Comparison in Need for Bank Blood Between Patients Undergoing Total Hip Surgery That Either Receive Their Own Blood Back or Not

NCT ID: NCT00822588

Last Updated: 2012-10-04

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

227 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-05-31

Study Completion Date

2010-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study is a prospective, controlled, randomised and assessor blind study that investigate if the need for bank blood transfusion could be reduced in patients, undergoing primary or revision total hip replacement surgery, who receive their own blood back with the medical device Sangvia.

A comparison in need for bank blood will be made between patients that either receive their own blood back or not.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip Blood Transfusion Blood Transfusion, Autologous

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sangvia® System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sangvia® Intra- and Post-op System

2

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sangvia® System

Sangvia® Intra- and Post-op System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Provision of informed consent
* Scheduled for primary or secondary, cemented or non-cemented, total hip arthroplasty
* Classified as ASA Physical Status Classification System class P1, P2 or P3 according to the American Society of Anaesthesiology.

Exclusion Criteria

* Involvement in the planning and conduct of the study (applies to both Astra Tech staff or staff at the study site)
* Previous enrollment or randomisation of treatment in the present study
* Expected or confirmed participation in another clinical study, that may interfere with the present study, during the study period
* Suspected severe non-compliance to protocol as judged by the investigator
* Current symptoms of haemophilia
* Current symptoms of hyperkalaemia
* Current symptoms of systemic infection or local infection in the operation field
* Current symptoms of impaired renal function including creatinine/clearance levels above the normal reference values
* History of or presence of malignant disease with propensity for systemic spread during the last 5 years
* Current or expected use of cytotoxic drugs
* Current untreated anaemia (e.g. sickle cell anaemia), i.e. Hb concentration \< 11 g/dl (7 mmol/l)
* Use of recombinant erythopoetin
* Use of aprotinin and/or fibrin sealant
* Use of other autologous blood transfusion than that with the Sangvia® system (e.g. CellSaver, pre-donation, acute normovolemic haemodilution etc.)
* Women of childbearing age
* Fractures
* Revision/secondary total hip surgery with expected serious bone grafting
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wellspect HealthCare

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rudolf Poolman, Dr.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis (OLVG)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medical University Vienna, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis (OLVG)

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis (RdGG), afd. Orthopedie

Delft, , Netherlands

Site Status

MC Haaglanden, Orthopedic Dept.

The Hague, , Netherlands

Site Status

St. Olavs Hospital, Ortopedisk avdelning

Trondheim, , Norway

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Mar- Esperança (IMAS), Servicio de Anestesiología

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Netherlands Norway Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Thomassen BJ, Pilot P, Scholtes VA, Grohs JG, Holen K, Bisbe E, Poolman RW. Limit allogeneic blood use with routine re-use of patient's own blood: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in total hip surgery. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044503. Epub 2012 Sep 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23028549 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

YA-DRA-0001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id