Trial Outcomes & Findings for A 2-Year Phase 3 Study Of CP-690,550 In Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis On Background Methotrexate (NCT NCT00847613)
NCT ID: NCT00847613
Last Updated: 2024-05-16
Results Overview
ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in tender joint count; \>=20% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP). For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 6 analysis.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
800 participants
Month 6
2024-05-16
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20 percent (%) reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
321
|
319
|
81
|
79
|
|
Overall Study
Treated
|
321
|
316
|
81
|
79
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
321
|
319
|
81
|
79
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20 percent (%) reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Ongoing at cut-off date
|
250
|
265
|
64
|
64
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
36
|
26
|
5
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
7
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Study terminated by Sponsor
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
5
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
6
|
6
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Pregnancy
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Site closure
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
8
|
11
|
2
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Participant moved
|
4
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Sponsor request
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Randomized, but not treated
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A 2-Year Phase 3 Study Of CP-690,550 In Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis On Background Methotrexate
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=321 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=316 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 5 mg
n=81 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20 percent (%) reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=79 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Total
n=797 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
53.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6 • n=93 Participants
|
52.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4 • n=4 Participants
|
53.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5 • n=27 Participants
|
52.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 • n=483 Participants
|
52.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5 • n=36 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
269 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
273 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
65 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
72 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
679 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
52 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
118 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 6Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing values due to withdrawal or advancement to active treatment before Month 6 were imputed using Non-responder Imputation (NRI) method.
ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in tender joint count; \>=20% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire \[HAQ\]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP). For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 6 analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=154 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Month 6
|
51.46 percentage of participants
|
61.81 percentage of participants
|
25.32 percentage of participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 6Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
mTSS = sum of erosion and Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) scores for 44 joints (16 per hand and 6 per foot). mTSS scores ranged from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst possible total score). Change: scores at observation minus score at baseline. An increase in mTSS from baseline represented disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represented halting of disease progression, and a decrease represented improvement. For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 6 analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=286 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=295 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=139 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Changes From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Month 6
Baseline
|
28.66 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.98
|
34.66 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.95
|
29.53 units on a scale
Standard Error 4.25
|
—
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Month 6
Change at Month 6
|
0.12 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
0.06 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
0.47 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom, arise, eat, walk, reach, grip, hygiene and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale, 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty;2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain sc ores and divided by number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3: 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty. For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 3 analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=315 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=156 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Month 3
Baseline
|
1.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
1.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
1.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Month 3
Change at Month 3
|
-0.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.45
|
-0.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
-0.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.38
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing values due to withdrawal or advancement to active treatment before Month 6 were imputed using NRI method.
DAS28-4 (ESR) calculated from swollen joint count (SJC) and tender/painful joint count (TJC) using 28 joint count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour \[mm/hour\]) and patient's global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (transformed score ranging 0 to 10; higher score indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total score range:0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) less than or equal to (=\<) 3.2 implied low disease activity, greater than (\>) 3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and less than (\<) 2.6=remission. For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 6 analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=265 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=257 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=129 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participant With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6 at Month 6
|
7.17 percentage of participants
|
15.95 percentage of participants
|
1.55 percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 1, 3Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing values due to withdrawal or advancement to active treatment before Month 6 were imputed using NRI method.
ACR20 response: \>=20% improvement in tender joint count; \>=20% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of HAQ); and CRP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=154 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) at Month 1 and 3
Month 1
|
41.42 percentage of participants
|
52.10 percentage of participants
|
16.34 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) at Month 1 and 3
Month 3
|
56.31 percentage of participants
|
66.34 percentage of participants
|
27.27 percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed)signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing values due to withdrawal or advancement to active treatment before Month 6 were imputed using NRI method. Data for time points after Month 12 shall be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
ACR20 response: \>=20% improvement in tender joint count; \>=20% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of HAQ); and CRP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=79 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=75 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9
|
47.90 percentage of participants
|
62.46 percentage of participants
|
32.91 percentage of participants
|
29.33 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12
|
48.54 percentage of participants
|
56.96 percentage of participants
|
30.38 percentage of participants
|
33.33 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 1, 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed)signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing values due to withdrawal or advancement to active treatment before Month 6 were imputed using NRI method.
ACR50 response: greater than or equal to \>=50% improvement in tender joint count; \>=50% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of HAQ); and CRP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=154 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) at Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1
|
16.83 percentage of participants
|
18.45 percentage of participants
|
1.31 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) at Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3
|
28.80 percentage of participants
|
36.25 percentage of participants
|
7.79 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) at Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6
|
32.36 percentage of participants
|
43.69 percentage of participants
|
8.44 percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed)signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing values due to withdrawal or advancement to active treatment before Month 6 were imputed using NRI method. Data for time points after Month 12 shall be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
ACR50 response: greater than or equal to \>=50% improvement in tender joint count; \>=50% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of HAQ); and CRP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=79 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=75 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9
|
32.69 percentage of participants
|
44.01 percentage of participants
|
22.78 percentage of participants
|
20.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12
|
32.69 percentage of participants
|
41.10 percentage of participants
|
21.52 percentage of participants
|
16.00 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 1, 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed)signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing values due to withdrawal or advancement to active treatment before Month 6 were imputed using NRI method.
ACR70 response: \>=70% improvement in tender joint count; \>=70% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of HAQ); and CRP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=154 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) at Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1
|
3.88 percentage of participants
|
3.56 percentage of participants
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) at Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3
|
10.68 percentage of participants
|
17.15 percentage of participants
|
2.60 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) at Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6
|
14.56 percentage of participants
|
22.33 percentage of participants
|
1.30 percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed)signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing values due to withdrawal or advancement to active treatment before Month 6 were imputed using NRI method. Data for time points after Month 12 shall be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
ACR70 response: \>=70% improvement in tender joint count; \>=70% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of HAQ); and CRP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=79 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=75 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9
|
18.45 percentage of participants
|
28.48 percentage of participants
|
8.86 percentage of participants
|
12.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12
|
18.77 percentage of participants
|
27.51 percentage of participants
|
10.13 percentage of participants
|
12.00 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.
DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) =\<3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and \<2.6 implied remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=316 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=156 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3 (n=294,299,145)
|
3.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.13
|
3.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
4.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
—
|
|
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline (n=316,309,156)
|
5.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
5.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
5.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
—
|
|
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1 (n=309,308,152)
|
4.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
3.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
4.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
—
|
|
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6 (n=283,285,62)
|
3.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
2.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
3.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data for time points after Month 12 will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) =\<3.2 indicated low disease activity, \>3.2 to 5.1 indicated moderate to high disease activity and \<2.6 = remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=265 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=278 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=69 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9
|
3.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
2.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
2.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
3.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
|
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12
|
3.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
2.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
3.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
2.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.
DAS28-4 (ESR) calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and PGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed score ranging 0 to 10; higher score indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total score range:0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) =\<3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and \<2.6 implied remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=316 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=306 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=154 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline (n=316,306,154)
|
6.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
6.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
6.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
—
|
|
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1 (n=258,250,127)
|
5.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.32
|
4.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.28
|
5.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
—
|
|
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3 (n=249,248,122)
|
4.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.29
|
4.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.34
|
5.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
—
|
|
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6 (n=239,236,49)
|
4.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
3.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.31
|
4.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data for time points after Month 12 will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
DAS28-4 (ESR) calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and PtGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed score ranging 0 to 10; higher score indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total score range:0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) =\<3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and \<2.6 implied remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=227 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=229 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=56 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=54 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9
|
4.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
3.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.35
|
4.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.33
|
3.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.30
|
|
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12
|
4.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.31
|
3.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.34
|
4.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
3.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.35
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24Population: Since DAS28-4 (CRP) was determined to provide no new information over DAS28-4 (ESR) and DAS28-3 (CRP), there was a change in planned analysis and data was not analyzed for DAS28-4 (CRP).
DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count, CRP \[mg/L\] and PtGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 \[CRP\] \<=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS28-4 \[CRP\] \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and DAS28 \<2.6 implied remission.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24Population: Since DAS28-3 (ESR) was determined to provide no new information over DAS28-4 (ESR) and DAS28-3 (CRP), there was a change in planned analysis and data was not analyzed for DAS28-3 (ESR).
DAS28-3 (ESR) was calculated from the number of SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and ESR (mm/hr). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (ESR) \<=3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and \<2.6 implied remission.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
mTSS = sum of erosion and JSN scores for 44 joints (16 per hand and 6 per foot). mTSS scores ranged from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst possible total score). An increase in mTSS from baseline represented disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represented halting of disease progression, and a decrease represented improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=286 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=295 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=139 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Modified Total Sharp Scores (mTSS) at Baseline
|
31.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 47.71
|
37.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 54.10
|
32.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 41.80
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 12, 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data for Month 24 will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
mTSS = sum of erosion and JSN scores for 44 joints (16 per hand and 6 per foot). mTSS scores ranged from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst possible total score). An increase in mTSS from baseline represented disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represented halting of disease progression, and a decrease represented improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=286 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=295 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=71 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=68 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Modified Total Sharp Scores (mTSS) at Month 12 and 24
|
31.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 47.88
|
37.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 54.03
|
36.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 43.59
|
30.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 41.18
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=315 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=156 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline (n=315,309,156)
|
1.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
1.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
1.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
—
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1 (n=309,308,153)
|
1.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.67
|
1.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
1.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.67
|
—
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3 (n=295,300,146)
|
1.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
0.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
1.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.69
|
—
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6 (n=283,285,62)
|
0.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.62
|
0.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.64
|
1.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.62
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data for time points after Month 12 will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=265 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=278 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=69 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9
|
0.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
0.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.64
|
0.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
0.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.67
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12
|
0.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
0.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
0.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
0.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.
Participants rated the severity of arthritis pain on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) visual analogue scale (VAS), where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=316 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=156 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline (n=316,309,156)
|
58.39 mm
Standard Deviation 23.08
|
57.62 mm
Standard Deviation 24.10
|
55.01 mm
Standard Deviation 23.87
|
—
|
|
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1 (n=309,308,153)
|
41.61 mm
Standard Deviation 24.08
|
33.91 mm
Standard Deviation 22.30
|
49.22 mm
Standard Deviation 24.51
|
—
|
|
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3 (n=295,300,146)
|
34.47 mm
Standard Deviation 23.49
|
29.23 mm
Standard Deviation 21.95
|
46.96 mm
Standard Deviation 24.02
|
—
|
|
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6 (n=283,285,62)
|
32.79 mm
Standard Deviation 22.90
|
29.05 mm
Standard Deviation 22.71
|
36.76 mm
Standard Deviation 22.14
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data for time points after Month 12 will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
Participants rated the severity of arthritis pain on a 0 to 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS), where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=265 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=278 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=69 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9
|
31.59 mm
Standard Deviation 23.13
|
27.14 mm
Standard Deviation 23.10
|
31.74 mm
Standard Deviation 23.26
|
27.54 mm
Standard Deviation 23.12
|
|
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12
|
30.54 mm
Standard Deviation 23.00
|
27.45 mm
Standard Deviation 24.56
|
27.99 mm
Standard Deviation 23.55
|
29.41 mm
Standard Deviation 26.22
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS where 0 = very well and 100 = very poorly.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=316 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=308 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=156 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Month 1, 3, and 6
Baseline (n=316,308,156)
|
58.06 mm
Standard Deviation 23.62
|
56.45 mm
Standard Deviation 22.96
|
54.11 mm
Standard Deviation 22.87
|
—
|
|
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Month 1, 3, and 6
Month 1 (n=309,308,153)
|
41.26 mm
Standard Deviation 23.69
|
34.95 mm
Standard Deviation 21.43
|
48.30 mm
Standard Deviation 24.47
|
—
|
|
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Month 1, 3, and 6
Month 3 (n=295,300,146)
|
35.07 mm
Standard Deviation 22.68
|
29.11 mm
Standard Deviation 20.54
|
46.96 mm
Standard Deviation 24.09
|
—
|
|
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Month 1, 3, and 6
Month 6 (n=283,285,62)
|
33.48 mm
Standard Deviation 22.39
|
29.03 mm
Standard Deviation 22.68
|
38.87 mm
Standard Deviation 23.17
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data for time points after Month 12 will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS where 0 = very well and 100 = very poorly.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=265 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=278 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=69 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis Pain at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9
|
31.19 mm
Standard Deviation 22.10
|
28.05 mm
Standard Deviation 22.46
|
31.46 mm
Standard Deviation 23.22
|
27.41 mm
Standard Deviation 23.22
|
|
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis Pain at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12
|
31.77 mm
Standard Deviation 22.55
|
29.12 mm
Standard Deviation 24.06
|
29.60 mm
Standard Deviation 23.15
|
28.11 mm
Standard Deviation 24.09
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very good and 100 mm = very bad.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=316 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=156 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Arthritis at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline (n=316,309,156)
|
59.44 mm
Standard Deviation 15.87
|
58.42 mm
Standard Deviation 17.08
|
55.90 mm
Standard Deviation 17.37
|
—
|
|
Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Arthritis at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1 (n=309,308,152)
|
37.97 mm
Standard Deviation 18.58
|
35.19 mm
Standard Deviation 19.29
|
45.50 mm
Standard Deviation 19.57
|
—
|
|
Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Arthritis at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3 (n=294,300,146)
|
30.12 mm
Standard Deviation 18.61
|
24.47 mm
Standard Deviation 17.51
|
43.29 mm
Standard Deviation 22.25
|
—
|
|
Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Arthritis at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6 (n=283,284,61)
|
25.47 mm
Standard Deviation 18.62
|
20.44 mm
Standard Deviation 15.75
|
26.61 mm
Standard Deviation 17.73
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data for time points after Month 12 will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very good and 100 mm = very bad.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=264 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=278 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=69 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=62 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Arthritis at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9
|
21.68 mm
Standard Deviation 16.14
|
18.90 mm
Standard Deviation 15.89
|
19.92 mm
Standard Deviation 17.59
|
19.29 mm
Standard Deviation 15.53
|
|
Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Arthritis at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12
|
20.40 mm
Standard Deviation 15.71
|
17.97 mm
Standard Deviation 15.08
|
20.42 mm
Standard Deviation 16.63
|
18.79 mm
Standard Deviation 15.42
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning) and is reported as 2 summary scores; physical component score and mental component score. Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100, where higher score represents higher level of functioning.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=315 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=156 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1:physical component(n=307,308,153)
|
36.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.24
|
38.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.07
|
36.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.24
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3:mental health(n=295,300,146)
|
43.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.82
|
45.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.50
|
42.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.47
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3:role emotional(n=295,300,146)
|
39.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.64
|
43.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.97
|
38.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.46
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3:vitality(n=295,300,146)
|
46.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.31
|
48.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.52
|
44.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.15
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3:general health(n=294,300,146)
|
39.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.31
|
41.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.84
|
38.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.79
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3:mental component(n=294,300,146)
|
45.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.69
|
47.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.27
|
43.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.68
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3:physical component(n=294,300,146)
|
38.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.62
|
41.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.49
|
36.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.39
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6:physical functioning(n=283,284,62)
|
37.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.51
|
39.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.71
|
37.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.70
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6:role physical(n=282,284,62)
|
41.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.16
|
43.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.62
|
41.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.78
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6:social functioning(n=283,285,62)
|
42.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.58
|
44.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.53
|
42.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.48
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6:bodily pain(n=283,285,62)
|
41.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.81
|
44.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.37
|
40.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.06
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6:mental health(n=283,285,62)
|
44.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.86
|
45.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.34
|
43.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.46
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6:role emotional(n=282,284,62)
|
40.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.54
|
42.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.69
|
41.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.80
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3:role physical(n=295,300,146)
|
39.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.11
|
42.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.98
|
38.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.65
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3:physical functioning(n=295,300,146)
|
36.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.51
|
39.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.66
|
35.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.66
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3:social functioning(n=295,300,146)
|
42.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.60
|
44.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.27
|
40.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.23
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline:general health(n=315,309,156)
|
35.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.07
|
36.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.79
|
36.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.11
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline:physical functioning(n=315,309,156)
|
32.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.98
|
32.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.86
|
33.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.70
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline:role physical(n=315,309,156)
|
34.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.40
|
35.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.73
|
36.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.54
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline:social functioning(n=315,309,156)
|
37.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.05
|
39.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.42
|
39.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.54
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline:bodily pain(n=315,309,156)
|
34.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.52
|
34.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.89
|
35.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.05
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline:mental health(n=315,309,156)
|
39.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.30
|
40.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.15
|
42.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.28
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline:role emotional(n=315,309,156)
|
35.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.67
|
36.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.37
|
37.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.82
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline:vitality(n=315,309,156)
|
40.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.90
|
42.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.67
|
42.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.95
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline:mental component(n=315,309,156)
|
41.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.54
|
42.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.52
|
43.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.90
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline:physical component(n=315,309,156)
|
33.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.94
|
33.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.77
|
34.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.03
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1:physical functioning(n=308,308,153)
|
34.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.96
|
36.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.01
|
35.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.48
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1:role physical(n=307,308,153)
|
39.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.04
|
41.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.81
|
38.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.24
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1:social functioning(n=308,308,153)
|
41.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.44
|
43.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.06
|
41.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.57
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1:bodily pain(n=308,308,153)
|
39.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.08
|
42.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.41
|
37.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.93
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1:mental health(n=308,308,153)
|
43.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.76
|
44.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.82
|
42.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.98
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1:role emotional(n=307,308,153)
|
39.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.34
|
41.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.03
|
38.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.47
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1:vitality(n=308,308,153)
|
45.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.33
|
46.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.77
|
43.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.40
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1:general health(n=308,308,153)
|
38.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.28
|
39.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.00
|
37.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.85
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1:mental component(n=307,308,153)
|
44.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.74
|
46.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.70
|
43.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.90
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3:bodily pain(n=295,300,146)
|
41.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.23
|
44.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.02
|
38.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.16
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6:vitality(n=283,285,62)
|
46.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.11
|
48.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.42
|
46.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.14
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6:general health(n=283,285,62)
|
40.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.14
|
41.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.24
|
39.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.03
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6:mental component(n=282,284,62)
|
45.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.86
|
46.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.85
|
45.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.35
|
—
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6:physical component(n=282,284,62)
|
39.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.39
|
41.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.56
|
39.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.99
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data for time points after Month 12 will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning) and is reported as 2 summary scores; physical component score and mental component score. Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100, where higher score represents higher level of functioning.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=264 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=278 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=69 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9:physical functioning
|
37.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.38
|
40.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.70
|
38.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.62
|
41.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.80
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9:role physical
|
41.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.30
|
43.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.86
|
41.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.87
|
44.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.21
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9:social functioning
|
44.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.13
|
45.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.67
|
43.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.10
|
45.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.40
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9:bodily pain
|
42.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.90
|
44.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.45
|
43.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.56
|
47.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.99
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9:mental health
|
45.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.18
|
45.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.75
|
44.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.29
|
48.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.68
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9:role emotional
|
41.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.56
|
43.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.72
|
41.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.43
|
45.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.54
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9:vitality
|
47.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.28
|
47.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.81
|
46.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.02
|
50.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.83
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9:general health
|
40.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.16
|
42.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.57
|
40.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.64
|
43.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.96
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9:mental component
|
46.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.50
|
46.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.16
|
45.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.01
|
49.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.98
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9:physical component
|
39.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.38
|
42.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.75
|
40.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.47
|
43.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.11
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12:physical functioning
|
38.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.83
|
40.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.03
|
39.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.51
|
42.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.02
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12:role physical
|
41.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.19
|
43.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.93
|
42.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.62
|
45.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.12
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12:social functioning
|
43.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.56
|
45.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.54
|
44.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.48
|
47.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.29
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12:bodily pain
|
42.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.85
|
44.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.59
|
43.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.21
|
45.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.89
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12:mental health
|
44.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.78
|
45.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.22
|
44.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.07
|
46.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.48
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12:role emotional
|
41.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.73
|
42.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.44
|
41.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.59
|
44.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.34
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12:vitality
|
47.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.15
|
48.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.96
|
47.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.04
|
49.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.33
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12:general health
|
40.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.31
|
41.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.38
|
40.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.38
|
43.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.53
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12:mental component
|
45.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.23
|
46.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.61
|
45.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.12
|
47.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.79
|
|
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12:physical component
|
40.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.61
|
42.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.82
|
41.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.29
|
43.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.20
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.
Participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week.7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakened short of breath, sleep adequacy, somnolence (range:0-100); sleep quantity(range:0-24), optimal sleep(yes or no). 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores: sleep problem summary, overall sleep problem. Except Adequacy, Optimal, Quantity of sleep, higher scores=more impairment. Scores transformed(actual raw score(RS) minus lowest possible score divided by possible RS range\*100);total score range:0-100,higher score=more intensity of attribute.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=314 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=156 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1:sleep problem summary(n=307,307,151)
|
33.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.86
|
33.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.97
|
35.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.46
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1:somnolence(n=307,307,151)
|
32.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.27
|
30.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.22
|
32.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.78
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1:snoring(n=308,306,151)
|
31.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.13
|
30.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.25
|
29.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.92
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1:quantity(n=307,306,153)
|
6.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.51
|
6.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.31
|
6.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.46
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1:sleep disturbance(n=308,307,151)
|
34.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.26
|
33.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.86
|
33.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.06
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1:awaken short of breath(n=308,307,151)
|
15.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.95
|
11.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.70
|
14.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.80
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1:adequacy(n=308,307,151)
|
51.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.31
|
49.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.28
|
47.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.79
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3:overall sleep problem(n=295,300,146)
|
34.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.37
|
34.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.56
|
35.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.16
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3:snoring(n=295,299,146)
|
33.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.36
|
28.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.81
|
30.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.01
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3:sleep problem summary(n=295,300,146)
|
33.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.90
|
33.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.97
|
35.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.04
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3:somnolence(n=295,300,146)
|
31.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.52
|
28.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.43
|
32.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.57
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3:quantity(n=295,300,146)
|
6.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.51
|
6.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.34
|
6.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.43
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3:sleep disturbance(n=295,300,146)
|
34.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.15
|
34.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.81
|
33.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.49
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3:awaken short of breath(n=295,300,146)
|
16.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.68
|
14.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.52
|
15.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.56
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3:adequacy(n=295,300,146)
|
52.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.21
|
50.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.31
|
48.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.74
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6:overall sleep problem(n=282,285,62)
|
33.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.14
|
32.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.56
|
32.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.97
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6:awaken short of breath(n=283,285,62)
|
15.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.21
|
13.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.19
|
13.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.47
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6:sleep problem summary(n=282,285,62)
|
32.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.38
|
32.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.84
|
31.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.05
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline:overall sleep problem(n=314,309,156)
|
40.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.12
|
39.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.48
|
37.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.32
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6:somnolence(n=283,285,62)
|
30.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.25
|
28.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.17
|
27.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.31
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline:sleep problem summary(n=314,309,156)
|
38.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.70
|
38.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.62
|
36.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.50
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6:snoring(n=283,285,62)
|
31.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.85
|
31.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.29
|
29.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.12
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline:somnolence(n=314,309,156)
|
36.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.74
|
34.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.05
|
33.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.13
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6:quantity(n=283,285,62)
|
6.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.46
|
6.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
6.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.32
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6:sleep disturbance(n=282,285,62)
|
31.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.72
|
32.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.14
|
31.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.56
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline:snoring(n=312,309,156)
|
34.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.74
|
29.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.28
|
29.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.02
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6:adequacy(n=283,285,62)
|
53.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.54
|
52.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.99
|
51.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.64
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline:quantity(n=315,308,155)
|
6.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.44
|
6.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
6.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.39
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline:sleep disturbance(n=314,309,156)
|
41.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.04
|
40.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.64
|
36.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.76
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline:awaken short of breath(n=314,309,156)
|
17.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.82
|
15.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.60
|
14.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.80
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline:adequacy(n=314,309,156)
|
46.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.23
|
45.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.37
|
46.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.14
|
—
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1:overall sleep problem(n=307,307,151)
|
34.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.68
|
33.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.55
|
35.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.12
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.
MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakened short of breath, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity and optimal sleep. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not by choosing yes or no. Number of participants with optimal sleep are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=315 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=156 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline (n=315,309,156)
|
140 participants
|
132 participants
|
70 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1 (n=309,309,153)
|
144 participants
|
156 participants
|
67 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3 (n=295,300,146)
|
140 participants
|
150 participants
|
71 participants
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6 (n=283,285,139)
|
132 participants
|
140 participants
|
64 participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 12, 18, 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data for time points after Month 12 will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
Participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week.7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakened short of breath, sleep adequacy, somnolence (range:0-100); sleep quantity(range:0-24), optimal sleep(yes or no). 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores: sleep problem summary, overall sleep problem. Except Adequacy, Optimal, Quantity of sleep, higher scores=more impairment. Scores transformed(actual raw score(RS) minus lowest possible score divided by possible RS range\*100);total score range:0-100,higher score=more intensity of attribute.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=248 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=264 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=67 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:overall sleep problem
|
32.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.21
|
32.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.05
|
30.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.24
|
28.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.87
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:sleep problem summary
|
31.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.69
|
31.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.21
|
31.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.18
|
28.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.96
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:somnolence
|
30.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.71
|
29.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.78
|
28.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.81
|
25.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.62
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:snoring
|
31.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.75
|
30.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.14
|
31.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.18
|
25.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.25
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:quantity
|
6.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
6.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
6.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.46
|
6.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.52
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:sleep disturbance
|
30.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.45
|
31.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.09
|
29.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.07
|
24.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.02
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:awaken short of breath
|
14.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.23
|
13.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.86
|
15.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.16
|
13.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.14
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:adequacy
|
53.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.11
|
52.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.33
|
55.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.66
|
53.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.77
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 12, 18, 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data reported for Month 12. For time points after Month 12, data will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakened short of breath, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity and optimal sleep. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not by choosing yes or no. Number of participants with optimal sleep are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=251 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=265 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=67 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Month 12, 18 and 24
|
131 participants
|
134 participants
|
36 participants
|
28 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.
FACIT-Fatigue is a 13-item questionnaire. Participant scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as 4 minus the participant's response. The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflected an improvement in the participant's health status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=315 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=307 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=155 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale at Baseline, Month 1, 3, and 6
Baseline (n=315,307,155)
|
28.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.62
|
29.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.62
|
31.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.06
|
—
|
|
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale at Baseline, Month 1, 3, and 6
Month 1 (n=309,306,150)
|
33.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.47
|
34.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.19
|
31.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.63
|
—
|
|
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale at Baseline, Month 1, 3, and 6
Month 3 (n=295,300,146)
|
34.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.29
|
36.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.53
|
31.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.10
|
—
|
|
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale at Baseline, Month 1, 3, and 6
Month 6 (n=283,284,61)
|
34.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.95
|
36.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.76
|
33.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.06
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 12, 18, 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data reported for Month 12. For time points after Month 12, data will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
FACIT-Fatigue is a 13-item questionnaire. Participant scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as 4 minus the participant's response. The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflected an improvement in the participant's health status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=250 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=265 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=67 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=62 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale at Month 12, 18 and 24
|
35.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.00
|
35.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.04
|
35.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.65
|
37.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.98
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=313 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=153 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D)- Health State Profile Utility Score at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3 (n=261,262,125)
|
0.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.27
|
0.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.22
|
0.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
—
|
|
Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D)- Health State Profile Utility Score at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline (n=313,309,153)
|
0.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
0.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
0.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
—
|
|
Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D)- Health State Profile Utility Score at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6 (n=283,285,62)
|
0.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.25
|
0.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
0.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 12, 18, 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data reported for Month 12. For time points after Month 12, data will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=251 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=265 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=67 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Euro Quality of Life (EQ-5D)- Health State Profile Utility Score at Month 12, 18 and 24
|
0.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.25
|
0.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
0.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
0.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.22
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.
WLQ: participant-reported 25-item scale to evaluate degree to which health problems interfere with an ability to perform job roles along 4 dimensions: Time Management scale (5-items); Physical Demands scale (6-item); Mental-Interpersonal Demands Scale (9-items); Output Demands scale (5-items). All the scales ranged from 0 (limited none of the time) to 100 (limited all of the time). Work Loss Index, which represented percentage of lost work over time period relative to a normative population, was derived (total score:0\[no loss\] to 100\[complete loss of work\]).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=155 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=157 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=87 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:physical demands(n=149,152,86)
|
50.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.18
|
50.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.19
|
49.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.67
|
—
|
|
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:time management(n=147,146,81)
|
49.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.59
|
41.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.90
|
44.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.39
|
—
|
|
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:mental demands(n=151,151,86)
|
33.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.41
|
29.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.47
|
33.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.93
|
—
|
|
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:output demands(n=149,147,83)
|
38.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.66
|
36.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.95
|
40.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.38
|
—
|
|
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:work loss index(n=155,157,87)
|
11.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.71
|
9.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.66
|
10.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.78
|
—
|
|
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:time management(n=107,116,52)
|
45.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.06
|
35.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.78
|
41.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.36
|
—
|
|
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:physical demands(n=106,124,55)
|
47.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.37
|
44.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.26
|
46.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.36
|
—
|
|
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:mental demands(n=111,124,55
|
27.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.18
|
23.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.09
|
34.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.87
|
—
|
|
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:output demands(n=108,119,54)
|
32.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.67
|
25.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.69
|
39.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.44
|
—
|
|
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:work loss index(n=111,127,55)
|
9.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.29
|
7.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.44
|
10.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.40
|
—
|
|
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:time management(n=97,116,19)
|
37.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.57
|
34.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.47
|
40.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.70
|
—
|
|
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:physical demands(n=104,116,19)
|
48.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.47
|
43.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.57
|
43.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.26
|
—
|
|
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:mental demands(n=103,117,18)
|
25.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.75
|
21.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.40
|
32.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.69
|
—
|
|
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:output demands(n=101,117,18)
|
29.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.61
|
24.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.30
|
35.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.78
|
—
|
|
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:work loss index(n=105,123,19)
|
8.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.75
|
7.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.57
|
10.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.54
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 12, 18, 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively. Data for time points after Month 12 will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
WLQ: participant-reported 25-item scale to evaluate degree to which health problems interfere with an ability to perform job roles along 4 dimensions: Time Management scale (5-items); Physical Demands scale (6-item); Mental-Interpersonal Demands Scale (9-items); Output Demands scale (5-items). All the scales ranged from 0 (limited none of the time) to 100 (limited all of the time). Work Loss Index, which represented percentage of lost work over time period relative to a normative population, was derived (total score:0\[no loss\] to 100\[complete loss of work\]).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=94 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=118 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=23 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=33 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:physical demands(n=91,110,22,33)
|
45.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.67
|
46.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.53
|
47.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.96
|
41.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.89
|
|
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:time management(n=92,108,22,32)
|
35.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.75
|
31.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.68
|
43.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.76
|
37.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.88
|
|
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:mental demands(n=93,115,23,33)
|
21.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.05
|
20.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.99
|
39.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.39
|
27.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.57
|
|
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:output demands(n=93,107,23,31)
|
23.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.59
|
21.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.52
|
37.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.59
|
33.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.78
|
|
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:work loss index(n=94,118,23,33)
|
7.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.94
|
6.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.98
|
11.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.64
|
9.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.91
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months for direct, indirect medical cost domains. Direct cost: visit to doctor, non-medical practitioner, nursing home, hospital, surgery, emergency room(ER) treatment, diagnostic tests, over-night stay, home healthcare services, aids/devices used. Indirect costs associated with functional disability: employment status, willingness to work, work disability due to RA, sick leave, part time work, ability to perform chores, chores done by family, friends or housekeeper. Assessment was based on 0 to 2-point scale; higher score=higher medical cost.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=315 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=306 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=155 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Treated in emergency room(n=259,260,121)
|
1.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
1.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.22
|
1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Non-study diagnostic test(n=259,260,121)
|
1.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.35
|
1.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.37
|
1.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.32
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:In nursing home(n=259,260,121)
|
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Home healthcare services(n=257,260,121)
|
1.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Required aids/devices(n=259,260,121)
|
1.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.29
|
1.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.29
|
1.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Unable to work due to RA(n=148,139,67)
|
1.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Lost job/retired early(n=148,139,67)
|
1.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
1.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
1.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Work disabled due to RA(n=150,140,68)
|
1.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
1.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Retired(n=150,142,70)
|
1.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Sick leave due to RA(n=175,200,89)
|
1.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
1.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Performed paid work(n=174,197,88)
|
1.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.46
|
1.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
1.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.46
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Unable to do chores(n=257,256,121)
|
1.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
1.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.46
|
1.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Chores by housekeeper(n=257,259,121)
|
1.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
1.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.27
|
1.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Chores by family/friends(n=257,259,121)
|
1.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.47
|
1.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
1.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Seen any doctor(n=282,285,61)
|
1.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.41
|
1.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.41
|
1.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.47
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Treated in emergency room(n=283,285,61)
|
1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
1.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
1.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.25
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Admitted for overnight stay (n=17,12,4)
|
0.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.33
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
1.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Hospitalization(n=283,285,61)
|
1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
1.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.25
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Outpatient surgery(n=283,285,61)
|
1.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
1.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.22
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Non-study diagnostic test(n=282,284,61)
|
1.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.41
|
1.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
|
1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:In nursing home(n=283,285,61)
|
1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Home healthcare services(n=282,284,61)
|
1.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
1.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Required aids/devices(n=283,285,61)
|
1.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Lost job/retired early(n=173,158,38)
|
1.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.46
|
1.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
1.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.41
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Performed part time work(n=193,215,37)
|
1.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
1.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.28
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Performed paid work(n=193,216,37)
|
1.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
1.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
1.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Chores by family/friends(n=281,285,61)
|
1.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.46
|
1.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.42
|
1.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Hospitalization(n=259,260,121)
|
1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
1.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Outpatient surgery(n=259,260,121)
|
1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
1.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Non-medical practitioner(n=259,260,121)
|
1.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
1.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline: Seen any doctor (n=315, 305, 154)
|
1.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.34
|
1.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
|
1.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Treated in emergency room(n=315,306,155)
|
1.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
1.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Admitted for overnight stay (n=22,12,9)
|
0.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.63
|
0.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.45
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Hospitalization(n=315,306,155)
|
1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Outpatient surgery(n=315,305,155)
|
1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
1.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Non-study diagnostic test(n=315,306,155)
|
1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
1.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.37
|
1.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:In nursing home(n=315,306,155)
|
1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Home healthcare services(n=315,306,154)
|
1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
1.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Required aids/devices(n=315,306,155)
|
1.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.34
|
1.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.29
|
1.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Non-medical practitioner(n=315,306,155)
|
1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
1.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Currently employed(n=314,306,155)
|
1.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
1.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
1.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Feel well enough to work(n=182,166,89)
|
1.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.33
|
1.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.35
|
1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Unable to work due to RA(n=185,169,88)
|
1.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
1.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
1.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.47
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Lost job/retired early(n=184,169,86)
|
1.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
1.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
1.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.47
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Work disabled due to RA(n=186,168,88)
|
1.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
1.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Retired(n=193,171,92)
|
1.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Sick leave due to RA(n=236,236,123)
|
1.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.38
|
1.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
1.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Performed part time work(n=235,236,121)
|
1.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.34
|
1.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.33
|
1.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Performed paid work(n=235,235,122)
|
1.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
1.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
1.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Unable to do chores(n=312,302,152)
|
1.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
1.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Chores by housekeeper(n=315,305,155)
|
1.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.37
|
1.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
|
1.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Chores by family/friends(n=315,305,155)
|
1.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Seen any doctor(n=259,260,121)
|
1.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.46
|
1.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.46
|
1.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.45
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Admitted for overnight stay (n=14,12,4)
|
0.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
0.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.29
|
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Currently employed(n=259,260,121)
|
1.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
1.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Non-medical practitioner(n=283,285,61)
|
1.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Currently employed(n=283,285,61)
|
1.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
1.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
1.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.46
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Feel well enough to work(n=176,154,38)
|
1.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.42
|
1.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
1.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.41
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Unable to work due to RA(n=177,155,40)
|
1.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Work disabled due to RA(n=174,154,38)
|
1.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
1.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Retired(n=178,157,41)
|
1.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Sick leave due to RA(n=195,216,37)
|
1.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.27
|
1.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.22
|
1.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Unable to do chores(n=281,284,61)
|
1.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
1.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.40
|
1.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Chores by housekeeper(n=281,285,61)
|
1.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
1.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.28
|
1.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Feel well enough to work(n=147,140,68)
|
1.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.41
|
1.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.45
|
1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.38
|
—
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Performed part time work(n=176,196,89)
|
1.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.29
|
1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
1.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.34
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 12, 18, 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively. Data for time points after Month 12 shall be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months for direct, indirect medical cost domains. Direct cost:visit to doctor,non-medical practitioner,nursing home,hospital,surgery,emergency room(ER) treatment,diagnostic tests, over-night stay,home healthcare services, aids/devices used. Indirect costs associated with functional disability:employment status,willingness to work,work disability due to RA,sick leave,part time work,ability to perform chores,chores done by family/friends/housekeeper. Assessment was based on 0 to 2-point scale;higher score=higher medical cost.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=250 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=265 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=67 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=63 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Treated in ER(n=250,265,67,63)
|
1.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
1.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
1.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Hospitalization(n=250,265,67,63)
|
1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
1.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
1.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:In nursing home(n=250,265,67,63)
|
1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Work disabled due to RA(n=151,143,42,30)
|
1.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
1.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.47
|
1.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Performed paid work(n=168,200,46,48)
|
1.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.42
|
1.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
1.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.42
|
1.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Unable to do chores(n=246,265,67,63)
|
1.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
1.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.42
|
1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
1.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Chores by housekeeper(n=249,264,67,63)
|
1.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.27
|
1.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.25
|
1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Chores by family/friends(n=249,264,67,63)
|
1.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
1.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.41
|
1.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
1.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.41
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Seen any doctor(n=250,265,67,63)
|
1.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.41
|
1.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
1.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.37
|
1.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.38
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Admitted for overnight stay(n=18,11,4,3)
|
0.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.38
|
0.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.40
|
0.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
0.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Outpatient surgery(n=250,265,67,63)
|
1.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.22
|
1.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
1.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Diagnostic test(n=250,265,67,63)
|
1.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.41
|
1.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
1.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.34
|
1.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.35
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Home healthcare services(n=249,264,67,63)
|
1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Required aids/devices(n=250,265,67,63)
|
1.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
1.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Non-medical practitioner(n=250,265,67,63)
|
1.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
1.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
1.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Currently employed(n=250,265,67,63)
|
1.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
1.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
1.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Feel well enough to work(n=151,141,41,29)
|
1.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.45
|
1.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
1.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.40
|
1.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Unable to work due to RA(n=150,141,41,29)
|
1.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.51
|
1.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Lost job/retired early(n=151,143,41,29)
|
1.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.45
|
1.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.47
|
1.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.47
|
1.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.38
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Retired(n=154,140,42,30)
|
1.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.51
|
1.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Sick leave due to RA(n=168,200,46,48)
|
1.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.25
|
1.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
1.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
1.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
|
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Performed part time work(n=167,199,46,48)
|
1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
1.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.
RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA/non-RA related number of events including visits to doctor, non-medical practitioner, hospital ER treatment, hospitalizations, number of surgeries, diagnostic tests, and devices/aids used were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=273 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=262 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=132 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:RA related ER visit(n=23,12,9)
|
0.74 events
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
0.83 events
Standard Deviation 1.34
|
0.56 events
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Doctor visit(n=273,262,132)
|
3.78 events
Standard Deviation 4.24
|
4.00 events
Standard Deviation 5.07
|
4.80 events
Standard Deviation 5.61
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:RA related doctor visit(n=271,262,131)
|
1.16 events
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
1.20 events
Standard Deviation 0.80
|
1.25 events
Standard Deviation 0.67
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Hospital ER visit(n=19,11,9)
|
1.42 events
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
1.73 events
Standard Deviation 1.27
|
1.22 events
Standard Deviation 0.67
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Hospitalization(n=18,18,5)
|
1.17 events
Standard Deviation 0.51
|
1.17 events
Standard Deviation 0.38
|
1.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:RA related hospitalization(n=18,19,5)
|
1.11 events
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
1.32 events
Standard Deviation 1.34
|
1.40 events
Standard Deviation 0.55
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Outpatient surgery(n=8,13,5)
|
1.13 events
Standard Deviation 0.35
|
1.85 events
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
1.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:RA related outpatient surgery(n=8,14,5)
|
0.38 events
Standard Deviation 0.52
|
0.43 events
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
0.40 events
Standard Deviation 0.55
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Non-study diagnostic test(n=56,51,22)
|
1.80 events
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
1.67 events
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
1.73 events
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:RA related diagnostic test(n=57,53,23)
|
0.74 events
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
0.77 events
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
0.83 events
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Non-medical practitioner visit(n=10,17,7)
|
12.50 events
Standard Deviation 12.29
|
10.88 events
Standard Deviation 13.09
|
12.57 events
Standard Deviation 13.23
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:RA related non-medical visit(n=11,18,7)
|
1.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
1.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
1.57 events
Standard Deviation 1.27
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Doctor visit(n=181,181,89)
|
2.85 events
Standard Deviation 1.79
|
3.08 events
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
3.27 events
Standard Deviation 3.73
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:RA related doctor visit(n=181,180,89)
|
0.92 events
Standard Deviation 0.63
|
0.79 events
Standard Deviation 0.54
|
0.87 events
Standard Deviation 0.61
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Hospital ER visit(n=14,11,4)
|
1.29 events
Standard Deviation 0.61
|
1.45 events
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
1.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:RA related ER visit(n=14,13,4)
|
0.29 events
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
0.15 events
Standard Deviation 0.55
|
0.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Hospitalization(n=9,4,1)
|
1.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
1.25 events
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
2.00 events
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:RA related hospitalization(n=9,4,1)
|
0.11 events
Standard Deviation 0.33
|
0.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.00 events
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Outpatient surgery(n=8,5,1)
|
1.25 events
Standard Deviation 0.46
|
1.20 events
Standard Deviation 0.45
|
1.00 events
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:RA related outpatient surgery(n=8,5,1)
|
0.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.00 events
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Non-study diagnostic test(n=32,43,13)
|
1.41 events
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
1.56 events
Standard Deviation 1.35
|
1.46 events
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:RA related diagnostic test(n=37,44,14)
|
0.14 events
Standard Deviation 0.35
|
0.07 events
Standard Deviation 0.25
|
0.14 events
Standard Deviation 0.36
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Non-medical practitioner visit(n=4,8,3)
|
7.50 events
Standard Deviation 11.03
|
3.63 events
Standard Deviation 1.51
|
22.33 events
Standard Deviation 11.24
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:RA related non-medical visit(n=4,8,3)
|
0.50 events
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
0.38 events
Standard Deviation 0.52
|
0.67 events
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Doctor visit(n=226,225,43)
|
3.00 events
Standard Deviation 2.89
|
2.72 events
Standard Deviation 2.28
|
4.51 events
Standard Deviation 6.05
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:RA related doctor visit(n=225,224,43)
|
0.87 events
Standard Deviation 0.56
|
0.86 events
Standard Deviation 0.56
|
0.91 events
Standard Deviation 0.61
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Hospital ER visit(n=15,12,4)
|
1.27 events
Standard Deviation 0.59
|
1.33 events
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
2.25 events
Standard Deviation 2.50
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:RA related ER visit(n=16,12,4)
|
0.25 events
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
0.33 events
Standard Deviation 0.78
|
0.50 events
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Hospitalization(n=3,3,4)
|
1.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
1.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
1.25 events
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Non-study diagnostic test(n=58,41,11)
|
1.78 events
Standard Deviation 1.83
|
1.73 events
Standard Deviation 1.40
|
2.00 events
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:RA related diagnostic test(n=60,44,11)
|
0.25 events
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
0.25 events
Standard Deviation 0.69
|
0.09 events
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Non-medical practitioner visit(n=6,8,2)
|
15.00 events
Standard Deviation 17.34
|
6.13 events
Standard Deviation 4.55
|
25.00 events
Standard Deviation 7.07
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:RA related non-medical visit(n=6,8,3)
|
1.50 events
Standard Deviation 1.52
|
0.25 events
Standard Deviation 0.46
|
1.67 events
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:RA related hospitalization(n=3,3,4)
|
0.33 events
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
0.33 events
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
0.50 events
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Outpatient surgery(n=12,2,3)
|
1.33 events
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
1.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
1.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
—
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:RA related outpatient surgery(n=12,3,3)
|
0.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 12, 18, 24Population: FAS. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively. Data for time points after Month 12 will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA/non-RA related number of events including visits to doctor, non-medical practitioner, hospital ER treatment, hospitalizations, number of surgeries, diagnostic tests, and devices/aids used were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=197 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=221 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=56 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=52 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Doctor visit(n=197,221,56,52)
|
2.70 events
Standard Deviation 2.74
|
2.43 events
Standard Deviation 2.26
|
3.27 events
Standard Deviation 4.02
|
2.81 events
Standard Deviation 3.91
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:RA related doctor visit (n=197,220,56,52)
|
0.92 events
Standard Deviation 0.52
|
0.89 events
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
0.93 events
Standard Deviation 0.60
|
0.88 events
Standard Deviation 0.47
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Hospital ER visit(n=18,11,4,3)
|
1.61 events
Standard Deviation 1.58
|
1.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
1.25 events
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:RA related ER visit(n=18,11,4,3)
|
0.11 events
Standard Deviation 0.32
|
0.09 events
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
0.25 events
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
0.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:RA related outpatient surgery(n=13,4,1,1)
|
0.46 events
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
0.25 events
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
2.00 events
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
0.00 events
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Non-study diagnostic test(n=50,47,9,8)
|
1.98 events
Standard Deviation 1.49
|
1.55 events
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
2.00 events
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
1.88 events
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:RA related diagnostic test(n=52,50,9,9)
|
0.27 events
Standard Deviation 0.56
|
0.24 events
Standard Deviation 0.48
|
0.22 events
Standard Deviation 0.67
|
0.11 events
Standard Deviation 0.33
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Non-medical practitioner visit(n=4,6,4,1)
|
12.00 events
Standard Deviation 5.86
|
9.83 events
Standard Deviation 15.03
|
10.00 events
Standard Deviation 7.12
|
9.00 events
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:RA related non-medical visit(n=4,6,4,1)
|
1.25 events
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
0.17 events
Standard Deviation 0.41
|
0.75 events
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
0.00 events
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Hospitalization(n=8,4,2,1)
|
1.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
1.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
1.50 events
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
1.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:RA related hospitalization(n=8,4,2,1)
|
0.50 events
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
0.50 events
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
0.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.00 events
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Outpatient surgery(n=13,4,1,1)
|
2.31 events
Standard Deviation 2.39
|
1.00 events
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
1.00 events
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
2.00 events
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.
RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains.Any RA or non-RA related number of days spent in hospital, nursing home, aids/devices used, on sick leave, work per week, performed part time work, performed paid work, chores done by housekeeper and chores done by family/friends.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=158 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=152 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=73 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Days of work per week(n=109,121,59)
|
5.01 days
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
5.14 days
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
4.93 days
Standard Deviation 1.39
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Days on sick leave due to RA(n=41,44,29)
|
13.17 days
Standard Deviation 21.61
|
16.84 days
Standard Deviation 27.67
|
15.45 days
Standard Deviation 25.69
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Days of part time work(n=30,29,12)
|
9.07 days
Standard Deviation 12.62
|
12.07 days
Standard Deviation 16.50
|
26.92 days
Standard Deviation 32.20
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Paid work, bothered by RA(n=92,88,48)
|
29.13 days
Standard Deviation 30.81
|
31.59 days
Standard Deviation 30.12
|
31.90 days
Standard Deviation 31.61
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Chores by housekeeper(n=50,44,15)
|
19.06 days
Standard Deviation 23.91
|
20.89 days
Standard Deviation 33.69
|
17.87 days
Standard Deviation 18.71
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Chores by family(n=158,152,73)
|
36.28 days
Standard Deviation 34.40
|
30.39 days
Standard Deviation 34.00
|
37.11 days
Standard Deviation 34.99
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Days aids/devices used(n=23,22,13)
|
107.22 days
Standard Deviation 102.77
|
69.36 days
Standard Deviation 60.36
|
85.00 days
Standard Deviation 57.64
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:RA related aids used(n=23,24,14)
|
1.78 days
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
1.21 days
Standard Deviation 0.51
|
1.21 days
Standard Deviation 0.70
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Days of work per week(n=97,113,48)
|
5.03 days
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
5.25 days
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
4.88 days
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Days on sick leave due to RA(n=19,15,16)
|
12.16 days
Standard Deviation 20.51
|
8.20 days
Standard Deviation 19.95
|
11.13 days
Standard Deviation 21.56
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Chores by housekeeper(n=25,21,12)
|
17.00 days
Standard Deviation 20.88
|
6.05 days
Standard Deviation 33.69
|
21.75 days
Standard Deviation 18.71
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Chores by family(n=84,70,57)
|
31.37 days
Standard Deviation 34.32
|
21.46 days
Standard Deviation 29.48
|
27.53 days
Standard Deviation 33.51
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Days aids/devices used(n=27,17,2)
|
93.44 days
Standard Deviation 104.39
|
87.12 days
Standard Deviation 61.54
|
110.00 days
Standard Deviation 98.99
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:RA related aids used(n=28,18,2)
|
1.36 days
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
1.56 days
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
2.00 days
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Days of work per week(n=98,117,18)
|
5.02 days
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
5.29 days
Standard Deviation 0.78
|
4.94 days
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Days on sick leave due to RA(n=15,11,4)
|
14.93 days
Standard Deviation 24.05
|
14.18 days
Standard Deviation 25.86
|
24.25 days
Standard Deviation 43.84
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Days of part time work(n=8,12,3)
|
11.88 days
Standard Deviation 14.99
|
11.33 days
Standard Deviation 11.44
|
4.33 days
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Paid work, bothered by RA(n=46,52,13)
|
18.87 days
Standard Deviation 25.75
|
18.67 days
Standard Deviation 19.85
|
12.85 days
Standard Deviation 15.66
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Chores by housekeeper(n=30,24,6)
|
15.90 days
Standard Deviation 22.43
|
18.08 days
Standard Deviation 26.29
|
44.00 days
Standard Deviation 40.99
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Chores by family(n=85,66,15)
|
29.41 days
Standard Deviation 33.22
|
29.65 days
Standard Deviation 33.02
|
34.87 days
Standard Deviation 40.65
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Hospital length of stay(n=18,18,5)
|
10.94 days
Standard Deviation 9.12
|
20.22 days
Standard Deviation 19.70
|
22.20 days
Standard Deviation 15.37
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Days in nursing home(n=3,3,2)
|
14.33 days
Standard Deviation 12.10
|
17.67 days
Standard Deviation 3.51
|
15.50 days
Standard Deviation 7.78
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Days aids/devices used(n=41,25,14)
|
109.63 days
Standard Deviation 108.88
|
74.08 days
Standard Deviation 66.11
|
102.21 days
Standard Deviation 75.87
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:RA related aids used(n=42,29,14)
|
1.93 days
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
1.59 days
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
1.64 days
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Hospital length of stay(n=9,4,1)
|
5.67 days
Standard Deviation 4.95
|
16.25 days
Standard Deviation 26.51
|
32.00 days
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Days in nursing home(n=0,1,0)
|
NA days
Standard Deviation NA
Data was not analyzed as no participant was evaluable for this parameter.
|
28.00 days
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA days
Standard Deviation NA
Data was not analyzed as no participant was evaluable for this parameter.
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Days of part time work(n=16,12,12)
|
9.44 days
Standard Deviation 11.51
|
9.42 days
Standard Deviation 13.17
|
15.67 days
Standard Deviation 26.60
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Paid work, bothered by RA(n=52,48,27)
|
20.60 days
Standard Deviation 27.99
|
17.42 days
Standard Deviation 21.52
|
34.59 days
Standard Deviation 33.28
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Hospital length of stay(n=3,3,4)
|
12.67 days
Standard Deviation 9.07
|
8.33 days
Standard Deviation 6.66
|
9.25 days
Standard Deviation 2.50
|
—
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Days in nursing home(n=3,0,0)
|
24.00 days
Standard Deviation 3.61
|
NA days
Standard Deviation NA
Data was not analyzed as no participant was evaluable for this parameter.
|
NA days
Standard Deviation NA
Data was not analyzed as no participant was evaluable for this parameter.
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 12, 18, 24Population: FAS. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively. Data for time points after Month 12 will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains.Any RA or non-RA related number of days spent in hospital, nursing home, aids/devices used, on sick leave, work per week, performed part time work, performed paid work, chores done by housekeeper and chores done by family/friends.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=94 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=114 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=23 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=31 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Days aids/devices used(n=25,14,4,1)
|
85.68 days
Standard Deviation 95.83
|
138.21 days
Standard Deviation 110.42
|
100.50 days
Standard Deviation 57.63
|
180.00 days
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Paid work, bothered by RA(n=38,38,10,12)
|
20.89 days
Standard Deviation 24.78
|
18.58 days
Standard Deviation 24.28
|
23.80 days
Standard Deviation 28.35
|
28.17 days
Standard Deviation 35.51
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Chores by housekeeper(n=18,18,4,0)
|
14.06 days
Standard Deviation 20.23
|
10.11 days
Standard Deviation 11.20
|
24.50 days
Standard Deviation 43.68
|
NA days
Standard Deviation NA
Data was not analyzed as no participant was evaluable for this parameter.
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Chores by family(n=62,56,16,13)
|
30.15 days
Standard Deviation 33.03
|
23.77 days
Standard Deviation 31.80
|
38.38 days
Standard Deviation 39.32
|
16.77 days
Standard Deviation 24.59
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Hospital length of stay(n=8,4,2,1)
|
10.13 days
Standard Deviation 6.58
|
7.00 days
Standard Deviation 5.35
|
2.50 days
Standard Deviation 2.12
|
3.00 days
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Days in nursing home(n=2,0,0,0)
|
11.50 days
Standard Deviation 2.12
|
NA days
Standard Deviation NA
Data was not analyzed as no participant was evaluable for this parameter.
|
NA days
Standard Deviation NA
Data was not analyzed as no participant was evaluable for this parameter.
|
NA days
Standard Deviation NA
Data was not analyzed as no participant was evaluable for this parameter.
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:RA related aids used(n=26,16,4,1)
|
1.62 days
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
1.94 days
Standard Deviation 1.69
|
1.00 days
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
2.00 days
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Days of work per week(n=94,114,23,31)
|
5.01 days
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
5.20 days
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
4.65 days
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
4.87 days
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Days on sick leave due to RA(n=11,15,1,5)
|
32.27 days
Standard Deviation 39.24
|
5.13 days
Standard Deviation 4.42
|
1.00 days
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
5.60 days
Standard Deviation 4.51
|
|
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Days of part time work(n=3,7,0,3)
|
16.33 days
Standard Deviation 17.90
|
15.57 days
Standard Deviation 21.19
|
NA days
Standard Deviation NA
Data was not analyzed as no participant was evaluable for this parameter.
|
31.67 days
Standard Deviation 51.39
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.
RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA or non-RA related number of hours spent per day for home healthcare services, chores done by housekeeper, chores done by family or friends, work done and work missed were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=158 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=152 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=71 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Chores by family(n=158,152,71)
|
3.95 hours per day
Standard Deviation 4.33
|
3.66 hours per day
Standard Deviation 3.87
|
3.49 hours per day
Standard Deviation 4.16
|
—
|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Chores by housekeeper(n=51,44,14)
|
4.27 hours per day
Standard Deviation 2.19
|
4.98 hours per day
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
4.21 hours per day
Standard Deviation 2.22
|
—
|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Home healthcare services(n=6,2,3)
|
1.50 hours per day
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
3.00 hours per day
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
1.33 hours per day
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
—
|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:RA related home HC services(n=8,4,3)
|
1.00 hours per day
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
1.50 hours per day
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
0.67 hours per day
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
—
|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Work done(n=108,121,59)
|
8.01 hours per day
Standard Deviation 4.05
|
8.22 hours per day
Standard Deviation 4.41
|
8.12 hours per day
Standard Deviation 5.25
|
—
|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline:Missed work due to RA(n=30,30,12)
|
7.03 hours per day
Standard Deviation 9.98
|
5.33 hours per day
Standard Deviation 4.47
|
4.33 hours per day
Standard Deviation 6.29
|
—
|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Home healthcare services(n=5,1,0)
|
1.20 hours per day
Standard Deviation 0.45
|
4.00 hours per day
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA hours per day
Standard Deviation NA
Data was not analyzed as no participant was evaluable for this parameter.
|
—
|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:RA related home HC services(n=5,1,0)
|
0.80 hours per day
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
3.00 hours per day
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA hours per day
Standard Deviation NA
Data was not analyzed as no participant was evaluable for this parameter.
|
—
|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Work done(n=97,113,48)
|
7.71 hours per day
Standard Deviation 4.83
|
8.25 hours per day
Standard Deviation 3.60
|
7.42 hours per day
Standard Deviation 2.47
|
—
|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Missed work due to RA(n=16,12,12)
|
9.94 hours per day
Standard Deviation 16.85
|
3.17 hours per day
Standard Deviation 2.92
|
5.42 hours per day
Standard Deviation 6.16
|
—
|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Chores by housekeeper(n=25,21,12)
|
4.84 hours per day
Standard Deviation 4.59
|
4.48 hours per day
Standard Deviation 2.18
|
4.83 hours per day
Standard Deviation 2.62
|
—
|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3:Chores by family(n=83,70,56)
|
4.31 hours per day
Standard Deviation 9.29
|
3.64 hours per day
Standard Deviation 4.73
|
4.04 hours per day
Standard Deviation 4.45
|
—
|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Home healthcare services(n=5,2,1)
|
2.20 hours per day
Standard Deviation 2.17
|
3.00 hours per day
Standard Deviation 2.83
|
1.00 hours per day
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
—
|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:RA related home HC services(n=5,2,1)
|
1.20 hours per day
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
1.50 hours per day
Standard Deviation 2.12
|
0.00 hours per day
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
—
|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Work done(n=98,117,18)
|
8.15 hours per day
Standard Deviation 4.15
|
7.90 hours per day
Standard Deviation 1.85
|
7.56 hours per day
Standard Deviation 3.05
|
—
|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Missed work due to RA(n=8,12,3)
|
2.38 hours per day
Standard Deviation 1.60
|
2.50 hours per day
Standard Deviation 1.62
|
1.00 hours per day
Standard Deviation 1.73
|
—
|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Chores by housekeeper(n=30,23,6)
|
4.97 hours per day
Standard Deviation 3.00
|
4.87 hours per day
Standard Deviation 2.32
|
2.67 hours per day
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
—
|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6:Chores by family(n=83,67,15)
|
3.13 hours per day
Standard Deviation 2.39
|
3.25 hours per day
Standard Deviation 4.09
|
2.93 hours per day
Standard Deviation 1.79
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 12, 18, 24Population: FAS. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively. Data for time points after Month 12 will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA or non-RA related number of hours spent per day for home healthcare services, chores done by housekeeper, chores done by family or friends, work done and work missed were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=95 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=114 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=23 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=31 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Home healthcare services(n=2,1,0,0)
|
20.50 hours per day
Standard Deviation 27.58
|
4.00 hours per day
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA hours per day
Standard Deviation NA
Data was not analyzed as no participant was evaluable for this parameter.
|
NA hours per day
Standard Deviation NA
Data was not analyzed as no participant was evaluable for this parameter.
|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:RA related home HC services(n=2,1,0,0)
|
0.50 hours per day
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
3.00 hours per day
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not estimable as only 1 participant was evaluable.
|
NA hours per day
Standard Deviation NA
Data was not analyzed as no participant was evaluable for this parameter.
|
NA hours per day
Standard Deviation NA
Data was not analyzed as no participant was evaluable for this parameter.
|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Work done(n=95,114,23,31)
|
7.78 hours per day
Standard Deviation 3.81
|
7.92 hours per day
Standard Deviation 1.88
|
7.48 hours per day
Standard Deviation 2.02
|
8.03 hours per day
Standard Deviation 2.09
|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Missed work due to RA(n=3,7,0,3)
|
1.33 hours per day
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
8.71 hours per day
Standard Deviation 12.42
|
NA hours per day
Standard Deviation NA
Data was not analyzed as no participant was evaluable for this parameter.
|
2.67 hours per day
Standard Deviation 1.53
|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Chores by housekeeper(n=17,17,4,0)
|
4.47 hours per day
Standard Deviation 2.27
|
4.53 hours per day
Standard Deviation 1.70
|
5.25 hours per day
Standard Deviation 3.40
|
NA hours per day
Standard Deviation NA
Data was not analyzed as no participant was evaluable for this parameter.
|
|
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
Month 12:Chores by family(n=62,56,16,13)
|
3.31 hours per day
Standard Deviation 2.36
|
3.20 hours per day
Standard Deviation 2.16
|
3.75 hours per day
Standard Deviation 2.38
|
2.31 hours per day
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points for each group respectively.
Work performance of participants on number of days bothered was based on a 0 to 10-point scale, where higher score indicated lower work performance.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=204 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=202 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=104 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Work Performance in Past 3 Months on Days Bothered as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Baseline (n=204,202,104)
|
5.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.09
|
4.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.03
|
4.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.03
|
—
|
|
Work Performance in Past 3 Months on Days Bothered as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 3 (n=151,176,81)
|
3.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.11
|
3.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.67
|
4.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.87
|
—
|
|
Work Performance in Past 3 Months on Days Bothered as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Month 6 (n=160,185,29)
|
3.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.18
|
2.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.94
|
3.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.85
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 12, 18, 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data for time points after Month 12 shall be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
Work performance of participants on number of days bothered was based on a 0 to 10-point scale, where higher score indicated lower work performance.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=144 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=163 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=39 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=44 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Work Performance in Past 3 Months on Days Bothered as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12, 18 and 24
|
3.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.13
|
2.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.80
|
2.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.54
|
2.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.72
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through Month 12, Month 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data up to Month 12 reported. For time period after Month 12, data will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
ACR20 response: \>=20% improvement in tender joint count; \>=20% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of HAQ); and CRP. Participants with sustained ACR20 response for 2, 3, 4 and 5 consecutive visits were analyzed up to Month 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=316 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=79 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=75 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Sustained American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
5 consecutive visits
|
18.7 percentage of participants
|
33.7 percentage of participants
|
7.6 percentage of participants
|
3.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Sustained American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
2 consecutive visits
|
16.8 percentage of participants
|
13.9 percentage of participants
|
21.5 percentage of participants
|
16.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Sustained American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
3 consecutive visits
|
13.0 percentage of participants
|
14.2 percentage of participants
|
27.8 percentage of participants
|
28.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Sustained American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
4 consecutive visits
|
16.5 percentage of participants
|
16.2 percentage of participants
|
11.4 percentage of participants
|
10.4 percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through Month 12, Month 24Population: FAS population: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Data up to Month 12 reported. For time period after Month 12, data will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
ACR50 response: \>=50% improvement in tender joint count; \>=50% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of HAQ); and CRP. Participants with sustained ACR50 response for 2, 3, 4 and 5 consecutive visits were analyzed up to Month 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=316 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=79 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=77 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Sustained American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
2 consecutive visits
|
12.0 percentage of participants
|
16.5 percentage of participants
|
21.5 percentage of participants
|
19.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Sustained American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
3 consecutive visits
|
7.9 percentage of participants
|
11.3 percentage of participants
|
13.9 percentage of participants
|
13.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Sustained American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
4 consecutive visits
|
8.2 percentage of participants
|
12.3 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
2.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Sustained American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
5 consecutive visits
|
7.3 percentage of participants
|
9.4 percentage of participants
|
1.3 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through Month 12, Month 24Population: FAS population: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. Data up to Month 12 reported. For time period after Month 12, data will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
ACR70 response: \>=70% improvement in tender joint count; \>=70% improvement in swollen joint count; and \>=70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of HAQ); and CRP. Participants with sustained ACR70 response for 2, 3, 4 and 5 consecutive visits were analyzed up to Month 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=316 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=79 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=77 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Sustained American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
2 consecutive visits
|
6.6 percentage of participants
|
10.4 percentage of participants
|
8.9 percentage of participants
|
18.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Sustained American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
3 consecutive visits
|
4.1 percentage of participants
|
6.8 percentage of participants
|
5.1 percentage of participants
|
2.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Sustained American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
4 consecutive visits
|
2.8 percentage of participants
|
7.1 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Sustained American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
5 consecutive visits
|
1.3 percentage of participants
|
2.3 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through Month 12, Month 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Data up to Month 12 reported. For time period after Month 12, data will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) =\<3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and \<2.6 implied remission. Participants with sustained DAS28-3 (CRP) response less than 2.6 for 2, 3, 4 and 5 consecutive visits were analyzed up to Month 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=316 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=79 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=75 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) Less Than 2.6
2 consecutive visits
|
13.0 percentage of participants
|
12.6 percentage of participants
|
19.0 percentage of participants
|
18.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) Less Than 2.6
3 consecutive visits
|
7.9 percentage of participants
|
11.7 percentage of participants
|
5.1 percentage of participants
|
7.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) Less Than 2.6
4 consecutive visits
|
5.7 percentage of participants
|
13.3 percentage of participants
|
3.8 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) Less Than 2.6
5 consecutive visits
|
2.2 percentage of participants
|
3.2 percentage of participants
|
1.3 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through Month 12, Month 24Population: FAS population. Data up to Month 12 reported. For time period after Month 12, data will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) =\<3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and \<2.6 implied remission. Participants with sustained DAS28-4 (ESR) response less than 2.6 for 2, 3, 4 and 5 consecutive visits were analyzed up to Month 12.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=316 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=79 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=77 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6
2 consecutive visits
|
4.4 percentage of participants
|
5.5 percentage of participants
|
3.8 percentage of participants
|
7.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6
3 consecutive visits
|
1.0 percentage of participants
|
3.6 percentage of participants
|
1.3 percentage of participants
|
1.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6
4 consecutive visits
|
1.9 percentage of participants
|
3.2 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6
5 consecutive visits
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
1.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Month 1, 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing values due to withdrawal or advancement to active treatment before Month 6 were imputed using NRI method.
DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (transformed score ranging 0 to 10; higher score indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total score range:0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) =\<3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and \<2.6 implied remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=265 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=257 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=129 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than or Equal to 3.2 at Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1
|
6.98 percentage of participants
|
10.40 percentage of participants
|
3.15 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than or Equal to 3.2 at Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3
|
13.96 percentage of participants
|
25.29 percentage of participants
|
3.88 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than or Equal to 3.2 at Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6
|
14.34 percentage of participants
|
28.40 percentage of participants
|
3.10 percentage of participants
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing values due to withdrawal or advancement to active treatment before Month 6 were imputed using NRI method. Data for time points after Month 12 will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (transformed score ranging 0 to 10; higher score indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total score range:0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) =\<3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and \<2.6 implied remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=265 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=257 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=65 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=64 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than or Equal to 3.2 at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9
|
18.87 percentage of participants
|
33.46 percentage of participants
|
10.77 percentage of participants
|
12.50 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than or Equal to 3.2 at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12
|
21.13 percentage of participants
|
28.79 percentage of participants
|
9.23 percentage of participants
|
17.19 percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Month 1, 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing values due to withdrawal or advancement to active treatment before Month 6 were imputed using NRI method.
DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (transformed score ranging 0 to 10; higher score indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total score range:0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) =\<3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and \<2.6 implied remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=265 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=257 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=129 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6 at Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1
|
1.55 percentage of participants
|
2.80 percentage of participants
|
0.00 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6 at Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3
|
5.28 percentage of participants
|
11.28 percentage of participants
|
1.55 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6 at Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6
|
7.17 percentage of participants
|
15.95 percentage of participants
|
1.55 percentage of participants
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing values due to withdrawal or advancement to active treatment before Month 6 were imputed using NRI method. Data for time points after Month 12 will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and patient's global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (transformed score ranging 0 to 10; higher score indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total score range:0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) =\<3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and \<2.6 implied remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=265 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=257 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=65 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=64 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6 at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9
|
10.57 percentage of participants
|
14.01 percentage of participants
|
4.62 percentage of participants
|
3.13 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6 at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12
|
9.81 percentage of participants
|
14.40 percentage of participants
|
3.08 percentage of participants
|
7.81 percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Month 1, 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing values due to withdrawal or advancement to active treatment before Month 6 were imputed using NRI method.
DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) =\<3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and \<2.6 implied remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=308 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=154 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) Less Than or Equal to 3.2 at Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1
|
23.62 percentage of participants
|
31.49 percentage of participants
|
6.58 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) Less Than or Equal to 3.2 at Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3
|
35.28 percentage of participants
|
44.48 percentage of participants
|
11.69 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) Less Than or Equal to 3.2 at Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6
|
37.86 percentage of participants
|
50.97 percentage of participants
|
10.39 percentage of participants
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing values due to withdrawal or advancement to active treatment before Month 6 were imputed using NRI method. Data for time points after Month 12 will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) =\<3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and \<2.6 implied remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=308 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=79 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=75 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) Less Than or Equal to 3.2 at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9
|
38.51 percentage of participants
|
52.27 percentage of participants
|
25.32 percentage of participants
|
24.00 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) Less Than or Equal to 3.2 at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12
|
40.13 percentage of participants
|
51.95 percentage of participants
|
24.05 percentage of participants
|
24.00 percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Month 1, 3, 6Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing values due to withdrawal or advancement to active treatment before Month 6 were imputed using NRI method.
DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) =\<3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and \<2.6 implied remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=308 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=154 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) Less Than 2.6 at Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 1
|
11.33 percentage of participants
|
9.09 percentage of participants
|
1.97 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) Less Than 2.6 at Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 3
|
20.39 percentage of participants
|
26.95 percentage of participants
|
5.19 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) Less Than 2.6 at Month 1, 3 and 6
Month 6
|
22.98 percentage of participants
|
36.36 percentage of participants
|
5.19 percentage of participants
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24Population: FAS population. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. Missing values due to withdrawal or advancement to active treatment before Month 6 were imputed using NRI method. Data for time points after Month 12 will be reported after completion of the end-of-study analysis.
DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) =\<3.2 implied low disease activity, \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and \<2.6 implied remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=308 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=79 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=75 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) Less Than 2.6 at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 9
|
26.86 percentage of participants
|
38.31 percentage of participants
|
22.78 percentage of participants
|
14.67 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) Less Than 2.6 at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Month 12
|
28.80 percentage of participants
|
39.61 percentage of participants
|
17.72 percentage of participants
|
18.67 percentage of participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Month 24Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6Population: Safety analysis set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed)=participants evaluable for the measure. 'n'=participants evaluable at given time points for each group respectively. Data for time points after Month 12 will be reported after completion of end-of-study analysis.
BP: pressure exerted by the blood upon the walls of the blood vessels and especially arteries, usually measured on the radial artery using a sphygmomanometer. Systolic BP: the highest arterial blood pressure of a cardiac cycle occurring immediately after systole of the left ventricle of the heart. Diastolic BP: the lowest arterial blood pressure of a cardiac cycle occurring during diastole of the heart.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=316 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=156 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (BP) at Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline:systolic BP(n=316,309,156)
|
125.85 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 13.23
|
123.95 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 15.05
|
123.87 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14.32
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (BP) at Month 1, 3 and 6
Baseline:diastolic BP(n=316,309,156)
|
77.27 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.41
|
77.25 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 9.34
|
76.81 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.70
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (BP) at Month 1, 3 and 6
Change at Month 1:systolic BP(n=309,308,153)
|
-1.6 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 11.87
|
0.5 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 12.40
|
0.5 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 11.96
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (BP) at Month 1, 3 and 6
Change at Month 1:diastolic BP(n=309,308,153)
|
-0.1 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.06
|
0.1 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.99
|
0.5 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.19
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (BP) at Month 1, 3 and 6
Change at Month 3:systolic BP(n=295,299,146)
|
-1.2 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 12.33
|
0.6 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 13.55
|
0.7 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 11.75
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (BP) at Month 1, 3 and 6
Change at Month 3:diastolic BP(n=295,299,146)
|
1.0 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.76
|
0.5 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.61
|
-0.0 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.63
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (BP) at Month 1, 3 and 6
Change at Month 6:systolic BP(n=283,285,62)
|
-0.5 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 13.57
|
1.1 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 13.15
|
-0.6 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 11.63
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (BP) at Month 1, 3 and 6
Change at Month 6:diastolic BP(n=283,285,62)
|
0.2 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.63
|
0.8 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 8.45
|
-0.4 millimeters of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 7.74
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24Population: Safety analysis set: all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed)=participants evaluable for the measure. 'n'=participants evaluable at given time points for each group respectively. Data for time points after Month 12 will be reported after completion of end-of-study analysis.
BP: pressure exerted by the blood upon the walls of the blood vessels and especially arteries, usually measured on the radial artery using a sphygmomanometer. Systolic BP: the highest arterial blood pressure of a cardiac cycle occurring immediately after systole of the left ventricle of the heart. Diastolic BP: the lowest arterial blood pressure of a cardiac cycle occurring during diastole of the heart.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg
n=316 Participants
CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg
n=309 Participants
CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo
n=79 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
Placebo, Then CP-690,550 10 mg
n=77 Participants
Placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily for 3 to 6 months. Response was assessed at Month 3 and participants who failed to achieve at least 20% reduction from baseline in both swollen and tender joint counts, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24. At Month 6, remaining participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (BP) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Baseline:systolic BP(n=316,309,79,77)
|
125.83 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.23
|
123.95 mmHg
Standard Deviation 15.05
|
124.37 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.78
|
123.35 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.90
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (BP) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Baseline:diastolic BP(n=316,309,79,77)
|
77.27 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.41
|
77.25 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.34
|
77.11 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.62
|
76.51 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.81
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (BP) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Change at Month 9:systolic BP(n=265,278,69,63)
|
-0.4 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.51
|
1.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.21
|
-1.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 12.44
|
0.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (BP) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Change at Month 9:diastolic BP(n=265,278,69,63)
|
0.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.92
|
1.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.78
|
-0.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 7.96
|
1.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 6.66
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (BP) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Change at Month 12:diastolic BP(n=251,265,67,63)
|
-0.9 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.37
|
0.6 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.94
|
1.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 7.50
|
0.7 mmHg
Standard Deviation 9.32
|
|
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (BP) at Month 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24
Change at Month 12:systolic BP(n=251,265,67,63)
|
-1.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 13.93
|
1.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.28
|
1.1 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.91
|
1.3 mmHg
Standard Deviation 14.59
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24Population: Data for this pre-specified outcome measure was collected and reported in individual participant listings as per planned analysis but not statistically summarized.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24Population: Data for this pre-specified outcome measure was collected and reported in individual participant listings as per planned analysis but not statistically summarized.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
CP-690,550 5 mg (Up To Month 3)
CP-690,550 10 mg (Up to Month 3)
Placebo (Up to Month 3)
CP-690,550 5 mg (Month 3 to 6)
CP-690,550 10 mg (Month 3 to 6)
Placebo (Month 3 to 6)
CP-690,550 5 mg (Post Month 6)
CP-690,550 10 mg (Post Month 6)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg (Up To Month 3)
n=321 participants at risk
Participants received CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 3.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg (Up to Month 3)
n=316 participants at risk
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 3.
|
Placebo (Up to Month 3)
n=160 participants at risk
Participants received placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Month 3.
|
CP-690,550 5 mg (Month 3 to 6)
n=363 participants at risk
Participants who received either CP-690,550 5 mg or matching placebo up to Month 3, received CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily from Month 3 to 6.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg (Month 3 to 6)
n=353 participants at risk
Participants who received either CP-690,550 10 mg or matching placebo up to Month 3, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily from Month 3 to 6.
|
Placebo (Month 3 to 6)
n=81 participants at risk
Participants received placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily from Month 3 to 6.
|
CP-690,550 5 mg (Post Month 6)
n=402 participants at risk
Participants who received either CP-690,550 5 mg or matching placebo up to Month 6, received CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily from Month 6 to 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg (Post Month 6)
n=395 participants at risk
Participants who received either CP-690,550 10 mg or matching placebo up to Month 6, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily from Month 6 to 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.31%
1/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.2%
1/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bundle branch block right
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Necrotising retinitis
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis erosive
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematemesis
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enteritis
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Device breakage
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.32%
1/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.32%
1/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.31%
1/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Drug ineffective
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Drug interaction
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.51%
2/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.31%
1/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatosplenomegaly
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cytomegalovirus viraemia
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.32%
1/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Dengue fever
|
0.31%
1/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.32%
1/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia
|
0.31%
1/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.31%
1/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.75%
3/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia viral
|
0.31%
1/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sialoadenitis
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.32%
1/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacterial sepsis
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.2%
1/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchiectasis
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.2%
1/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.55%
2/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Enterocolitis bacterial
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.55%
2/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia primary atypical
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.2%
1/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis acute
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle fracture
|
0.31%
1/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Concussion
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.32%
1/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
0.31%
1/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament sprain
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.32%
1/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.32%
1/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.32%
1/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thoracic vertebral fracture
|
0.31%
1/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tibia fracture
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fracture
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radius fracture
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal fracture
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subdural haematoma
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Upper limb fracture
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.2%
1/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Dislocation of vertebra
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal compression fracture
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Transaminases increased
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Colonoscopy
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Fracture nonunion
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.32%
1/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Inguinal mass
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rheumatoid arthritis
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal column stenosis
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.32%
1/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteonecrosis
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Lumbar spinal stenosis
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Basal cell carcinoma
|
0.31%
1/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.2%
1/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.32%
1/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.32%
1/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lymphoma
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Ovarian granulosa-theca cell tumour
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.2%
1/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung cancer metastatic
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery disease
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.32%
1/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery stenosis
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.32%
1/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Polyneuropathy
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Lacunar infarction
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Uraemic encephalopathy
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.2%
1/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Pregnancy
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Unintended pregnancy
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion missed
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Diabetic nephropathy
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.2%
1/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hydronephrosis
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.2%
1/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.2%
1/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Endometriosis
|
0.31%
1/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Metrorrhagia
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.2%
1/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
0.31%
1/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Interstitial lung disease
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory disorder
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulcer
|
0.31%
1/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.25%
1/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Infarction
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.28%
1/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
CP-690,550 5 mg (Up To Month 3)
n=321 participants at risk
Participants received CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 3.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg (Up to Month 3)
n=316 participants at risk
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily up to Month 3.
|
Placebo (Up to Month 3)
n=160 participants at risk
Participants received placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily up to Month 3.
|
CP-690,550 5 mg (Month 3 to 6)
n=363 participants at risk
Participants who received either CP-690,550 5 mg or matching placebo up to Month 3, received CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily from Month 3 to 6.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg (Month 3 to 6)
n=353 participants at risk
Participants who received either CP-690,550 10 mg or matching placebo up to Month 3, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily from Month 3 to 6.
|
Placebo (Month 3 to 6)
n=81 participants at risk
Participants received placebo matched to CP-690,550 tablet orally twice daily from Month 3 to 6.
|
CP-690,550 5 mg (Post Month 6)
n=402 participants at risk
Participants who received either CP-690,550 5 mg or matching placebo up to Month 6, received CP-690,550 5 mg tablet orally twice daily from Month 6 to 24.
|
CP-690,550 10 mg (Post Month 6)
n=395 participants at risk
Participants who received either CP-690,550 10 mg or matching placebo up to Month 6, received CP-690,550 10 mg tablet orally twice daily from Month 6 to 24.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
2.2%
7/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
3/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.2%
2/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
2.2%
7/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.5%
8/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.2%
2/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
4.4%
14/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.1%
13/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.6%
13/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.5%
9/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.9%
4/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.5%
22/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.6%
22/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
2.8%
9/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.2%
7/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.1%
5/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.7%
17/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.5%
9/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.2%
13/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.8%
15/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
2.8%
9/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
3/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.5%
4/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.5%
10/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.3%
17/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.83%
3/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.5%
9/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.2%
9/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.5%
10/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.00%
0/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.5%
10/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.5%
14/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
1.6%
5/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.95%
3/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.1%
5/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
5.6%
18/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.3%
4/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.9%
3/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.31%
1/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.8%
9/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
3.4%
11/321 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.3%
4/316 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.62%
1/160 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/363 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/353 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/81 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.0%
8/402 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
1.5%
6/395 • Baseline up to Month 12
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER