Trial Outcomes & Findings for Does Adding Bevacizumab Therapy in Glaucoma Surgery Improve the Success of Needle Bleb Revisions? (NCT NCT00853073)

NCT ID: NCT00853073

Last Updated: 2018-07-09

Results Overview

mmHg (millimeters of mercury)

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Target enrollment

63 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

6 months

Results posted on

2018-07-09

Participant Flow

Eligible patients were recruited between February 2009 and July 2011 from the Glaucoma Service located at Wills Eye Hospital in Philadelphia.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Treatment A (Bevacizumab)
patients randomized to treatment A are given 1.0mg (0.04cc of 25 mg/mL) subconjunctival bevacizumab injection either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
Treatment B (Balanced Salt Solution)
patients randomized to treatment B are given 0.04cc of balanced salt solution injected in identical fashion either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
Overall Study
STARTED
32
31
Overall Study
COMPLETED
29
29
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
3
2

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Treatment A (Bevacizumab)
patients randomized to treatment A are given 1.0mg (0.04cc of 25 mg/mL) subconjunctival bevacizumab injection either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
Treatment B (Balanced Salt Solution)
patients randomized to treatment B are given 0.04cc of balanced salt solution injected in identical fashion either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
3
2

Baseline Characteristics

Does Adding Bevacizumab Therapy in Glaucoma Surgery Improve the Success of Needle Bleb Revisions?

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Treatment A (Bevacizumab)
n=29 Participants
patients randomized to treatment A are given 1.0mg (0.04cc of 25 mg/mL) subconjunctival bevacizumab injection either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
Treatment B (Balanced Salt Solution)
n=29 Participants
patients randomized to treatment B are given 0.04cc of balanced salt solution injected in identical fashion either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
Total
n=58 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
64.6 years
n=5 Participants
71.2 years
n=7 Participants
67.9 years
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
29 participants
n=5 Participants
29 participants
n=7 Participants
58 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

mmHg (millimeters of mercury)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Treatment A (Bevacizumab)
n=29 Participants
patients randomized to treatment A are given 1.0mg (0.04cc of 25 mg/mL) subconjunctival bevacizumab injection either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
Treatment B (Balanced Salt Solution)
n=29 Participants
patients randomized to treatment B are given 0.04cc of balanced salt solution injected in identical fashion either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
11.52 mmHg (millimeters of mercury)
Interval 9.44 to 14.05
12.83 mmHg (millimeters of mercury)
Interval 10.44 to 15.77

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 months

Surgery was rated as complete success, qualified success or failure. Complete success was defined as 20% (percent) reduction in eye pressure (IOP) without any IOP lowering medications. Qualified success was defined as 20% reduction of IOP with IOP lowering medications. Failure was defined as IOP greater than 21 mmHG (millimeters of mercury), less than 20% IOP reduction or need for additional surgery.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Treatment A (Bevacizumab)
n=29 Participants
patients randomized to treatment A are given 1.0mg (0.04cc of 25 mg/mL) subconjunctival bevacizumab injection either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
Treatment B (Balanced Salt Solution)
n=29 Participants
patients randomized to treatment B are given 0.04cc of balanced salt solution injected in identical fashion either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
Number of Participants With Surgical Success
Complete success
17 Participants
12 Participants
Number of Participants With Surgical Success
Qualified success
0 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Surgical Success
Failure
12 Participants
15 Participants

Adverse Events

Treatment A (Bevacizumab)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 17 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Treatment B (Balanced Salt Solution)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 15 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Treatment A (Bevacizumab)
n=29 participants at risk
patients randomized to treatment A are given 1.0mg (0.04cc of 25 mg/mL) subconjunctival bevacizumab injection either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
Treatment B (Balanced Salt Solution)
n=29 participants at risk
patients randomized to treatment B are given 0.04cc of balanced salt solution injected in identical fashion either temporal or nasal to the bleb following bleb needling procedure in addition to 0.1 cc mitomycin C.
Eye disorders
Hyphema
13.8%
4/29 • Number of events 4
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
10.3%
3/29 • Number of events 3
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
Eye disorders
Shallow Anterior Chamber
24.1%
7/29 • Number of events 7
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
17.2%
5/29 • Number of events 5
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
Eye disorders
Shallow Anterior Chamber necessitating injection of viscoelastic
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
Eye disorders
Endothelial folds
13.8%
4/29 • Number of events 4
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
13.8%
4/29 • Number of events 4
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
Eye disorders
Retinal/Choroidal folds
17.2%
5/29 • Number of events 5
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
17.2%
5/29 • Number of events 5
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
Eye disorders
Choroidals
20.7%
6/29 • Number of events 6
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1
At each of the five post-operative follow-up visits, patients were assessed for visual acuity, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, hypotony changes, endothelial folds, hyphema, flare, cells, optic nerve swelling, choroidal folds, choroidal detachment and macular/retina folds.

Additional Information

Marlene R. Moster, MD

Wills Eye Hospital

Phone: 215-928-3123

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place