Overall
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
304
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
121
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
183
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)
Eszopiclone Overall
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
35
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
30
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
67
|
|
Overall Study
Clinical Hold
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Site Closed
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Miscellaneous
|
8
|
Baseline Characteristics
Long Term Safety Study of Study Drug (Eszopiclone) in Children and Adolescents With ADHD -Associated Insomnia
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)
n=303 Participants
Eszopiclone Overall
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
303 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
11.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
119 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
184 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
303 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)Population: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all enrolled subjects who had taken any study medication. One subject did not receive study medication
Outcome measures
| Measure |
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)
n=303 Participants
Eszopiclone Overall
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Incidence of Adverse Events
Subjects with at least 1 TEAE
|
212 participants
|
|
Overall Incidence of Adverse Events
Potentially-related TEAE
|
138 participants
|
|
Overall Incidence of Adverse Events
Severe TEAE
|
10 participants
|
|
Overall Incidence of Adverse Events
Serious TEAE
|
4 participants
|
|
Overall Incidence of Adverse Events
Fatal TEAE
|
1 participants
|
|
Overall Incidence of Adverse Events
Discontinued study due to TEAE
|
34 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)Population: Intent to treat population
Outcome measures
| Measure |
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)
n=303 Participants
Eszopiclone Overall
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Incidence of Skin Reactions: Number of Events
|
17 Events
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)Population: Intent to treat population
Outcome measures
| Measure |
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)
n=303 Participants
Eszopiclone Overall
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Incidence of Skin Reactions: Number of Participant Affected
|
13 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 MonthsPopulation: Intent to treat population
The C-SSRS is a physician-completed scale to assess any suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior. The C-SSRS contained questions about suicidal behavior and suicidal ideation. Subjects were placed into categories for suicidal behavior and for suicidal ideation based on their responses to various questions. Any suicidality was defined as suicidal behavior or suicidal ideation. The suicidal behavior categories were determined based on the response to the questions under suicidal behavior (Completed Suicide, Actual Attempt, Interrupted Attempt, Aborted Attempt, Preparatory Acts or Behavior).The suicidal ideation categories were determined by examining the response to 5 questions under suicidal ideation (Wish to be Dead, Nonspecific Active Suicidal Thoughts, Active Suicidal Ideation with Any Methods (Not Plan) without Intent to Act, Active Suicidal Ideation with Some Intent to Act, without Specific Plan, Active Suicidal Ideation with Specific Plan and Intent).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)
n=303 Participants
Eszopiclone Overall
|
|---|---|
|
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Item Responses
Any Suicidal Behavior
|
1 Subjects
0.3
|
|
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Item Responses
Completed Suicide
|
0 Subjects
0
|
|
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Item Responses
Actual Attempt
|
0 Subjects
0
|
|
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Item Responses
Interrupted Attempt
|
0 Subjects
0
|
|
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Item Responses
Aborted Attempt
|
1 Subjects
0.3
|
|
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Item Responses
Preparatory Acts or Behavior
|
0 Subjects
0
|
|
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Item Responses
Any Suicidal Ideation
|
4 Subjects
1.3
|
|
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Item Responses
Wish to be Dead
|
0 Subjects
0
|
|
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Item Responses
Non-specific Active Suicidal Thoughts
|
3 Subjects
1.0
|
|
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Item Responses
Active Suicidal Ideation without Intent to Act
|
0 Subjects
0
|
|
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Item Responses
Active Suicidal Ideation w/ Some Intent to Act
|
0 Subjects
0
|
|
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Item Responses
Any Suicidality
|
4 Subjects
1.3
|
|
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Item Responses
Active Suicidal Ideation w/ Specific Plan
|
1 Subjects
0.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)Population: Intent to Treat Population
These tests are standardized information processing tasks to assess recognition and recoding of sensory information. The subject was given 90 seconds to complete as many substitutions of symbols as possible according to a code provided on top of the sheet. The Coding Copy Subtest A was used for subjects 6 to 7 years of age, the Coding Copy Subtest B was used for subjects 8 to 16 years of age, and the DSST was used for subjects 17 years of age. The DSST consists of rows containing small blank squares, each paired with a randomly assigned numbers 1-9. Above the rows is a key that pairs each number with a symbol. The subject must fill in the blank spaces with the matching symbol that is in the key. For the Subcopy tests the subject simply copies the symbol above each empty square. Scaled scores are used to account for age differences among test takers. Scaled scores range from 1 to 19, and higher scores indicate higher cognitive function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)
n=303 Participants
Eszopiclone Overall
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Coding Copy Subtest A or B, or Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)at Month 12
|
1.1 score
Standard Deviation 6.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)Population: Intent to treat population
A 7-point scale was used for improvement with numeric values assigned to each of the responses: very much improved (1), much improved (2), minimally improved (3), no change (4), minimally worse (5), much worse (6), and very much worse (7).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)
n=303 Participants
Eszopiclone Overall
|
|---|---|
|
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Improvement Score as Assessed by Parent/Caregiver or Child at Month 12
From Parent
|
2.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
|
Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Improvement Score as Assessed by Parent/Caregiver or Child at Month 12
From Child
|
2.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)Population: Intent to treat population
Sleep latency is the amount of time it takes to fall asleep after the lights have been turned off.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)
n=303 Participants
Eszopiclone Overall
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline at Month 12 in Subjective Sleep Latency (SL)
|
-18.1 Minutes
Standard Deviation 87.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)Population: Intent to treat population
CBCL was completed by parents or guardians who saw the child in home-like settings. It includes several competence items, open-ended items for describing the child's illnesses, disabilities, concerns about the child, best things about the child, and several items to rate behavioral, emotional, and social problems. Responses are recorded on a Likert scale: 0 = Not True, 1 = Somewhat or Sometimes True, 2 = Very True or Often True. The checklist contains 120 questions. The standardized score is computed by determining the z-score by subtracting the mean for the subject's age group and gender from the raw score and then dividing this by the standard deviation for the subject's age group and gender. Next, multiply the zscore by 15 and then add 100. For activities scale, social scale, school scale, and total competence scale, higher values indicate higher competencies. For Internalizing problems, externalizing problems, and total problems, higher values indicate more problems.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)
n=303 Participants
Eszopiclone Overall
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)
Activities scale standardized score
|
1.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.83
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)
Social scale standardized score
|
0.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.29
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)
School scale standardized score
|
0.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.49
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)
Total competence standardized score
|
1.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.34
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)
Internalizing problems standardized score
|
0.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.13
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)
Externalizing problems standardized score
|
0.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.33
|
|
Change From Baseline in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)
Total problems standardized score
|
0.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.16
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)Population: Intent to Treat Population
The PDSS total score ranges from a low of 0 where the individual is endorsing each item at the lowest level of daytime sleepiness to a high of 32 where the individual is endorsing each item at the highest level of daytime sleepiness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)
n=303 Participants
Eszopiclone Overall
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Pediatric Daytime Sleepiness Scale (PDSS)at Month 12
|
-3.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)Population: Intent to treat population
The CCPT-II is a computer-based 14-minute, visual-performance task. During an administration, respondents were required to press the space bar or click the mouse whenever any letter except the target letter appears on the screen. The speed at which the letters were presented varied during the administration. There were 6 blocks, with 3 sub-blocks, each containing 20 trials (letter presentations). The interstimulus intervals (ISIs) were 1, 2, and 4 seconds with a display time of 250 milliseconds. The order in which the different ISIs were presented varied between blocks. Conners' CCPT-II provides the following measures:% Omissions,% Commissions, Hit Reaction Time, Hit Reaction Time Standard Error,Variability of Standard Error, Detectability (d'), Response Style (beta), Perseverations, Hit Reaction Time Block Change (Vigilance Measure), Hit Standard Error Block Change (Vigilance Measure), Hit Reaction Time ISI change, and Hit Standard Error ISI Change, Confidence Index.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)
n=303 Participants
Eszopiclone Overall
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CCPT II)
Omissions % Percentile
|
10.285 percentage of score
Standard Deviation 29.390
|
|
Change From Baseline in Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CCPT II)
Commissions % Percentile
|
-5.980 percentage of score
Standard Deviation 29.332
|
|
Change From Baseline in Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CCPT II)
Hit RT Percentile
|
5.933 percentage of score
Standard Deviation 27.606
|
|
Change From Baseline in Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CCPT II)
Hit RT Std Error Percentile
|
8.747 percentage of score
Standard Deviation 30.776
|
|
Change From Baseline in Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CCPT II)
Variability Percentile
|
8.781 percentage of score
Standard Deviation 32.543
|
|
Change From Baseline in Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CCPT II)
Detectability (d') Percentile
|
-3.614 percentage of score
Standard Deviation 33.471
|
|
Change From Baseline in Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CCPT II)
Responsive Style (beta) Percentile
|
-3.614 percentage of score
Standard Deviation 33.471
|
|
Change From Baseline in Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CCPT II)
Perseverations % Percentile
|
4.807 percentage of score
Standard Deviation 25.389
|
|
Change From Baseline in Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CCPT II)
Hit RT Block Change Percentile
|
0.213 percentage of score
Standard Deviation 33.614
|
|
Change From Baseline in Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CCPT II)
Hit SE Block Change Percentile
|
-2.919 percentage of score
Standard Deviation 36.037
|
|
Change From Baseline in Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CCPT II)
Hit RT ISI Change Percentile
|
8.070 percentage of score
Standard Deviation 30.364
|
|
Change From Baseline in Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CCPT II)
Hit SE ISI Change Percentile
|
8.270 percentage of score
Standard Deviation 35.780
|
|
Change From Baseline in Conners' Continuous Performance Test II (CCPT II)
Confidence Index
|
8.471 percentage of score
Standard Deviation 23.889
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)Population: Intent to treat population
The sleep questionnaire, a Sponsor produced questionnaire used in previous eszopiclone studies, asked the subject or parent/guardian to report information about the subject's sleep and daytime functioning since the last visit. This questionnaire provided a subjective assessment of the subject's sleep over a predefined time period. WASO was assessed based on the responses to the sleep questionnaire.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)
n=303 Participants
Eszopiclone Overall
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline at Month 12 in Subjective Wake Time After Sleep Onset (WASO)
|
-22.7 Minutes
Standard Deviation 70.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)Population: Intent to treat population
The sleep questionnaire, a Sponsor produced questionnaire used in previous eszopiclone studies, asked the subject or parent/guardian to report information about the subject's sleep and daytime functioning since the last visit. This questionnaire provided a subjective assessment of the subject's sleep over a predefined time period. NAASO was assessed based on the responses to the sleep questionnaire.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)
n=303 Participants
Eszopiclone Overall
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline at Month 12 in Subjective Number of Awakening After Sleep Onset (NAASO)
|
-0.8 Number of Awakenings
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)Population: Intent to treat population
The sleep questionnaire, a Sponsor produced questionnaire used in previous eszopiclone studies, asked the subject or parent/guardian to report information about the subject's sleep and daytime functioning since the last visit. This questionnaire provided a subjective assessment of the subject's sleep over a predefined time period. TST was assessed based on the responses to the sleep questionnaire.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)
n=303 Participants
Eszopiclone Overall
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline at Month 12 in Subjective Total Sleep Time (TST).
|
45.3 Minutes
Standard Deviation 119.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months (from the 1st dose to the end of study)Population: Intent to treat population
The SF-10™ Health Survey for Children is a 10-item care-giver completed assessment designed to measure children's health-related quality of life. The scale asked questions about the child's physical wellness, feelings, behavior, and activities at school and with family and friends. The SF-10 physical and psychosocial summary measures were scored such that higher scores indicated more favorable functioning. The Physical Summary Score is computed by summing values for questions 1, 2a, 2b, 3 and 5 and standardizing scores by normalizing to a total possible score of 0-100 with higher scores representing more positive indications. The Psychosocial Summary Score is computed by summing questions 4, 6, 7, 8, and 9 and standardizing scores by normalizing to a total possible score of 0-100 with higher scores representing more positive indications.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)
n=303 Participants
Eszopiclone Overall
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Scale
Physical Summary Score
|
-1.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.15
|
|
Change From Baseline in Pediatric Quality of Life Scale
Psychosocial Summary Score
|
2.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.37
|
Adverse Events
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)
n=303 participants at risk
Eszopiclone Overall
|
|---|---|
|
General disorders
Drowning
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral Infection
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Upper limb fracture
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Delirium
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
2mg Eszopiclone (6-11yrs), 3mg Eszopiclone (12-17yrs)
n=303 participants at risk
Eszopiclone Overall
|
|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
21.5%
65/303 • Number of events 123 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
13.9%
42/303 • Number of events 46 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
9.9%
30/303 • Number of events 35 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
5.0%
15/303 • Number of events 17 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain Upper
|
6.3%
19/303 • Number of events 19 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
5.0%
15/303 • Number of events 18 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
4.3%
13/303 • Number of events 16 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
4.3%
13/303 • Number of events 14 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
3.0%
9/303 • Number of events 13 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
2.3%
7/303 • Number of events 7 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
6.6%
20/303 • Number of events 27 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory infection
|
4.0%
12/303 • Number of events 16 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sinusitis
|
3.6%
11/303 • Number of events 14 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
3.3%
10/303 • Number of events 11 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis streptococcal
|
2.6%
8/303 • Number of events 8 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
2.0%
6/303 • Number of events 7 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
5.3%
16/303 • Number of events 18 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
4.3%
13/303 • Number of events 18 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
4.0%
12/303 • Number of events 14 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
5.3%
16/303 • Number of events 20 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
2.0%
6/303 • Number of events 7 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
3.3%
10/303 • Number of events 10 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Hallucination, visual
|
2.3%
7/303 • Number of events 8 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
2.0%
6/303 • Number of events 6 • 12 Months
The intent-to-treat (ITT) population consisted of all randomized subjects who had taken any study medication. The ITT population was used for all safety analyses.
|
Additional Information
CNS Medical Director
Sunovion
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER