Trial Outcomes & Findings for Trial to Evaluate the Safety & Efficacy of the Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System in Subjects With Atherosclerotic de Novo or Restenotic Lesions in the Native Common Iliac Artery and/or Native External Iliac Artery. (NCT NCT00844532)

NCT ID: NCT00844532

Last Updated: 2015-06-09

Results Overview

Defined as death, myocardial infarction (MI), clinically-driven target lesion revascularization, and limb loss (major amputation only) on the treated side(s).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

151 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

9 months

Results posted on

2015-06-09

Participant Flow

Trial population is comprised of male and female subjects with moderate to severe iliac artery atherosclerotic occlusive disease. Recruitment dates: March 23, 2009 through May 17, 2010

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Overall Study
STARTED
151
Overall Study
COMPLETED
112
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
39

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Overall Study
Death
16
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
16
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
7

Baseline Characteristics

Trial to Evaluate the Safety & Efficacy of the Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System in Subjects With Atherosclerotic de Novo or Restenotic Lesions in the Native Common Iliac Artery and/or Native External Iliac Artery.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
85 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
66 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
62.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
98 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
151 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 9 months

Population: Intent to treat (ITT) population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

Defined as death, myocardial infarction (MI), clinically-driven target lesion revascularization, and limb loss (major amputation only) on the treated side(s).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=147 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Major Adverse Event (MAE) Rate
6.1 percentage of participants
Interval to 10.4
One-sided 95% confidence interval was computed for this endpoint, lower bound is not provided.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: acute: from beginning of index procedure to end of index procedure.

Population: Intent to treat (ITT) population. Included 192 study stents implanted plus 1 study stent inserted in subjects vasculature, but not implanted due to device malfunction. 1 study stent was excluded from device success because the chosen size was not appropriate, therefore the stent was not implanted.

On a per device basis, the achievement of successful delivery and deployment of the trial device(s) at the intended location(s) and successful withdrawal of the delivery catheter(s).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=193 devices
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Device Success
96.4 percentage of devices
Interval 92.7 to 98.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: acute: from beginning of index procedure to end of index procedure.

Population: ITT population

Technical success is defined, on per target lesion basis, device success and attainment of a final in-stent residual stenosis of \< 30% by QA or as reported by the investigator, if QA is not available.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 target lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Technical Success
87.3 percentage of target lesions
Interval 81.5 to 91.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Beginning of index procedure to 2 days post-index procedure or discharge, whichever is sooner

Population: ITT population

Procedure success is defined, per patient basis, as technical success without any of the following complications; death due to all causes, myocardial infarction (MI), major amputation of the treated limb(s), stent thrombosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) within two (2) days after the index procedure or at hospital discharge, whichever is sooner.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Procedure Success
85.4 percentage of participants
Interval 78.8 to 90.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-procedure

Population: Per target limb analysis. ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

The thigh brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral thigh systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=170 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
0.8 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Post-procedure

Population: Per target limb analysis. ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

The thigh brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral thigh systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=162 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
1.0 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month

Population: Per target limb analysis.ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

The thigh brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral thigh systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
1.1 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 9 months

Population: Per target limb analysis. ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

The thigh brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral thigh systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=144 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
1.1 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: Per target limb analysis. ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

The thigh brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral thigh systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=118 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
1.0 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 years

Population: Per target limb analysis. ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

The thigh brachial index is the ratio of the resting ipsilateral thigh systolic blood pressure as compared to the highest resting brachial systolic blood pressure. A normal range is 0.9 to 1.3.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=109 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
1.1 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Post-procedure

Population: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

The changes in thigh brachial index is the ratio of change between the pre-procedure measure and the stated timepoint measure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=160 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Changes in Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
0.2 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month

Population: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

The changes in thigh brachial index is the ratio of change between the pre-procedure measure and the stated timepoint measure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=145 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Changes in Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
0.3 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 9 months

Population: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

The changes in thigh brachial index is the ratio of change between the pre-procedure measure and the stated timepoint measure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=136 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Changes in Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
0.3 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

The changes in thigh brachial index is the ratio of change between the pre-procedure measure and the stated timepoint measure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=112 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Changes in Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
0.2 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 years

Population: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

The changes in thigh brachial index is the ratio of change between the pre-procedure measure and the stated timepoint measure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=102 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Changes in Thigh Brachial Index (TBI) for the Treated Limb(s)
0.2 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-procedure

Population: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.The highest possible score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty. Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity.

Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), a disease-specific instrument utilized to characterize walking ability through a questionnaire as an alternative to treadmill testing. It is a measure of subject-perceived walking performance for subjects with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and/or intermittent claudication. The WIQ quantifies patient-reported walking speed, walking distance, and stair-climbing ability, respectively, on a scale of 0 (= worst) to 100 (= best).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Walking Distance Score
14.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.9
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Walking Speed Score
17.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.8
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Stair Climbing Score
22.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month

Population: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.The highest score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty. Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity.

Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), a disease-specific instrument utilized to characterize walking ability through a questionnaire as an alternative to treadmill testing. It is a measure of subject-perceived walking performance for subjects with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and/or intermittent claudication. The WIQ quantifies patient-reported walking speed, walking distance, and stair-climbing ability, respectively, on a scale of 0 (= worst) to 100 (= best).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=135 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Stair Climbing Score (N=127)
55.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.7
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Walking Distance Score (N=134)
53.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.6
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Walking Speed Score (N=135)
51.8 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 9 months

Population: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point. The highest score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty.Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity.

Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ), a disease-specific instrument utilized to characterize walking ability through a questionnaire as an alternative to treadmill testing. It is a measure of subject-perceived walking performance for subjects with Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and/or intermittent claudication. The WIQ quantifies patient-reported walking speed, walking distance, and stair-climbing ability, respectively, on a scale of 0 (= worst) to 100 (= best).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=127 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Walking Distance Score (N=127)
55.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 39.6
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Walking Speed Score (N=126)
50.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.9
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Stair Climbing Score (N=119)
59.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.The highest score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty. Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity.

Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=99 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Walking Distance Score (N=99)
58.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.1
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Walking Speed Score (N=99)
50.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.4
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Stair Climbing Score (N=95)
59.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 36.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 years

Population: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.The highest score for each domain is 100%, which indicates no difficulty. Lowest possible score for each domain is 0%, which indicates inability to perform the activity.

Measured by the Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=94 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Walking Distance Score (N=94)
54.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 40.0
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Walking Speed Score (N=94)
49.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.0
Walking Impairment Questionaire Scores
Stair Climbing Score (N=88)
58.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-Procedure

Population: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia. Category and Clinical Description: 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
1
0.6 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
2
28.2 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
3
63.0 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
4
8.3 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
5
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
6
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
0
0.0 Percentage of Limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month

Population: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia. Category and Clinical Description: 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=161 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
2
15.5 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
3
2.5 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
4
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
5
0.6 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
6
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
0
54.7 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
1
26.7 Percentage of Limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 9 months

Population: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia. Category and Clinical Description: 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=148 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
1
23.6 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
2
14.2 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
3
2.0 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
4
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
5
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
6
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
0
60.1 Percentage of Limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia. Category and Clinical Description: 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=119 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
0
61.2 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
1
25.6 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
2
7.4 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
3
4.1 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
4
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
5
1.7 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
6
0.0 Percentage of Limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 years

Population: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

The Rutherford Becker clinical category is a scale to measure chronic limb ischemia. Category and Clinical Description: 0 = Asymptomatic, no hemodynamically significant occlusive disease, 1 = Mild claudication, 2 = Moderate claudication, 3 = Severe claudication, 4 = Ischemic rest pain, 5 = tissue loss, non-healing ulcer, or focal gangrene with diffuse pedal ischemia, 6 = Major tissue loss, extending above transmetatarsal level, functional foot no longer salvageable

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=113 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
0
69.9 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
1
18.6 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
2
9.7 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
3
1.8 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
4
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
5
0.0 Percentage of Limbs
Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
6
0.0 Percentage of Limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Between baseline and 1 month

Population: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

Change in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: Worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: Deterioration (an increase) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category by at least two categories from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement or to a category 5 or 6. Improved Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: An improvement (a decrease) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category of at least one category from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=161 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by 2 categories
30.4 Percentage of Limbs
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by 1 category
18.6 Percentage of Limbs
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
No change
8.1 Percentage of Limbs
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by >/= 3 categories
42.2 Percentage of Limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Between baseline and 9 months

Population: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

Change in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: Worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: Deterioration (an increase) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category by at least two categories from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement or to a category 5 or 6. Improved Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: An improvement (a decrease) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category of at least one category from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=148 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by 1 category
17.6 Percentage of Limbs
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
No change
6.1 Percentage of Limbs
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by 2 categories
29.1 Percentage of Limbs
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by >/= 3 categories
47.3 Percentage of Limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Between baseline and 2 years

Population: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

Change in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: Worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: Deterioration (an increase) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category by at least two categories from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement or to a category 5 or 6. Improved Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: An improvement (a decrease) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category of at least one category from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=119 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by >/= 3 categories
52.9 Percentage of Limbs
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by 2 categories
19.8 Percentage of Limbs
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by 1 category
21.5 Percentage of Limbs
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
No change
3.3 Percentage of Limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Between baseline and 3 years

Population: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

Change in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: Worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: Deterioration (an increase) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category by at least two categories from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement or to a category 5 or 6. Improved Rutherford Becker Clinical Category: An improvement (a decrease) in the Rutherford Becker Clinical Category of at least one category from baseline and subsequently from the earliest post-procedural measurement.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=113 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by >/= 3 categories
56.6 Percentage of Limbs
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by 2 categories
23.0 Percentage of Limbs
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
Improved by 1 category
15.0 Percentage of Limbs
Changes From Baseline in Rutherford Becker Clinical Category for the Treated Limb(s)
No change
5.3 Percentage of Limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month and 9 months

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target lesions who were event free at this timepoint.

Target lesion revascularization was defined as any revascularization at the target lesion with or without evidence of target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by duplex ultrasonography (DUS) or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
1 month
100 percentage of target lesions
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
9 months
95.6 percentage of target lesions

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 18 months

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target lesions who were event free at this timepoint.

Target lesion revascularization was defined as any revascularization at the target lesion with or without evidence of target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
93.5 percentage of target lesions

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target lesions who were event free at this timepoint.

Target lesion revascularization was defined as any revascularization at the target lesion with or without evidence of target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesion
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
89.6 percentage of target lesions

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 years

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target lesions who were event free at this timepoint.

Target lesion revascularization was defined as any revascularization at the target lesion with or without evidence of target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
84.4 percentage of target lesions

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month and 9 months

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target lesions who were event free at this timepoint.

Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Clinically-driven is defined as: Revascularization of the stent with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion, and target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography.) (Note: This does not include coincidental overlap of a percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) balloon or stent into a study stent, that has \<50% stenosis, while treating a non-target lesion in the target vessel).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR)
1 month
100 percentage of target lesions
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR)
9 months
97.1 percentage of target lesions

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 18 months

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target lesions who were event free at this timepoint.

Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Clinically-driven is defined as: Revascularization of the stent with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion, and target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography.) (Note: This does not include coincidental overlap of a PTA balloon or stent into a study stent, that has \<50% stenosis, while treating a non-target lesion in the target vessel).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR)
94.7 percentage of target lesions

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target lesions who were event free at this timepoint.

Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Clinically-driven is defined as: Revascularization of the stent with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion, and target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography.) (Note: This does not include coincidental overlap of a PTA balloon or stent into a study stent, that has \<50% stenosis, while treating a non-target lesion in the target vessel).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR)
91.4 percentage of target lesions

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 years

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target lesions who were event free at this timepoint.

Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Clinically-driven is defined as: Revascularization of the stent with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target lesion, and target lesion diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by duplex ultrasound or arteriography.) (Note: This does not include coincidental overlap of a PTA balloon or stent into a study stent, that has \<50% stenosis, while treating a non-target lesion in the target vessel).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (CD-TLR)
86.9 percentage of target lesions

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month and 9 months

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with lesions in the target vessel who were event free at this timepoint.

Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) defined: Any revascularization of the target vessel, outside of the target lesion, with or without evidence of diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target vessel.)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
1 month
100 percentage of target vessels
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
9 months
96.5 percentage of target vessels

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 18 months

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with lesions in the target vessel who were event free at this timepoint.

Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) defined: Any revascularization of the target vessel, outside of the target lesion, with or without evidence of diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target vessel.)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
96.5 percentage of target vessels

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects with lesions in the target vessel who were event free at this timepoint.

Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) defined: Any revascularization of the target vessel, outside of the target lesion, with or without evidence of diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target vessel.)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
94.5 percentage of target vessels

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 years

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with lesions in the target vessel who were event free at this timepoint.

Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years. Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) defined: Any revascularization of the target vessel, outside of the target lesion, with or without evidence of diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category that is clearly referable to the target vessel.)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
92.2 percentage of target vessels

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month and 9 months

Population: ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects with lesions in the target vessel who were event free at this timepoint.

Revascularization of the target vessel (outside the target lesion) with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker clinical category that is clearly referable to the target vessel, and diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (CD-TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
1 month
100 percentage of target vessels
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (CD-TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
9 months
97.1 percentage of target vessels

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 18 months

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with lesions in the target vessel who were event free at this timepoint.

Revascularization of the target vessel (outside the target lesion) with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker clinical category that is clearly referable to the target vessel, and diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (CD-TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
97.1 percentage of target vessels

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with lesions in the target vessel who were event free at this timepoint.

Revascularization of the target vessel (outside the target lesion) with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker clinical category that is clearly referable to the target vessel, and diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (CD-TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
95.1 percentage of target vessels

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 years

Population: ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects with lesions in the target vessel who were event free at this timepoint.

Revascularization of the target vessel (outside the target lesion) with evidence of new distal ischemic signs (worsening Rutherford Becker clinical category that is clearly referable to the target vessel, and diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Lesions
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (CD-TVR) for the Treated Limb(s)
94.3 percentage of target vessels

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month and 9 months

Population: ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects with vessels in the extremity with the target lesions, who were event free at this timepoint.

Any revascularization of a target extremity vessel (distal to the superior border of the inguinal ligament on the ipsilateral side) with or without evidence of vessel diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, and with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Extremity Revascularization (TER) for the Treated Limb(s)
1 month
99.4 percentage of limbs
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Extremity Revascularization (TER) for the Treated Limb(s)
9 months
97.7 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 18 months

Population: ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects with vessels in the extremity with the target lesions, who were event free at this timepoint.

Any revascularization of a target extremity vessel (distal to the superior border of the inguinal ligament on the ipsilateral side) with or without evidence of vessel diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, and with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Extremity Revascularization (TER) for the Treated Limb(s)
96.6 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects with vessels in the extremity with the target lesions, who were event free at this timepoint.

Any revascularization of a target extremity vessel (distal to the superior border of the inguinal ligament on the ipsilateral side) with or without evidence of vessel diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, and with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Extremity Revascularization (TER) for the Treated Limb(s)
95.3 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 years

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with vessels in the extremity with the target lesions, who were event free at this timepoint.

Any revascularization of a target extremity vessel (distal to the superior border of the inguinal ligament on the ipsilateral side) with or without evidence of vessel diameter stenosis ≥ 50% determined by DUS or arteriography, and with or without new distal ischemic sign (worsening Rutherford Becker Clinical Category).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Target Extremity Revascularization (TER) for the Treated Limb(s)
93.0 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month

Population: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

Absence of in-stent restenosis of the target lesion (≥50%) as determined by duplex ultrasound or angiogram and without interval reintervention since the initial study procedure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=172 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Primary Stent Patency
98.3 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 9 months

Population: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

Absence of in-stent restenosis of the target lesion (≥50%) as determined by duplex ultrasound or angiogram and without interval reintervention since the initial study procedure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=154 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Primary Stent Patency
90.9 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

Absence of in-stent restenosis of the target lesion (≥50%) as determined by duplex ultrasound or angiogram and without interval reintervention since the initial study procedure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=140 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Primary Stent Patency
80.7 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 years

Population: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

Absence of in-stent restenosis of the target lesion (≥50%) as determined by duplex ultrasound or angiogram and without interval reintervention since the initial study procedure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=125 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Primary Stent Patency
75.2 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 9 months

Population: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

Defined as ≥ 50% stenosis at follow-up.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=154 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Restenosis
8.4 percentage of limbs
Interval 4.6 to 14.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

Defined as ≥ 50% stenosis at follow-up.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=136 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Restenosis
16.9 percentage of limbs
Interval 11.0 to 24.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 years

Population: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

Defined as ≥ 50% stenosis at follow-up.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=118 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Restenosis
20.3 percentage of limbs
Interval 13.5 to 28.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month and 9 months

Population: ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.

Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Death (All Cause)
1 month
100 percentage of participants
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Death (All Cause)
9 months
96.1 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 18 months

Population: ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.

Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Death (All Cause)
94.5 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.

Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Death (All Cause)
92.3 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 years

Population: ITT population. This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.

Outcome measure analysed at 1, 9 and 18 months, 2 and 3 years

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Death (All Cause)
88.3 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month and 9 months

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.

The term myocardial infarction should be used when there is evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with myocardial ischemia.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Myocardial Infarction (MI)
1 month
100 percentage of participants
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Myocardial Infarction (MI)
9 months
98.6 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 18 months

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.

The term myocardial infarction should be used when there is evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with myocardial ischemia.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Myocardial Infarction (MI)
97.9 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.

The term myocardial infarction should be used when there is evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with myocardial ischemia.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Myocardial Infarction (MI)
97.1 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 years

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.

The term myocardial infarction should be used when there is evidence of myocardial necrosis in a clinical setting consistent with myocardial ischemia.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Myocardial Infarction (MI)
96.2 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month and 9 months

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target limbs who were event free at this time point.

Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this study, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb(s) that was/were treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Amputations (Major) of the Treated Limb(s)
1 month
100 percentage of limbs
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Amputations (Major) of the Treated Limb(s)
9 months
99.4 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 18 months

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target limbs who were event free at this time point.

Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this study, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb(s) that was/were treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Amputations (Major) of the Treated Limb(s)
99.4 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target limbs who were event free at this time point.

Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this study, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb(s) that was/were treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Amputations (Major) of the Treated Limb(s)
99.4 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 years

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects with target limbs who were event free at this time point.

Amputation is defined as the removal of a body extremity by surgery. For this study, the definition of amputation will only include amputations of the limb(s) that was/were treated. A minor amputation will be defined as below the ankle; a major amputation will be defined as at or above the ankle.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=181 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Amputations (Major) of the Treated Limb(s)
99.4 percentage of limbs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month and 9 months

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.

Embolism is the formation of a thrombus within the target lesion or stent with migration or atherosclerotic emboli migration to a distal artery.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Embolic Events
9 months
98.7 percentage of participants
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Embolic Events
1 month
99.3 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 18 months

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.

Embolism is the formation of a thrombus within the target lesion or stent with migration or atherosclerotic emboli migration to a distal artery

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Embolic Events
98.7 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.

Embolism is the formation of a thrombus within the target lesion or stent with migration or atherosclerotic emboli migration to a distal artery

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Embolic Events
98.7 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 years

Population: ITT population.This analysis represents those subjects who were event free at this time point.

Embolism is the formation of a thrombus within the target lesion or stent with migration or atherosclerotic emboli migration to a distal artery

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Freedom From Embolic Events
98.7 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 month

Population: ITT population.The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

Stent thrombosis is defined as a total occlusion documented by DUS and/or arteriography at the stent site with or without symptoms that occurs ≤ 30 days post index procedure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=177 Limbs
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Stent Thrombosis
0.6 percentage of limbs
Interval 0.0 to 3.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 1 month

Population: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean. SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=133 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Physical Component Summary
9.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 9 months

Population: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean. SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=124 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Physical Component Summary
9.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 2 years

Population: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean. SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=101 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Physical Component Summary
10.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 3 years

Population: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean. SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=96 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Physical Component Summary
8.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 1 month

Population: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean. SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=133 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Mental Component Summary
3.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 9 months

Population: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean. SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=124 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Mental Component Summary
1.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 2 years

Population: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean. SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=101 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Mental Component Summary
2.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 3 years

Population: ITT population. The number of participants analyzed includes the subjects with available follow-up data at that time-point.

This measure indicates the absolute change between two timepoints represented by the mean. SF-12® Health Survey is validated measure using 12 questions to measure functional health and well-being from the patient's point of view. Scores on the scale are 0% (indicating poor perceived health status) to 100% (indicating excellent perceived health status) possible.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=96 Participants
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Changes in Quality of Life Measures: Mental Component Summary
2.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.4

Adverse Events

Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System

Serious events: 91 serious events
Other events: 88 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 participants at risk
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Bleeding
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pain at insertion site
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pseudoaneurysm
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
5.3%
8/151 • Number of events 9 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Cancer
6.0%
9/151 • Number of events 10 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Cardiac disorders
Angina
4.0%
6/151 • Number of events 6 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmias (other than bradycardia)
4.6%
7/151 • Number of events 7 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac Arrest
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Cardiac disorders
Congestive Heart Failure
4.0%
6/151 • Number of events 6 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Cardiac disorders
Other: Chest Pain
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Cardiac disorders
Other: Coronary Artery Disease
4.6%
7/151 • Number of events 8 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Cardiac disorders
Pain
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Cardiac disorders
Surgery/Interventional Procedure
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Cardiac disorders
Hypertension
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Cardiac disorders
Hypotension
2.6%
4/151 • Number of events 4 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Cardiac disorders
Syncope
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Bleeding
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal Bleed
4.0%
6/151 • Number of events 6 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastro-intestinal
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Other: Cholecystitis
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Other: Esophagitis
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Other: Hernia
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Other: Malnutrition
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Other: Pancreatitis
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pain
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Infections and infestations
Fever
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Infections and infestations
Gastro-intestinal
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Infections and infestations
Musculoskeletal
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Infections and infestations
Other: Cellulitis
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Infections and infestations
Other: Facial Abscess
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Infections and infestations
Other: Foot Ulcer
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Infections and infestations
Other: Inguinal Cellulitis
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Infections and infestations
Other: Osteomyelitis
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Infections and infestations
Other: Pancreatitis
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
6.0%
9/151 • Number of events 10 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
2.0%
3/151 • Number of events 3 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Infections and infestations
Urinary Tract Infection
2.0%
3/151 • Number of events 4 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Infections and infestations
Viral, bacterial and fungal infections
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Infections and infestations
Wound complication or wound infection
2.0%
3/151 • Number of events 4 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Other: Hyperglycemia
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Other: Hypoglycemia
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
General disorders
Genito-urinary
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
General disorders
Headache
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
General disorders
Musculoskeletal
6.0%
9/151 • Number of events 11 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
General disorders
Other: Non Cardiac Chest Pain
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
General disorders
Surgery/Interventional Procedure
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
General disorders
Wound complication or wound infection
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial Infarction - Non-Q- wave
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial Infarction - Unknown
2.0%
3/151 • Number of events 3 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Cardiac disorders
Other: Non Stemi MI
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Nervous system disorders
Confusion
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Nervous system disorders
Mental Status Change
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 3 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Nervous system disorders
Myalgia
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Nervous system disorders
Other: Hydrocephalus
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Nervous system disorders
Other: Anoxic Encephalopathy
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Nervous system disorders
Other: Anxiety
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Nervous system disorders
Other: Extremity Tremors
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Nervous system disorders
Other: Metabolic Encephalopathy
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Nervous system disorders
Other: Subarachnoid/Intracerebral Hemorrhage
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Nervous system disorders
Surgery/Interventional Procedure
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Nervous system disorders
Transient Ischemic Attack
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Dissection
2.6%
4/151 • Number of events 4 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hypertension
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
2.6%
4/151 • Number of events 4 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Other: Pleural Effusion
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal Failure
2.0%
3/151 • Number of events 4 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Other: Drug Toxicity
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Other: Dyspnea
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Other: Shortness Of Breath
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory Failure
4.6%
7/151 • Number of events 7 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Vascular disorders
Other: cerebrovascular accident
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 3 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Vascular disorders
Other: Right Cerebellar Infarct
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Vascular disorders
Stroke: Unknown
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Vascular disorders
Aneurysm
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Vascular disorders
Dissection
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Vascular disorders
Hematoma
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Vascular disorders
Ischemia
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Vascular disorders
Occlusion
6.0%
9/151 • Number of events 11 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Vascular disorders
Other: Carotid Stenosis
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Vascular disorders
Other: Deep Vein Thrombosis
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Vascular disorders
Other: Peripheral Vascular Disease
9.3%
14/151 • Number of events 25 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Vascular disorders
Pseudoaneurysm
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Vascular disorders
Restenosis
4.0%
6/151 • Number of events 12 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Vascular disorders
Stenosis
13.9%
21/151 • Number of events 31 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Vascular disorders
Surgery/Interventional Procedure
1.3%
2/151 • Number of events 2 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Vascular disorders
Thrombosis
0.66%
1/151 • Number of events 1 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System
n=151 participants at risk
The Absolute Pro™ Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System includes two versions of the device, the Absolute Pro™ and Absolute Pro™ Long Lesion (LL) Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent Systems, which are analyzed together per protocol pre-specification.
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmias (other than bradycardia)
5.3%
8/151 • Number of events 8 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Cardiac disorders
Hypotension
6.6%
10/151 • Number of events 11 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
General disorders
Edema (non pulmonary)
5.3%
8/151 • Number of events 9 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal
35.1%
53/151 • Number of events 85 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
General disorders
Pain
6.6%
10/151 • Number of events 11 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Vascular disorders
Other: Peripheral Vascular Disease
13.9%
21/151 • Number of events 26 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.
Vascular disorders
Stenosis
7.3%
11/151 • Number of events 12 • 3 years
Organ systems designations were chosen to match Abbott Categories coding as closely as possible and may differ from other coding systems. The number at risk excludes subjects who were lost to follow-up or withdrew from the study through 3 years without any events.

Additional Information

David R Rutledge

Abbott Vascular

Phone: 408-845-3820

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: GT60