Trial Outcomes & Findings for Atorvastatin Three Year Pediatric Study (NCT NCT00827606)
NCT ID: NCT00827606
Last Updated: 2021-02-21
Results Overview
Assessments were performed in the fasting state (minimum 10-hour fast). Change from baseline was also determined.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
272 participants
Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 (or early termination [ET])
2021-02-21
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
Participants aged 6 to less than (\<)10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 milligrams per day (mg/day), orally (PO), through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (\<3.35 millimoles per liter \[mmol/L\]) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
Participants aged greater than or equal to (≥) 10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
139
|
132
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
112
|
94
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
27
|
38
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
Participants aged 6 to less than (\<)10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 milligrams per day (mg/day), orally (PO), through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (\<3.35 millimoles per liter \[mmol/L\]) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
Participants aged greater than or equal to (≥) 10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
4
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
7
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Pregnancy
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
5
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
LDL below 2.59 mmol/L
|
4
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
4
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Atorvastatin Three Year Pediatric Study
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=139 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
n=132 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Total
n=271 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
8.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.86 • n=93 Participants
|
12.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.68 • n=4 Participants
|
10.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.48 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
46 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
79 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
125 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
93 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
146 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 (or early termination [ET])Population: FAS; n (number) equals (=) number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Assessments were performed in the fasting state (minimum 10-hour fast). Change from baseline was also determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=139 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
n=132 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C; Millimoles Per Liter [mMol/L]) During the Study
Baseline (n=139,132)
|
6.304 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.3130
|
5.921 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.1646
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C; Millimoles Per Liter [mMol/L]) During the Study
Month 1 (n=131,130)
|
4.087 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.0264
|
3.675 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.8749
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C; Millimoles Per Liter [mMol/L]) During the Study
Change at Month 1 (n=131,130)
|
-2.214 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.7568
|
-2.233 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.8009
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C; Millimoles Per Liter [mMol/L]) During the Study
Month 2 (n=132,122)
|
3.719 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.8346
|
3.437 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.7438
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C; Millimoles Per Liter [mMol/L]) During the Study
Change at Month 2 (n=132,122)
|
-2.586 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.9297
|
-2.554 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.9155
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C; Millimoles Per Liter [mMol/L]) During the Study
Month 3 (n=126,117)
|
3.503 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.7566
|
3.270 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.6533
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C; Millimoles Per Liter [mMol/L]) During the Study
Change at Month 3 (n=126,117)
|
-2.798 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.0251
|
-2.795 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.0835
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C; Millimoles Per Liter [mMol/L]) During the Study
Month 6 (n=127,115)
|
3.366 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.5787
|
3.347 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.5953
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C; Millimoles Per Liter [mMol/L]) During the Study
Change at Month 6 (n=127,115)
|
-2.968 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.1096
|
-2.732 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.0660
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C; Millimoles Per Liter [mMol/L]) During the Study
Month 12 (n=121,109)
|
3.409 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.7395
|
3.196 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.6565
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C; Millimoles Per Liter [mMol/L]) During the Study
Change at Month 12 (n=121,109)
|
-2.966 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.0987
|
-2.838 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.1450
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C; Millimoles Per Liter [mMol/L]) During the Study
Month 18 (n=116,101)
|
3.309 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.5933
|
3.261 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.5288
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C; Millimoles Per Liter [mMol/L]) During the Study
Change at Month 18 (n=116,101)
|
-3.105 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.1558
|
-2.835 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.2128
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C; Millimoles Per Liter [mMol/L]) During the Study
Month 24 (n=111,96)
|
3.316 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.6803
|
3.189 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.6537
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C; Millimoles Per Liter [mMol/L]) During the Study
Change at Month 24 (n=111,96)
|
-3.088 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.2026
|
-2.933 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.2292
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C; Millimoles Per Liter [mMol/L]) During the Study
Month 30 (n=112,94)
|
3.335 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.6490
|
3.142 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.6916
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C; Millimoles Per Liter [mMol/L]) During the Study
Change at Month 30 (n=112,94)
|
-3.090 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.2402
|
-3.008 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.1489
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C; Millimoles Per Liter [mMol/L]) During the Study
Month 36/ET (n=123,117)
|
3.450 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.7372
|
3.457 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.8808
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C; Millimoles Per Liter [mMol/L]) During the Study
Change at Month 36/ET (n=123,117)
|
-2.855 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.2625
|
-2.468 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.3270
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 (or ET)Population: FAS; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Assessments were performed in the fasting state (minimum 10-hour fast).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
n=130 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C
Month 1 (n=131,130)
|
-34.995 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.7300
|
-37.516 percent change
Standard Deviation 10.0245
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C
Month 2 (n=132,122)
|
-40.371 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.6468
|
-41.939 percent change
Standard Deviation 10.4816
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C
Month 3 (n=126,117)
|
-43.568 percent change
Standard Deviation 10.2149
|
-44.887 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.7530
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C
Month 6 (n=127,115)
|
-45.647 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.6969
|
-43.697 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.1836
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C
Month 12 (n=121,109)
|
-45.530 percent change
Standard Deviation 10.5112
|
-45.727 percent change
Standard Deviation 13.5336
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C
Month 18 (n=116,101)
|
-47.101 percent change
Standard Deviation 10.5592
|
-44.818 percent change
Standard Deviation 13.2623
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C
Month 24 (n=111,96)
|
-46.944 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.9490
|
-46.417 percent change
Standard Deviation 13.8658
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C
Month 30 (n=112,94)
|
-46.631 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.0206
|
-47.734 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.6696
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C
Month 36/ET (n=123,117)
|
-43.785 percent change
Standard Deviation 13.5585
|
-39.863 percent change
Standard Deviation 17.5411
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Assessments were performed in the fasting state (minimum 10-hour fast). Change from baseline was also determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=139 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
n=132 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C; mMol/L) During the Study
Baseline (n=139,132)
|
1.349 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2732
|
1.277 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2546
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C; mMol/L) During the Study
Month 1 (n=131,130)
|
1.360 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2717
|
1.292 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2650
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C; mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 1 (n=131,130)
|
0.010 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1685
|
0.016 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1740
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C; mMol/L) During the Study
Month 2 (n=132,122)
|
1.364 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2805
|
1.297 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2625
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C; mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 2 (n=132,122)
|
0.014 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2238
|
0.025 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1600
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C; mMol/L) During the Study
Month 3 (n=126,117)
|
1.371 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2768
|
1.274 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2606
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C; mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 3 (n=126,117)
|
0.015 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1943
|
0.011 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1837
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C; mMol/L) During the Study
Month 6 (n=127,115)
|
1.337 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2834
|
1.268 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2311
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C; mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 6 (n=127,115)
|
-0.011 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1848
|
0.010 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1833
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C; mMol/L) During the Study
Month 12 (n=121,109)
|
1.328 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2885
|
1.241 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2429
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C; mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 12 (n=121,109)
|
-0.012 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1945
|
-0.023 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1727
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C; mMol/L) During the Study
Month 18 (n=116,102)
|
1.367 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.3003
|
1.234 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2349
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C; mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 18 (n=116,102)
|
0.024 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1923
|
-0.027 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1744
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C; mMol/L) During the Study
Month 24 (n=111,96)
|
1.385 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2729
|
1.266 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2443
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C; mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 24 (n=111,96)
|
0.027 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2043
|
0.007 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1910
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C; mMol/L) During the Study
Month 30 (n=112,94)
|
1.380 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2942
|
1.265 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2487
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C; mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 30 (n=112,94)
|
0.032 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1997
|
0.006 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2150
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C; mMol/L) During the Study
Month 36/ET (n=123,117)
|
1.335 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2918
|
1.278 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2516
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C; mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 36/ET (n=123,117)
|
-0.024 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1949
|
0.005 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1975
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Assessments were performed in the fasting state (minimum 10-hour fast).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
n=130 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C
Month 1 (n=131,130)
|
1.526 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.7845
|
2.192 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.0769
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C
Month 2 (n=132,122)
|
2.195 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.6882
|
2.544 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.7802
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C
Month 3 (n=126,117)
|
1.929 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.7329
|
1.674 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.9525
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C
Month 6 (n=127,115)
|
-0.016 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.8853
|
1.877 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.9113
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C
Month 12 (n=121,109)
|
-0.069 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.2821
|
-1.023 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.1983
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C
Month 18 (n=116,102)
|
2.472 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.8939
|
-1.165 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.3783
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C
Month 24 (n=111,96)
|
3.014 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.9559
|
1.737 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.6924
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C
Month 30 (n=112,94)
|
3.345 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.5080
|
1.868 percent change
Standard Deviation 17.2633
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C
Month 36/ET (n=123,117)
|
-1.125 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.7816
|
1.602 percent change
Standard Deviation 15.4895
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Assessments were performed in the fasting state (minimum 10-hour fast). Change from baseline was also determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=139 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
n=132 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Total Cholesterol (mMol/L) During the Study
Baseline (n=139,132)
|
8.056 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.3356
|
7.647 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.2250
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Total Cholesterol (mMol/L) During the Study
Month 1 (n=134,131)
|
5.785 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.0497
|
5.352 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.9345
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Total Cholesterol (mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 1 (n=134,131)
|
-2.266 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.7957
|
-2.297 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.8516
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Total Cholesterol (mMol/L) During the Study
Month 2 (n=132,124)
|
5.435 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.8629
|
5.061 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.7865
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Total Cholesterol (mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 2 (n=132,124)
|
-2.620 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.9581
|
-2.654 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.9707
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Total Cholesterol (mMol/L) During the Study
Month 3 (n=127,118)
|
5.195 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.8000
|
4.883 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.7034
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Total Cholesterol (mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 3 (n=127,118)
|
-2.869 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.0904
|
-2.883 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.1363
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Total Cholesterol (mMol/L) During the Study
Month 6 (n=127,115)
|
5.019 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.6380
|
4.982 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.6620
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Total Cholesterol (mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 6 (n=127,115)
|
-3.063 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.1687
|
-2.809 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.1133
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Total Cholesterol (mMol/L) During the Study
Month 12 (n=121,109)
|
5.081 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.7470
|
4.799 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.7176
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Total Cholesterol (mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 12 (n=121,109)
|
-3.040 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.1353
|
-2.945 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.2112
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Total Cholesterol (mMol/L) During the Study
Month 18 (n=116,101)
|
4.989 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.6512
|
4.845 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.5401
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Total Cholesterol (mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 18 (n=116,101)
|
-3.168 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.1990
|
-2.965 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.2667
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Total Cholesterol (mMol/L) During the Study
Month 24 (n=111,96)
|
5.032 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.7111
|
4.817 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.7413
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Total Cholesterol (mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 24 (n=111,96)
|
-3.123 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.2039
|
-3.009 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.2871
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Total Cholesterol (mMol/L) During the Study
Month 30 (n=112,95)
|
5.075 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.6951
|
4.795 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.8256
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Total Cholesterol (mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 30 (n=112,95)
|
-3.096 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.2999
|
-3.048 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.2716
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Total Cholesterol (mMol/L) During the Study
Month 36/ET (n=123,117)
|
5.134 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.7863
|
5.099 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.9318
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Total Cholesterol (mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 36/ET (n=123,117)
|
-2.923 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.3256
|
-2.543 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 1.3669
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Assessments were performed in the fasting state (minimum 10-hour fast).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=134 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
n=131 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol
Month 1 (n=134,131)
|
-27.879 percent change
Standard Deviation 8.2639
|
-29.653 percent change
Standard Deviation 8.5987
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol
Month 2 (n=132,124)
|
-31.900 percent change
Standard Deviation 8.5025
|
-33.726 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.2319
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol
Month 3 (n=127,118)
|
-34.784 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.4141
|
-36.126 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.0136
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol
Month 6 (n=127,115)
|
-36.889 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.2297
|
-35.055 percent change
Standard Deviation 10.0273
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol
Month 12 (n=121,109)
|
-36.541 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.2486
|
-36.943 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.9418
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol
Month 18 (n=116,101)
|
-37.772 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.7325
|
-36.634 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.4572
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol
Month 24 (n=111,96)
|
-37.287 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.9578
|
-37.317 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.2461
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol
Month 30 (n=112,95)
|
-36.662 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.2064
|
-37.856 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.5116
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol
Month 36/ET (n=123,117)
|
-35.063 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.0345
|
-32.013 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.5000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Assessments were performed in the fasting state (minimum 10-hour fast). Change from baseline was also determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=139 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
n=132 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Trigylcerides (mMol/L) During the Study
Baseline (n=139,132)
|
0.880 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.4343
|
0.980 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.4986
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Trigylcerides (mMol/L) During the Study
Month 1 (n=134,131)
|
0.759 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.3958
|
0.815 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.3848
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Trigylcerides (mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 1 (n=134,131)
|
-0.121 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.3895
|
-0.166 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.5024
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Trigylcerides (mMol/L) During the Study
Month 2 (n=132,124)
|
0.772 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.3837
|
0.741 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.3382
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Trigylcerides (mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 2 (n=132,124)
|
-0.103 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.3652
|
-0.246 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.4825
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Trigylcerides (mMol/L) During the Study
Month 3 (n=127,118)
|
0.699 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2916
|
0.748 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.3357
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Trigylcerides (mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 3 (n=127,118)
|
-0.166 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.3937
|
-0.237 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.4466
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Trigylcerides (mMol/L) During the Study
Month 6 (n=127,115)
|
0.691 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.3602
|
0.801 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.3848
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Trigylcerides (mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 6 (n=127,115)
|
-0.183 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.4305
|
-0.188 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.4880
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Trigylcerides (mMol/L) During the Study
Month 12 (n=121,109)
|
-0.747 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.3901
|
0.789 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.4050
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Trigylcerides (mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 12 (n=121,109)
|
-0.136 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.4060
|
-0.181 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.5255
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Trigylcerides (mMol/L) During the Study
Month 18 (n=116,102)
|
0.687 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.3435
|
0.765 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.3438
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Trigylcerides (mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 18 (n=116,102)
|
-0.190 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.3665
|
-0.219 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.4623
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Trigylcerides (mMol/L) During the Study
Month 24 (n=111,96)
|
0.725 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.3676
|
0.790 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.3651
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Trigylcerides (mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 24 (n=111,96)
|
-0.133 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.4112
|
-0.179 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.4956
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Trigylcerides (mMol/L) During the Study
Month 30 (n=112,95)
|
0.788 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.3454
|
0.781 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.4167
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Trigylcerides (mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 30 (n=112,95)
|
-0.082 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.3898
|
-0.187 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.5728
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Trigylcerides (mMol/L) During the Study
Month 36/ET (n=123,117)
|
0.764 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.4220
|
0.794 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.3894
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Trigylcerides (mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 36/ET (n=123,117)
|
-0.092 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.4615
|
-0.171 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.5216
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Assessments were performed in the fasting state (minimum 10-hour fast).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=134 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
n=131 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Trigylcerides
Month 1 (n=134,131)
|
-5.950 percent change
Standard Deviation 39.0995
|
-5.927 percent change
Standard Deviation 51.1811
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Trigylcerides
Month 2 (n=132,124)
|
-3.260 percent change
Standard Deviation 42.5136
|
-14.832 percent change
Standard Deviation 40.4952
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Trigylcerides
Month 3 (n=127,118)
|
-8.760 percent change
Standard Deviation 41.1184
|
-14.415 percent change
Standard Deviation 39.9951
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Trigylcerides
Month 6 (n=127,115)
|
-11.817 percent change
Standard Deviation 41.9879
|
-9.097 percent change
Standard Deviation 43.0350
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Trigylcerides
Month 12 (n=121,109)
|
-7.981 percent change
Standard Deviation 40.4511
|
-7.950 percent change
Standard Deviation 48.7238
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Trigylcerides
Month 18 (n=116,102)
|
-13.113 percent change
Standard Deviation 39.3990
|
-12.443 percent change
Standard Deviation 37.3822
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Trigylcerides
Month 24 (n=111,96)
|
-6.697 percent change
Standard Deviation 38.7027
|
-7.328 percent change
Standard Deviation 45.3694
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Trigylcerides
Month 30 (n=112,95)
|
0.657 percent change
Standard Deviation 43.3886
|
-4.935 percent change
Standard Deviation 63.1887
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Trigylcerides
Month 36/ET (n=123,117)
|
-0.703 percent change
Standard Deviation 50.6333
|
-7.759 percent change
Standard Deviation 45.6372
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Assessments were performed in the fasting state (minimum 10-hour fast). Change from baseline was also determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=139 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
n=132 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL; mMol/L) During the Study
Month 2 (n=132,124)
|
0.354 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1757
|
0.340 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1541
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL; mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 2 (n=132,124)
|
-0.047 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1672
|
-0.113 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2215
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL; mMol/L) During the Study
Month 3 (n=127,118)
|
0.320 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1333
|
0.344 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1548
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL; mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 3 (n=127,118)
|
-0.076 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1805
|
-0.108 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2044
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL; mMol/L) During the Study
Month 6 (n=127,115)
|
0.317 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1652
|
0.367 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1767
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL; mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 6 (n=127,115)
|
-0.084 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1977
|
-0.086 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2240
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL; mMol/L) During the Study
Month 12 (n=121,109)
|
0.343 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1786
|
0.362 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1862
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL; mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 12 (n=121,109)
|
-0.062 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1872
|
-0.082 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2421
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL; mMol/L) During the Study
Month 18 (n=116,101)
|
0.315 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1571
|
0.349 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1571
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL; mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 18 (n=116,101)
|
-0.087 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1680
|
-0.102 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2126
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL; mMol/L) During the Study
Month 24 (n=111,96)
|
0.332 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1680
|
0.363 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1680
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL; mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 24 (n=111,96)
|
-0.061 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1887
|
-0.081 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2285
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL; mMol/L) During the Study
Month 30 (n=112,95)
|
0.361 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1581
|
0.358 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1914
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL; mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 30 (n=112,95)
|
-0.038 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1781
|
-0.086 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2621
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL; mMol/L) During the Study
Month 36/ET (n=123,117)
|
0.350 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1930
|
0.364 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1782
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL; mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 36/ET (n=123,117)
|
-0.042 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2112
|
-0.079 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2385
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL; mMol/L) During the Study
Baseline (n=139,132)
|
0.403 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1993
|
0.449 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2288
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL; mMol/L) During the Study
Month 1 (n=134,131)
|
0.348 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1823
|
0.374 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1770
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Very Low-Density Lipoprotein (VLDL; mMol/L) During the Study
Change at Month 1 (n=134,131)
|
-0.056 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1793
|
-0.076 mMol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2307
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Assessments were performed in the fasting state (minimum 10-hour fast).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=134 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
n=131 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in VLDL
Month 1 (n=134,131)
|
-6.060 percent change
Standard Deviation 39.3300
|
-5.805 percent change
Standard Deviation 51.7264
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in VLDL
Month 2 (n=132,124)
|
-3.097 percent change
Standard Deviation 42.3626
|
-14.694 percent change
Standard Deviation 40.1710
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in VLDL
Month 3 (n=127,118)
|
-8.711 percent change
Standard Deviation 41.2631
|
-14.263 percent change
Standard Deviation 39.7239
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in VLDL
Month 6 (n=127,115)
|
-11.591 percent change
Standard Deviation 42.4219
|
-9.158 percent change
Standard Deviation 43.1397
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in VLDL
Month 12 (n=121,109)
|
-7.739 percent change
Standard Deviation 40.7579
|
-7.827 percent change
Standard Deviation 48.9819
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in VLDL
Month 18 (n=116,101)
|
-12.911 percent change
Standard Deviation 39.7908
|
-12.768 percent change
Standard Deviation 37.4142
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in VLDL
Month 24 (n=111,96)
|
-6.654 percent change
Standard Deviation 38.7945
|
-6.920 percent change
Standard Deviation 46.3317
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in VLDL
Month 30 (n=112,95)
|
0.627 percent change
Standard Deviation 43.6239
|
-4.751 percent change
Standard Deviation 64.2502
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in VLDL
Month 36/ET (n=123,117)
|
-0.520 percent change
Standard Deviation 51.3422
|
-7.842 percent change
Standard Deviation 45.4640
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Assessments were performed in the fasting state (minimum 10-hour fast). Change from baseline was also determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=138 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
n=132 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apoliprotein A-1 (Apo A-1; Grams Per Liter [g/L]) During the Study
Baseline (n=138,132)
|
1.396 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1839
|
1.308 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2006
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein A-1 (Apo A-1; Grams Per Liter [g/L]) During the Study
Month 1 (n=132,130)
|
1.419 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2233
|
1.337 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1927
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein A-1 (Apo A-1; Grams Per Liter [g/L]) During the Study
Change at Month 1 (n=132,130)
|
0.025 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1639
|
0.032 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1506
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein A-1 (Apo A-1; Grams Per Liter [g/L]) During the Study
Month 2 (n=131,123)
|
1.411 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1952
|
1.334 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1950
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein A-1 (Apo A-1; Grams Per Liter [g/L]) During the Study
Change at Month 2 (n=131,123)
|
0.016 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1519
|
0.025 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1355
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein A-1 (Apo A-1; Grams Per Liter [g/L]) During the Study
Month 3 (n=126,117)
|
1.405 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1914
|
1.306 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1919
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein A-1 (Apo A-1; Grams Per Liter [g/L]) During the Study
Change at Month 3 (n=126,117)
|
0.005 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1713
|
0.006 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1557
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein A-1 (Apo A-1; Grams Per Liter [g/L]) During the Study
Month 6 (n=123,110)
|
1.386 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2081
|
1.329 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1894
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein A-1 (Apo A-1; Grams Per Liter [g/L]) During the Study
Change at Month 6 (n=123,110)
|
-0.007 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1609
|
0.026 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1818
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein A-1 (Apo A-1; Grams Per Liter [g/L]) During the Study
Month 12 (n=120,108)
|
1.347 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1893
|
1.271 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1798
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein A-1 (Apo A-1; Grams Per Liter [g/L]) During the Study
Change at Month 12 (n=120,108)
|
-0.041 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1574
|
-0.028 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1586
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein A-1 (Apo A-1; Grams Per Liter [g/L]) During the Study
Month 18 (n=114,100)
|
1.339 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1972
|
1.266 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1676
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein A-1 (Apo A-1; Grams Per Liter [g/L]) During the Study
Change at Month 18 (n=114,100)
|
-0.049 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1558
|
-0.038 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1643
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein A-1 (Apo A-1; Grams Per Liter [g/L]) During the Study
Month 24 (n=113,95)
|
1.364 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1929
|
1.275 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1736
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein A-1 (Apo A-1; Grams Per Liter [g/L]) During the Study
Change at Month 24 (n=113,95)
|
-0.032 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1749
|
-0.027 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1799
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein A-1 (Apo A-1; Grams Per Liter [g/L]) During the Study
Month 30 (n=112,95)
|
1.357 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2247
|
1.268 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1848
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein A-1 (Apo A-1; Grams Per Liter [g/L]) During the Study
Change at Month 30 (n=112,95)
|
-0.040 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1857
|
-0.036 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1861
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein A-1 (Apo A-1; Grams Per Liter [g/L]) During the Study
Month 36/ET (n=125,118)
|
1.327 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2081
|
1.272 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1664
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein A-1 (Apo A-1; Grams Per Liter [g/L]) During the Study
Change at Month 36/ET (n=125,118)
|
-0.073 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1725
|
-0.040 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1676
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Assessments were performed in the fasting state (minimum 10-hour fast).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
n=130 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A-1
Month 1 (n=132,130)
|
2.229 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.4001
|
3.301 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.2009
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A-1
Month 2 (n=131,123)
|
1.701 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.0364
|
2.499 percent change
Standard Deviation 10.7656
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A-1
Month 3 (n=126,117)
|
1.041 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.4204
|
1.192 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.1640
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A-1
Month 6 (n=123,110)
|
-0.069 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.1109
|
3.011 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.1347
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A-1
Month 12 (n=120,108)
|
-2.365 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.5882
|
-1.370 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.3901
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A-1
Month 18 (n=114,100)
|
-3.042 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.2219
|
-1.980 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.2170
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A-1
Month 24 (n=113,95)
|
-1.611 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.4618
|
-0.961 percent change
Standard Deviation 13.9868
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A-1
Month 30 (n=112,95)
|
-2.342 percent change
Standard Deviation 13.3357
|
-1.695 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.2732
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A-1
Month 36/ET (n=125,118)
|
-4.804 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.0443
|
-1.954 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.7229
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Assessments were performed in the fasting state (minimum 10-hour fast). Change from baseline was also determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=138 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
n=132 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apoliprotein B (Apo B; g/L) During the Study
Baseline (n=138,132)
|
1.454 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2890
|
1.381 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2619
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein B (Apo B; g/L) During the Study
Month 1 (n=132,130)
|
1.062 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2423
|
0.967 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2257
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein B (Apo B; g/L) During the Study
Change at Month 1 (n=132,130)
|
-0.395 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1599
|
-0.415 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1691
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein B (Apo B; g/L) During the Study
Month 2 (n=131,123)
|
0.980 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1929
|
0.916 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1813
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein B (Apo B; g/L) During the Study
Change at Month 2 (n=131,123)
|
-0.471 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1825
|
-0.484 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1858
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein B (Apo B; g/L) During the Study
Month 3 (n=126,117)
|
0.930 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1836
|
0.890 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1707
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein B (Apo B; g/L) During the Study
Change at Month 3 (n=126,117)
|
-0.522 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2152
|
-0.518 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2184
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein B (Apo B; g/L) During the Study
Month 6 (n=123,110)
|
0.919 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1557
|
0.910 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1683
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein B (Apo B; g/L) During the Study
Change at Month 6 (n=123,110)
|
-0.535 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2092
|
-0.503 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2086
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein B (Apo B; g/L) During the Study
Month 12 (n=120,108)
|
0.918 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1816
|
0.871 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1493
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein B (Apo B; g/L) During the Study
Change at Month 12 (n=120,108)
|
-0.548 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2131
|
-0.530 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2194
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein B (Apo B; g/L) During the Study
Month 18 (n=114,100)
|
0.893 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1546
|
0.882 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1293
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein B (Apo B; g/L) During the Study
Change at Month 18 (n=114,100)
|
-0.578 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2343
|
-0.533 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2463
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein B (Apo B; g/L) During the Study
Month 24 (n=113,95)
|
0.918 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1719
|
0.884 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1575
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein B (Apo B; g/L) During the Study
Change at Month 24 (n=113,95)
|
-0.551 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2353
|
-0.535 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2344
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein B (Apo B; g/L) During the Study
Month 30 (n=112,95)
|
0.910 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1723
|
0.885 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1717
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein B (Apo B; g/L) During the Study
Change at Month 30 (n=112,95)
|
-0.560 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2664
|
-0.533 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2467
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein B (Apo B; g/L) During the Study
Month 36/ET (n=125,118)
|
0.926 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.1860
|
0.924 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2173
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Apoliprotein B (Apo B; g/L) During the Study
Change at Month 36/ET (n=125,118)
|
-0.520 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2730
|
-0.450 g/L
Standard Deviation 0.2748
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Assessments were performed in the fasting state (minimum 10-hour fast).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=132 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
n=130 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B
Month 1 (n=132,130)
|
-26.933 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.5550
|
-29.851 percent change
Standard Deviation 10.3544
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B
Month 2 (n=131,123)
|
-31.867 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.2821
|
-33.959 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.9478
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B
Month 3 (n=126,117)
|
-35.163 percent change
Standard Deviation 10.5680
|
-35.849 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.6832
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B
Month 6 (n=123,110)
|
-35.900 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.3398
|
-34.740 percent change
Standard Deviation 10.7982
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B
Month 12 (n=120,108)
|
-36.624 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.7413
|
-36.842 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.6106
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B
Month 18 (n=114,100)
|
-38.158 percent change
Standard Deviation 10.4084
|
-36.211 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.7805
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B
Month 24 (n=113,95)
|
-36.426 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.4333
|
-36.677 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.1824
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B
Month 30 (n=112,95)
|
-36.668 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.8783
|
-36.453 percent change
Standard Deviation 13.6888
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B
Month 36/ET (n=125,118)
|
-34.507 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.0740
|
-31.362 percent change
Standard Deviation 16.4770
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; n=number of participants assessed for the specific parameter at a given visit.
Tanner\_Stage was assessed based on 2 components by gender, pubic hair and breasts for females and pubic hair and genitalia for males. If these values of components were not same, then the Tanner\_Stage had the higher value of 2 components for each gender by visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=127 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
n=52 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
n=25 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
n=31 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
n=18 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 1, Month 6 (n=126,48,25,27,15)
|
107 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 2 , Month 6 (n=126,48,25,27,15)
|
14 participants
|
34 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 3, Month 6 (n=126,48,25,27,15)
|
5 participants
|
10 participants
|
14 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 4, Month 6 (n=126,48,25,27,15)
|
0 participants
|
4 participants
|
11 participants
|
25 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 5, Month 6 (n=126,48,25,27,15)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
14 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 1, Month 12 (n=121,43,23,26,15)
|
85 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 2, Month 12 (n=121,43,23,26,15)
|
25 participants
|
17 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 3, Month 12 (n=121,43,23,26,15)
|
10 participants
|
21 participants
|
11 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 4, Month 12 (n=121,43,23,26,15)
|
1 participants
|
5 participants
|
10 participants
|
22 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 5, Month 12 (n=121,43,23,26,15)
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
4 participants
|
14 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 1, Month 18 (n=115,41, 21,25,14)
|
63 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 2, Month 18 (n=115,41, 21,25,14)
|
31 participants
|
15 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 3, Month 18 (n=115,41, 21,25,14)
|
18 participants
|
16 participants
|
6 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 4, Month 18 (n=115,41, 21,25,14)
|
3 participants
|
9 participants
|
11 participants
|
18 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 5, Month 18 (n=115,41, 21,25,14)
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
4 participants
|
7 participants
|
13 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 1, Month 24 (n=113,38,19,22,14)
|
51 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 2, Month 24 (n=113,38,19,22,14)
|
33 participants
|
9 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 3, Month 24 (n=113,38,19,22,14)
|
20 participants
|
14 participants
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 4, Month 24 (n=113,38,19,22,14)
|
9 participants
|
12 participants
|
13 participants
|
13 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 5, Month 24 (n=113,38,19,22,14)
|
0 participants
|
3 participants
|
4 participants
|
9 participants
|
13 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 1, Month 30 (n=111,38,19,23,14)
|
39 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 2, Month 30 (n=111,38,19,23,14)
|
32 participants
|
3 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 3, Month 30 (n=111,38,19,23,14)
|
26 participants
|
11 participants
|
1 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 4, Month 30 (n=111,38,19,23,14)
|
14 participants
|
18 participants
|
9 participants
|
11 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 5, Month 30 (n=111,38,19,23,14)
|
0 participants
|
6 participants
|
9 participants
|
12 participants
|
13 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 1, Month 36/ET (n=127,52,25,31,18)
|
41 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 2, Month 36/ET (n=127,52,25,31,18)
|
31 participants
|
6 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 3, Month 36/ET (n=127,52,25,31,18)
|
25 participants
|
10 participants
|
2 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 4, Month 36/ET (n=127,52,25,31,18)
|
25 participants
|
24 participants
|
13 participants
|
12 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Tanner_Stage by Timepoint and Baseline Tanner_Stage
Tanner_Stage 5, Month 36/ET (n=127,52,25,31,18)
|
5 participants
|
12 participants
|
10 participants
|
19 participants
|
18 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; only male participants were included in the analysis. n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Investigator assessment of height changes during the study. Change from baseline was also determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=146 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Height (Centimeters [cm]) During the Study: Males
Baseline (n=146)
|
144.36 cm
Standard Deviation 16.004
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (Centimeters [cm]) During the Study: Males
Month 1 (n=141)
|
145.21 cm
Standard Deviation 16.114
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (Centimeters [cm]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 1 (n=141)
|
0.68 cm
Standard Deviation 0.964
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (Centimeters [cm]) During the Study: Males
Month 2 (n=138)
|
145.93 cm
Standard Deviation 16.302
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (Centimeters [cm]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 2 (n=138)
|
1.27 cm
Standard Deviation 0.964
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (Centimeters [cm]) During the Study: Males
Month 3 (n=133)
|
146.00 cm
Standard Deviation 16.139
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (Centimeters [cm]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 3 (n=133)
|
1.72 cm
Standard Deviation 1.172
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (Centimeters [cm]) During the Study: Males
Month 6 (n=129)
|
147.17 cm
Standard Deviation 16.033
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (Centimeters [cm]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 6 (n=129)
|
3.24 cm
Standard Deviation 1.485
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (Centimeters [cm]) During the Study: Males
Month 12 (n=123)
|
150.75 cm
Standard Deviation 16.321
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (Centimeters [cm]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 12 (n=123)
|
6.67 cm
Standard Deviation 2.385
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (Centimeters [cm]) During the Study: Males
Month 18 (n=119)
|
153.26 cm
Standard Deviation 16.388
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (Centimeters [cm]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 18 (n=119)
|
9.31 cm
Standard Deviation 2.978
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (Centimeters [cm]) During the Study: Males
Month 24 (n=114)
|
156.03 cm
Standard Deviation 16.001
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (Centimeters [cm]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 24 (n=114)
|
12.11 cm
Standard Deviation 3.630
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (Centimeters [cm]) During the Study: Males
Month 30 (n=114)
|
158.78 cm
Standard Deviation 15.770
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (Centimeters [cm]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 30 (n=114)
|
14.86 cm
Standard Deviation 4.403
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (Centimeters [cm]) During the Study: Males
Month 36/ET (n=134)
|
160.59 cm
Standard Deviation 15.602
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (Centimeters [cm]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 36/ET (n=134)
|
15.53 cm
Standard Deviation 6.801
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; only male participants were included in the analysis. n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Investigator assessment of height changes during the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=141 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Height: Males
Month 1 (n=141)
|
0.47 percent change
Standard Deviation 0.689
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Height: Males
Month 2 (n=138)
|
0.88 percent change
Standard Deviation 0.652
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Height: Males
Month 3 (n=133)
|
1.19 percent change
Standard Deviation 0.777
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Height: Males
Month 6 (n=129)
|
2.25 percent change
Standard Deviation 0.987
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Height: Males
Month 12 (n=123)
|
4.66 percent change
Standard Deviation 1.606
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Height: Males
Month 18 (n=119)
|
6.53 percent change
Standard Deviation 2.021
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Height: Males
Month 24 (n=114)
|
8.53 percent change
Standard Deviation 2.607
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Height: Males
Month 30 (n=114)
|
10.49 percent change
Standard Deviation 3.260
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Height: Males
Month 36/ET (n=134)
|
10.97 percent change
Standard Deviation 5.010
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; only female participants were included in the analysis. n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Investigator assessment of height changes during the study. Change from baseline was also determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=125 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Height (cm) During the Study: Females
Baseline (n=125)
|
145.28 cm
Standard Deviation 14.108
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (cm) During the Study: Females
Month 1 (n=124)
|
146.06 cm
Standard Deviation 14.045
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (cm) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 1 (n=124)
|
0.71 cm
Standard Deviation 1.378
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (cm) During the Study: Females
Month 2 (n=119)
|
146.57 cm
Standard Deviation 13.919
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (cm) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 2 (n=119)
|
1.19 cm
Standard Deviation 1.700
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (cm) During the Study: Females
Month 3 (n=115)
|
146.81 cm
Standard Deviation 13.838
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (cm) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 3 (n=115)
|
1.68 cm
Standard Deviation 1.278
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (cm) During the Study: Females
Month 6 (n=113)
|
147.87 cm
Standard Deviation 13.619
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (cm) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 6 (n=113)
|
2.77 cm
Standard Deviation 1.720
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (cm) During the Study: Females
Month 12 (n=107)
|
150.84 cm
Standard Deviation 12.968
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (cm) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 12 (n=107)
|
5.50 cm
Standard Deviation 2.992
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (cm) During the Study: Females
Month 18 (n=99)
|
152.77 cm
Standard Deviation 12.648
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (cm) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 18 (n=99)
|
7.41 cm
Standard Deviation 4.043
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (cm) During the Study: Females
Month 24 (n=95)
|
154.79 cm
Standard Deviation 11.913
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (cm) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 24 (n=95)
|
9.61 cm
Standard Deviation 5.120
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (cm) During the Study: Females
Month 30 (n=93)
|
156.43 cm
Standard Deviation 11.288
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (cm) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 30 (n=93)
|
11.23 cm
Standard Deviation 6.118
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (cm) During the Study: Females
Month 36/ET (n=121)
|
156.52 cm
Standard Deviation 11.032
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Height (cm) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 36/ET (n=121)
|
11.23 cm
Standard Deviation 7.551
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; only female participants were included in the analysis. n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Investigator assessment of height changes during the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=124 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Height: Females
Month 1 (n=124)
|
0.51 percent change
Standard Deviation 1.004
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Height: Females
Month 2 (n=119)
|
0.84 percent change
Standard Deviation 1.220
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Height: Females
Month 3 (n=115)
|
1.20 percent change
Standard Deviation 0.925
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Height: Females
Month 6 (n=113)
|
1.98 percent change
Standard Deviation 1.291
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Height: Females
Month 12 (n=107)
|
3.93 percent change
Standard Deviation 2.262
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Height: Females
Month 18 (n=99)
|
5.30 percent change
Standard Deviation 3.036
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Height: Females
Month 24 (n=95)
|
6.93 percent change
Standard Deviation 3.933
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Height: Females
Month 30 (n=93)
|
8.13 percent change
Standard Deviation 4.740
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Height: Females
Month 36/ET (n=121)
|
8.14 percent change
Standard Deviation 5.789
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; only male participants were included in the analysis. n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Investigator assessment of weight changes during the study. Change from baseline was also determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=146 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Weight (Kilograms [kg]) During the Study: Males
Baseline (n=146)
|
40.79 kg
Standard Deviation 14.079
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (Kilograms [kg]) During the Study: Males
Month 1 (n=141)
|
41.18 kg
Standard Deviation 14.287
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (Kilograms [kg]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 1 (n=141)
|
0.36 kg
Standard Deviation 1.203
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (Kilograms [kg]) During the Study: Males
Month 2 (n=138)
|
41.83 kg
Standard Deviation 14.467
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (Kilograms [kg]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 2 (n=138)
|
0.80 kg
Standard Deviation 1.422
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (Kilograms [kg]) During the Study: Males
Month 3 (n=133)
|
41.68 kg
Standard Deviation 14.266
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (Kilograms [kg]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 3 (n=133)
|
1.08 kg
Standard Deviation 1.907
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (Kilograms [kg]) During the Study: Males
Month 6 (n=129)
|
42.47 kg
Standard Deviation 14.564
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (Kilograms [kg]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 6 (n=129)
|
2.00 kg
Standard Deviation 2.528
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (Kilograms [kg]) During the Study: Males
Month 12 (n=123)
|
45.29 kg
Standard Deviation 15.526
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (Kilograms [kg]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 12 (n=123)
|
4.65 kg
Standard Deviation 3.822
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (Kilograms [kg]) During the Study: Males
Month 18 (n=119)
|
47.53 kg
Standard Deviation 16.164
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (Kilograms [kg]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 18 (n=119)
|
7.02 kg
Standard Deviation 4.432
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (Kilograms [kg]) During the Study: Males
Month 24 (n=114)
|
49.77 kg
Standard Deviation 16.401
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (Kilograms [kg]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 24 (n=114)
|
9.27 kg
Standard Deviation 5.079
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (Kilograms [kg]) During the Study: Males
Month 30 (n=114)
|
52.12 kg
Standard Deviation 17.100
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (Kilograms [kg]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 30 (n=114)
|
11.61 kg
Standard Deviation 6.032
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (Kilograms [kg]) During the Study: Males
Month 36/ET (n=134)
|
53.50 kg
Standard Deviation 16.787
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (Kilograms [kg]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 36/ET (n=134)
|
12.35 kg
Standard Deviation 6.771
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; only male participants were included in the analysis. n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Investigator assessment of weight changes during the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=141 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weight: Males
Month 1 (n=141)
|
0.94 percent change
Standard Deviation 2.739
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weight: Males
Month 2 (n=138)
|
2.04 percent change
Standard Deviation 3.262
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weight: Males
Month 3 (n=133)
|
2.73 percent change
Standard Deviation 4.317
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weight: Males
Month 6 (n=129)
|
5.09 percent change
Standard Deviation 5.559
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weight: Males
Month 12 (n=123)
|
11.85 percent change
Standard Deviation 8.172
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weight: Males
Month 18 (n=119)
|
18.03 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.629
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weight: Males
Month 24 (n=114)
|
24.28 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.696
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weight: Males
Month 30 (n=114)
|
30.46 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.058
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weight: Males
Month 36/ET (n=134)
|
32.54 percent change
Standard Deviation 17.409
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; only female participants were included in the analysis. n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Investigator assessment of weight changes during the study. Change from baseline was also determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=125 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Weight (kg) During the Study: Females
Baseline (n=125)
|
42.14 kg
Standard Deviation 14.038
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (kg) During the Study: Females
Month 1 (n=125)
|
42.50 kg
Standard Deviation 14.007
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (kg) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 1 (n=125)
|
0.36 kg
Standard Deviation 0.924
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (kg) During the Study: Females
Month 2 (n=120)
|
42.86 kg
Standard Deviation 14.209
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (kg) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 2 (n=120)
|
0.67 kg
Standard Deviation 1.338
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (kg) During the Study: Females
Month 3 (n=115)
|
43.34 kg
Standard Deviation 14.753
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (kg) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 3 (n=115)
|
1.24 kg
Standard Deviation 1.819
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (kg) During the Study: Females
Month 6 (n=113)
|
44.26 kg
Standard Deviation 15.027
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (kg) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 6 (n=113)
|
2.10 kg
Standard Deviation 2.409
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (kg) During the Study: Females
Month 12 (n=107)
|
46.61 kg
Standard Deviation 15.158
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (kg) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 12 (n=107)
|
4.41 kg
Standard Deviation 3.317
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (kg) During the Study: Females
Month 18 (n=99)
|
48.32 kg
Standard Deviation 14.670
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (kg) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 18 (n=99)
|
6.24 kg
Standard Deviation 4.291
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (kg) During the Study: Females
Month 24 (n=95)
|
50.13 kg
Standard Deviation 14.731
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (kg) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 24 (n=95)
|
8.55 kg
Standard Deviation 5.038
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (kg) During the Study: Females
Month 30 (n=93)
|
51.73 kg
Standard Deviation 14.681
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (kg) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 30 (n=93)
|
10.02 kg
Standard Deviation 6.127
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (kg) During the Study: Females
Month 36/ET (n=121)
|
51.55 kg
Standard Deviation 14.498
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Weight (kg) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 36/ET (n=121)
|
9.77 kg
Standard Deviation 7.047
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; only female participants were included in the analysis. n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Investigator assessment of weight changes during the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=125 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weight: Females
Month 1 (n=125)
|
0.97 percent change
Standard Deviation 2.303
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weight: Females
Month 2 (n=120)
|
1.85 percent change
Standard Deviation 3.206
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weight: Females
Month 3 (n=115)
|
3.16 percent change
Standard Deviation 4.149
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weight: Females
Month 6 (n=113)
|
5.37 percent change
Standard Deviation 5.529
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weight: Females
Month 12 (n=107)
|
11.65 percent change
Standard Deviation 8.391
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weight: Females
Month 18 (n=99)
|
16.79 percent change
Standard Deviation 11.315
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weight: Females
Month 24 (n=95)
|
23.43 percent change
Standard Deviation 14.333
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weight: Females
Month 30 (n=93)
|
27.83 percent change
Standard Deviation 17.507
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Weight: Females
Month 36/ET (n=121)
|
27.26 percent change
Standard Deviation 21.389
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; only male participants were included in the analysis. n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Investigator assessment of BMI changes during the study. Change from baseline was also determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=146 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI in kg Per Square Meter [kg/m^2]) During the Study: Males
Baseline (n=146)
|
18.97 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 3.664
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI in kg Per Square Meter [kg/m^2]) During the Study: Males
Month 1 (n=141)
|
18.94 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 3.751
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI in kg Per Square Meter [kg/m^2]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 1 (n=141)
|
0.01 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 0.577
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI in kg Per Square Meter [kg/m^2]) During the Study: Males
Month 2 (n=138)
|
19.06 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 3.755
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI in kg Per Square Meter [kg/m^2]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 2 (n=138)
|
0.06 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 0.658
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI in kg Per Square Meter [kg/m^2]) During the Study: Males
Month 3 (n=133)
|
18.99 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 3.745
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI in kg Per Square Meter [kg/m^2]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 3 (n=133)
|
0.07 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 0.890
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI in kg Per Square Meter [kg/m^2]) During the Study: Males
Month 6 (n=129)
|
19.04 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 3.881
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI in kg Per Square Meter [kg/m^2]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 6 (n=129)
|
0.10 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.218
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI in kg Per Square Meter [kg/m^2]) During the Study: Males
Month 12 (n=123)
|
19.34 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 3.922
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI in kg Per Square Meter [kg/m^2]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 12 (n=123)
|
0.37 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.541
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI in kg Per Square Meter [kg/m^2]) During the Study: Males
Month 18 (n=119)
|
19.65 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 4.053
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI in kg Per Square Meter [kg/m^2]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 18 (n=119)
|
0.73 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.625
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI in kg Per Square Meter [kg/m^2]) During the Study: Males
Month 24 (n=114)
|
19.91 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 4.098
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI in kg Per Square Meter [kg/m^2]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 24 (n=114)
|
0.99 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.745
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI in kg Per Square Meter [kg/m^2]) During the Study: Males
Month 30 (n=114)
|
20.18 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 4.400
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI in kg Per Square Meter [kg/m^2]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 30 (n=114)
|
1.25 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 2.099
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI in kg Per Square Meter [kg/m^2]) During the Study: Males
Month 36/ET (n=134)
|
20.28 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 4.137
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI in kg Per Square Meter [kg/m^2]) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 36/ET (n=134)
|
1.33 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.958
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; only male participants were included in the analysis. n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Investigator assessment of BMI changes during the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=141 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in BMI: Males
Month 30 (n=114)
|
6.80 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.737
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in BMI: Males
Month 36/ET (n=134)
|
7.31 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.290
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in BMI: Males
Month 1 (n=141)
|
0.03 percent change
Standard Deviation 2.953
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in BMI: Males
Month 2 (n=138)
|
0.31 percent change
Standard Deviation 3.405
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in BMI: Males
Month 3 (n=133)
|
0.39 percent change
Standard Deviation 4.496
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in BMI: Males
Month 6 (n=129)
|
0.55 percent change
Standard Deviation 5.673
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in BMI: Males
Month 12 (n=123)
|
2.10 percent change
Standard Deviation 7.065
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in BMI: Males
Month 18 (n=119)
|
3.98 percent change
Standard Deviation 7.533
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in BMI: Males
Month 24 (n=114)
|
5.45 percent change
Standard Deviation 8.306
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; only female participants were included in the analysis. n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Investigator assessment of BMI changes during the study. Change from baseline was also determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=125 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
BMI (kg/m^2) During the Study: Females
Baseline (n=125)
|
19.44 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 3.994
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
BMI (kg/m^2) During the Study: Females
Month 1 (n=124)
|
19.45 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 3.973
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
BMI (kg/m^2) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 1 (n=124)
|
-0.02 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 0.582
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
BMI (kg/m^2) During the Study: Females
Month 2 (n=119)
|
19.47 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 3.940
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
BMI (kg/m^2) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 2 (n=119)
|
0.00 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 0.756
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
BMI (kg/m^2) During the Study: Females
Month 3 (n=115)
|
19.54 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 4.171
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
BMI (kg/m^2) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 3 (n=115)
|
0.13 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 0.861
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
BMI (kg/m^2) During the Study: Females
Month 6 (n=113)
|
19.68 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 4.288
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
BMI (kg/m^2) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 6 (n=113)
|
0.24 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.004
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
BMI (kg/m^2) During the Study: Females
Month 12 (n=107)
|
19.98 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 4.257
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
BMI (kg/m^2) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 12 (n=107)
|
0.60 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.305
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
BMI (kg/m^2) During the Study: Females
Month 18 (n=99)
|
20.24 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 3.990
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
BMI (kg/m^2) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 18 (n=99)
|
0.92 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.432
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
BMI (kg/m^2) During the Study: Females
Month 24 (n=95)
|
20.50 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 3.976
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
BMI (kg/m^2) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 24 (n=95)
|
1.38 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.624
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
BMI (kg/m^2) During the Study: Females
Month 30 (n=93)
|
20.75 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 4.014
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
BMI (kg/m^2) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 30 (n=93)
|
1.59 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.931
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
BMI (kg/m^2) During the Study: Females
Month 36/ET (n=121)
|
20.71 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 4.217
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
BMI (kg/m^2) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 36/ET (n=121)
|
1.46 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.948
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; only female participants were included in the analysis. n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Investigator assessment of BMI changes during the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=124 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in BMI: Females
Month 1 (n=124)
|
-0.06 percent change
Standard Deviation 3.058
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in BMI: Females
Month 2 (n=119)
|
0.16 percent change
Standard Deviation 3.777
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in BMI: Females
Month 3 (n=115)
|
0.73 percent change
Standard Deviation 4.314
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in BMI: Females
Month 6 (n=113)
|
1.26 percent change
Standard Deviation 4.992
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in BMI: Females
Month 12 (n=107)
|
3.33 percent change
Standard Deviation 6.765
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in BMI: Females
Month 18 (n=99)
|
5.14 percent change
Standard Deviation 7.578
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in BMI: Females
Month 24 (n=95)
|
7.68 percent change
Standard Deviation 8.661
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in BMI: Females
Month 30 (n=93)
|
8.89 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.916
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in BMI: Females
Month 36/ET (n=121)
|
8.06 percent change
Standard Deviation 10.147
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; only male participants were included in the analysis. n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Investigator assessment of age during the study. Change from baseline was also determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=146 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Males
Baseline (n=146)
|
9.94 years
Standard Deviation 2.489
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Males
Month 1 (n=141)
|
10.05 years
Standard Deviation 2.553
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 1 (n=141)
|
0.11 years
Standard Deviation 0.309
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Males
Month 2 (n=138)
|
10.14 years
Standard Deviation 2.583
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 2 (n=138)
|
0.18 years
Standard Deviation 0.387
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Males
Month 3 (n=133)
|
10.21 years
Standard Deviation 2.567
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 3 (n=133)
|
0.29 years
Standard Deviation 0.457
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Males
Month 6 (n=129)
|
10.43 years
Standard Deviation 2.552
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 6 (n=129)
|
0.55 years
Standard Deviation 0.499
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Males
Month 12 (n=123)
|
10.96 years
Standard Deviation 2.543
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 12 (n=123)
|
1.02 years
Standard Deviation 0.155
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Males
Month 18 (n=119)
|
11.47 years
Standard Deviation 2.544
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 18 (n=119)
|
1.54 years
Standard Deviation 0.501
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Males
Month 24 (n=114)
|
11.93 years
Standard Deviation 2.534
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 24 (n=114)
|
2.02 years
Standard Deviation 0.132
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Males
Month 30 (n=114)
|
12.46 years
Standard Deviation 2.553
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 30 (n=114)
|
2.54 years
Standard Deviation 0.500
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Males
Month 36/ET (n=134)
|
12.69 years
Standard Deviation 2.587
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Males
Change at Month 36/ET (n=134)
|
2.67 years
Standard Deviation 0.899
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; only male participants were included in the analysis. n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Investigator assessment of age during the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=141 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Age: Males
Month 1 (n=141)
|
1.09 percent change
Standard Deviation 3.327
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Age: Males
Month 2 (n=138)
|
1.86 percent change
Standard Deviation 4.184
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Age: Males
Month 3 (n=133)
|
3.16 percent change
Standard Deviation 5.175
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Age: Males
Month 6 (n=129)
|
6.06 percent change
Standard Deviation 5.956
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Age: Males
Month 12 (n=123)
|
11.13 percent change
Standard Deviation 3.878
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Age: Males
Month 18 (n=119)
|
16.82 percent change
Standard Deviation 7.732
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Age: Males
Month 24 (n=114)
|
21.92 percent change
Standard Deviation 6.623
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Age: Males
Month 30 (n=114)
|
27.67 percent change
Standard Deviation 9.855
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Age: Males
Month 36/ET (n=134)
|
28.90 percent change
Standard Deviation 13.486
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; only female participants were included in the analysis. n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Investigator assessment of age during the study. Change from baseline was also determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=125 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Females
Baseline (n=125)
|
10.55 years
Standard Deviation 2.421
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Females
Month 1 (n=125)
|
10.66 years
Standard Deviation 2.436
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 1 (n=125)
|
0.11 years
Standard Deviation 0.317
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Females
Month 2 (n=120)
|
10.78 years
Standard Deviation 2.430
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 2 (n=120)
|
0.20 years
Standard Deviation 0.402
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Females
Month 3 (n=115)
|
10.75 years
Standard Deviation 2.449
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 3 (n=115)
|
0.28 years
Standard Deviation 0.450
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Females
Month 6 (n=113)
|
10.99 years
Standard Deviation 2.477
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 6 (n=113)
|
0.52 years
Standard Deviation 0.502
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Females
Month 12 (n=107)
|
11.50 years
Standard Deviation 2.416
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 12 (n=107)
|
0.99 years
Standard Deviation 0.097
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Females
Month 18 (n=99)
|
12.02 years
Standard Deviation 2.503
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 18 (n=99)
|
1.52 years
Standard Deviation 0.502
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Females
Month 24 (n=95)
|
12.42 years
Standard Deviation 2.482
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 24 (n=95)
|
1.98 years
Standard Deviation 0.144
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Females
Month 30 (n=93)
|
12.99 years
Standard Deviation 2.564
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 30 (n=93)
|
2.52 years
Standard Deviation 0.502
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Females
Month 36/ET (n=121)
|
13.07 years
Standard Deviation 2.547
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Age (Years) During the Study: Females
Change at Month 36/ET (n=121)
|
2.54 years
Standard Deviation 0.940
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FAS; only female participants were included in the analysis. n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Investigator assessment of age during the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=125 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Age: Females
Month 1 (n=125)
|
1.10 percent change
Standard Deviation 3.169
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Age: Females
Month 2 (n=120)
|
2.00 percent change
Standard Deviation 4.128
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Age: Females
Month 3 (n=115)
|
2.74 percent change
Standard Deviation 4.549
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Age: Females
Month 6 (n=113)
|
5.18 percent change
Standard Deviation 5.221
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Age: Females
Month 12 (n=107)
|
10.00 percent change
Standard Deviation 2.811
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Age: Females
Month 18 (n=99)
|
15.20 percent change
Standard Deviation 6.006
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Age: Females
Month 24 (n=95)
|
20.08 percent change
Standard Deviation 5.298
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Age: Females
Month 30 (n=93)
|
25.35 percent change
Standard Deviation 7.415
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Age: Females
Month 36/ET (n=121)
|
25.73 percent change
Standard Deviation 12.168
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FMD Set: all participants enrolled in the FMD study who had at least baseline FMD measurements. n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Percent (%) FMD was calculated as (hyperemic diameter minus resting diameter) divided by the resting diameter multiplied by 100. Change from baseline was also determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=37 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
n=36 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) During the Study
Baseline (n=37,36)
|
5.523 % FMD
Standard Deviation 3.2062
|
6.651 % FMD
Standard Deviation 4.4926
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) During the Study
Month 6 (n=27,23)
|
5.749 % FMD
Standard Deviation 2.5047
|
6.520 % FMD
Standard Deviation 4.0763
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) During the Study
Change at Month 6 (n=27,23)
|
-0.063 % FMD
Standard Deviation 3.4768
|
-0.759 % FMD
Standard Deviation 4.8732
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) During the Study
Month 12 (n=32,29)
|
4.732 % FMD
Standard Deviation 1.8477
|
6.363 % FMD
Standard Deviation 8.0370
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) During the Study
Change at Month 12 (n=32,29)
|
-0.952 % FMD
Standard Deviation 3.6796
|
-0.778 % FMD
Standard Deviation 9.4743
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) During the Study
Month 18 (n=33,28)
|
4.942 % FMD
Standard Deviation 2.6740
|
4.668 % FMD
Standard Deviation 3.8874
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) During the Study
Change at Month 18 (n=33,28)
|
-0.762 % FMD
Standard Deviation 3.7374
|
-2.556 % FMD
Standard Deviation 6.3123
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) During the Study
Month 24 (n=33,28)
|
4.538 % FMD
Standard Deviation 2.4239
|
5.679 % FMD
Standard Deviation 4.3224
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) During the Study
Change at Month 24 (n=33,28)
|
-1.166 % FMD
Standard Deviation 3.2524
|
-1.545 % FMD
Standard Deviation 7.2325
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) During the Study
Month 30 (n=33,28)
|
5.571 % FMD
Standard Deviation 2.7198
|
5.191 % FMD
Standard Deviation 2.5120
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) During the Study
Change at Month 30 (n=33,28)
|
-0.134 % FMD
Standard Deviation 3.3399
|
-2.033 % FMD
Standard Deviation 5.8591
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) During the Study
Month 36/ET (n=34,33)
|
4.987 % FMD
Standard Deviation 2.2540
|
5.360 % FMD
Standard Deviation 2.9873
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Flow-Mediated Dilatation (FMD) During the Study
Change at Month 36/ET (n=34,33)
|
-0.550 % FMD
Standard Deviation 3.6625
|
-1.563 % FMD
Standard Deviation 4.8355
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36/ETPopulation: FMD Set; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Percent (%) FMD was calculated as (hyperemic diameter minus resting diameter) divided by the resting diameter multiplied by 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=34 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
n=33 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in FMD
Month 6 (n=27,23)
|
14.867 percent change
Standard Deviation 67.6028
|
-0.205 percent change
Standard Deviation 60.7192
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in FMD
Month 12 (n=32,29)
|
-3.880 percent change
Standard Deviation 56.1910
|
15.444 percent change
Standard Deviation 207.6932
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in FMD
Month 18 (n=33,28)
|
-4.598 percent change
Standard Deviation 68.0267
|
-24.387 percent change
Standard Deviation 81.5683
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in FMD
Month 24 (n=33,28)
|
-9.992 percent change
Standard Deviation 57.3868
|
3.850 percent change
Standard Deviation 102.2001
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in FMD
Month 30 (n=33,28)
|
7.000 percent change
Standard Deviation 63.0894
|
-18.804 percent change
Standard Deviation 42.2259
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in FMD
Month 36/ET (n=34,33)
|
0.648 percent change
Standard Deviation 62.5814
|
-7.506 percent change
Standard Deviation 61.2361
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 (or early termination)Population: FAS; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=139 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
n=132 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Expected Maturation and Development Consistent With Expectations as Assessed by the Investigator
Baseline (n=139,132)
|
99.3 percentage of participants
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Expected Maturation and Development Consistent With Expectations as Assessed by the Investigator
Month 1 (n=118,113)
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Expected Maturation and Development Consistent With Expectations as Assessed by the Investigator
Month 2 (n=116,109)
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Expected Maturation and Development Consistent With Expectations as Assessed by the Investigator
Month 3 (n=130,118)
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Expected Maturation and Development Consistent With Expectations as Assessed by the Investigator
Month 6 (n=127,115)
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
99.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Expected Maturation and Development Consistent With Expectations as Assessed by the Investigator
Month 12 (n=121,109)
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
99.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Expected Maturation and Development Consistent With Expectations as Assessed by the Investigator
Month 18 (n=115,102)
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Expected Maturation and Development Consistent With Expectations as Assessed by the Investigator
Month 24 (n=113,95)
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Expected Maturation and Development Consistent With Expectations as Assessed by the Investigator
Month 30 (n=111,94)
|
100.0 percentage of participants
|
98.9 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Overall Expected Maturation and Development Consistent With Expectations as Assessed by the Investigator
Month 36/Early Termination (n=128,127)
|
99.2 percentage of participants
|
99.2 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 (or early termination)Population: Safety Analysis Set: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit.
Compliance to study drug was categorized as \<80%, 80% - 120%, and greater than (\>) 120%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=135 Participants
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
n=132 Participants
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 3
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 3 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 4
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 4 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Baseline Tanner_Stage 5
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 5 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, PO, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 36/ET, <80% (n=129,129)
|
11.6 percentage of participants
|
16.3 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 1, <80% (n=135,132)
|
3.0 percentage of participants
|
6.8 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 1, 80%-120% (n=135,132)
|
97.0 percentage of participants
|
93.2 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 1, >120% (n=135,132)
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 2, <80% (n=132,126)
|
6.8 percentage of participants
|
7.9 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 2, 80%-120% (n=132,126)
|
92.4 percentage of participants
|
92.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 2, >120% (n=132,126)
|
0.8 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 3, <80% (n=130,118)
|
3.8 percentage of participants
|
7.6 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 3, 80%-120% (n=130,118)
|
95.4 percentage of participants
|
92.4 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 3, >120% (n=130,118)
|
0.8 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 6, <80% (n=127,115)
|
7.9 percentage of participants
|
9.6 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 6, 80%-120% (n=127,115)
|
92.1 percentage of participants
|
90.4 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 6, >120% (n=127,115)
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 12, <80% (n=121,109)
|
7.4 percentage of participants
|
7.3 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 12, 80%-120% (n=121,109)
|
92.6 percentage of participants
|
92.7 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 12, >120% (n=121,109)
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 18, <80% (n=116,102)
|
4.3 percentage of participants
|
5.9 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 18, 80%-120% (n=116,102)
|
94.0 percentage of participants
|
94.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 18, >120% (n=116,102)
|
1.7 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 24, <80% (n=113,95)
|
8.8 percentage of participants
|
9.5 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 24, 80%-120% (n=113,95)
|
91.2 percentage of participants
|
89.5 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 24, >120% (n=113,95)
|
0 percentage of participants
|
1.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 30, <80% (n=112,94)
|
8.0 percentage of participants
|
6.4 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 30, 80%-120% (n=112,94)
|
92.0 percentage of participants
|
92.6 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 30, >120% (n=112,94)
|
0 percentage of participants
|
1.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 36/ET, 80%-120% (n=129,129)
|
86.8 percentage of participants
|
83.7 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Study Drug Compliance Category
Month 36/ET, >120% (n=129,129)
|
1.6 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=139 participants at risk
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
n=132 participants at risk
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.72%
1/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.76%
1/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Appendix disorder
|
0.72%
1/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
|
0.72%
1/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.76%
1/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Feeling abnormal
|
0.72%
1/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
1.4%
2/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
0.72%
1/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Concussion
|
0.72%
1/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb injury
|
0.00%
0/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.76%
1/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lumbar vertebral fracture
|
0.00%
0/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.76%
1/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thoracic vertebral fracture
|
0.00%
0/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.76%
1/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ulna fracture
|
0.72%
1/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Obesity
|
0.00%
0/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.76%
1/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Type I diabetes mellitus
|
0.00%
0/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.76%
1/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myositis
|
0.72%
1/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Ewing's sarcoma
|
0.72%
1/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia
|
0.72%
1/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.72%
1/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.76%
1/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Bipolar disorder
|
0.72%
1/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide attempt
|
0.00%
0/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.76%
1/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Testsicular appendage torsion
|
0.72%
1/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Atorvastatin (5-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 1
n=139 participants at risk
Participants aged 6 to \<10 years, at Tanner\_Stage 1 received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 5 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 10 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 20 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
Atorvastatin (10-80 mg): Tanner_Stage 2+
n=132 participants at risk
Participants aged ≥10 to 15 years, at Tanner\_Stage 2+ received an initial dose of atorvastatin tablets, 10 mg/day, PO, through Week 4; after Week 4, dose may have been doubled to 20 mg/day, with subsequent doubling to 40 mg/day (as necessary; maximum dose was 80 mg/day), PO, if target LDL-C (\<3.35 mmol/L) was not attained.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
15.1%
21/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
7.6%
10/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
18.7%
26/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
19.7%
26/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
7.2%
10/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.8%
5/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
2.9%
4/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
7.6%
10/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
18.0%
25/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
18.9%
25/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
5.0%
7/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.3%
3/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
5.8%
8/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.8%
9/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
2.2%
3/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.1%
8/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
10.8%
15/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
5.3%
7/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
10.8%
15/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.8%
13/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
6.5%
9/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.76%
1/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
|
6.5%
9/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.5%
6/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
12.2%
17/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
9.1%
12/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
9.4%
13/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
10.6%
14/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
6.5%
9/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.1%
8/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
5.0%
7/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
9.4%
13/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.8%
9/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
|
7.2%
10/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
4.5%
6/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
14.4%
20/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
7.6%
10/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
|
9.4%
13/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
2.3%
3/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
2.2%
3/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
6.8%
9/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
10.1%
14/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
3.8%
5/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
10.1%
14/139 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
8.3%
11/132 • Baseline up through Month 36
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER