Reducing Injuries From Medication-Related Falls Using Computerized Alerts for High Risk Patients
NCT ID: NCT00818285
Last Updated: 2019-08-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
5628 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-09-30
2012-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The overall purpose of this research program is to reduce medication-related fall injuries by using computerized electronic prescribing and drug management systems to identify high risk patients and provide physicians with patient-specific recommendations for modifying psychotropic medication use to reduce this risk.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Clinical Decision Support System and Patient Portal for Preventing Medication-related Falls in Older Patients
NCT05449470
Reducing Post-discharge Adverse Drug Events Amongst the Elderly: a Multi-centre Electronic Deprescribing Intervention
NCT03272607
Testing the SNOWDROP Intervention: Using a Clinical Decision Support System and Patient Portal for Falls Prevention Among Older Patients in Primary Care
NCT05611008
FRIDs and Fall Risk Among Older Adults
NCT05169476
Reducing Post-discharge Potentially Inappropriate Medications Among Older Adults
NCT02918058
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: To determine the extent to which a targeted psychotropic drug alert and recommendation system will reduce
a) the rate of potentially inappropriate psychotropic medication for patients at risk of fall-related injuries, and b) fall-related injury risk, fall-related injuries and hospitalizations.
Research Plan : A single blind, cluster randomized controlled trial will be conducted to test the hypothesized benefits of the targeted psychotropic drug alert and recommendation system versus the standard automated generic drug alert system within a fixed cohort of primary care physicians and an open cohort of patients seen by study physicians in the 16 month follow-up period for the assessment of reductions in potentially inappropriate psychotropic prescriptions and fall-related injuries. A single blind trial was planned because intervention status cannot be blinded for physicians in the study. However, study participants are blinded to the outcomes assessed, because the data required to assess these outcomes can be predominantly collected and assessed using data sources that are independent of the intervention status. Patients, clustered within physicians, is the unit of analysis because patient level information provides the most precise, non-ecological, method of the study outcomes as well as potential confounders, and because hierarchical multivariate analytic methods are now available to model clustering in the assessment of treatment effect{Chuang, 2000 4339 /id}. The benefit of the intervention will be assessed by comparing patients of physicians who received the psychotropic drug alert and recommendation system and patients of physicians who received automated drug decision support. This approach minimizes Hawthorne effects, arising from the intensive nature of practice intervention required to support computer-based systems in primary care that would likely result in over-estimation of benefit if computer-based decision support for drug management were compared to physicians with no computerized intervention. Further, it provides a means by which information on prescriptions, drug and disease profile can be assessed in an equivalent way between patients of physicians with automated control or targeted alert experimental decision-support, reducing biases related to differences in measurement sources.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Physicians in this arm will be using the standard electronic prescription interface.
No interventions assigned to this group
2
In addition to the standard electronic prescription module, physicians in this arm will receive targeted drugs alert and decision support for psychotropic drug management
CDS for psychotropic drug management
Computerized decision support (CDS) for patients with available supplies of psychotropic medications. The decision support will consist of a screen displaying to the physician the patient's current risk of falling as well as what their risk could be lowered to with modifications to medications.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CDS for psychotropic drug management
Computerized decision support (CDS) for patients with available supplies of psychotropic medications. The decision support will consist of a screen displaying to the physician the patient's current risk of falling as well as what their risk could be lowered to with modifications to medications.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Canadian Patient Safety Institute
OTHER
McGill University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Robyn Tamblyn
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robyn M Tamblyn, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
McGill University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
McGill University
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tamblyn R, Eguale T, Buckeridge DL, Huang A, Hanley J, Reidel K, Shi S, Winslade N. The effectiveness of a new generation of computerized drug alerts in reducing the risk of injury from drug side effects: a cluster randomized trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug;19(4):635-43. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000609. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RFA06-1035-QC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.