Impact of Accu-Chek 360 in Veterans With Type 2 Diabetes

NCT ID: NCT00824694

Last Updated: 2011-06-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

348 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-03-31

Study Completion Date

2010-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To show that a structured treatment plan based upon Accu-Chek 360 View has a favorable effect on physician decision-making and HbA1c for patients on oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) or insulin for type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Hypothesis 1: Compared to controls, intervention subjects will undergo a greater number of medication changes and have a lower HbA1 at the conclusion of the study.

Hypothesis 2: Higher rates of monitoring at entry will be associated with lower CHO consumption, lower percent body fat, higher medication compliance, and higher physical activity levels.

Hypothesis 3: Patients with lower rates of monitoring at entry will have higher rates of depression, more likely to have an external locus of control, and express greater fear about self-testing.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary care providers (PCP's) will be randomized to intervention and control arms. Their T2D patients will be identified by searching computerized pharmacy records for OHA or insulin, followed until they are on a stable medical regimen, and eligible to participate if their baseline HbA1c is 7.0 - 9.5% if on OHA or 7.5 - 10.0% if on insulin. Two sample frames will be created for intervention patients: one of patients on OHA alone and one of patients on insulin alone or in combination with OHA. The same procedure will be used to develop corresponding sample frames for control patients. OHA patients will be randomly sampled from the intervention and control groups at a ratio of 1:1 until 174 subjects have been enrolled. Insulin patients will be recruited in the same manner until another 174 subjects are recruited. At entry, patients will have measurements of fat mass, insulin-resistance, stimulated C-peptide, carbohydrate intake, and physical activity level.

The intervention will consist of targeted SMBG, provider training, and patient education, all of which will be focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time. SMBG will alternate between 2 strategies: glucose profiling and target monitoring. Intervention PCP's will use 360 View to identify a patient's most significant glucose elevation(s) and devise a treatment plan that includes the medication to be used, starting dose, dose increment per cycle, interval between dose increases, monitoring times and frequency, goal for the target, and stop criteria. Separate treatment protocols will be recommended for OHA patients with basal hyperglycemia, OHA patients with PP hyperglycemia, insulin patients with basal hyperglycemia, and insulin patients with PP hyperglycemia. Treatment will conform to current standards of practice as defined by package inserts and Micromedex, the VA's official on-line drug reference. Subjects will repeat the dose titration cycle under the guidance of a case manager until the target is reached, maximal recommended doses of medications are used, or a stop criterion is met. They will then resume glucose profiling to identify the next target. This process is repeated until all targets reach their optimal value. Intervention subjects will undergo no less than 4 cycles in 48 weeks. Control patients will monitor and be treated in the customary manner.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 2 Diabetes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention

The intervention will consist of targeted SMBG, provider training and patient education-all of which are focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time. SMBG will alternate between 2 strategies: glucose profiling and target monitoring. Intervention PCP's will use 380 View to identify a patient's most significant glucose elevations(s) and devise a treatment plan that includes drug type, dose increases, monitoring times, goal for the target, and stop criteria.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Targeted Self-Monitoring Of Blood Glucose (SMBG)

Intervention Type OTHER

SMBG will alternate between 2 strategies: glucose profiling and target monitoring.

Provider Training

Intervention Type OTHER

Focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time.

Patient Education

Intervention Type OTHER

Focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time.

Control Arms

Subjects will repeat the dose titration cycle under the guidance of a case manager until the target is reached, maximal recommended doses of medications are used, or a stop criterion is met. They will then resume glucose profiling to identify the next target. This process is repeated until all targets reach their optimal value. Control patients will monitor and be treated in the customary manner.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Targeted Self-Monitoring Of Blood Glucose (SMBG)

Intervention Type OTHER

SMBG will alternate between 2 strategies: glucose profiling and target monitoring.

Provider Training

Intervention Type OTHER

Focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time.

Patient Education

Intervention Type OTHER

Focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Targeted Self-Monitoring Of Blood Glucose (SMBG)

SMBG will alternate between 2 strategies: glucose profiling and target monitoring.

Intervention Type OTHER

Provider Training

Focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time.

Intervention Type OTHER

Patient Education

Focused on normalizing the most significant glucose abnormalities at any given time.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Must have a primary care provider
* Diabetes diagnosed after age 35
* Eat 3 meals daily and ≤ 1 snack
* If on OHA, have willingness to start insulin

Exclusion Criteria

* Type 1 diabetes or DKA
* On insulin pump or CGM
* Preference for language other than English
* Can't or won't monitor
* Unfavorable occupation or living arrangements
* Terminal illness
* Active alcoholism or substance abuse
* Severe depression
* Chronic liver disease
* Pituitary or adrenal dysfunction
* Immunosuppression
* Hct \< 35
* Creatinine ≥ 2.5
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

New Mexico VA Healthcare System

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Carl T. Hayden VA Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Southern Arizona VA Health Care System

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Biomedical Research Institute of New Mexico

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

New Mexico VA Health Care System

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Glen H Murata, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

New Mexico VA Healthcare System

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Carl T. Hayden VAMC

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Southern Arizona VA Healthcare System

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

New Mexico VA Health Care System

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Investigator Initiated

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Medication Adherence Program
NCT00838344 UNKNOWN NA