Development of 1-Day Rest/Stress Cardiac PET Perfusion Imaging Protocol of BMS747158

NCT ID: NCT00849108

Last Updated: 2015-10-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

176 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-01-31

Study Completion Date

2010-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main purpose of this study is to get more information on using BMS747158 (the study drug),a drug with small amounts of radioactivity to allow for heart imaging, during a PET scan which can then be compared to other images such as SPECT. The safety and quality of images will be studied.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary objectives of this study are:

* To acquire data for the development of one-day rest/stress cardiac PET perfusion imaging protocols for BMS747158 with comparable diagnostic image quality to a two-day rest/stress PET protocol
* To assess the safety of multiple doses of BMS747158

The secondary objectives of this study are:

* To assess PET imaging parameters and image quality following administration of BMS747158 at rest and at stress (pharmacologic or exercise) same day (at different time intervals) and 16-48 hours after the rest injection
* To assess feasibility of gated cardiac PET imaging with BMS747158 for left ventricular function assessment
* To assess agreement of one and two day rest/stress PET imaging with BMS747158 in patients with reversible ischemia with rest/stress single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging
* To perform a preliminary assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of one-day and two-day rest/stress PET perfusion imaging with BMS747158 as compared with invasive coronary angiography or computed tomography angiography (CTA) for detection of

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ischemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cohort 1: dose range and dose interval

Patients to receive either 2 or 3 IV bolus injections of BMS747158: 1 at rest and 1 or 2 during pharmacological or exercise stress, over a 1-day or 2-day period.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

BMS747158

Intervention Type DRUG

dosages at rest and at stress were not to exceed a total of 14 mCi.

Cohort 1: Patients received either 2 or 3 IV bolus injections of BMS747158: 1 at rest and 1 or 2 during stress, over a 1-day or 2-day period.

Cohort 2: Patients to recieve IV bolus injections of BMS747158:

For the Pharmacologic (Adenosine) Stress:

* Doses at rest were to range between 2.9 and 3.4 mCi.
* Doses under stress were to be a factor of 2.0 to 2.4 greater than the rest dose, resulting in a range of stress doses between 5.8 and 8.2 mCi.

For the Exercise Stress:

* Doses at rest were to range between 1.7 and 2.0 mCi.
* Doses under stress were to be a factor of 3.0 to 3.6 greater than the rest dose, resulting in a range between 5.1 and 7.2 mCi.

Cohort 2: Pharm&exercise stress Efficacy

Patients to receive 2 IV bolus injections of BMS747158:1 at rest and 1 at stress

For the Pharmacologic (Adenosine) Stress:

* Doses at rest to range between 2.9 and 3.4 mCi.
* Doses under stress to be a factor of 2.0 to 2.4 greater than the rest dose, resulting in a range of stress doses between 5.8 and 8.2 mCi.

For the Exercise Stress:

* Doses at rest were to range between 1.7 and 2.0 mCi.
* Doses under stress were to be a factor of 3.0 to 3.6 greater than the rest dose, resulting in a range between 5.1 and 7.2 mCi.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

BMS747158

Intervention Type DRUG

dosages at rest and at stress were not to exceed a total of 14 mCi.

Cohort 1: Patients received either 2 or 3 IV bolus injections of BMS747158: 1 at rest and 1 or 2 during stress, over a 1-day or 2-day period.

Cohort 2: Patients to recieve IV bolus injections of BMS747158:

For the Pharmacologic (Adenosine) Stress:

* Doses at rest were to range between 2.9 and 3.4 mCi.
* Doses under stress were to be a factor of 2.0 to 2.4 greater than the rest dose, resulting in a range of stress doses between 5.8 and 8.2 mCi.

For the Exercise Stress:

* Doses at rest were to range between 1.7 and 2.0 mCi.
* Doses under stress were to be a factor of 3.0 to 3.6 greater than the rest dose, resulting in a range between 5.1 and 7.2 mCi.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

BMS747158

dosages at rest and at stress were not to exceed a total of 14 mCi.

Cohort 1: Patients received either 2 or 3 IV bolus injections of BMS747158: 1 at rest and 1 or 2 during stress, over a 1-day or 2-day period.

Cohort 2: Patients to recieve IV bolus injections of BMS747158:

For the Pharmacologic (Adenosine) Stress:

* Doses at rest were to range between 2.9 and 3.4 mCi.
* Doses under stress were to be a factor of 2.0 to 2.4 greater than the rest dose, resulting in a range of stress doses between 5.8 and 8.2 mCi.

For the Exercise Stress:

* Doses at rest were to range between 1.7 and 2.0 mCi.
* Doses under stress were to be a factor of 3.0 to 3.6 greater than the rest dose, resulting in a range between 5.1 and 7.2 mCi.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

There are no other names

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Provide signed IC prior to undergoing any study procedures
* Be male or nonpregnant female, between the ages of 18 to 75 years, inclusive
* Have:A rest/stress SPECT imaging study (either exercise or pharmacologic stress) within 21 days of enrollment, using 99mTc-labeled tracers and showing reversible ischemia
* Female patients must:

* be nonlactating,
* no longer have child-bearing potential, either because they are post-menopausal (defined as amenorrhea ≥ 12 consecutive months, or because they have undergone successful surgical sterilization (hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation or bilateral oophorectomy)

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of any condition that may disrupt and/or increase permeability of the BBB, including multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, acute central nervous system (CNS) infection, CNS tumor, autoimmune disease affecting the CNS, or CNS inflammatory
* Current significant illness, pathology or physical examination or vital signs measurement-findings that could potentiate any adverse pharmacological event associated with a vasodilatory drug or any pathology that, in the opinion of the investigator, might confound the interpretation of the results of the study
* Known hypersensitivity to adenosine, dipyridamole or aminophylline
* Presence of any contraindications to exercise stress testing
* History of New York Heart Association Class III or IV Congestive Heart Failure (CHF)
* Any major surgery within 4 weeks prior to enrollment or planned within 2 weeks following completion of the 2-week telephone follow-up assessment
* Inability to tolerate IV medication.
* History of drug or alcohol abuse within the last year
* Participation in any investigational drug, device, or placebo study within 6 months prior to study enrollment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Lantheus Medical Imaging

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cesare Orlandi, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Lantheus Medical Imaging

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Silicon Valley Medical Imaging

Fremont, California, United States

Site Status

Scripps Memorial Hospital

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

UCLA Medical Plaza

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Radiological Associates of Sacramento

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

VA Healthcare System San Diego

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Hartford Hospital

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Yale University

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Emory University Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Primary Care Cardiology Research, Inc

Ayer, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Brigham & Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Cardiovascular Consultants

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Saint Louis University

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Holy Name Hospital

Teaneck, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Columbia University Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

St. Francis Hospital

Roslyn, New York, United States

Site Status

University Hospital Case Medical Center

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Midwest Cardiology Research Foundation

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mountain States Health Alliance

Johnson City, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

East Tennessee Clinical Research Institute

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bateman TM. Cardiac positron emission tomography and the role of adenosine pharmacologic stress. Am J Cardiol. 2004 Jul 22;94(2A):19D-24D; discussion 24D-25D. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.04.013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15261128 (View on PubMed)

Beller GA. First annual Mario S. Verani, MD, Memorial lecture: clinical value of myocardial perfusion imaging in coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2003 Sep-Oct;10(5):529-42. doi: 10.1016/s1071-3581(03)00655-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14569247 (View on PubMed)

Beller GA, Bergmann SR. Myocardial perfusion imaging agents: SPECT and PET. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004 Jan-Feb;11(1):71-86. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2003.12.002. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14752475 (View on PubMed)

Beller GA, Zaret BL. Contributions of nuclear cardiology to diagnosis and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2000 Mar 28;101(12):1465-78. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.12.1465. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10736294 (View on PubMed)

Cerqueira MD, Verani MS, Schwaiger M, Heo J, Iskandrian AS. Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: results from the Adenoscan Multicenter Trial Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Feb;23(2):384-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90424-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8294691 (View on PubMed)

Guideri F, Ferber D, Galgano G, Isidori S, Blardi P, Pasini FL, Di Perri T. QTc interval prolongation during infusion with dipyridamole or adenosine. Int J Cardiol. 1995 Jan 27;48(1):67-73. doi: 10.1016/0167-5273(94)02209-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7744540 (View on PubMed)

Glover DK, Gropler RJ. Journey to find the ideal PET flow tracer for clinical use: are we there yet? J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):765-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.09.019. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18022101 (View on PubMed)

Henzlova MJ, Cerqueira MD, Mahmarian JJ, Yao SS; Quality Assurance Committee of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Stress protocols and tracers. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006 Nov;13(6):e80-90. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2006.08.011. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17174798 (View on PubMed)

Miyamoto MI, Vernotico SL, Majmundar H, Thomas GS. Pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging: a practical approach. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 Apr;14(2):250-5. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.01.006. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17386388 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BMS747158-201

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.