Effective Aids Treatment and Support in the Free State (FEATS)
NCT ID: NCT00821366
Last Updated: 2009-02-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
648 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-10-31
2010-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Patients receiving ARV treatment and the associated support currently provided in the public sector ARV treatment programme.
* Patients receiving (a) plus bi-weekly visits by an experienced ARV patient who has been trained as a peer adherence supporter
* Patients receiving (a) and (b) plus a weekly nutritional supplement in the form of two 400g cans of meatballs and spaghetti in tomato sauce The group of 'comparison' households comprises the fourth group. Trained enumerators will conduct follow-up interviews with all patients and households at approximately six- and at twelve-months respectively. In addition, the ARV coordinator and other providers working in the ARV treatment programme at each of the twelve selected health care facilities will be interviewed by trained enumerators, at baseline and again at six- and at twelve-months. Clinical data will be obtained from patient files at baseline and at completion of the study. Using these data, various outcomes of importance to the study will be compared between the four study groups, using experimental and non-experimental methods.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective 1: Present a broader view of treatment success
In order to achieve this objective, the study aims to:
* Investigate how access to antiretroviral treatment and to nutritional supplementation impacts labour productivity and time allocation of patients and other household members
* Investigate how access to antiretroviral treatment and to nutritional supplementation impacts household welfare
* Investigate how access to antiretroviral treatment and to nutritional supplementation impacts educational and health outcomes for children in households with patients on antiretroviral treatment
Objective 2: Develop a model of the determinants of treatment success
In order to achieve this objective, the study aims to:
* Determine how various individual, household and facility-level characteristics impact adherence to antiretroviral treatment, including access to a disability grant
* Determine how access to a peer adherence supporter and nutritional supplementation impacts adherence to antiretroviral treatment
* Estimate the cost-effectiveness of these interventions in enhancement in adherence, from both a fiscal and a social perspective
Objective 3: Understand the links between treatment and prevention
In order to achieve this objective, the study aims to:
* Determine how access to antiretroviral treatment impacts on the uptake of voluntary counselling and testing among members of households including patients on ARV treatment and among members of households in the general community
* Determine how access to antiretroviral treatment, to a peer adherence supporter and to nutritional supplementation impacts on the sexual behaviour of patients on antiretroviral treatment, their household members, and members of households in the general community
The study aims to investigate effective AIDS treatment and support in settings where free ARV treatment has been introduced already, with issues of scale-up and sustainability as a result representing an important issue. The study therefore is being conducted in twelve phase I ARV assessment sites in the Free State province, i.e. sites where ARV treatment first became available when the ARV treatment programme was launched in the Free State province in 2004/05.
1. Type of study The study is a prospective, cohort study with a patient, household, facility and provider survey component. The study has a social scientific focus, with a clinical component, and comprises two behavioural interventions.
2. Description of experimental design The study is a combination of a group time-series quasi-experimental design and a a variation of a double randomised consent design. The study comprises four groups of households, three of which include patients on ARV treatment (Figure 1). The provision of ARV treatment represents a quasi- or field experiment, while the peer adherence support and nutritional interventions represent a randomised-control experiment executed in accordance with a Zelen-type double randomised consent design. This study design is deemed appropriate given the fact that: blinding is not practicable or possible; the use of classical randomisation and informed consent procedures significantly threatens internal validity; the interventions are highly attractive; the control group receives standard care; the study focuses on a clinically relevant objective(s) and offers important new insights (Kaptchuk, 2001; MacLehose et al, 2001; Rains \& Penzien, 2005).
Figure 1: Experimental study design
Group A: Households including ARV patients who receive the ARV treatment and associated support provided as part of government's ARV treatment programme Sample size: n\~216\]
Group B: Households including ARV patients who receive the ARV treatment and associated support provided as part of government's ARV treatment programme PLUS Adherence support provided by a trained peer adherence supporter during twice weekly visits to the patient \[Sample size: n\~216\]
Group C: Households including ARV patients who receive the ARV treatment and associated support provided as part of government's ARV treatment programme PLUS Adherence support provided by a trained peer adherence supporter during twice weekly visits to the patient PLUS Nutritional supplementation: weekly delivery of two 400g cans of meatballs and spaghetti in tomato sauce by peer adherence supporter \[Sample size: n\~216\]
Group D: Randomly selected households from the general community served by the selected health facility, excluding households where someone is known to receive ARV treatment \[Sample size: n\~180\]
Sample size estimation:
The sample size calculation for the arms of the study is based on the method proposed by Freedman (1982). The sample size estimation is based on the following assumptions:
* The proportion of people showing an improvement in a specific outcome, are compared across two arms of the study at a time.
* Attrition in the control group of comparison households is assumed to be minimal or none (since there is no ARV patient in the household), while attrition in the intervention arms (where ARV treatment is considered an intervention) is assumed to be much higher, given a reported mortality of 10% among ARV patients in the first months of treatment (Free State Department of Health, 2006).
* The required sample sizes for a 4-equal-arms-at-end-of-study design were calculated taking into account the attrition rate of 17% in the three intervention groups and a ratio of 1 for the treatment: control arms at the end of the study is expected.
* Assuming a two-tailed test with Type I error of 5%, Type II error of 10%, and at least 17% improvement in any outcome.
The affordable sample size was 801 households with 177 for the control arm and 208 for each of the intervention arms. This sample is expected to yield statistically significant results for the analysis of all measures contemplated. Although the statistical power of the study design with this sample size can be considered good the sample size was rounded up to \~828 households, with \~180 households in the control arm and \~216 households in each of the intervention arms. This was done to represent multiples of 12 since the study will be conducted in 12 facilities.
3. Method of randomisation From among the \~648 ARV patients recruited into the study \[\~54/study site\], individual patients will be assigned randomly to the control group \[Group A; n\~216\] and to the two experimental arms of the study \[Group B \& C; n\~216 each\], using the relevant random sampling selection commands in version 10 of the Stata software programme.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Households including ARV patients who receive the ARV treatment and associated support provided as part of government's ARV treatment programme - ARV treatment only group
ARV treatment
Households including ARV patients who receive the ARV treatment and associated support provided as part of government's ARV treatment programme
2
Households including ARV patients who receive the ARV treatment and associated support provided as part of government's ARV treatment programme - ARV treatment and ARV peer adherence support group
ARV peer adherence support (PAS)
Adherence support provided during twice weekly visits to the patient by an experienced ART patients who received basic training in ARV peer adherence support
ARV treatment
Households including ARV patients who receive the ARV treatment and associated support provided as part of government's ARV treatment programme
3
Households including ARV patients who receive the ARV treatment and associated support provided as part of government's ARV treatment programme - ARV treatment, ARV peer adherence support and nutritional support group
ARV peer adherence support (PAS)
Adherence support provided during twice weekly visits to the patient by an experienced ART patients who received basic training in ARV peer adherence support
Nutritional support
Weekly delivery by peer adherence supporter (PAS) of two 400g cans of meatballs and spaghetti in tomato sauce
ARV treatment
Households including ARV patients who receive the ARV treatment and associated support provided as part of government's ARV treatment programme
4
Randomly selected households from the general community served by the selected health facility, excluding households where someone is known to receive ARV treatment - comparison/control group
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ARV peer adherence support (PAS)
Adherence support provided during twice weekly visits to the patient by an experienced ART patients who received basic training in ARV peer adherence support
Nutritional support
Weekly delivery by peer adherence supporter (PAS) of two 400g cans of meatballs and spaghetti in tomato sauce
ARV treatment
Households including ARV patients who receive the ARV treatment and associated support provided as part of government's ARV treatment programme
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Eligible for public sector ARV treatment (CD4\<200 and/or WHO stage 4)
* Commenced ARV treatment in past 4 weeks
* Patient resident in town/village where ART clinic located
Exclusion Criteria
* Not eligible for public sector ARV treatment
* Had not commenced ARV treatment
* Commenced ARV treatment longer than one month ago
* Patient not resident in town/village where ART clinic
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
World Bank
OTHER
Bank-Netherlands Partnership Programme (BNPP)
UNKNOWN
Centre for Health Systems Research & Development, University of the Free State
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
University of the Free State
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Frikkie LR Booysen, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of the Free State
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Batho clinic
Bloemfontein, Free State, South Africa
MUCPP clinic
Bloemfontein, Free State, South Africa
Tswelepele clinic
Bloemfontein, Free State, South Africa
Refengkhotso clinic
Deneysville, Free State, South Africa
Tshiame clinic
Harrismith, Free State, South Africa
Itumeleng clinic
Jagersfontein, Free State, South Africa
Phomolong clinic
Phomolong, Free State, South Africa
Namahali clinic
Phuthaditjaba, Free State, South Africa
Tseki clinic
Phuthaditjaba, Free State, South Africa
Zamdela clinic
Sasolburg, Free State, South Africa
Matjhabeng clinic
Welkom, Free State, South Africa
Welkom clinic
Welkom, Free State, South Africa
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bhargava A, Booysen FLR, Walsh CM. Health status, food insecurity, and time allocation patterns of patients with AIDS receiving antiretroviral treatment in South Africa. AIDS Care. 2018 Mar;30(3):361-368. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2017.1371665. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FEATS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id