Trial Outcomes & Findings for Interprofessional Training to Improve Diabetes Care: The ReSPECT Trial (NCT NCT00854594)

NCT ID: NCT00854594

Last Updated: 2015-10-06

Results Overview

Providers asked to indicate their level of confidence on an 11-point scale, with 0 indicating 'not at all confident' and 10 indicating 'extremely confident' for the following activities: 1. Instruct patients on home glucose monitoring 2. Teach foot care 3. Teach insulin administration 4. Instruct patients about diet 5. Help patients make changes in their diets that you have recommended 6. Instruct patients about regular exercise 7. Help patients make changes in their exercise habits that you have recommended 8. Identify candidates for long-acting insulin 9. Interpret glucose patterns 10. Adjust insulin in insulin-treated patients with poor glycemic control 11. Do you feel comfortable knowing whether to titrate basal insulin versus bolus insulin 12. Manage patients with poor glycemic control 13. Initiate insulin therapy (NPH or insulin glargine and aspart) 14. Apply principles of diabetes care in a team setting Averages of provider efficacy were calculated across all activities.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

117 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline

Results posted on

2015-10-06

Participant Flow

Cleveland and Cincinnati CBOCs (excluding Georgetown; n = 18 CBOCs) were the study sites randomized to the two study arms. Providers within site were subject to the intervention to which the site was randomized and the questionnaire responses were collected at the provider level.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Control
Providers within sites randomized to the control arm will receive the baseline measures pre and post. These sites will receive traditional diabetes education, which includes teleconsultation.
ReSPECT Intervention
Providers within sites randomized to the intervention arm will receive baseline measures pre and post, but also in-depth Shared Medical Appointments (SMA)(The Role modeling in Shared medical appointments to Promote Establishing Collaborative Teams (ReSPECT) intervention) and at 15 months SMA video conferences. At the end of the 18 months the randomly selected patients and providers will be asked to take part in a qualitative interview. Role modeling in Shared medical appointments to Promote Establishing Collaborative Teams (ReSPECT): The intervention is designed to educate the clinicians at intervention Community-Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs) by modeling interprofessional team practices during SMAs for diabetes mellitus (DM) patients from each CBOC primary care provider's (PCP) patient panel. We hypothesize that this education at intervention CBOCs will improve interprofessional practices and overall quality care delivered to veterans.
Overall Study
STARTED
48
69
Overall Study
COMPLETED
48
69
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Interprofessional Training to Improve Diabetes Care: The ReSPECT Trial

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Control
n=48 Participants
Control sites will receive the baseline measures pre and post. These sites will receive traditional diabetes education, which includes teleconsultation.
ReSPECT Intervention
n=69 Participants
Intervention sites will receive baseline measures pre and post, but also in-depth Shared Medical Appointments (SMA)(The Role modeling in Shared medical appointments to Promote Establishing Collaborative Teams (ReSPECT) intervention) and at 15 months SMA video conferences. At the end of the 18 months the randomly selected patients and providers will be asked to take part in a qualitative interview. Role modeling in Shared medical appointments to Promote Establishing Collaborative Teams (ReSPECT): The intervention is designed to educate the clinicians at intervention CBOCs by modeling interprofessional team practices during SMAs for DM patients from each CBOC primary care provider's (PCP) patient panel. We hypothesize that this education at intervention CBOCs will improve interprofessional practices and overall quality care delivered to veterans.
Total
n=117 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Customized
Missing
0 participants
n=5 Participants
4 participants
n=7 Participants
4 participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Customized
39 years or less
7 participants
n=5 Participants
12 participants
n=7 Participants
19 participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Customized
40 to 59 years
41 participants
n=5 Participants
48 participants
n=7 Participants
89 participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Customized
60 years or greater
0 participants
n=5 Participants
5 participants
n=7 Participants
5 participants
n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
12 participants
n=5 Participants
13 participants
n=7 Participants
25 participants
n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
36 participants
n=5 Participants
53 participants
n=7 Participants
89 participants
n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Unknown
0 participants
n=5 Participants
3 participants
n=7 Participants
3 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Population: Providers within sites randomized to control and intervention arms were surveyed at baseline; 39 control arm providers and 55 intervention arm providers completed the ability items of the survey.

Providers asked to indicate their level of confidence on an 11-point scale, with 0 indicating 'not at all confident' and 10 indicating 'extremely confident' for the following activities: 1. Instruct patients on home glucose monitoring 2. Teach foot care 3. Teach insulin administration 4. Instruct patients about diet 5. Help patients make changes in their diets that you have recommended 6. Instruct patients about regular exercise 7. Help patients make changes in their exercise habits that you have recommended 8. Identify candidates for long-acting insulin 9. Interpret glucose patterns 10. Adjust insulin in insulin-treated patients with poor glycemic control 11. Do you feel comfortable knowing whether to titrate basal insulin versus bolus insulin 12. Manage patients with poor glycemic control 13. Initiate insulin therapy (NPH or insulin glargine and aspart) 14. Apply principles of diabetes care in a team setting Averages of provider efficacy were calculated across all activities.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control
n=39 Participants
Control sites will receive the baseline measures pre and post. These sites will receive traditional diabetes education, which includes teleconsultation.
ReSPECT Intervention
n=55 Participants
Intervention sites will receive baseline measures pre and post, but also in-depth Shared Medical Appointments (SMA)(The Role modeling in Shared medical appointments to Promote Establishing Collaborative Teams (ReSPECT) intervention) and at 15 months SMA video conferences. At the end of the 18 months the randomly selected patients and providers will be asked to take part in a qualitative interview. Role modeling in Shared medical appointments to Promote Establishing Collaborative Teams (ReSPECT): The intervention is designed to educate the clinicians at intervention CBOCs by modeling interprofessional team practices during SMAs for DM patients from each CBOC primary care provider's (PCP) patient panel. We hypothesize that this education at intervention CBOCs will improve interprofessional practices and overall quality care delivered to veterans.
Provider Abilities Scale - Subscale From the Midwest (MW) Clinicians' Network
6.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.17
6.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.90

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 22 months (post-intervention)

Population: Providers within sites randomized to control and intervention arms were surveyed after the intervention period; 20 control arm providers and 29 intervention arm providers completed the ability items of the survey.

Providers asked to indicate their level of confidence on an 11-point scale, with 0 indicating 'not at all confident' and 10 indicating 'extremely confident' for the following activities: 1. Instruct patients on home glucose monitoring 2. Teach foot care 3. Teach insulin administration 4. Instruct patients about diet 5. Help patients make changes in their diets that you have recommended 6. Instruct patients about regular exercise 7. Help patients make changes in their exercise habits that you have recommended 8. Identify candidates for long-acting insulin 9. Interpret glucose patterns 10. Adjust insulin in insulin-treated patients with poor glycemic control 11. Do you feel comfortable knowing whether to titrate basal insulin versus bolus insulin 12. Manage patients with poor glycemic control 13. Initiate insulin therapy (NPH or insulin glargine and aspart) 14. Apply principles of diabetes care in a team setting Averages of provider efficacy were calculated across all activities.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control
n=20 Participants
Control sites will receive the baseline measures pre and post. These sites will receive traditional diabetes education, which includes teleconsultation.
ReSPECT Intervention
n=29 Participants
Intervention sites will receive baseline measures pre and post, but also in-depth Shared Medical Appointments (SMA)(The Role modeling in Shared medical appointments to Promote Establishing Collaborative Teams (ReSPECT) intervention) and at 15 months SMA video conferences. At the end of the 18 months the randomly selected patients and providers will be asked to take part in a qualitative interview. Role modeling in Shared medical appointments to Promote Establishing Collaborative Teams (ReSPECT): The intervention is designed to educate the clinicians at intervention CBOCs by modeling interprofessional team practices during SMAs for DM patients from each CBOC primary care provider's (PCP) patient panel. We hypothesize that this education at intervention CBOCs will improve interprofessional practices and overall quality care delivered to veterans.
Provider Abilities Scale - Subscale From the Midwest (MW) Clinicians' Network
7.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.05
6.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.14

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Population: Providers within sites randomized to control and intervention arms were surveyed at baseline; 39 control arm providers and 53 intervention arm providers complete the attitude scale of the survey.

A validated scale developed to assess attitudes towards teams in a healthcare setting with three subscales to assess attitudes toward team value, attitudes toward team efficiency, and attitudes towards physician's shared role on a team. Each of the 21 items is rated 1 to 6, ranging from 'Strongly Disagree' to 'Strongly Agree'. The scale was considered 'complete' for analysis among providers who answered at least 7 of the 21 items. Items were reverse-coded as specified in the subscale development publication. Averages across completed items were calculated within provider. Higher values corresponded with more positive attitudes towards teams.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control
n=39 Participants
Control sites will receive the baseline measures pre and post. These sites will receive traditional diabetes education, which includes teleconsultation.
ReSPECT Intervention
n=53 Participants
Intervention sites will receive baseline measures pre and post, but also in-depth Shared Medical Appointments (SMA)(The Role modeling in Shared medical appointments to Promote Establishing Collaborative Teams (ReSPECT) intervention) and at 15 months SMA video conferences. At the end of the 18 months the randomly selected patients and providers will be asked to take part in a qualitative interview. Role modeling in Shared medical appointments to Promote Establishing Collaborative Teams (ReSPECT): The intervention is designed to educate the clinicians at intervention CBOCs by modeling interprofessional team practices during SMAs for DM patients from each CBOC primary care provider's (PCP) patient panel. We hypothesize that this education at intervention CBOCs will improve interprofessional practices and overall quality care delivered to veterans.
Attitudes Toward Healthcare Teams Scale and Subscales
4.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .52
4.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .55

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 22 months (post-intervention)

Population: Providers within sites randomized to control and intervention arms were surveyed after the intervention period; 20 control arm providers and 29 intervention arm providers completed the attitude scale of the survey.

A validated scale developed to assess attitudes towards teams in a healthcare setting with three subscales to assess attitudes toward team value, attitudes toward team efficiency, and attitudes towards physician's shared role on a team. Each of the 21 items is rated 1 to 6, ranging from 'Strongly Disagree' to 'Strongly Agree'. The scale was considered 'complete' for analysis among providers who answered at least 7 of the 21 items. Items were reverse-coded as specified in the subscale development publication. Averages across completed items were calculated within provider. Higher values corresponded with more positive attitudes towards teams.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control
n=20 Participants
Control sites will receive the baseline measures pre and post. These sites will receive traditional diabetes education, which includes teleconsultation.
ReSPECT Intervention
n=29 Participants
Intervention sites will receive baseline measures pre and post, but also in-depth Shared Medical Appointments (SMA)(The Role modeling in Shared medical appointments to Promote Establishing Collaborative Teams (ReSPECT) intervention) and at 15 months SMA video conferences. At the end of the 18 months the randomly selected patients and providers will be asked to take part in a qualitative interview. Role modeling in Shared medical appointments to Promote Establishing Collaborative Teams (ReSPECT): The intervention is designed to educate the clinicians at intervention CBOCs by modeling interprofessional team practices during SMAs for DM patients from each CBOC primary care provider's (PCP) patient panel. We hypothesize that this education at intervention CBOCs will improve interprofessional practices and overall quality care delivered to veterans.
Attitudes Toward Healthcare Teams Scale and Subscales
4.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.52
4.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.59

Adverse Events

Control

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

ReSPECT Intervention

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Jeneen Shell-Boyd

Louis Stokes VA Medical Center

Phone: (216) 791-2300

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place