The Effect of Biannual Monitoring With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), X-ray, or Usual Care on Treatment for Inflammatory Arthritis
NCT ID: NCT00808496
Last Updated: 2011-10-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
186 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-06-30
2013-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study will determine if magnetic resonance imaging (also known as 'MRI') conducted every six months provides arthritis specialists with information to help them better treat peripheral inflammatory arthritis patients over the first two years of care. The effect of MRI will be compared to 1) the use of x-ray every six months; and, 2) the frequency at which these tests are usually used. The study will also determine if differences in treatment between the three groups result in differences in the well-being of patients.
A total of 186 patients with early signs of inflammatory arthritis will be studied. All participants will have an MRI and x-ray conducted every six months. One-third of participants (62 in total) will only have MRI information sent to their arthritis specialist (MRI group); 62 will have x-ray information sent (X-ray group); and, the remaining 62 will have x-ray information sent only when ordered by the arthritis specialist (Usual Care group). Negative disease progression reports will be sent to the arthritis specialist unless intervention allocation-specific disease progression is detected. In which case, a report blinded to imaging modality will be sent indicating the detection of disease progression relative to the last timepoint of progression, or baseline, as applicable. At any point in the study, the arthritis specialist can request a clinical MRI or x-ray for any participant.
Neither the participants nor their doctors will know to which group they are assigned. A computer program will randomly assign participants to one of the three groups using a technique called minimization. This technique accounts for differences between participants that are known to effect disease progression and treatment decisions. Using this technique, participants with similar disease will be evenly distributed between the three groups.
The results of this study will have a direct impact on care for new inflammatory arthritis patients. It will determine the benefits, if any, of regular monitoring of disease progression with MRI or x-ray. Using tests proven to help treatment decision-making, arthritis specialists will improve the care provided to new inflammatory arthritis patients.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MRI
Biannual disease progression monitoring with peripheral magnetic resonance imaging of the 2nd to 5th metacarpophalangeal joints of the worst-effected or dominant hand at baseline.
MRI
Biannual disease progression monitoring with peripheral magnetic resonance imaging of the 2nd to 5th metacarpophalangeal joints of the worst-effected or dominant hand at baseline. Scored using the Xie-modified rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score (RAMRIS).
MRI intervention group also undergoes radiography imaging. Only protocol determined smallest detectable changes on MRI reported.
Radiography
Biannual disease progression monitoring with radiography of both hands and wrists.
Radiography
Biannual disease progression monitoring with radiography of both hands and wrists. Scored using the van der Heijde-modified Sharp score.
Radiography intervention group also undergoes MRI imaging. Only protocol determined smallest detectable changes on radiography reported.
Standard of Care
Diagnostic imaging results (MRI or radiography) reported to upon requisition.
Standard of Care
Diagnostic imaging results (MRI or radiography) reported upon requisition. Standard of Care intervention group undergoes both MRI and radiography imaging. Upon requisition of either MRI or radiography, radiology reports are delivered as per institutional standard of care
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MRI
Biannual disease progression monitoring with peripheral magnetic resonance imaging of the 2nd to 5th metacarpophalangeal joints of the worst-effected or dominant hand at baseline. Scored using the Xie-modified rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score (RAMRIS).
MRI intervention group also undergoes radiography imaging. Only protocol determined smallest detectable changes on MRI reported.
Radiography
Biannual disease progression monitoring with radiography of both hands and wrists. Scored using the van der Heijde-modified Sharp score.
Radiography intervention group also undergoes MRI imaging. Only protocol determined smallest detectable changes on radiography reported.
Standard of Care
Diagnostic imaging results (MRI or radiography) reported upon requisition. Standard of Care intervention group undergoes both MRI and radiography imaging. Upon requisition of either MRI or radiography, radiology reports are delivered as per institutional standard of care
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* At least three swollen joints; OR,
* Metacarpophalangeal joint(s) positive squeeze test; OR,
* Metatarsophalangeal joint(s) positive squeeze test; OR,
* At least 30 minutes of self-reported morning stiffness.
* At least six weeks of self-reported symptom duration.
Exclusion Criteria
* Medical history of juvenile arthritis
* Evidence of viral arthritis
* A concomitant condition with medical priority over inflammatory arthritis, or that contraindicates treatment with DMARDs excluding sulfa allergy or medically controlled, non-terminal liver disease.
* Refusal to receive DMARD treatment
* Patients with a psychological deficit, or diminished capacity to provide independent, informed consent
* Any contraindication to MRI or x-ray
* Current or planned pregnancy
* Lactation
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
McMaster University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ruben Tavares
PhD Candidate
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ruben Tavares, MBt MSc CCRA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
McMaster University
Jonathan D Adachi, MD FRCPC
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
McMaster University
Maggie J Larche, MD PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
McMaster University
Colin E Webber, PhD CCPM
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
McMaster University
Naveen Parasu, MD FRCPC
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
McMaster University
Karen A Beattie, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
McMaster University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
McMaster University, Division of Rheumatology
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Brown AK, Conaghan PG, Karim Z, Quinn MA, Ikeda K, Peterfy CG, Hensor E, Wakefield RJ, O'Connor PJ, Emery P. An explanation for the apparent dissociation between clinical remission and continued structural deterioration in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Oct;58(10):2958-67. doi: 10.1002/art.23945.
Schiff MH, Hobbs KF, Gensler T, Keenan GF. A retrospective analysis of low-field strength magnetic resonance imaging and the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 May;23(5):961-8. doi: 10.1185/030079907x178892.
McQueen FM, Stewart N, Crabbe J, Robinson E, Yeoman S, Tan PL, McLean L. Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals progression of erosions despite clinical improvement. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999 Mar;58(3):156-63. doi: 10.1136/ard.58.3.156.
Olech E, Freeston JE, Conaghan PG, Hensor EM, Emery P, Yocum D. Using extremity magnetic resonance imaging to assess and monitor early rheumatoid arthritis: the optimal joint combination to be scanned in clinical practice. J Rheumatol. 2008 Apr;35(4):580-3. Epub 2008 Mar 1.
Xie X, Webber CE, Adachi JD, O'Neill J, Inglis D, Bobba RS, Wu H. Quantitative, small bore, 1 Tesla, magnetic resonance imaging of the hands of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008 Sep-Oct;26(5):860-5.
van der Heijde DM, van Riel PL, Nuver-Zwart IH, Gribnau FW, vad de Putte LB. Effects of hydroxychloroquine and sulphasalazine on progression of joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 1989 May 13;1(8646):1036-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)92442-2.
Taves DR. Minimization: a new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1974 May;15(5):443-53. doi: 10.1002/cpt1974155443. No abstract available.
Saag KG, Teng GG, Patkar NM, Anuntiyo J, Finney C, Curtis JR, Paulus HE, Mudano A, Pisu M, Elkins-Melton M, Outman R, Allison JJ, Suarez Almazor M, Bridges SL Jr, Chatham WW, Hochberg M, MacLean C, Mikuls T, Moreland LW, O'Dell J, Turkiewicz AM, Furst DE; American College of Rheumatology. American College of Rheumatology 2008 recommendations for the use of nonbiologic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jun 15;59(6):762-84. doi: 10.1002/art.23721. No abstract available.
Emery P, Breedveld FC, Dougados M, Kalden JR, Schiff MH, Smolen JS. Early referral recommendation for newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis: evidence based development of a clinical guide. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Apr;61(4):290-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.4.290.
Tavares R, Beattie KA, Bensen WG, Bobba RS, Cividino AA, Finlay K, Goeree R, Hart LE, Jurriaans E, Larche MJ, Parasu N, Tarride JE, Webber CE, Adachi JD. A double-blind, randomized controlled trial to compare the effect of biannual peripheral magnetic resonance imaging, radiography and standard of care disease progression monitoring on pharmacotherapeutic escalation in rheumatoid and undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Jul 5;15:268. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-268.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
200901
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id