Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of AZX100 Drug Product Following Excision of Keloid Scars (NCT NCT00825916)
NCT ID: NCT00825916
Last Updated: 2012-10-11
Results Overview
Efficacy was based on the difference between mean POSAS scores of placebo, 3 mg AZX100, and 10 mg AZX100 12 months after surgery. This gave four comparisons to placebo: patient or observer and 3 mg and 10 mg AZX100. PSAS included patients' ratings on a scale of 1-10 (1 was normal skin or no complaints and 10 was the worst imaginable scar or the worst difference) for the following: Is the scar painful? Is the scar itching? Is the color of the scar different? Is the scar more stiff? Is the thickness of the scar different? Is the scar irregular? The possible minimum score was 6 and the maximum (worst) score was 60. OSAS included observers' ratings on a scale of 1-10 (1 was normal skin and 10 was the worst scar imaginable) for vascularization, pigmentation, thickness, relief, and pliability. The possible minimum score was 5 and the possible maximum (worst) score was 50.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
59 participants
12 Months
2012-10-11
Participant Flow
Enrollment in the study began in April 2009 and was completed in August 2009. All patients were enrolled at dermatological medical clinics.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
High Dose
AZX100 Drug Product 10 mg was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Placebo
Placebo (0.9% saline) was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Low Dose
AZX100 Drug Product 3 mg was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
19
|
20
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
15
|
18
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
High Dose
AZX100 Drug Product 10 mg was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Placebo
Placebo (0.9% saline) was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Low Dose
AZX100 Drug Product 3 mg was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of AZX100 Drug Product Following Excision of Keloid Scars
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
High Dose
n=19 Participants
AZX100 Drug Product 10 mg was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Placebo
n=20 Participants
Placebo (0.9% saline) was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Low Dose
n=20 Participants
AZX100 Drug Product 3 mg was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Total
n=59 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Age Continuous
|
38.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1 • n=5 Participants
|
37.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 • n=7 Participants
|
38.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1 • n=5 Participants
|
37.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
19 participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
59 participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 MonthsPopulation: In this early phase study, the efficacy and safety analyses were performed using an evaluable subject sample, which included all subjects who received study agent and provided some efficacy or safety data.
Efficacy was based on the difference between mean POSAS scores of placebo, 3 mg AZX100, and 10 mg AZX100 12 months after surgery. This gave four comparisons to placebo: patient or observer and 3 mg and 10 mg AZX100. PSAS included patients' ratings on a scale of 1-10 (1 was normal skin or no complaints and 10 was the worst imaginable scar or the worst difference) for the following: Is the scar painful? Is the scar itching? Is the color of the scar different? Is the scar more stiff? Is the thickness of the scar different? Is the scar irregular? The possible minimum score was 6 and the maximum (worst) score was 60. OSAS included observers' ratings on a scale of 1-10 (1 was normal skin and 10 was the worst scar imaginable) for vascularization, pigmentation, thickness, relief, and pliability. The possible minimum score was 5 and the possible maximum (worst) score was 50.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PSAS Results for Placebo
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
PSAS Results for 3 mg AZX100
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for patients who received 3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
PSAS Results for 10 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for patients who received 10 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for Placebo
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for 3 mg AZX100
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for patients who received 3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for 10 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for patients who received 10 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - Placebo
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - 3 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - 10 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 10 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - Placebo
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - 3 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - 10 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 10 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - Placebo
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - 3 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - 10 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 10 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Differences Among the 3 Dosage Groups in the Patient (PSAS) and Observer (OSAS) Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) Scores
|
13.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.8
|
17.7 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.5
|
15.9 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.3
|
17.1 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.2
|
17.3 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.6
|
15.5 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.3
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: In this early phase study, the efficacy and safety analyses were performed using an evaluable subject sample, which included all subjects who received study agent and provided some efficacy or safety data.
At 12 months, two independent dermatologists who were blinded to study treatment evaluated the scar images using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 0-100 millimeters (mm), with 0 being normal skin and 100 being the worst scar imaginable. The scars were presented in longitudinal (chronological) order. Efficacy was based on the difference between VAS scores of placebo and 3 mg AZX100, and placebo and 10 mg AZX100 for each of the two raters separately. Data from the two raters was not combined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PSAS Results for Placebo
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
PSAS Results for 3 mg AZX100
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for patients who received 3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
PSAS Results for 10 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for patients who received 10 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for Placebo
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for 3 mg AZX100
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for patients who received 3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for 10 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for patients who received 10 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - Placebo
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - 3 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - 10 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 10 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - Placebo
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - 3 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - 10 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 10 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - Placebo
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - 3 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - 10 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 10 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Between-group Mean Differences in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Scores by Independent Blinded Raters
|
62.3 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 25.6
|
55.9 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 30.3
|
54.9 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 28.7
|
60.3 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 11.8
|
57.2 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 15.0
|
58.1 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 16.3
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: In this early phase study, the efficacy and safety analyses were performed using an evaluable subject sample, which included all subjects who received study agent and provided some efficacy or safety data.
This secondary outcome included scar measurements based on 3D photography of the scar surface at Month 12 and included maximum length, maximum width perpendicular to maximum length, and minimum, maximum and mean elevation. All elevation measurements were made relative to the interpolated smooth skin surface. A value closest to zero was preferred because zero was equal to the normal skin surface. The minimum elevation value was calculated as the lowest point of the scar below the interpolated smooth skin surface and was always a negative number. A more negative number was worse because it indicated a deeper measurement below the interpolated smooth skin surface. The maximum elevation value was calculated as the highest point of the scar above the interpolated smooth skin surface. A larger number was worse because it indicated a higher peak above the interpolated smooth skin surface. The mean elevation of the scar relative to the interpolated smooth skin surface was also calculated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PSAS Results for Placebo
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
PSAS Results for 3 mg AZX100
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for patients who received 3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
PSAS Results for 10 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for patients who received 10 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for Placebo
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for 3 mg AZX100
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for patients who received 3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for 10 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for patients who received 10 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - Placebo
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - 3 mg AZX100
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - 10 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 10 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - Placebo
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - 3 mg AZX100
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - 10 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 10 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - Placebo
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - 3 mg AZX100
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - 10 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 10 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Between-group Mean Differences in Objective Measures Obtained Via 3D Photography (Elevation, Length, Width)
|
26.8 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 5.9
|
24.7 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 5.6
|
27.2 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 8.9
|
10.8 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 4.2
|
13.3 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 5.1
|
11.3 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 4.5
|
-0.5 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
-0.6 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
-0.5 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.3
|
1.5 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
1.7 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
1.9 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
0.3 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.2
|
0.3 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.3
|
0.3 Millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: In this early phase study, the efficacy and safety analyses were performed using an evaluable subject sample, which included all subjects who received study agent and provided some efficacy or safety data.
This secondary outcome included measurements based on 3D photography of the scar surface at Month 12 and included positive volume, negative volume, and total volume. All volume measurements were made relative to the interpolated smooth skin surface. A value closer to zero was preferred, because zero was equal to the normal skin surface. Positive volume was calculated as the volume of the scar above the interpolated smooth skin surface. Negative volume was calculated as the volume of the scar below the smooth interpolated skin surface, and was always a negative number. Total volume was calculated as the sum of positive volume and the absolute value of negative volume. Smaller values were more desirable.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PSAS Results for Placebo
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
PSAS Results for 3 mg AZX100
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for patients who received 3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
PSAS Results for 10 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 PSAS scores for patients who received 10 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for Placebo
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for 3 mg AZX100
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for patients who received 3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
OSAS Results for 10 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 OSAS scores for patients who received 10 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - Placebo
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - 3 mg AZX100
n=20 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Minimum Elevation - 10 mg AZX100
n=19 Participants
This group included Month 12 scar minimum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 10 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - Placebo
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - 3 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Maximum Elevation - 10 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar maximum elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 10 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - Placebo
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received placebo (saline)/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - 3 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 3 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Scar Mean Elevation - 10 mg AZX100
This group included Month 12 scar mean elevation (mm) measurements for patients who received 10 mg AZX100/linear centimeter intradermally along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Between-group Mean Differences in Objective Measures Obtained Via 3D Photography (Volume)
|
0.3 Millimeters cubed
Standard Deviation 0.2
|
0.3 Millimeters cubed
Standard Deviation 0.4
|
0.5 Millimeters cubed
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
-0.0 Millimeters cubed
Standard Deviation 0.0
|
-0.0 Millimeters cubed
Standard Deviation 0.0
|
-0.1 Millimeters cubed
Standard Deviation 0.1
|
0.3 Millimeters cubed
Standard Deviation 0.2
|
0.4 Millimeters cubed
Standard Deviation 0.4
|
0.6 Millimeters cubed
Standard Deviation 0.6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
High Dose
Placebo
Low Dose
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
High Dose
n=19 participants at risk
AZX100 Drug Product 10 mg was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Placebo
n=20 participants at risk
Placebo (0.9% saline) was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Low Dose
n=20 participants at risk
AZX100 Drug Product 3 mg was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Transient Ischemic Attack
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral Infection
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
High Dose
n=19 participants at risk
AZX100 Drug Product 10 mg was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Placebo
n=20 participants at risk
Placebo (0.9% saline) was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
Low Dose
n=20 participants at risk
AZX100 Drug Product 3 mg was administered intradermally per linear centimeter along the excision line following keloid scar excision at 21 days and 42 days after surgery.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
15.0%
3/20 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
10.0%
2/20 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
10.0%
2/20 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
15.8%
3/19 • Number of events 7 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
30.0%
6/20 • Number of events 13 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
30.0%
6/20 • Number of events 11 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site erythema
|
31.6%
6/19 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
30.0%
6/20 • Number of events 10 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site induration
|
10.5%
2/19 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pain
|
42.1%
8/19 • Number of events 19 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
35.0%
7/20 • Number of events 12 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
35.0%
7/20 • Number of events 17 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pruritus
|
15.8%
3/19 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
15.0%
3/20 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
15.0%
3/20 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site reaction
|
26.3%
5/19 • Number of events 7 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
10.0%
2/20 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site urticaria
|
42.1%
8/19 • Number of events 14 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
20.0%
4/20 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
30.0%
6/20 • Number of events 10 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
|
General disorders
Injecton site irritation
|
47.4%
9/19 • Number of events 17 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
40.0%
8/20 • Number of events 18 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
10.5%
2/19 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
15.0%
3/20 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
20.0%
4/20 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
10.5%
2/19 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomach discomfort
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
10.0%
2/20 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory infection
|
5.3%
1/19 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
25.0%
5/20 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urninary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
0.00%
0/20 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
10.0%
2/20 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events began to be collected for each patient after dosing with study agent, and were collected for the duration of the study (12 months) The adverse event collection period for the entire study lasted for approximately 16 months.
|
Additional Information
Denise Lamon, Director of Regulatory Affairs
Capstone Therapeutics
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60