Trial Outcomes & Findings for Expiratory Muscle Training for Persons With Neurodegenerative Disease (NCT NCT00856518)
NCT ID: NCT00856518
Last Updated: 2017-02-10
Results Overview
Expiratory pressure generating capacity assessed via handheld manometer.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
42 participants
at baseline and again after 5-week EMST exercise
2017-02-10
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Arm 1: EMST
Experimental Group
Expiratory Muscle Strength Trainer: Pressure threshold device targeted at increase muscle force generation of expiratory and submental muscles.
|
Arm 2: Sham Group
sham group
sham device: Looks just like the EMST device but does not provide a load on the target muscle group
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
24
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
20
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Arm 1: EMST
Experimental Group
Expiratory Muscle Strength Trainer: Pressure threshold device targeted at increase muscle force generation of expiratory and submental muscles.
|
Arm 2: Sham Group
sham group
sham device: Looks just like the EMST device but does not provide a load on the target muscle group
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
4
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Expiratory Muscle Training for Persons With Neurodegenerative Disease
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Arm 1: EMST
n=24 Participants
Expiratory Muscle Strength Trainer: Pressure threshold device targeted at increase muscle force generation of expiratory and submental muscles.
|
Arm 2: Sham Group
n=18 Participants
Sham Device: Looks just like the EMST device but does not provide a load on the target muscle group
|
Total
n=42 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=5 Participants
|
58 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 • n=7 Participants
|
55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Gender
Female
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Gender
Male
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: at baseline and again after 5-week EMST exercisePopulation: Out of the 42 recruited patients, 6 withdrew following the baseline MEP testing, citing travel or loss of interest as the reason. Therefore, 36 subjects were reported for the MEP test (n = 20 for EMST, n = 16 for sham).
Expiratory pressure generating capacity assessed via handheld manometer.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: EMST
n=20 Participants
EMST Group
Expiratory Muscle Strength Trainer: Pressure threshold device targeted at increase muscle force generation of expiratory and submental muscles.
|
Arm 2: Sham
n=16 Participants
Sham group
sham device: Looks just like the EMST device but does not provide a load on the target muscle group
|
|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Expiratory Pressure (MEP)
baseline
|
78.6 cm H2O
Standard Deviation 30.72
|
75.56 cm H2O
Standard Deviation 27.68
|
|
Maximum Expiratory Pressure (MEP)
post-training
|
99.00 cm H2O
Standard Deviation 32.97
|
99.38 cm H2O
Standard Deviation 37.59
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: at baseline and again after 5-week EMST exercisePopulation: Out of the 42 recruited patients, 8 failed to complete the PAS test either at baseline or post training testing. Therefore, 34 subjects were reported for the PAS test (n = 20 for EMST, n = 14 for sham).
The Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) was used to measure swallow safety. PAS is an 8 point ordinal scale for quantification of penetration and aspiration. PAS measures the depth to which material enters the airway and if the material is expelled following penetration or aspiration. Categorical groupings of PAS scores include "normal to mild" (1-2), "moderate" (3-5) and "severe" (6-8, indicating that material has passed into the lower airway). These PAS scores may be useful in denoting clinically significant changes (e.g. moderate to mild) resulting from treatment or disease progression. The following table reports the percentage of participants (out of the respective total group participants in EMST and Sham) with changed PAS score of 1 point or more (improving or worsening) and without PAS score changes from pre- to post treatment. The data represent an exploratory quantification without statistical analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: EMST
n=20 Participants
EMST Group
Expiratory Muscle Strength Trainer: Pressure threshold device targeted at increase muscle force generation of expiratory and submental muscles.
|
Arm 2: Sham
n=14 Participants
Sham group
sham device: Looks just like the EMST device but does not provide a load on the target muscle group
|
|---|---|---|
|
Penetration-Aspiration Scale Score
with worsened PAS after training
|
15.0 percentage of group participants
|
21.4 percentage of group participants
|
|
Penetration-Aspiration Scale Score
with improved PAS after training
|
40.0 percentage of group participants
|
14.3 percentage of group participants
|
|
Penetration-Aspiration Scale Score
with unchanged PAS after training
|
45.0 percentage of group participants
|
64.3 percentage of group participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: at baseline and after 5-week of EMST exercisePopulation: Out of the total 42 recruited study participants, ten either did not show up for the SWAL-QOL test or only partially answered the questionnaire. Thus, 32 remaining participants (n = 19 for EMST, and n = 13 for Sham) were reported.
The SWAL-QOL is a validated and standardized tool that measures burden; symptom status including pharyngeal, oral, and saliva; fear; and mental health subdomains. Responses are determined according to an ordinal scale where 1 equals a severe problem and 5 equals no problem. The SWAL-QOL provides an overall score as well as subscale scores. Subjects rate quality of life as follows (expressed as percentage of the possible perfect score): little to no impact (81% - 100%), mild impact (61% - 80%), moderate impact (41% - 60%), severe impact (21% - 40%), and profound impact (0% - 20%).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: EMST
n=19 Participants
EMST Group
Expiratory Muscle Strength Trainer: Pressure threshold device targeted at increase muscle force generation of expiratory and submental muscles.
|
Arm 2: Sham
n=13 Participants
Sham group
sham device: Looks just like the EMST device but does not provide a load on the target muscle group
|
|---|---|---|
|
Swallow-related Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL)
pre-training Saliva
|
84.2 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 16.2
|
83.1 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 13.5
|
|
Swallow-related Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL)
pre-training total SWAL-QOL
|
83.3 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 11.5
|
81.4 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 10.9
|
|
Swallow-related Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL)
post-traing total SWAL-QOL
|
88.1 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 10.8
|
84.4 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 8.5
|
|
Swallow-related Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL)
pre-training Burden
|
90.0 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 20.0
|
80.8 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 25.0
|
|
Swallow-related Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL)
post-training Burden
|
97.4 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 7.3
|
86.2 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 18.9
|
|
Swallow-related Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL)
pre-training Pharyngeal
|
73.5 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 16.9
|
75.4 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 13.0
|
|
Swallow-related Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL)
post-training Pharyngeal
|
82.4 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 16.6
|
77.6 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 11.6
|
|
Swallow-related Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL)
post-training Saliva
|
92.3 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 9.5
|
83.6 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 15.8
|
|
Swallow-related Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL)
pre-training Oral
|
95.3 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 7.0
|
91.2 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 13.1
|
|
Swallow-related Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL)
post-training Oral
|
96.9 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 4.5
|
91.2 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 9.8
|
|
Swallow-related Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL)
pre-training Fear
|
80.5 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 22.2
|
79.2 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 14.8
|
|
Swallow-related Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL)
post-training Fear
|
89.2 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 20.4
|
84.6 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 11.3
|
|
Swallow-related Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL)
pre-training Mental Health
|
87.2 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 21.5
|
83.4 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 16.5
|
|
Swallow-related Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL)
post-training Mental Health
|
94.1 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 18.2
|
90.2 percentage of possible perfect score
Standard Deviation 13.0
|
Adverse Events
Arm 1: EMST
Arm 2: Sham Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Janis Daly
North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place