Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effects of Carotid Stent Design on Cerebral Embolization (NCT NCT00830232)
NCT ID: NCT00830232
Last Updated: 2020-02-05
Results Overview
Bilateral transcranial Doppler scan monitoring of the anterior and middle cerebral arteries was performed using a PMD150-ST3 digital transcranial Doppler pulsed-wave ultrasound scan system (Spencer Technologies, Seattle, Wash) with 2-MHz probes located over the temporal bones above the zygomatic arch. Isolated microembolic signals (MES) were identified from Doppler spectras according to the criteria given by the Consensus Committee of the Ninth International Cerebral Hemodynamic Symposium. If the number of MES was too high to be counted separately, heartbeats with microemboli were counted as microembolic showers. To avoid confusion, MES detected during contrast injection were excluded from the analysis. For analysis purposes, the procedure was divided into the following phases: lesion crossing, filter deployment, IVUS examination, predilation, stent deployment, postdilatation (when applicable), and filter removal.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
First 24 hours after implantation of carotid stent
2020-02-05
Participant Flow
Patients recruitment was started on december 2008 and continued until February 2012. Patients recruitment and consenting were performed at the medical clinic.
Patients were considered officially enrolled after the randomization, which was performed during the procedure after the initial angiography (initial image of the brain blood flow).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Closed-cell Stent
Patients enrolled in this study arm underwent for carotid stenting using closed stent cell. The graft used in this group was the Xact closed-cell stent. This type of device is a rigid device with a dense composition between the nitinol rings.
Carotid stenting was used on standard fashion using filters as embolic protection device.
|
Open-cell Stent
Patients enrolled in this study arm underwent for carotid stenting using open stent cell stents. This type of stent is a tube shaped graft composed of flexible nitinol rings. The device used in this group was the Acculinx open-cell stent.
Stenting procedure eas performed on standard fashion.Filters were used as embolic protection device.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
20
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
20
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Effects of Carotid Stent Design on Cerebral Embolization
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Closed-cell Stent
n=20 Participants
closed-cell stent : Closed-cell stent: Comparison of two types of carotid stent designs (open- vs. closed-cell) regarding the primary and secondary outcomes.
|
Open-cell Stent
n=20 Participants
Open-cell stent : Open-cell Stent: Comparison of two types of carotid stent designs (open- vs. closed-cell) regarding the primary and secondary outcomes.
|
Total
n=40 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.07 • n=5 Participants
|
67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5 • n=7 Participants
|
66.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 participants
n=7 Participants
|
40 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: First 24 hours after implantation of carotid stentBilateral transcranial Doppler scan monitoring of the anterior and middle cerebral arteries was performed using a PMD150-ST3 digital transcranial Doppler pulsed-wave ultrasound scan system (Spencer Technologies, Seattle, Wash) with 2-MHz probes located over the temporal bones above the zygomatic arch. Isolated microembolic signals (MES) were identified from Doppler spectras according to the criteria given by the Consensus Committee of the Ninth International Cerebral Hemodynamic Symposium. If the number of MES was too high to be counted separately, heartbeats with microemboli were counted as microembolic showers. To avoid confusion, MES detected during contrast injection were excluded from the analysis. For analysis purposes, the procedure was divided into the following phases: lesion crossing, filter deployment, IVUS examination, predilation, stent deployment, postdilatation (when applicable), and filter removal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Closed-cell Stent
n=20 Participants
closed-cell stent : Closed-cell stent: Comparison of two types of carotid stent designs (open- vs. closed-cell) regarding the primary and secondary outcomes.
|
Open-cell Stent
n=20 Participants
Open-cell stent : Open-cell Stent: Comparison of two types of carotid stent designs (open- vs. closed-cell) regarding the primary and secondary outcomes.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Transcranial Doppler Counts of Micro-embolic Signals in the Ipsilateral Middle Cerebral Artery.
|
264 Micro-emboli
Interval 222.0 to 343.0
|
339 Micro-emboli
Interval 163.0 to 408.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: within 30 days after the carotid stenting procedureOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: within 24 hours after carotid artery stentingOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Closed-cell Stent
Open-cell Stent
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Closed-cell Stent
n=20 participants at risk
closed-cell stent : Closed-cell stent: Comparison of two types of carotid stent designs (open- vs. closed-cell) regarding the primary and secondary outcomes.
|
Open-cell Stent
n=20 participants at risk
Open-cell stent : Open-cell Stent: Comparison of two types of carotid stent designs (open- vs. closed-cell) regarding the primary and secondary outcomes.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)
|
10.0%
2/20 • Number of events 2 • Assessment for adverse events was perfumed at 30 days after carotid stenting.
Only serious adverse events were collected/assessed for this study
|
0.00%
0/20 • Assessment for adverse events was perfumed at 30 days after carotid stenting.
Only serious adverse events were collected/assessed for this study
|
|
Vascular disorders
Groin Hematoma
|
0.00%
0/20 • Assessment for adverse events was perfumed at 30 days after carotid stenting.
Only serious adverse events were collected/assessed for this study
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Assessment for adverse events was perfumed at 30 days after carotid stenting.
Only serious adverse events were collected/assessed for this study
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peri-operative hypotension
|
15.0%
3/20 • Number of events 3 • Assessment for adverse events was perfumed at 30 days after carotid stenting.
Only serious adverse events were collected/assessed for this study
|
0.00%
0/20 • Assessment for adverse events was perfumed at 30 days after carotid stenting.
Only serious adverse events were collected/assessed for this study
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Aphasia
|
0.00%
0/20 • Assessment for adverse events was perfumed at 30 days after carotid stenting.
Only serious adverse events were collected/assessed for this study
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Assessment for adverse events was perfumed at 30 days after carotid stenting.
Only serious adverse events were collected/assessed for this study
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Assessment for adverse events was perfumed at 30 days after carotid stenting.
Only serious adverse events were collected/assessed for this study
|
0.00%
0/20 • Assessment for adverse events was perfumed at 30 days after carotid stenting.
Only serious adverse events were collected/assessed for this study
|
|
Vascular disorders
Stroke
|
0.00%
0/20 • Assessment for adverse events was perfumed at 30 days after carotid stenting.
Only serious adverse events were collected/assessed for this study
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Assessment for adverse events was perfumed at 30 days after carotid stenting.
Only serious adverse events were collected/assessed for this study
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient Ischemic Atack
|
0.00%
0/20 • Assessment for adverse events was perfumed at 30 days after carotid stenting.
Only serious adverse events were collected/assessed for this study
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Assessment for adverse events was perfumed at 30 days after carotid stenting.
Only serious adverse events were collected/assessed for this study
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Assessment for adverse events was perfumed at 30 days after carotid stenting.
Only serious adverse events were collected/assessed for this study
|
0.00%
0/20 • Assessment for adverse events was perfumed at 30 days after carotid stenting.
Only serious adverse events were collected/assessed for this study
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place