Study of Non Inferiority Bi-Profenid® 200mg Versus Bi-Profenid® 300mg Among Patients Presenting of the Post-traumatic or Rheumatologic Acute Affections of the Locomotor Apparatus (BIPROPAIN)
NCT ID: NCT00810121
Last Updated: 2009-09-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
409 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-11-30
2009-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To demonstrate the non-inferiority of Bi-Profenid 100 mg x 2 day versus Bi-Profenid 150 mg x 2 day in patients presenting with pain related to closed, benign, acute post-traumatic conditions of the motor system or acute, non-infectious rheumatologic conditions, by comparing, on the one hand, changes in resting pain intensity over the entire day, measured at the end of the day using a numeric scale (NS), over 5 days and, on the other hand, total intake over 5 days of concomitant analgesics.
Secondary Objectives:
* To describe concomitant analgesic treatments
* To describe the time between baseline and use of a step I, II or III analgesic
* To evaluate patients pain relief using a Likert 4-class scale (complete or substantial relief, moderate relief slight relief and absence of relief) at D5
* To evaluate changes in intensity of pain when moving, over the entire day, measured at the end of the day using a numeric scale, over 5 days
* To evaluate the patients overall satisfaction at the end of treatment using a 4-point Simple Verbal Scale (SVS) (very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat unsatisfied, very unsatisfied)
* To evaluate the patients overall satisfaction at the end of the study using a 4-point Simple Verbal Scale (EVS) (very satisfied, somewhat satisfied, somewhat unsatisfied, very unsatisfied)
* To compare the safety of the two treatments
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ibuprofen With or Without Acetaminophen for Low Back Pain
NCT03554018
Evaluation of the Effectiveness, Compliance of Ibuprofen in a Sustained Release Form in the Treatment of Egyptian Osteoarthritic Patients
NCT01226095
A Study of Ibuprofen 250 mg / Acetaminophen 500 mg Comparing The Antipyretic Effects in Healthy Male Volunteers
NCT02761980
Bioequivalence Study of Ibuprofen 200 mg/5 mL Oral Suspension vs. MOMENT 200 mg Coated Tablet
NCT02902289
Ibuprofen/Caffeine Lower Back or Neck Pain Study
NCT03003000
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Ketoprofen 100 mg b.i.d. for 5 days
ketoprofen 100 mg
100 mg b.i.d. for 5 days
2
Ketoprofen 150 mg b.i.d. for 5 days
ketoprofen
150 mg b.i.d. for 5 days
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ketoprofen 100 mg
100 mg b.i.d. for 5 days
ketoprofen
150 mg b.i.d. for 5 days
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Women using a method of contraception and with a negative pregnancy test before entering the study, or women who have been menopausal for at least 1 year,
* Patients meeting one of the following criteria:
* Closed benign trauma of the motor system occurring within the last 24 hours,
* Contusion of the motor system occurring within the last 24 hours,
* Acute rheumatologic conditions (acute lower back pain, lumbar sciatica, cervicobrachial neuralgia),
* Abarticular rheumatism,
* Requiring treatment with Bi-Profenid for 5 days,
* With resting pain intensity measured on a numeric scale at baseline \>or= 3 (before administration of any treatment),
* Receiving a prior medical examination suited to the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Need for hospitalization,
* Need for an analgesic other than step I at the baseline visit,
* Need for treatment with another selective or non-selective NSAID (per os and/or topical), including aspirin, selective cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors, corticosteroids or muscle relaxants at baseline and throughout the study,
* Serious trauma: knee luxation, any fracture, ruptures such as Achilles tendon rupture,
* Sprain treated with a cast,
* Bursitis,
* Local and/or general severe infection,
* Pregnant or nursing women,
* Hypersensitivity to ketoprofen or to any of the excipients of the product,
* Previous history of asthma triggered by taking ketoprofen or substances with similar activity such as other NSAIDs or aspirin,
* Gastrointestinal haemorrhage, cerebrovascular haemorrhage or other active haemorrhage,
* Previous history of digestive haemorrhage or perforation during previous NSAID treatment,
* Active intestinal ulcer,
* Active peptic ulcer, previous history of peptic ulcer or recurrent haemorrhage (2 separate episodes or more of haemorrhage or ulcerations detected),
* Severe hepatic failure,
* Severe renal failure,
* Severe heart failure,
* Uncontrolled hypertension,
* Hypersensitivity or intolerance to gluten, due to the presence of wheat starch (gluten),
* Patients treated with oral anticoagulants, heparins, platelet antiaggregants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), lithium, methotrexate, pemetrexed and immunosuppressants
The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sanofi
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
sanofi-aventis
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marie Sebille
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Sanofi
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2008-003375-41
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
KETOP_L_03948
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.