Trial Outcomes & Findings for Trial to Evaluate the Safety & Efficacy of the Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System in Subjects With Atherosclerotic de Novo or Restenotic Lesions in the Native Common Iliac Artery and/or Native External Iliac Artery. (NCT NCT00844532)
NCT ID: NCT00844532
Last Updated: 2015-06-09
Results Overview
Defined as death, myocardial infarction (MI), clinically-driven target lesion revascularization, and limb loss (major amputation only) on the treated side(s).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
151 participants
9 months
2015-06-09
Participant Flow
Trial population is comprised of male and female subjects with moderate to severe iliac artery atherosclerotic occlusive disease. Recruitment dates: March 23, 2009 through May 17, 2010
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
151
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
112
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
39
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
7
|
Baseline Characteristics
Trial to Evaluate the Safety & Efficacy of the Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System in Subjects With Atherosclerotic de Novo or Restenotic Lesions in the Native Common Iliac Artery and/or Native External Iliac Artery.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
85 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
66 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
62.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
98 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
151 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 9 monthsPopulation: Intent to treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
Defined as death, myocardial infarction (MI), clinically-driven target lesion revascularization, and limb loss (major amputation only) on the treated side(s).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=147 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Major Adverse Event (MAE) Rate
|
6.1 percentage of participants
Interval to 10.4
One-sided 95% confidence interval was computed for this endpoint, lower bound is not provided.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: acute: from beginning of index procedure to end of index procedure.Population: Intent to treat (ITT) population. Included 192 study stents implanted plus 1 study stent inserted in subjects vasculature, but not implanted due to device malfunction. 1 study stent was excluded from device success because the chosen size was not appropriate, therefore the stent was not implanted.
On a per device basis, the achievement of successful delivery and deployment of the trial device(s) at the intended location(s) and successful withdrawal of the delivery catheter(s).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=193 devices
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Device Success
|
96.4 percentage of devices
Interval 92.7 to 98.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: acute: from beginning of index procedure to end of index procedure.Population: ITT population
Technical success is defined, on per target lesion basis, device success and attainment of a final in-stent residual stenosis of \< 30% by QA or as reported by the investigator, if QA is not available.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 target lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Technical Success
|
87.3 percentage of target lesions
Interval 81.5 to 91.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Beginning of index procedure to 2 days post-index procedure or discharge, whichever is soonerPopulation: ITT population
Procedure success is defined, per patient basis, as technical success without any of the following complications; death due to all causes, myocardial infarction (MI), major amputation of the treated limb(s), stent thrombosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) within two (2) days after the index procedure or at hospital discharge, whichever is sooner.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Procedure Success
|
85.4 percentage of participants
Interval 78.8 to 90.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-procedurePopulation: Per target limb analysis. ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
The thigh brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral thigh systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=170 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
|
0.8 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-procedurePopulation: Per target limb analysis. ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
The thigh brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral thigh systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=162 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
|
1.0 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 monthPopulation: Per target limb analysis.ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
The thigh brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral thigh systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
|
1.1 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 9 monthsPopulation: Per target limb analysis. ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
The thigh brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral thigh systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=144 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
|
1.1 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: Per target limb analysis. ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
The thigh brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral thigh systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=118 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
|
1.0 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: Per target limb analysis. ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
The thigh brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral thigh systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=109 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
|
1.1 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Post-procedurePopulation: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
The changes in thigh brachial index is the ratio of change between the pre-procedure measure and the stated timepoint measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=160 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
|
0.2 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 monthPopulation: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
The changes in thigh brachial index is the ratio of change between the pre-procedure measure and the stated timepoint measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=145 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
|
0.3 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 9 monthsPopulation: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
The changes in thigh brachial index is the ratio of change between the pre-procedure measure and the stated timepoint measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=136 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
|
0.3 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
The changes in thigh brachial index is the ratio of change between the pre-procedure measure and the stated timepoint measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=112 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
|
0.2 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
The changes in thigh brachial index is the ratio of change between the pre-procedure measure and the stated timepoint measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=102 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
|
0.2 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-procedurePopulation: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.The highest possible score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty. Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity.
Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), a disease-specific instrument utilized to characterize walking ability through a questionnaire as an alternative to treadmill testing. It is a measure of subject-perceived walking performance for subjects with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and/or intermittent claudication. The WIQ quantifies patient-reported walking speed, walking distance, and stair-climbing ability, respectively, on a scale of 0 (= worst) to 100 (= best).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Walking Distance Score
|
14.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.9
|
|
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Walking Speed Score
|
17.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.8
|
|
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Stair Climbing Score
|
22.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 monthPopulation: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.The highest score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty. Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity.
Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), a disease-specific instrument utilized to characterize walking ability through a questionnaire as an alternative to treadmill testing. It is a measure of subject-perceived walking performance for subjects with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and/or intermittent claudication. The WIQ quantifies patient-reported walking speed, walking distance, and stair-climbing ability, respectively, on a scale of 0 (= worst) to 100 (= best).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=135 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Stair Climbing Score (N=127)
|
55.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.7
|
|
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Walking Distance Score (N=134)
|
53.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.6
|
|
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Walking Speed Score (N=135)
|
51.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 9 monthsPopulation: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. The highest score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty.Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity.
Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), a disease-specific instrument utilized to characterize walking ability through a questionnaire as an alternative to treadmill testing. It is a measure of subject-perceived walking performance for subjects with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and/or intermittent claudication. The WIQ quantifies patient-reported walking speed, walking distance, and stair-climbing ability, respectively, on a scale of 0 (= worst) to 100 (= best).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=127 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Walking Distance Score (N=127)
|
55.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 39.6
|
|
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Walking Speed Score (N=126)
|
50.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.9
|
|
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Stair Climbing Score (N=119)
|
59.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.The highest score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty. Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity.
Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=99 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Walking Distance Score (N=99)
|
58.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.1
|
|
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Walking Speed Score (N=99)
|
50.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.4
|
|
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Stair Climbing Score (N=95)
|
59.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.The highest score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty. Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity.
Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=94 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Walking Distance Score (N=94)
|
54.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 40.0
|
|
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Walking Speed Score (N=94)
|
49.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.0
|
|
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Stair Climbing Score (N=88)
|
58.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-ProcedurePopulation: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia. Category and Clinical Description: 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
1
|
0.6 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
2
|
28.2 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
3
|
63.0 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
4
|
8.3 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
5
|
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
6
|
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
0
|
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 monthPopulation: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia. Category and Clinical Description: 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=161 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
2
|
15.5 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
3
|
2.5 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
4
|
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
5
|
0.6 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
6
|
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
0
|
54.7 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
1
|
26.7 Percentage of Limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 9 monthsPopulation: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia. Category and Clinical Description: 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=148 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
1
|
23.6 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
2
|
14.2 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
3
|
2.0 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
4
|
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
5
|
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
6
|
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
0
|
60.1 Percentage of Limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia. Category and Clinical Description: 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=119 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
0
|
61.2 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
1
|
25.6 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
2
|
7.4 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
3
|
4.1 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
4
|
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
5
|
1.7 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
6
|
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia. Category and Clinical Description: 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=113 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
0
|
69.9 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
1
|
18.6 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
2
|
9.7 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
3
|
1.8 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
4
|
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
5
|
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
6
|
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Between baseline and 1 monthPopulation: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
Change in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: Worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: Deterioration (an increase) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category by at least two categories from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement or to a category 5 or 6. Improved Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: An improvement (a decrease) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category of at least one category from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=161 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by 2 categories
|
30.4 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by 1 category
|
18.6 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
No change
|
8.1 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by >/= 3 categories
|
42.2 Percentage of Limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Between baseline and 9 monthsPopulation: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
Change in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: Worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: Deterioration (an increase) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category by at least two categories from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement or to a category 5 or 6. Improved Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: An improvement (a decrease) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category of at least one category from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=148 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by 1 category
|
17.6 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
No change
|
6.1 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by 2 categories
|
29.1 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by >/= 3 categories
|
47.3 Percentage of Limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Between baseline and 2 yearsPopulation: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
Change in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: Worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: Deterioration (an increase) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category by at least two categories from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement or to a category 5 or 6. Improved Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: An improvement (a decrease) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category of at least one category from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=119 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by >/= 3 categories
|
52.9 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by 2 categories
|
19.8 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by 1 category
|
21.5 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
No change
|
3.3 Percentage of Limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Between baseline and 3 yearsPopulation: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
Change in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: Worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: Deterioration (an increase) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category by at least two categories from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement or to a category 5 or 6. Improved Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: An improvement (a decrease) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category of at least one category from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=113 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by >/= 3 categories
|
56.6 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by 2 categories
|
23.0 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by 1 category
|
15.0 Percentage of Limbs
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
No change
|
5.3 Percentage of Limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month and 9 monthsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target lesions who were event free at this timepoint.
Target lesion revascularization was defined as any revascularization at the target lesion with or without evidence of target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by duplex ultrasonography (DUS) or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
1 month
|
100 percentage of target lesions
|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
9 months
|
95.6 percentage of target lesions
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 monthsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target lesions who were event free at this timepoint.
Target lesion revascularization was defined as any revascularization at the target lesion with or without evidence of target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
|
93.5 percentage of target lesions
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target lesions who were event free at this timepoint.
Target lesion revascularization was defined as any revascularization at the target lesion with or without evidence of target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesion
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
|
89.6 percentage of target lesions
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target lesions who were event free at this timepoint.
Target lesion revascularization was defined as any revascularization at the target lesion with or without evidence of target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
|
84.4 percentage of target lesions
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month and 9 monthsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target lesions who were event free at this timepoint.
Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Clinically-driven is defined as: Revascularization of the stent with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion, and target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography.) (Note: This does not include coincidental overlap of a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloon or stent into a study stent, that has \<50% stenosis, while treating a non-target lesion in the target vessel).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR)
1 month
|
100 percentage of target lesions
|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR)
9 months
|
97.1 percentage of target lesions
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 monthsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target lesions who were event free at this timepoint.
Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Clinically-driven is defined as: Revascularization of the stent with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion, and target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography.) (Note: This does not include coincidental overlap of a PTA balloon or stent into a study stent, that has \<50% stenosis, while treating a non-target lesion in the target vessel).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR)
|
94.7 percentage of target lesions
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target lesions who were event free at this timepoint.
Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Clinically-driven is defined as: Revascularization of the stent with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion, and target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography.) (Note: This does not include coincidental overlap of a PTA balloon or stent into a study stent, that has \<50% stenosis, while treating a non-target lesion in the target vessel).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR)
|
91.4 percentage of target lesions
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target lesions who were event free at this timepoint.
Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Clinically-driven is defined as: Revascularization of the stent with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion, and target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography.) (Note: This does not include coincidental overlap of a PTA balloon or stent into a study stent, that has \<50% stenosis, while treating a non-target lesion in the target vessel).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR)
|
86.9 percentage of target lesions
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month and 9 monthsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with lesions in the target vessel who were event free at this timepoint.
Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) defined: Any revascularization of the target vessel, outside of the target lesion, with or without evidence of diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target vessel.)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
1 month
|
100 percentage of target vessels
|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
9 months
|
96.5 percentage of target vessels
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 monthsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with lesions in the target vessel who were event free at this timepoint.
Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) defined: Any revascularization of the target vessel, outside of the target lesion, with or without evidence of diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target vessel.)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
|
96.5 percentage of target vessels
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects with lesions in the target vessel who were event free at this timepoint.
Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) defined: Any revascularization of the target vessel, outside of the target lesion, with or without evidence of diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target vessel.)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
|
94.5 percentage of target vessels
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with lesions in the target vessel who were event free at this timepoint.
Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) defined: Any revascularization of the target vessel, outside of the target lesion, with or without evidence of diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target vessel.)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
|
92.2 percentage of target vessels
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month and 9 monthsPopulation: ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects with lesions in the target vessel who were event free at this timepoint.
Revascularization of the target vessel (outside the target lesion) with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker clinical category that is clearly referable to the target vessel, and diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (CD-TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
1 month
|
100 percentage of target vessels
|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (CD-TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
9 months
|
97.1 percentage of target vessels
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 monthsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with lesions in the target vessel who were event free at this timepoint.
Revascularization of the target vessel (outside the target lesion) with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker clinical category that is clearly referable to the target vessel, and diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (CD-TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
|
97.1 percentage of target vessels
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with lesions in the target vessel who were event free at this timepoint.
Revascularization of the target vessel (outside the target lesion) with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker clinical category that is clearly referable to the target vessel, and diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (CD-TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
|
95.1 percentage of target vessels
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects with lesions in the target vessel who were event free at this timepoint.
Revascularization of the target vessel (outside the target lesion) with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker clinical category that is clearly referable to the target vessel, and diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (CD-TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
|
94.3 percentage of target vessels
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month and 9 monthsPopulation: ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects with vessels in the extremity with the target lesions, who were event free at this timepoint.
Any revascularization of a target extremity vessel (distal to the superior border of the inguinal ligament on the ipsilateral side) with or without evidence of vessel diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, and with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Extremity Revascularization (TER) for the Treated Limb(s)
1 month
|
99.4 percentage of limbs
|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Extremity Revascularization (TER) for the Treated Limb(s)
9 months
|
97.7 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 monthsPopulation: ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects with vessels in the extremity with the target lesions, who were event free at this timepoint.
Any revascularization of a target extremity vessel (distal to the superior border of the inguinal ligament on the ipsilateral side) with or without evidence of vessel diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, and with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Extremity Revascularization (TER) for the Treated Limb(s)
|
96.6 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects with vessels in the extremity with the target lesions, who were event free at this timepoint.
Any revascularization of a target extremity vessel (distal to the superior border of the inguinal ligament on the ipsilateral side) with or without evidence of vessel diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, and with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Extremity Revascularization (TER) for the Treated Limb(s)
|
95.3 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with vessels in the extremity with the target lesions, who were event free at this timepoint.
Any revascularization of a target extremity vessel (distal to the superior border of the inguinal ligament on the ipsilateral side) with or without evidence of vessel diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, and with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Extremity Revascularization (TER) for the Treated Limb(s)
|
93.0 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 monthPopulation: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
Absence of in-stent restenosis of the target lesion (≥50%) as determined by duplex ultrasound or angiogram and without interval reintervention since the initial study procedure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=172 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Primary Stent Patency
|
98.3 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 9 monthsPopulation: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
Absence of in-stent restenosis of the target lesion (≥50%) as determined by duplex ultrasound or angiogram and without interval reintervention since the initial study procedure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=154 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Primary Stent Patency
|
90.9 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
Absence of in-stent restenosis of the target lesion (≥50%) as determined by duplex ultrasound or angiogram and without interval reintervention since the initial study procedure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=140 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Primary Stent Patency
|
80.7 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
Absence of in-stent restenosis of the target lesion (≥50%) as determined by duplex ultrasound or angiogram and without interval reintervention since the initial study procedure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=125 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Primary Stent Patency
|
75.2 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 9 monthsPopulation: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
Defined as ≥ 50% stenosis at follow-up.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=154 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Restenosis
|
8.4 percentage of limbs
Interval 4.6 to 14.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
Defined as ≥ 50% stenosis at follow-up.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=136 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Restenosis
|
16.9 percentage of limbs
Interval 11.0 to 24.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
Defined as ≥ 50% stenosis at follow-up.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=118 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Restenosis
|
20.3 percentage of limbs
Interval 13.5 to 28.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month and 9 monthsPopulation: ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.
Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Death (All Cause)
1 month
|
100 percentage of participants
|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Death (All Cause)
9 months
|
96.1 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 monthsPopulation: ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.
Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Death (All Cause)
|
94.5 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.
Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Death (All Cause)
|
92.3 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.
Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Death (All Cause)
|
88.3 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month and 9 monthsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.
The term myocardial infarction should be used when there is evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with myocardial ischemia.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Myocardial Infarction (MI)
1 month
|
100 percentage of participants
|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Myocardial Infarction (MI)
9 months
|
98.6 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 monthsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.
The term myocardial infarction should be used when there is evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with myocardial ischemia.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Myocardial Infarction (MI)
|
97.9 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.
The term myocardial infarction should be used when there is evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with myocardial ischemia.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Myocardial Infarction (MI)
|
97.1 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.
The term myocardial infarction should be used when there is evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with myocardial ischemia.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Myocardial Infarction (MI)
|
96.2 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month and 9 monthsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target limbs who were event free at this time point.
Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this study, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb(s) that was/were treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Amputations (Major) of the Treated Limb(s)
1 month
|
100 percentage of limbs
|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Amputations (Major) of the Treated Limb(s)
9 months
|
99.4 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 monthsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target limbs who were event free at this time point.
Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this study, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb(s) that was/were treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Amputations (Major) of the Treated Limb(s)
|
99.4 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target limbs who were event free at this time point.
Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this study, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb(s) that was/were treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Amputations (Major) of the Treated Limb(s)
|
99.4 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target limbs who were event free at this time point.
Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this study, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb(s) that was/were treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Amputations (Major) of the Treated Limb(s)
|
99.4 percentage of limbs
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month and 9 monthsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.
Embolism is the formation of a thrombus within the target lesion or stent with migration or atherosclerotic emboli migration to a distal artery.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Embolic Events
9 months
|
98.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Embolic Events
1 month
|
99.3 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 18 monthsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.
Embolism is the formation of a thrombus within the target lesion or stent with migration or atherosclerotic emboli migration to a distal artery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Embolic Events
|
98.7 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 yearsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.
Embolism is the formation of a thrombus within the target lesion or stent with migration or atherosclerotic emboli migration to a distal artery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Embolic Events
|
98.7 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 yearsPopulation: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.
Embolism is the formation of a thrombus within the target lesion or stent with migration or atherosclerotic emboli migration to a distal artery
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Embolic Events
|
98.7 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 monthPopulation: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
Stent thrombosis is defined as a total occlusion documented by DUS and/or arteriography at the stent site with or without symptoms that occurs ≤ 30 days post index procedure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=177 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Stent Thrombosis
|
0.6 percentage of limbs
Interval 0.0 to 3.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 monthPopulation: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean. SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=133 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Physical Component Summary
|
9.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 9 monthsPopulation: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean. SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=124 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Physical Component Summary
|
9.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 yearsPopulation: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean. SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=101 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Physical Component Summary
|
10.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 yearsPopulation: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean. SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=96 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Physical Component Summary
|
8.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 monthPopulation: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean. SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=133 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Mental Component Summary
|
3.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 9 monthsPopulation: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean. SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=124 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Mental Component Summary
|
1.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 yearsPopulation: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean. SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=101 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Mental Component Summary
|
2.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 3 yearsPopulation: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.
This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean. SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=96 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Mental Component Summary
|
2.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.4
|
Adverse Events
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 participants at risk
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Bleeding
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pain at insertion site
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pseudoaneurysm
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
5.3%
8/151 • Number of events 9 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Cancer
|
6.0%
9/151 • Number of events 10 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina
|
4.0%
6/151 • Number of events 6 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmias (other than bradycardia)
|
4.6%
7/151 • Number of events 7 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac Arrest
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Congestive Heart Failure
|
4.0%
6/151 • Number of events 6 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Other: Chest Pain
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Other: Coronary Artery Disease
|
4.6%
7/151 • Number of events 8 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pain
|
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Surgery/Interventional Procedure
|
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Hypertension
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Hypotension
|
2.6%
4/151 • Number of events 4 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Syncope
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Bleeding
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal Bleed
|
4.0%
6/151 • Number of events 6 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastro-intestinal
|
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Other: Cholecystitis
|
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Other: Esophagitis
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Other: Hernia
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Other: Malnutrition
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Other: Pancreatitis
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pain
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Fever
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastro-intestinal
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Musculoskeletal
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Other: Cellulitis
|
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Other: Facial Abscess
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Other: Foot Ulcer
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Other: Inguinal Cellulitis
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Other: Osteomyelitis
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Other: Pancreatitis
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
6.0%
9/151 • Number of events 10 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
2.0%
3/151 • Number of events 3 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary Tract Infection
|
2.0%
3/151 • Number of events 4 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral, bacterial and fungal infections
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Wound complication or wound infection
|
2.0%
3/151 • Number of events 4 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Other: Hyperglycemia
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Other: Hypoglycemia
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
General disorders
Genito-urinary
|
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
General disorders
Headache
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
General disorders
Musculoskeletal
|
6.0%
9/151 • Number of events 11 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
General disorders
Other: Non Cardiac Chest Pain
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
General disorders
Surgery/Interventional Procedure
|
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
General disorders
Wound complication or wound infection
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial Infarction - Non-Q- wave
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial Infarction - Unknown
|
2.0%
3/151 • Number of events 3 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Other: Non Stemi MI
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Confusion
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Mental Status Change
|
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 3 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Myalgia
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Other: Hydrocephalus
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Other: Anoxic Encephalopathy
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Other: Anxiety
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Other: Extremity Tremors
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Other: Metabolic Encephalopathy
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Other: Subarachnoid/Intracerebral Hemorrhage
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Surgery/Interventional Procedure
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient Ischemic Attack
|
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Dissection
|
2.6%
4/151 • Number of events 4 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hypertension
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
|
2.6%
4/151 • Number of events 4 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Other: Pleural Effusion
|
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal Failure
|
2.0%
3/151 • Number of events 4 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Other: Drug Toxicity
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Other: Dyspnea
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Other: Shortness Of Breath
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia
|
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory Failure
|
4.6%
7/151 • Number of events 7 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Other: cerebrovascular accident
|
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 3 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Other: Right Cerebellar Infarct
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Stroke: Unknown
|
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aneurysm
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Dissection
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hematoma
|
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Ischemia
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Occlusion
|
6.0%
9/151 • Number of events 11 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Other: Carotid Stenosis
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Other: Deep Vein Thrombosis
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Other: Peripheral Vascular Disease
|
9.3%
14/151 • Number of events 25 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Pseudoaneurysm
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Restenosis
|
4.0%
6/151 • Number of events 12 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Stenosis
|
13.9%
21/151 • Number of events 31 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Surgery/Interventional Procedure
|
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombosis
|
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 participants at risk
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmias (other than bradycardia)
|
5.3%
8/151 • Number of events 8 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Hypotension
|
6.6%
10/151 • Number of events 11 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
General disorders
Edema (non pulmonary)
|
5.3%
8/151 • Number of events 9 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal
|
35.1%
53/151 • Number of events 85 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
6.6%
10/151 • Number of events 11 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Other: Peripheral Vascular Disease
|
13.9%
21/151 • Number of events 26 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Stenosis
|
7.3%
11/151 • Number of events 12 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60