Trial Outcomes & Findings for Does Adding Bevacizumab Therapy in Glaucoma Surgery Improve the Success of Needle Bleb Revisions? (NCT NCT00853073)
NCT ID: NCT00853073
Last Updated: 2018-07-09
Results Overview
mmHg (millimeters of mercury)
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
63 participants
6 months
2018-07-09
Participant Flow
Eligible patients were recruited between February 2009 and July 2011 from the Glaucoma Service located at Wills Eye Hospital in Philadelphia.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Treatment A (Bevacizumab)
patients randomized to treatment A are given 1.0mg (0.04cc of 25 mg/mL) subconjunctival bevacizumab injection either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
|
Treatment B (Balanced Salt Solution)
patients randomized to treatment B are given 0.04cc of balanced salt solution injected in identical fashion either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
32
|
31
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
29
|
29
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Treatment A (Bevacizumab)
patients randomized to treatment A are given 1.0mg (0.04cc of 25 mg/mL) subconjunctival bevacizumab injection either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
|
Treatment B (Balanced Salt Solution)
patients randomized to treatment B are given 0.04cc of balanced salt solution injected in identical fashion either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Does Adding Bevacizumab Therapy in Glaucoma Surgery Improve the Success of Needle Bleb Revisions?
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Treatment A (Bevacizumab)
n=29 Participants
patients randomized to treatment A are given 1.0mg (0.04cc of 25 mg/mL) subconjunctival bevacizumab injection either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
|
Treatment B (Balanced Salt Solution)
n=29 Participants
patients randomized to treatment B are given 0.04cc of balanced salt solution injected in identical fashion either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
|
Total
n=58 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
64.6 years
n=5 Participants
|
71.2 years
n=7 Participants
|
67.9 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
29 participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 participants
n=7 Participants
|
58 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsmmHg (millimeters of mercury)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment A (Bevacizumab)
n=29 Participants
patients randomized to treatment A are given 1.0mg (0.04cc of 25 mg/mL) subconjunctival bevacizumab injection either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
|
Treatment B (Balanced Salt Solution)
n=29 Participants
patients randomized to treatment B are given 0.04cc of balanced salt solution injected in identical fashion either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
|
11.52 mmHg (millimeters of mercury)
Interval 9.44 to 14.05
|
12.83 mmHg (millimeters of mercury)
Interval 10.44 to 15.77
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsSurgery was rated as complete success, qualified success or failure. Complete success was defined as 20% (percent) reduction in eye pressure (IOP) without any IOP lowering medications. Qualified success was defined as 20% reduction of IOP with IOP lowering medications. Failure was defined as IOP greater than 21 mmHG (millimeters of mercury), less than 20% IOP reduction or need for additional surgery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Treatment A (Bevacizumab)
n=29 Participants
patients randomized to treatment A are given 1.0mg (0.04cc of 25 mg/mL) subconjunctival bevacizumab injection either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
|
Treatment B (Balanced Salt Solution)
n=29 Participants
patients randomized to treatment B are given 0.04cc of balanced salt solution injected in identical fashion either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Surgical Success
Complete success
|
17 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Surgical Success
Qualified success
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Surgical Success
Failure
|
12 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Treatment A (Bevacizumab)
Treatment B (Balanced Salt Solution)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Treatment A (Bevacizumab)
n=29 participants at risk
patients randomized to treatment A are given 1.0mg (0.04cc of 25 mg/mL) subconjunctival bevacizumab injection either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
|
Treatment B (Balanced Salt Solution)
n=29 participants at risk
patients randomized to treatment B are given 0.04cc of balanced salt solution injected in identical fashion either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Hyphema
|
13.8%
4/29 • Number of events 4
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Number of events 3
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
|
|
Eye disorders
Shallow Anterior Chamber
|
24.1%
7/29 • Number of events 7
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
|
17.2%
5/29 • Number of events 5
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
|
|
Eye disorders
Shallow Anterior Chamber necessitating injection of viscoelastic
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
|
|
Eye disorders
Endothelial folds
|
13.8%
4/29 • Number of events 4
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
|
13.8%
4/29 • Number of events 4
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal/Choroidal folds
|
17.2%
5/29 • Number of events 5
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
|
17.2%
5/29 • Number of events 5
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
|
|
Eye disorders
Choroidals
|
20.7%
6/29 • Number of events 6
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place