Trial Outcomes & Findings for Minocycline for HIV+ Cognitive Impairment in Uganda (NCT NCT00855062)

NCT ID: NCT00855062

Last Updated: 2011-02-25

Results Overview

The U NP Sum is defined as the average of z scores for 9 neuropsychological test subcomponents in the neuropsychological test battery (i.e. the average of norm-adjusted ("z") scores for Grooved Pegboard Dominant Hand, Grooved Pegboard Non-dominant Hand, Color Trails 1, Color Trails 2, Symbol Digit, WHO-UCLA Verbal Learning test Trial 5, WHO-UCLA Verbal Learning test delayed recall, Digit Span forward and Digit Span backward). The outcome is defined as U NP Sum at week 24 - U NP Sum at baseline.

Recruitment status

TERMINATED

Study phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Target enrollment

73 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

At baseline and week 24

Results posted on

2011-02-25

Participant Flow

The recruitment period was from Mar 2008 to Oct 2009 when the study was stopped early (Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) decision based on futility) on Nov 2009. The study participants were recruited from the Infectious Disease Institute, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Total of 353 participants were screened; only 73 were randomized and thus 280 were not enrolled: 146 of them did not have cognitive impairment, 55 of them lacked laboratory inclusion criteria, and 79 of them had "others".

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Minocycline
Minocycline 100 mg orally every 12 hours
Placebo
Placebo minocycline capsules every 12 hours
Step1
STARTED
36
37
Step1
COMPLETED
26
26
Step1
NOT COMPLETED
10
11
Step2
STARTED
19
21
Step2
COMPLETED
13
15
Step2
NOT COMPLETED
6
6

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Minocycline
Minocycline 100 mg orally every 12 hours
Placebo
Placebo minocycline capsules every 12 hours
Step1
Early Study Closure
5
7
Step1
Adverse Event
1
1
Step1
Protocol Violation
1
0
Step1
Pregnancy
1
0
Step1
Withdrawal by Subject
2
3
Step2
Early Study Closure
6
2
Step2
Adverse Event
0
3
Step2
Initiation of antiretroviral therapy/ART
0
1

Baseline Characteristics

Minocycline for HIV+ Cognitive Impairment in Uganda

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Minocycline
n=36 Participants
Minocycline 100 mg orally every 12 hours
Placebo
n=37 Participants
Placebo minocycline capsules every 12 hours
Total
n=73 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
37 Participants
n=7 Participants
73 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age Continuous
37.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.21 • n=5 Participants
36.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.17 • n=7 Participants
37.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.66 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
32 Participants
n=7 Participants
66 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Uganda
36 participants
n=5 Participants
37 participants
n=7 Participants
73 participants
n=5 Participants
Baseline Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Dementia Scale
Equivocal/subclinical
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
37 Participants
n=7 Participants
72 Participants
n=5 Participants
Baseline Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Dementia Scale
Mild
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Baseline Cluster of Differentiation Four (CD4) Count
319 cells/mm^3
n=5 Participants
305 cells/mm^3
n=7 Participants
313 cells/mm^3
n=5 Participants
Baseline Log10(Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Viral Load (VL))
4.41 copies/mL
n=5 Participants
4.59 copies/mL
n=7 Participants
4.50 copies/mL
n=5 Participants
Baseline Karnofsky's Performance Score
80 (Karnofsky Score)
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Baseline Karnofsky's Performance Score
90 (Karnofsky Score)
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
34 Participants
n=7 Participants
69 Participants
n=5 Participants
Baseline Karnofsky's Performance Score
100 (Karnofsky Score)
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Baseline Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Primarily cognitive problems
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Baseline Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Primarily physical problems
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Baseline Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Not having any difficulties on the tasks
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
35 Participants
n=7 Participants
64 Participants
n=5 Participants
Baseline Overall Neurological Assessment
Normal neurological assessment
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
Baseline Overall Neurological Assessment
Central Nervous System (CNS) abnormality only
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Baseline Overall Neurological Assessment
Peripheral Nervous System (PNS) abnormality only
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Baseline Overall Neurological Assessment
CNS and PNS abnormality
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Baseline Overall Neurological Assessment
Can not assess
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Baseline Uganda Neuropsychological Test Battery Summary measure (U NP Sum)
-0.97 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.78 • n=5 Participants
-0.97 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.86 • n=7 Participants
-0.97 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.82 • n=5 Participants
WHO-UCLA Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT): Trials Total
-1.28 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.88 • n=5 Participants
-1.48 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.14 • n=7 Participants
-1.38 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.02 • n=5 Participants
WHO-UCLA Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT): Delayed
-1.17 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.79 • n=5 Participants
-1.15 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.18 • n=7 Participants
-1.16 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.00 • n=5 Participants
Color Trails 1
-1.35 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.03 • n=5 Participants
-1.65 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.03 • n=7 Participants
-1.51 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.60 • n=5 Participants
Color Trails 2
-2.55 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.07 • n=5 Participants
-2.33 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.05 • n=7 Participants
-2.44 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.05 • n=5 Participants
Grooved Pegboard Dominant
-0.34 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.58 • n=5 Participants
-0.03 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.14 • n=7 Participants
-0.18 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.37 • n=5 Participants
Grooved Pegboard Non-dominant
-0.56 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.82 • n=5 Participants
-0.48 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.42 • n=7 Participants
-0.52 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.61 • n=5 Participants
Symbol Digit
-0.87 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.96 • n=5 Participants
-0.86 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.80 • n=7 Participants
-0.86 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.88 • n=5 Participants
Digit Span Backward
-0.68 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.75 • n=5 Participants
-0.94 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.06 • n=7 Participants
-0.81 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.93 • n=5 Participants
Digit Span Forward
0.02 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.79 • n=5 Participants
0.19 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.99 • n=7 Participants
0.11 z-scores
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.90 • n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At baseline and week 24

Population: The descriptive statistics are based on per protocol analysis. For the statistical analysis, ITT analysis was used and the missing U NP Sums at week 24 were imputed using a multiple regression imputation method. The number of participants analyzed for the ITT analysis was 73 (36 for Minocycline and 37 for Placebo).

The U NP Sum is defined as the average of z scores for 9 neuropsychological test subcomponents in the neuropsychological test battery (i.e. the average of norm-adjusted ("z") scores for Grooved Pegboard Dominant Hand, Grooved Pegboard Non-dominant Hand, Color Trails 1, Color Trails 2, Symbol Digit, WHO-UCLA Verbal Learning test Trial 5, WHO-UCLA Verbal Learning test delayed recall, Digit Span forward and Digit Span backward). The outcome is defined as U NP Sum at week 24 - U NP Sum at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Minocycline
n=30 Participants
Minocycline 100 mg orally every 12 hours
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Placebo minocycline capsules every 12 hours
24-week Change of Uganda Neuropsychological Test Battery Summary Measure (U NP Sum)
0.44 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.74
0.49 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.67

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At baseline and week 24

Population: The descriptive statistics were based on observed data. Since all participants reported there were no change in the MSK score at week 24, no statistical test was conducted.

The outcome is a new dichotomous variable: no change/worse vs. better at 24 weeks compared to baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Minocycline
n=28 Participants
Minocycline 100 mg orally every 12 hours
Placebo
n=27 Participants
Placebo minocycline capsules every 12 hours
24-week Change of Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) HIV Dementia Stage
No Change/Worse
28 participants
27 participants
24-week Change of Memorial Sloan Kettering (MSK) HIV Dementia Stage
Better
0 participants
0 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At baseline and week 24

Population: This analysis includes the participants with Karnofsky performance score at baseline and week 24.

The outcome is a new dichotomous variable: no change/worse vs. better at 24 weeks compared to baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Minocycline
n=32 Participants
Minocycline 100 mg orally every 12 hours
Placebo
n=31 Participants
Placebo minocycline capsules every 12 hours
24-week Change of Karnofsky Performance Score
No Change/Worse
97 percentage of participants
94 percentage of participants
24-week Change of Karnofsky Performance Score
Better
3 percentage of participants
6 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Time of initial Grade ≥ 2 toxicity and/or sign and symptom event up to week 24

Population: This analysis includes every randomized participants. A total of 21 minocycline and 20 placebo participants reported at least one Grade ≥ 2 toxicity and/or sign and symptoms during 24 weeks

The outcome is the time to first Grade ≥ 2 toxicity and/or sign and symptoms from study treatment initiation up to week 24. The grade was determined by clinicians and an Grade ≥ 2 event means moderate, severe, life-threatening, or death event.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Minocycline
n=36 Participants
Minocycline 100 mg orally every 12 hours
Placebo
n=37 Participants
Placebo minocycline capsules every 12 hours
Time From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms.
0-4 weeks
12 participants with an event
10 participants with an event
Time From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms.
4.01 - 12 weeks
6 participants with an event
7 participants with an event
Time From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms.
12.01 - 24 weeks
3 participants with an event
3 participants with an event

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Time of first Grade ≥ 2 toxicity and/or sign and symptom event up to 48 weeks

Population: This analysis includes every randomized participants. A total of 22 minocycline and 21 placebo participants reported at least one Grade ≥ 2 toxicity and/or sign and symptoms during 48 weeks.

The outcome is the time of first Grade ≥ 2 toxicity and/or sign and symptoms from treatment initiation up to 48 weeks. The grade was determined by clinicians and an Grade ≥ 2 event means moderate, severe, life-threatening, or death event.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Minocycline
n=36 Participants
Minocycline 100 mg orally every 12 hours
Placebo
n=37 Participants
Placebo minocycline capsules every 12 hours
Time From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms
0-4 weeks
12 participants with an event
10 participants with an event
Time From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms
4.01-12 weeks
6 participants with an event
7 participants with an event
Time From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms
12.01-24 weeks
3 participants with an event
3 participants with an event
Time From Treatment Initiation to the Development of a Grade ≥ 2 Toxicity and/or Sign and Symptoms
24.01-48 weeks
1 participants with an event
1 participants with an event

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At baseline and week 24

Population: This analysis used the participants with CD4 cell counts at baseline and week 24.

The outcome is defined as CD4 cell count at week 24 - CD4 cell count at baseline. The unit is cells/mm\^3.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Minocycline
n=29 Participants
Minocycline 100 mg orally every 12 hours
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Placebo minocycline capsules every 12 hours
24-week Change of CD4 Cell Counts
-25.28 cells/mm^3
Standard Deviation 70.85
-28.57 cells/mm^3
Standard Deviation 61.65

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At baseline and week 48

Population: This analysis used the participants with CD4 cell counts at baseline and week 48.

The outcome is defined as CD4 cell count at week 48 - CD4 cell count at baseline. The unit is cells/mm\^3.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Minocycline
n=13 Participants
Minocycline 100 mg orally every 12 hours
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Placebo minocycline capsules every 12 hours
48-week Change of CD4 Cell Counts
-61.15 cells/mm^3
Standard Deviation 80.46
-56.50 cells/mm^3
Standard Deviation 84.97

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At baseline and week 24

Population: The analysis includes participants with IADL scores at baseline and week 24.

The outcome is a new dichotomous variable: no change/worse vs. better at 24 weeks compared to baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Minocycline
n=28 Participants
Minocycline 100 mg orally every 12 hours
Placebo
n=26 Participants
Placebo minocycline capsules every 12 hours
24-week Change of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
No Change/Worse
86 percentage of participants
88 percentage of participants
24-week Change of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Better
14 percentage of participants
12 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At baseline and week 24

Population: The analysis includes participants with HIV RNA viral loads at baseline and week 24.

The outcome is the HIV RNA plasma viral loads (Log10 transformed) at week 24 - the viral loads (Log10 transformed) at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Minocycline
n=22 Participants
Minocycline 100 mg orally every 12 hours
Placebo
n=25 Participants
Placebo minocycline capsules every 12 hours
24-week Change of HIV RNA Plasma Viral Loads (Log10 Transformed)
0.22 copies/mL
Interval -0.14 to 0.5
0.13 copies/mL
Interval -0.23 to 0.43

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At baseline and week 24

Population: The analysis includes participants with CES-D scores at baseline and week 24.

The outcome is the total CES-D score at week 24 - the total CES-D score at baseline. The total CES-D score is based on 20 CES-D items, such as "I was bothered by things that usually don't bother me" and "I did not feel like eating, my appetite was poor". Patients were asked to answer each item by 4 scales: (1) Rarely, (2) Sometimes, (3) Occasionally, and (4) Most of the time. After 4 negative items were multiplied by -1, the total CES-D score is a simple sum of all items. The min and Max are 0 and 60, respectively. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Minocycline
n=31 Participants
Minocycline 100 mg orally every 12 hours
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Placebo minocycline capsules every 12 hours
24-week Change of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Score
-4.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.86
-4.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.27

Adverse Events

Minocycline

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 26 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 25 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Minocycline
n=36 participants at risk
Minocycline 100 mg orally every 12 hours
Placebo
n=37 participants at risk
Placebo minocycline capsules every 12 hours
Infections and infestations
Death
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.
0.00%
0/37 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.
Renal and urinary disorders
Potassium
2.8%
1/36 • Number of events 1 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.
0.00%
0/37 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Sgpt
0.00%
0/36 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Sgot
0.00%
0/36 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Minocycline
n=36 participants at risk
Minocycline 100 mg orally every 12 hours
Placebo
n=37 participants at risk
Placebo minocycline capsules every 12 hours
General disorders
Fever
5.6%
2/36 • Number of events 2 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Allergic Rash
0.00%
0/36 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.
10.8%
4/37 • Number of events 4 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.
General disorders
Carbon Dioxide
11.1%
4/36 • Number of events 4 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.
Renal and urinary disorders
Phosphorus
8.3%
3/36 • Number of events 3 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.
8.1%
3/37 • Number of events 3 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.
Renal and urinary disorders
Sodium
5.6%
2/36 • Number of events 2 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.
2.7%
1/37 • Number of events 1 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Absolute Neutrophil Count
33.3%
12/36 • Number of events 21 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.
32.4%
12/37 • Number of events 12 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.
Hepatobiliary disorders
SGOT
8.3%
3/36 • Number of events 3 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.
0.00%
0/37 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
White Blood Cells
0.00%
0/36 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.
5.4%
2/37 • Number of events 2 • 48 weeks
The lab assessments were conducted at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 48.

Additional Information

Sachiko Miyahara

Harvard School of Public Health

Phone: 617-432-2837

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place