Impact of Accu-Chek 360 in Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT ID: NCT00824694
Last Updated: 2011-06-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
348 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-03-31
2010-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis 1: Compared to controls, intervention subjects will undergo a greater number of medication changes and have a lower HbA1 at the conclusion of the study.
Hypothesis 2: Higher rates of monitoring at entry will be associated with lower CHO consumption, lower percent body fat, higher medication compliance, and higher physical activity levels.
Hypothesis 3: Patients with lower rates of monitoring at entry will have higher rates of depression, more likely to have an external locus of control, and express greater fear about self-testing.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Insulin Treatment Variation in Southwestern Diabetics
NCT00148304
A 6-month Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effect of a Digital Disease Management Tool in Patients With T2DM
NCT03090464
Impact of an Automated Telephone Intervention on Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) in Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00700908
Metabolic Effects of Accurate Blood Sugar Results and Education in Type 1 Diabetes
NCT00284232
Diabetic Treatment Adherence
NCT01318564
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The intervention will consist of targeted SMBG, provider training, and patient education, all of which will be focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time. SMBG will alternate between 2 strategies: glucose profiling and target monitoring. Intervention PCP's will use 360 View to identify a patient's most significant glucose elevation(s) and devise a treatment plan that includes the medication to be used, starting dose, dose increment per cycle, interval between dose increases, monitoring times and frequency, goal for the target, and stop criteria. Separate treatment protocols will be recommended for OHA patients with basal hyperglycemia, OHA patients with PP hyperglycemia, insulin patients with basal hyperglycemia, and insulin patients with PP hyperglycemia. Treatment will conform to current standards of practice as defined by package inserts and Micromedex, the VA's official on-line drug reference. Subjects will repeat the dose titration cycle under the guidance of a case manager until the target is reached, maximal recommended doses of medications are used, or a stop criterion is met. They will then resume glucose profiling to identify the next target. This process is repeated until all targets reach their optimal value. Intervention subjects will undergo no less than 4 cycles in 48 weeks. Control patients will monitor and be treated in the customary manner.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
The intervention will consist of targeted SMBG, provider training and patient education-all of which are focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time. SMBG will alternate between 2 strategies: glucose profiling and target monitoring. Intervention PCP's will use 380 View to identify a patient's most significant glucose elevations(s) and devise a treatment plan that includes drug type, dose increases, monitoring times, goal for the target, and stop criteria.
Targeted Self-Monitoring Of Blood Glucose (SMBG)
SMBG will alternate between 2 strategies: glucose profiling and target monitoring.
Provider Training
Focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time.
Patient Education
Focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time.
Control Arms
Subjects will repeat the dose titration cycle under the guidance of a case manager until the target is reached, maximal recommended doses of medications are used, or a stop criterion is met. They will then resume glucose profiling to identify the next target. This process is repeated until all targets reach their optimal value. Control patients will monitor and be treated in the customary manner.
Targeted Self-Monitoring Of Blood Glucose (SMBG)
SMBG will alternate between 2 strategies: glucose profiling and target monitoring.
Provider Training
Focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time.
Patient Education
Focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Targeted Self-Monitoring Of Blood Glucose (SMBG)
SMBG will alternate between 2 strategies: glucose profiling and target monitoring.
Provider Training
Focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time.
Patient Education
Focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diabetes diagnosed after age 35
* Eat 3 meals daily and ≤ 1 snack
* If on OHA, have willingness to start insulin
Exclusion Criteria
* On insulin pump or CGM
* Preference for language other than English
* Can't or won't monitor
* Unfavorable occupation or living arrangements
* Terminal illness
* Active alcoholism or substance abuse
* Severe depression
* Chronic liver disease
* Pituitary or adrenal dysfunction
* Immunosuppression
* Hct \< 35
* Creatinine ≥ 2.5
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
New Mexico VA Healthcare System
FED
Carl T. Hayden VA Medical Center
FED
Southern Arizona VA Health Care System
FED
Biomedical Research Institute of New Mexico
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
New Mexico VA Health Care System
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Glen H Murata, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
New Mexico VA Healthcare System
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Carl T. Hayden VAMC
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Southern Arizona VA Healthcare System
Tucson, Arizona, United States
New Mexico VA Health Care System
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Investigator Initiated
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.