Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effect of Spinal Manipulation on Sensorimotor Functions in Back Pain Patients (NCT NCT00830596)
NCT ID: NCT00830596
Last Updated: 2017-09-25
Results Overview
Changes in sensorimotor function, as measured by postural sway in patients with LBP from baseline to 2 weeks. The adjusted within-group mean changes from baseline to two week follow-up are detailed below for: Postural sway (AP=mean excursion in the anterior-posterior direction, ML= mean excursion in the medial-to-lateral direction.
COMPLETED
NA
221 participants
Baseline and 2 weeks
2017-09-25
Participant Flow
Participants with acute, subacute, or chronic low back pain were recruited from local communities.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
HVLA-SM
High velocity, low amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
HVLA-SM: High velocity, low amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
|
LVVA-SM
Low velocity, variable amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
LVVA-SM: Low velocity, variable amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
|
Sham Intervention
Light effleurage and a sham mechanically-assisted chiropractic treatment for 2 weeks followed by full spine manipulation for 4 weeks
light effleurage followed by SMT: 2 weeks of light effleurage and a sham mechanically-assisted chiropractic treatment followed by 4 weeks active care with full spine spinal manipulation
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
74
|
74
|
73
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
72
|
72
|
67
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
2
|
6
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Effect of Spinal Manipulation on Sensorimotor Functions in Back Pain Patients
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
HVLA-SM
n=74 Participants
High velocity, low amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
HVLA-SM: High velocity, low amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
|
LVVA-SM
n=74 Participants
Low velocity, variable amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
LVVA-SM: Low velocity, variable amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
|
Sham Intervention
n=73 Participants
Light effleurage and a sham mechanically-assisted chiropractic treatment for 2 weeks followed by full spine manipulation for 4 weeks
light effleurage followed by SMT: 2 weeks of light effleurage and a sham mechanically-assisted chiropractic treatment followed by 4 weeks active care with full spine spinal manipulation
|
Total
n=221 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
44.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 • n=5 Participants
|
44.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 • n=7 Participants
|
44.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5 • n=5 Participants
|
44.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
101 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
120 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeksChanges in sensorimotor function, as measured by postural sway in patients with LBP from baseline to 2 weeks. The adjusted within-group mean changes from baseline to two week follow-up are detailed below for: Postural sway (AP=mean excursion in the anterior-posterior direction, ML= mean excursion in the medial-to-lateral direction.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HVLA-SM
n=74 Participants
High velocity, low amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
HVLA-SM: High velocity, low amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
|
LVVA-SM
n=74 Participants
Low velocity, variable amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
LVVA-SM: Low velocity, variable amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
|
Sham Intervention
n=73 Participants
Light effleurage and a sham mechanically-assisted chiropractic treatment for 2 weeks followed by full spine manipulation for 4 weeks
light effleurage followed by SMT: 2 weeks of light effleurage and a sham mechanically-assisted chiropractic treatment followed by 4 weeks active care with full spine spinal manipulation
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Postural Sway
Postural Sway_AP excursion - Hard (mm)
|
-.13 mm
Interval -0.6 to 0.35
|
-0.26 mm
Interval -0.75 to 0.22
|
-0.18 mm
Interval -0.66 to 0.3
|
|
Postural Sway
Postural Sway_ML excursion - Hard (mm)
|
-0.06 mm
Interval -0.25 to 0.14
|
-0.06 mm
Interval -0.26 to 0.14
|
-0.11 mm
Interval -0.31 to 0.09
|
|
Postural Sway
Postural Sway_AP excursion - Soft (mm)
|
-0.03 mm
Interval -0.63 to 0.56
|
0.02 mm
Interval -0.58 to 0.63
|
-0.26 mm
Interval -0.87 to 0.34
|
|
Postural Sway
Postural Sway_ML excursion - Soft (mm)
|
0.53 mm
Interval 0.09 to 0.98
|
0.51 mm
Interval 0.06 to 0.96
|
0.2 mm
Interval -0.25 to 0.64
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeksChanges in sensorimotor function, as measured by postural sway speed in patients with LBP from baseline to 2 weeks. The adjusted within-group mean changes from baseline to two week follow-up are detailed below for: Sway Speed=overall center of pressure traveling distance divided by time.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HVLA-SM
n=74 Participants
High velocity, low amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
HVLA-SM: High velocity, low amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
|
LVVA-SM
n=74 Participants
Low velocity, variable amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
LVVA-SM: Low velocity, variable amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
|
Sham Intervention
n=73 Participants
Light effleurage and a sham mechanically-assisted chiropractic treatment for 2 weeks followed by full spine manipulation for 4 weeks
light effleurage followed by SMT: 2 weeks of light effleurage and a sham mechanically-assisted chiropractic treatment followed by 4 weeks active care with full spine spinal manipulation
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Postural Sway Speed
Postural Sway_ Sway speed - Hard (mm/s)
|
0.02 mm/s
Interval -1.14 to 1.18
|
-0.11 mm/s
Interval -1.29 to 1.07
|
-0.23 mm/s
Interval -1.4 to 0.94
|
|
Postural Sway Speed
Postural Sway_Sway speed - Soft (mm/s)
|
-0.40 mm/s
Interval -2.53 to 1.74
|
-1.71 mm/s
Interval -3.87 to 0.46
|
-0.94 mm/s
Interval -3.1 to 1.21
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeksChanges in sensorimotor function, as measured by response to sudden load in patients with LBP from baseline to 2 weeks. The adjusted within-group mean changes from baseline to two week follow-up are detailed below for Response to sudden load \[RTSL\], ant. COP=anterior movement in center of pressure
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HVLA-SM
n=74 Participants
High velocity, low amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
HVLA-SM: High velocity, low amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
|
LVVA-SM
n=74 Participants
Low velocity, variable amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
LVVA-SM: Low velocity, variable amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
|
Sham Intervention
n=73 Participants
Light effleurage and a sham mechanically-assisted chiropractic treatment for 2 weeks followed by full spine manipulation for 4 weeks
light effleurage followed by SMT: 2 weeks of light effleurage and a sham mechanically-assisted chiropractic treatment followed by 4 weeks active care with full spine spinal manipulation
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Response to Sudden Load, Anterior Movement in Center of Pressure Excursion in SL
|
-4.7 mm
Interval -7.9 to 1.5
|
-4.1 mm
Interval -7.4 to 0.7
|
-5.8 mm
Interval -9.2 to -2.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeksChanges in sensorimotor function, as measured by response to sudden load in patients with LBP from baseline to 2 weeks. The adjusted within-group mean changes from baseline to two week follow-up are detailed below for for Response to sudden load \[RTSL\] (ant. COP=anterior movement in center of pressure, L=left side of erector spinae, R=right side of erector spinae)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HVLA-SM
n=74 Participants
High velocity, low amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
HVLA-SM: High velocity, low amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
|
LVVA-SM
n=74 Participants
Low velocity, variable amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
LVVA-SM: Low velocity, variable amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
|
Sham Intervention
n=73 Participants
Light effleurage and a sham mechanically-assisted chiropractic treatment for 2 weeks followed by full spine manipulation for 4 weeks
light effleurage followed by SMT: 2 weeks of light effleurage and a sham mechanically-assisted chiropractic treatment followed by 4 weeks active care with full spine spinal manipulation
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Response to Sudden Load, Peak Muscle Response Per Side
RTSL_Norm. peak muscle response - L (%)
|
-11.4 % muscle response
Interval -21.7 to -1.2
|
5.2 % muscle response
Interval -5.0 to 15.4
|
0.1 % muscle response
Interval -10.0 to 10.2
|
|
Response to Sudden Load, Peak Muscle Response Per Side
RTSL_Norm. peak muscle response - R (%)
|
3.4 % muscle response
Interval -3.0 to 9.8
|
1.4 % muscle response
Interval -5.2 to 8.0
|
-1.2 % muscle response
Interval -7.8 to 5.3
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 2 weeksChanges in sensorimotor function, as measured by response to sudden load in patients with LBP from baseline to 2 weeks. The adjusted within-group mean changes from baseline to two week follow-up are detailed below for for Response to sudden load \[RTSL\] (ant. COP=anterior movement in center of pressure, L=left side of erector spinae, R=right side of erector spinae)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
HVLA-SM
n=74 Participants
High velocity, low amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
HVLA-SM: High velocity, low amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
|
LVVA-SM
n=74 Participants
Low velocity, variable amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
LVVA-SM: Low velocity, variable amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
|
Sham Intervention
n=73 Participants
Light effleurage and a sham mechanically-assisted chiropractic treatment for 2 weeks followed by full spine manipulation for 4 weeks
light effleurage followed by SMT: 2 weeks of light effleurage and a sham mechanically-assisted chiropractic treatment followed by 4 weeks active care with full spine spinal manipulation
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Response to Sudden Load Response Times
RTSL_Response start time - L (ms)
|
-18.3 ms
Interval -54.2 to 17.7
|
-42.8 ms
Interval -82.4 to -3.2
|
-19.8 ms
Interval -53.0 to 13.3
|
|
Response to Sudden Load Response Times
RTSL_Response start time R (ms)
|
-5.9 ms
Interval -25.1 to 13.2
|
-17.1 ms
Interval -38.4 to 4.3
|
-20.8 ms
Interval -38.9 to -2.7
|
|
Response to Sudden Load Response Times
RTSL_Peak response time - L (ms)
|
-14.6 ms
Interval -49.6 to 20.3
|
-25.2 ms
Interval -63.7 to 13.3
|
-28.5 ms
Interval -60.7 to 3.7
|
|
Response to Sudden Load Response Times
RTSL_Peak response time - R (ms)
|
-18.1 ms
Interval -30.5 to -5.8
|
-2.2 ms
Interval -15.9 to 11.6
|
1.9 ms
Interval -9.9 to 13.8
|
Adverse Events
HVLA-SM*
LVVA-SM*
Sham Intervention*
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
HVLA-SM*
n=74 participants at risk
High velocity, low amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
HVLA-SM: High velocity, low amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
|
LVVA-SM*
n=74 participants at risk
Low velocity, variable amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
LVVA-SM: Low velocity, variable amplitude lumbo-pelvic manipulation
|
Sham Intervention*
n=73 participants at risk
Light effleurage and a sham mechanically-assisted chiropractic treatment for 2 weeks followed by full spine manipulation for 4 weeks
light effleurage followed by SMT: 2 weeks of light effleurage and a sham mechanically-assisted chiropractic treatment followed by 4 weeks active care with full spine spinal manipulation
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Tooth/facial pain
|
0.00%
0/74 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
0.00%
0/74 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Number of events 1 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
|
General disorders
Numbness/tingling
|
0.00%
0/74 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Number of events 1 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
|
General disorders
Gastrointestinal symptoms
|
0.00%
0/74 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
0.00%
0/73 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
|
General disorders
Migraine
|
0.00%
0/74 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
0.00%
0/74 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Number of events 1 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
|
General disorders
Insect bite
|
0.00%
0/74 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
0.00%
0/73 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spine-related pain
|
62.2%
46/74 • Number of events 92 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
73.0%
54/74 • Number of events 124 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
52.1%
38/73 • Number of events 70 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spine-related pain with radiation
|
10.8%
8/74 • Number of events 9 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
20.3%
15/74 • Number of events 20 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
20.5%
15/73 • Number of events 17 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Extremity pain
|
17.6%
13/74 • Number of events 17 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
17.6%
13/74 • Number of events 24 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
17.8%
13/73 • Number of events 18 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Headache
|
4.1%
3/74 • Number of events 4 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
5.5%
4/73 • Number of events 5 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
General stiffness/tightness
|
10.8%
8/74 • Number of events 8 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
8.1%
6/74 • Number of events 6 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
9.6%
7/73 • Number of events 10 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Transient muscle weakness
|
0.00%
0/74 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
0.00%
0/73 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tenderness
|
0.00%
0/74 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Number of events 1 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasm/cramp
|
2.7%
2/74 • Number of events 2 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
5.4%
4/74 • Number of events 5 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
2.7%
2/73 • Number of events 2 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle pain
|
5.4%
4/74 • Number of events 4 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Number of events 2 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
|
General disorders
Tiredness/fatigue
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
0.00%
0/73 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
|
General disorders
Dizziness/imbalance/vertigo
|
0.00%
0/74 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
1.4%
1/74 • Number of events 1 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
4.1%
3/73 • Number of events 4 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
|
General disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/74 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
0.00%
0/74 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
1.4%
1/73 • Number of events 1 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
|
General disorders
Sinus congestion/respiratory symptoms/allergy
|
2.7%
2/74 • Number of events 2 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
8.1%
6/74 • Number of events 6 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
2.7%
2/73 • Number of events 2 • 2 weeks
Any untoward medical occurrence that may present itself during the conduct of the study which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study procedures. \*The total number of AEs may exceed the total # of people affected because some people experienced multiple AEs.
|
Additional Information
Christine Goertz, DC, PhD, Principal Investigator
Palmer College of Chiropractic
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place