Trial Outcomes & Findings for Long Term Study Of Pregabalin In Idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome Patients (NCT NCT00806026)

NCT ID: NCT00806026

Last Updated: 2021-01-26

Results Overview

International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) is psychometrically and clinically valid and reliable clinician-administered instrument used to assess the severity of RLS. It assesses RLS symptom severity and impact on daily living and is comprised of 10 items, scored on 0 to 4 scale, where lower score indicates lower symptom severity/impact on living. Two subscale scores are symptom severity (6 items) ranging from 0-24 (lower score indicates lower symptom severity) and impact on daily living (3 items) ranging from 0-12 (lower score indicates lower impact on living). Item 3 is unrelated to the other items. The global score is calculated from all 10 items, range from 0 to 40, where lower scores reflect lower severity and better quality of life.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

731 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline

Results posted on

2021-01-26

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Pregabalin 300 mg
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Placebo to Pregabalin 300 mg
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) for 12 weeks, re-randomized to PGB 300 mg following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 40 weeks. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Placebo to Pramipexole 0.25 mg
PBO capsules matched to PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily and Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) for 12 weeks, re-randomized to PPX 0.25 mg following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily and Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 40 weeks. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Placebo to Pramipexole 0.5 mg
PBO capsules matched to PPX 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) for 12 weeks, re-randomized to PPX 0.5 mg following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 40 weeks. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Overall Study
STARTED
185
183
182
61
59
61
Overall Study
Treated
182
178
180
59
59
61
Overall Study
COMPLETED
93
82
89
32
29
29
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
92
101
93
29
30
32

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Pregabalin 300 mg
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Placebo to Pregabalin 300 mg
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) for 12 weeks, re-randomized to PGB 300 mg following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 40 weeks. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Placebo to Pramipexole 0.25 mg
PBO capsules matched to PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily and Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) for 12 weeks, re-randomized to PPX 0.25 mg following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily and Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 40 weeks. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Placebo to Pramipexole 0.5 mg
PBO capsules matched to PPX 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) for 12 weeks, re-randomized to PPX 0.5 mg following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 40 weeks. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Overall Study
Death
0
0
0
1
0
0
Overall Study
Did not meet entrance criteria
4
1
2
1
0
0
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
5
18
13
4
8
7
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
8
15
8
2
6
6
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
14
17
9
2
5
3
Overall Study
Other
3
6
8
2
0
4
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
6
9
9
0
2
3
Overall Study
Adverse Event
52
35
44
17
9
9

Baseline Characteristics

Long Term Study Of Pregabalin In Idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome Patients

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=182 Participants
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=178 Participants
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=180 Participants
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Placebo to Pregabalin 300 mg
n=59 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) for 12 weeks, re-randomized to PGB 300 mg following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 40 weeks. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Placebo to Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=59 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily and Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) for 12 weeks, re-randomized to PPX 0.25 mg following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily and Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 40 weeks. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Placebo to Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=61 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PPX 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) for 12 weeks, re-randomized to PPX 0.5 mg following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 40 weeks. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Total
n=719 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Customized
Less than 18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
0 Participants
n=115 Participants
Age, Customized
18 to 44 years
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
34 Participants
n=7 Participants
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
17 Participants
n=21 Participants
20 Participants
n=10 Participants
164 Participants
n=115 Participants
Age, Customized
45 to 64 years
101 Participants
n=5 Participants
85 Participants
n=7 Participants
84 Participants
n=5 Participants
29 Participants
n=4 Participants
32 Participants
n=21 Participants
31 Participants
n=10 Participants
362 Participants
n=115 Participants
Age, Customized
Greater than and equal to 65 years
44 Participants
n=5 Participants
59 Participants
n=7 Participants
51 Participants
n=5 Participants
19 Participants
n=4 Participants
10 Participants
n=21 Participants
10 Participants
n=10 Participants
193 Participants
n=115 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
123 Participants
n=5 Participants
108 Participants
n=7 Participants
99 Participants
n=5 Participants
37 Participants
n=4 Participants
36 Participants
n=21 Participants
38 Participants
n=10 Participants
441 Participants
n=115 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
59 Participants
n=5 Participants
70 Participants
n=7 Participants
81 Participants
n=5 Participants
22 Participants
n=4 Participants
23 Participants
n=21 Participants
23 Participants
n=10 Participants
278 Participants
n=115 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least one post-randomization efficacy assessment on any efficacy scale. Here, the 'N' (number of participants analyzed) is signifying those participants who were evaluable for this measure for each group respectively.

International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) is psychometrically and clinically valid and reliable clinician-administered instrument used to assess the severity of RLS. It assesses RLS symptom severity and impact on daily living and is comprised of 10 items, scored on 0 to 4 scale, where lower score indicates lower symptom severity/impact on living. Two subscale scores are symptom severity (6 items) ranging from 0-24 (lower score indicates lower symptom severity) and impact on daily living (3 items) ranging from 0-12 (lower score indicates lower impact on living). Item 3 is unrelated to the other items. The global score is calculated from all 10 items, range from 0 to 40, where lower scores reflect lower severity and better quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=172 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation for 12 weeks, re-randomized to 1 of the 3 active treatments (PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg) and dose was escalated to the assigned fixed dose over 2 weeks and continued up to 40 weeks followed by dose tapering over 1 week similar to the active treatment.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=177 Participants
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=169 Participants
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=178 Participants
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) Symptom Severity
22.40 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 5.58
22.30 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 5.73
22.40 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 5.37
22.10 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 5.19

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least one post-randomization efficacy assessment on any efficacy scale. Here, the 'N' (number of participants analyzed) is signifying those participants who were evaluable for this measure for each group respectively.

IRLS is psychometrically and clinically valid and reliable clinician-administered instrument used to assess the severity of RLS. It assesses RLS symptom severity and impact on daily living and is comprised of 10 items, scored on 0 to 4 scale, where lower score indicates lower symptom severity/impact on living. Two subscale scores are symptom severity (6 items) ranging from 0-24 (lower score indicates lower symptom severity) and impact on daily living (3 items) ranging from 0-12 (lower score indicates lower impact on living). Item 3 is unrelated to the other items. The global score is calculated from all 10 items, range from 0 to 40, where lower scores reflect lower severity and better quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=172 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation for 12 weeks, re-randomized to 1 of the 3 active treatments (PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg) and dose was escalated to the assigned fixed dose over 2 weeks and continued up to 40 weeks followed by dose tapering over 1 week similar to the active treatment.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=177 Participants
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=169 Participants
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=178 Participants
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Change From Baseline in the RLS Symptom Severity at Week 12
-7.30 Units on a Scale
Standard Error 0.48
-11.80 Units on a Scale
Standard Error 0.47
-7.90 Units on a Scale
Standard Error 0.49
-10.50 Units on a Scale
Standard Error 0.47

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: ITT population. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) is signifying those participants who were evaluable for this measure for each group respectively.

CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected. Responders were defined as participants who report CGI-I score of "very much improved" or "much improved".

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=173 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation for 12 weeks, re-randomized to 1 of the 3 active treatments (PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg) and dose was escalated to the assigned fixed dose over 2 weeks and continued up to 40 weeks followed by dose tapering over 1 week similar to the active treatment.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=175 Participants
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=168 Participants
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=177 Participants
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Percentage of Participants Responding to Treatment at Week 12
46.80 Percentage of participants
71.40 Percentage of participants
51.20 Percentage of participants
62.70 Percentage of participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 52

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least one post-randomization efficacy assessment on any efficacy scale. Here, the 'N' (number of participants analyzed) is signifying those participants who were evaluable for this measure for each group respectively.

Augmentation was worsening of RLS symptoms, attributable to a specific long-term therapeutic intervention for RLS. Percentage of participants with augmentation was evaluated by centralized evaluation board using a set of assessment criteria for potential augmentation which included structured interview for diagnosis of augmentation during RLS treatment (SIDA-RLS), augmentation severity rating scale (ASRS), clinical judgment. ASRS measures severity of augmentation and consist of three items to be completed by clinician. Clinician would score participants' answers by comparing post-baseline evaluations to those at baseline. ASRS total score range: 0-24, with higher score indicating more severe augmentation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation for 12 weeks, re-randomized to 1 of the 3 active treatments (PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg) and dose was escalated to the assigned fixed dose over 2 weeks and continued up to 40 weeks followed by dose tapering over 1 week similar to the active treatment.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=176 Participants
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=167 Participants
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=178 Participants
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Percentage of Participants With Augmentation
—
1.70 Percentage of participants
6.60 Percentage of participants
9.00 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least one post-randomization efficacy assessment on any efficacy scale. Here, the 'N' (number of participants analyzed) is signifying those participants who were evaluable for this measure for each group respectively.

SSQ: Participant-rated instrument used to assess previous night's sleep profile. It is used to measure sleep quantity and quality and is comprised of 5 items yielding 5 subscale scores: latency (1 item), hours of sleep (1 item), number of awakenings (1 item), total WASO (1 item), quality of sleep (1 item). WASO is time spent awake from sleep onset to final awakening. Total WASO subscale (in minutes): numerical rating completed by the participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period is the night before. Total WASO subscale score ranges from 0-1440 minutes. Lower value indicates better sleep.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=163 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation for 12 weeks, re-randomized to 1 of the 3 active treatments (PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg) and dose was escalated to the assigned fixed dose over 2 weeks and continued up to 40 weeks followed by dose tapering over 1 week similar to the active treatment.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=168 Participants
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=158 Participants
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=169 Participants
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Subjective Waking After Sleep Onset (WASO)
79.50 minutes
Standard Deviation 69.85
90.60 minutes
Standard Deviation 76.10
100.20 minutes
Standard Deviation 85.92
83.90 minutes
Standard Deviation 77.35

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least one post-randomization efficacy assessment on any efficacy scale. Here, the 'N' (number of participants analyzed) is signifying those participants who were evaluable for this measure for each group respectively.

SSQ: Participant-rated instrument used to assess previous night's sleep profile. It is used to measure sleep quantity and quality and is comprised of 5 items yielding 5 subscale scores: latency (1 item), hours of sleep (1 item), number of awakenings (1 item), total WASO (1 item), quality of sleep (1 item). WASO is time spent awake from sleep onset to final awakening. Total WASO subscale (in minutes): numerical rating completed by the participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period is the night before. Total WASO subscale score ranges from 0-1440 minutes. Lower value indicates better sleep.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=163 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation for 12 weeks, re-randomized to 1 of the 3 active treatments (PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg) and dose was escalated to the assigned fixed dose over 2 weeks and continued up to 40 weeks followed by dose tapering over 1 week similar to the active treatment.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=168 Participants
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=158 Participants
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=169 Participants
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Change From Baseline in SSQ: Subjective WASO at Week 12
-32.61 minutes
Standard Error 3.10
-49.86 minutes
Standard Error 3.06
-33.69 minutes
Standard Error 3.15
-37.18 minutes
Standard Error 3.04

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least one post-randomization efficacy assessment on any efficacy scale. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) is signifying those participants who were evaluable for this measure for each group respectively.

SSQ: Participant-rated instrument used to assess previous night's sleep profile. It is used to measure sleep quantity and quality and is comprised of 5 items yielding 5 subscale scores: latency (1 item), hours of sleep (1 item), number of awakenings (1 item), total WASO (1 item), quality of sleep (1 item). Latency subscale (in minutes): numerical rating completed by the participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period is the night before. Latency subscale score ranges from 0-840 minutes. Lower value indicates better sleep.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=165 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation for 12 weeks, re-randomized to 1 of the 3 active treatments (PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg) and dose was escalated to the assigned fixed dose over 2 weeks and continued up to 40 weeks followed by dose tapering over 1 week similar to the active treatment.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=169 Participants
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=161 Participants
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=174 Participants
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Latency Subscale Score at Week 12
47.70 minutes
Standard Deviation 44.89
41.60 minutes
Standard Deviation 35.76
43.10 minutes
Standard Deviation 35.84
35.90 minutes
Standard Deviation 33.08

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least one post-randomization efficacy assessment on any efficacy scale. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) is signifying those participants who were evaluable for this measure for each group respectively.

SSQ: Participant-rated instrument used to assess previous night's sleep profile. It is used to measure sleep quantity and quality and is comprised of 5 items yielding 5 subscale scores: latency (1 item), hours of sleep (1 item), number of awakenings (1 item), total WASO (1 item), quality of sleep (1 item). Hours of sleep subscale: numerical rating completed by the participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period is the night before. Hours of sleep subscale score ranges from 0-16 hours. Higher value indicates better sleep.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=165 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation for 12 weeks, re-randomized to 1 of the 3 active treatments (PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg) and dose was escalated to the assigned fixed dose over 2 weeks and continued up to 40 weeks followed by dose tapering over 1 week similar to the active treatment.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=170 Participants
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=161 Participants
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=174 Participants
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Hours of Sleep Subscale Score at Week 12
6.70 hours
Standard Deviation 1.16
7.00 hours
Standard Deviation 1.05
6.70 hours
Standard Deviation 1.19
6.80 hours
Standard Deviation 1.09

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least one post-randomization efficacy assessment on any efficacy scale. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) is signifying those participants who were evaluable for this measure for each group respectively.

SSQ: Participant-rated instrument used to assess previous night's sleep profile. It is used to measure sleep quantity and quality and is comprised of 5 items yielding 5 subscale scores: latency (1 item), hours of sleep (1 item), number of awakenings (1 item), total WASO (1 item), quality of sleep (1 item). Number of awakenings subscale: numerical rating completed by the participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period is the night before. Number of awakenings subscale score ranges from 0-30. Lower value indicates better sleep.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=165 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation for 12 weeks, re-randomized to 1 of the 3 active treatments (PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg) and dose was escalated to the assigned fixed dose over 2 weeks and continued up to 40 weeks followed by dose tapering over 1 week similar to the active treatment.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=170 Participants
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=161 Participants
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=174 Participants
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Number of Awakenings Subscale Score at Week 12
1.80 awakenings
Standard Deviation 2.14
1.10 awakenings
Standard Deviation 1.14
1.70 awakenings
Standard Deviation 1.22
1.50 awakenings
Standard Deviation 1.08

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least one post-randomization efficacy assessment on any efficacy scale. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) is signifying those participants who were evaluable for this measure for each group respectively.

SSQ: Participant-rated instrument used to assess previous night's sleep profile. It is used to measure sleep quantity and quality and is comprised of 5 items yielding 5 subscale scores: latency (1 item), hours of sleep (1 item), number of awakenings (1 item), total WASO (1 item), quality of sleep (1 item). Quality of sleep subscale: numerical rating completed by the participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period is the night before. Quality of sleep subscale score ranges from 0-100. Higher score indicates better quality of sleep.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=165 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation for 12 weeks, re-randomized to 1 of the 3 active treatments (PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg) and dose was escalated to the assigned fixed dose over 2 weeks and continued up to 40 weeks followed by dose tapering over 1 week similar to the active treatment.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=170 Participants
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=161 Participants
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=174 Participants
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Quality of Sleep Subscale Score at Week 12
57.70 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.27
66.50 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.00
57.40 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.83
60.20 Units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.43

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least one post-randomization efficacy assessment on any efficacy scale. Here, the 'N' (number of participants analyzed) is signifying those participants who were evaluable for this measure for each group respectively.

The RLS-NDI is a participant-rated instrument designed to assess daytime performance as related to RLS and the participant's previous night's sleep. The instrument consists of 14 items that encompass 5 domains: tiredness; emotional functioning; social functioning; cognitive functioning; and activities of daily living. There is also 1 global item assessing overall well -being. Each item is scored on a 0-10 numeric rating scale. Total score is the sum of scores from question 1 to 14. The total score ranges from 0 to 140 where higher scores indicate a more severe impact.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=31 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation for 12 weeks, re-randomized to 1 of the 3 active treatments (PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg) and dose was escalated to the assigned fixed dose over 2 weeks and continued up to 40 weeks followed by dose tapering over 1 week similar to the active treatment.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=26 Participants
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=30 Participants
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=34 Participants
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
RLS-Next Day Impact (RLS-NDI)
50.00 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 22.64
49.30 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 22.03
51.90 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.62
58.40 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 20.27

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least one post-randomization efficacy assessment on any efficacy scale. Here, the 'N' (number of participants analyzed) is signifying those participants who were evaluable for this measure for each group respectively.

The RLS-NDI is a participant-rated instrument designed to assess daytime performance as related to RLS and the participant's previous night's sleep. The instrument consists of 14 items that encompass 5 domains: tiredness; emotional functioning; social functioning; cognitive functioning; and activities of daily living. There is also 1 global item assessing overall well -being. Each item is scored on a 0-10 numeric rating scale. Total score is the sum of scores from question 1 to 14. The total score ranges from 0 to 140 where higher scores indicate a more severe impact.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=31 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation for 12 weeks, re-randomized to 1 of the 3 active treatments (PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg) and dose was escalated to the assigned fixed dose over 2 weeks and continued up to 40 weeks followed by dose tapering over 1 week similar to the active treatment.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=26 Participants
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=30 Participants
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=34 Participants
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Change From Baseline in RLS-NDI at Week 12
-6.60 Units on a Scale
Standard Error 2.68
-8.10 Units on a Scale
Standard Error 2.88
-4.30 Units on a Scale
Standard Error 2.65
-14.50 Units on a Scale
Standard Error 2.50

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least one post-randomization efficacy assessment on any efficacy scale. Here, the 'N' (number of participants analyzed) is signifying those participants who were evaluable for this measure for each group respectively.

100 millimeter (mm) line (Visual Analog Scale) marked by participant. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = worst possible pain.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=158 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation for 12 weeks, re-randomized to 1 of the 3 active treatments (PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg) and dose was escalated to the assigned fixed dose over 2 weeks and continued up to 40 weeks followed by dose tapering over 1 week similar to the active treatment.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=163 Participants
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=155 Participants
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=167 Participants
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Limb Pain-Visual Analog Scale (Limb Pain-VAS)
4.10 mm
Standard Deviation 2.52
4.20 mm
Standard Deviation 2.70
4.30 mm
Standard Deviation 2.58
4.00 mm
Standard Deviation 2.53

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least one post-randomization efficacy assessment on any efficacy scale. Here, the 'N' (number of participants analyzed) is signifying those participants who were evaluable for this measure for each group respectively.

100 mm line (VAS) marked by participant. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 mm = no pain to 100 mm = worst possible pain. Change = observation mean minus baseline mean.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=158 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation for 12 weeks, re-randomized to 1 of the 3 active treatments (PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg) and dose was escalated to the assigned fixed dose over 2 weeks and continued up to 40 weeks followed by dose tapering over 1 week similar to the active treatment.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=163 Participants
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=155 Participants
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=167 Participants
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Change From Baseline in Limb Pain-VAS at Week 12
-2.20 mm
Standard Error 0.20
-3.20 mm
Standard Error 0.20
-2.64 mm
Standard Error 0.20
-2.75 mm
Standard Error 0.21

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least one post-randomization efficacy assessment on any efficacy scale. Here, the 'N' (number of participants analyzed) is signifying those participants who were evaluable for this measure for each group respectively.

ASRS measures severity of augmentation and consist of three items to be completed by clinician. Clinician would score participants' answers by comparing post-baseline evaluations to those at baseline. ASRS total score range: 0-24, with higher score indicating more severe augmentation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=170 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation for 12 weeks, re-randomized to 1 of the 3 active treatments (PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg) and dose was escalated to the assigned fixed dose over 2 weeks and continued up to 40 weeks followed by dose tapering over 1 week similar to the active treatment.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=176 Participants
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=167 Participants
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=177 Participants
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Severity of Augmentation Symptoms at Week 12
1.40 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.95
0.90 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.60
1.60 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 2.29
1.30 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.87

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least one post-randomization efficacy assessment on any efficacy scale. Here, the 'N' (number of participants analyzed) is signifying those participants who were evaluable for this measure for each group respectively.

CGI-S: 7-point clinician rated scale to assess severity of participant's current illness state; range: 1 (normal-not ill at all) to 7 (among the most extremely ill participants). Higher score = more affected.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=173 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation for 12 weeks, re-randomized to 1 of the 3 active treatments (PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg) and dose was escalated to the assigned fixed dose over 2 weeks and continued up to 40 weeks followed by dose tapering over 1 week similar to the active treatment.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=176 Participants
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=169 Participants
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=178 Participants
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) at Week 12
3.70 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
2.90 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
3.50 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.22
3.10 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.17

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least one post-randomization efficacy assessment on any efficacy scale. Here, 'n' is signifying those participants who were evaluable for particular category for each group respectively.

MOS-SS: Participant rated instrument to assess sleep quantity, quality; comprised of 12 items yielding 7 subscale scores: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakening short of breath/headache, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity, optimal sleep, 2 composite index scores: sleep problems Index I, II. Sleep adequacy data was reported at week 12 and not for first 12 weeks (average). Subscale scores range: 0-100; exception quantity of sleep (range 0-24 hours). With exception of sleep quantity and sleep adequacy, higher scores reflect poorer sleep outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=174 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation for 12 weeks, re-randomized to 1 of the 3 active treatments (PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg) and dose was escalated to the assigned fixed dose over 2 weeks and continued up to 40 weeks followed by dose tapering over 1 week similar to the active treatment.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=177 Participants
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=169 Participants
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=178 Participants
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Week 12
Sleep disturbance (n = 175, 169, 178, 171)
38.60 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 21.43
30.50 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 21.84
39.30 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 23.72
34.40 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 20.89
Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Week 12
Sleep adequacy (n = 128, 120, 133, 125 )
50.00 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 28.74
61.30 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 28.57
54.80 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 29.45
55.20 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 27.87
Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Week 12
Sleep problem index II (n = 175, 169, 178, 171)
36.30 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 16.81
30.70 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 17.15
36.60 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.90
34.10 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 17.05
Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Week 12
Snoring (n = 172, 169, 178, 170)
24.60 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 24.57
29.00 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 27.50
25.80 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 28.46
25.80 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 25.81
Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Week 12
Awakening short of breath (n = 175, 169, 178, 171)
9.60 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 15.13
10.50 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 15.78
12.30 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 17.09
13.80 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.22
Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Week 12
Somnolence (n = 175, 169, 178, 171)
26.00 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.77
23.90 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 17.57
27.60 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.61
25.50 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.67
Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Week 12
Sleep quantity (n = 175, 169, 178, 171)
6.50 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
6.80 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
6.50 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.25
6.60 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Week 12
Sleep problem index I (n = 175, 169, 178, 171)
35.00 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 16.54
29.40 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 17.26
35.30 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.82
33.40 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 16.73

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least one post-randomization efficacy assessment on any efficacy scale. Here, the 'N' (number of participants analyzed) is signifying those participants who were evaluable for this measure for each group respectively.

MOS-SS: Participant rated instrument to assess sleep quantity, quality; comprised of 12 items yielding 7 subscale scores: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakening short of breath/ headache, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity, optimal sleep, 2 composite index scores: sleep problems Index I, II. Optimal sleep subscale scores range: 0-1; Optimal sleep = 1 if 'Average hours sleep' = 7 or 8, is 0 if 'Average hours sleep' is non-missing and less than 7, and is missing if 'Average hours sleep' is missing. Higher scores reflect better sleep outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=125 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation for 12 weeks, re-randomized to 1 of the 3 active treatments (PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg) and dose was escalated to the assigned fixed dose over 2 weeks and continued up to 40 weeks followed by dose tapering over 1 week similar to the active treatment.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=128 Participants
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=120 Participants
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=132 Participants
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Number of Participants With Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)- Optimal Sleep at Week 12
68 Participants
84 Participants
64 Participants
77 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: Data for this pre-specified outcome measure was collected and reported in individual participant listings but not statistically summarized for analysis due to lack of sufficient knowledge as how to analyze mood data inferentially in RLS population.

POMS are participant-rated instrument comprising 6 sub-scales (tension-anxiety, depression-dejection, anger-hostility, vigor-activity, fatigue-inertia, and confusion-bewilderment) and each subscale comprising 5 items, on 'How you feel right now?' (Scale: 0=not at all, 1=a little, 2=moderately, 3=quite a bit, 4=extremely). All items were rated in the same direction except for vigor-activity. A total score is obtained for each scale. The range of total score is 0 - 100, with higher score indicating more mood disturbance.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least one post-randomization efficacy assessment on any efficacy scale. Here, the 'N' (number of participants analyzed) is signifying those participants who were evaluable for this measure for each group respectively.

RLS QoL: Participant rated instrument used to assess the impact of RLS on quality of life and health status function (symptom severity, daily activity, social functioning, sleep, concentrating and decision making, traveling, sexual activity, and work) yielding a summary score ranging from 0-100. Higher scores reflect better quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=168 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation for 12 weeks, re-randomized to 1 of the 3 active treatments (PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg) and dose was escalated to the assigned fixed dose over 2 weeks and continued up to 40 weeks followed by dose tapering over 1 week similar to the active treatment.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=173 Participants
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=169 Participants
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=176 Participants
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Restless Legs Syndrome-Quality of Life Scale (RLS-QoL) at Week 12
73.23 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 13.98
77.75 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 10.92
73.33 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 13.02
75.48 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 12.69

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least one post-randomization efficacy assessment on any efficacy scale. Here, the 'N' (number of participants analyzed) is signifying those participants who were evaluable for this measure for each group respectively.

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being (physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health); 2 summary scores (physical and mental component); and self evaluated change in health status (summary of health status). The score for subscale scores and 2 summary score is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). Summary of health status is a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "0=much worse now" to "4=much better now". Higher subscale and summary score reflect better health status.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=171 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation for 12 weeks, re-randomized to 1 of the 3 active treatments (PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg) and dose was escalated to the assigned fixed dose over 2 weeks and continued up to 40 weeks followed by dose tapering over 1 week similar to the active treatment.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=175 Participants
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=168 Participants
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=178 Participants
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Medical Outcomes Study-Short Form 36 (SF-36) at Week 12
Social functioning
86.80 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.37
87.20 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.01
84.50 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.14
84.00 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.75
Medical Outcomes Study-Short Form 36 (SF-36) at Week 12
Mental health
78.70 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 15.23
77.40 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 16.13
74.60 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 16.80
76.10 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 16.29
Medical Outcomes Study-Short Form 36 (SF-36) at Week 12
Summary mental score
78.00 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 15.76
78.00 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 15.73
75.50 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 15.60
76.10 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 15.32
Medical Outcomes Study-Short Form 36 (SF-36) at Week 12
Physical functioning
83.00 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 19.22
83.70 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.30
81.90 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 19.56
82.40 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 19.98
Medical Outcomes Study-Short Form 36 (SF-36) at Week 12
Role physical
81.50 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 19.70
81.20 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 20.75
79.60 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 19.37
79.10 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 20.71
Medical Outcomes Study-Short Form 36 (SF-36) at Week 12
Bodily pain
65.50 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 20.03
73.30 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 20.51
65.20 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 20.14
69.00 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 20.40
Medical Outcomes Study-Short Form 36 (SF-36) at Week 12
General health
72.80 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 19.47
73.60 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.37
69.80 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.33
70.50 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 17.68
Medical Outcomes Study-Short Form 36 (SF-36) at Week 12
Vitality
59.30 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 20.51
62.40 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 19.27
59.00 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 19.69
59.80 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 20.17
Medical Outcomes Study-Short Form 36 (SF-36) at Week 12
Role emotional
87.00 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.25
85.10 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.91
83.90 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 17.77
84.60 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 18.09
Medical Outcomes Study-Short Form 36 (SF-36) at Week 12
Summary physical score
75.70 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 16.03
78.00 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 16.50
74.20 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 15.92
75.30 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 16.43
Medical Outcomes Study-Short Form 36 (SF-36) at Week 12
Summary of health status
3.10 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.53
3.10 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.47
3.10 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
3.20 Units on a Scale
Standard Deviation 0.54

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least one post-randomization efficacy assessment on any efficacy scale. Here, 'n' is signifying those participants who were evaluable for particular category for each group respectively.

WPAI: 6 question participant rated questionnaire to determine degree to which SHP affected work productivity while at work and outside of work. Four scores are derived: percentage of absenteeism and presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), overall work impairment score combining absenteeism and presenteeism, percentage of impairment in activities performed outside of work. Score range: 0 (not affected/no impairment) to 10 (completely affected/impaired). WPAI outcomes expressed as impairment percentages with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=174 Participants
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation for 12 weeks, re-randomized to 1 of the 3 active treatments (PGB 300 mg/ PPX 0.5 mg/ PPX 0.25 mg) and dose was escalated to the assigned fixed dose over 2 weeks and continued up to 40 weeks followed by dose tapering over 1 week similar to the active treatment.
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=177 Participants
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=169 Participants
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=178 Participants
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) at Week 12
Overall work (n= 10, 7, 11, 10)
14.60 Percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 23.39
6.00 Percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 9.66
5.70 Percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 11.34
9.10 Percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 20.71
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) at Week 12
Work time missed (n= 10, 7, 11, 10)
1.50 Percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 3.62
0.00 Percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 0.00
0.00 Percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 0.00
0.00 Percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 0.00
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) at Week 12
Activity (n= 18, 22, 25, 20)
23.00 Percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 24.52
12.20 Percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 19.27
20.90 Percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 24.28
22.80 Percentage of impairment
Standard Deviation 23.01

Adverse Events

Pregabalin 300 mg

Serious events: 9 serious events
Other events: 134 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Pramipexole 0.25 mg

Serious events: 12 serious events
Other events: 110 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Pramipexole 0.5 mg

Serious events: 9 serious events
Other events: 118 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo to Pregabalin 300 mg

Serious events: 5 serious events
Other events: 42 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo to Pramipexole 0.25 mg

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 34 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo to Pramipexole 0.5 mg

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 41 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=182 participants at risk
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=178 participants at risk
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=180 participants at risk
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Placebo to Pregabalin 300 mg
n=59 participants at risk
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) for 12 weeks, re-randomized to PGB 300 mg following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 40 weeks. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Placebo to Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=59 participants at risk
PBO capsules matched to PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily and Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) for 12 weeks, re-randomized to PPX 0.25 mg following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily and Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 40 weeks. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Placebo to Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=61 participants at risk
PBO capsules matched to PPX 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) for 12 weeks, re-randomized to PPX 0.5 mg following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 40 weeks. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
0.55%
1/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Bradyarrhythmia
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders
Amaurosis fugax
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis acute
0.55%
1/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Chest pain
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.1%
2/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Device dislocation
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
1/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatitis acute
0.55%
1/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Immune system disorders
Allergy to arthropod sting
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle fracture
0.55%
1/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.1%
2/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fractured coccyx
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hand fracture
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rib fracture
0.55%
1/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tendon rupture
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tibia fracture
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound
0.55%
1/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
0.55%
1/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal osteoarthritis
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
1/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gastric cancer
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery stenosis
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
1/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Loss of consciousness
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Multiple sclerosis
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
1/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Neurological symptom
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
0.55%
1/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
0.55%
1/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Mental status changes
0.55%
1/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideation
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
1/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Withdrawal syndrome
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
1/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Bladder dysplasia
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Surgical and medical procedures
Bladder calculus removal
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Surgical and medical procedures
Spinal deformity correction
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
1/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
0.55%
1/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
0.00%
0/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Pregabalin 300 mg
n=182 participants at risk
Pregabalin (PGB) capsule 300 milligram (mg) once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with placebo (PBO) capsule matched to PGB 300 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=178 participants at risk
Pramipexole (PPX) 0.25 mg capsules administered once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.25 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=180 participants at risk
PPX capsule 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 52 weeks along with PBO capsule matched to PPX 0.5 mg in week 13 and 14. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Placebo to Pregabalin 300 mg
n=59 participants at risk
PBO capsules matched to PGB 300 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) for 12 weeks, re-randomized to PGB 300 mg following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 75 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 150 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 300 mg once daily) up to 40 weeks. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PGB 150 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 75 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Placebo to Pramipexole 0.25 mg
n=59 participants at risk
PBO capsules matched to PPX 0.25 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily and Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) for 12 weeks, re-randomized to PPX 0.25 mg following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily and Day 6 onwards: 0.25 mg once daily) up to 40 weeks. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.125 mg once daily (Day 1-3) and matching PBO capsule once daily (Day 4-7) after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Placebo to Pramipexole 0.5 mg
n=61 participants at risk
PBO capsules matched to PPX 0.5 mg once daily following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) for 12 weeks, re-randomized to PPX 0.5 mg following a two week up escalation (Day 1-5: 0.125 mg once daily; Day 6-10: 0.25 mg once daily and Day 11 onwards: 0.5 mg once daily) up to 40 weeks. Participants were administered a tapering dose of PPX 0.25 mg once daily (Day 1-3); 0.125 mg once daily (Day 4-6) and matching PBO capsule once daily on Day 7 after completion of 52 weeks treatment.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
7.1%
13/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.1%
2/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.8%
5/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.1%
3/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
1.6%
3/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
4/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.1%
3/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
1/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
2.7%
5/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.1%
9/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.8%
5/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.8%
4/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
1/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.9%
3/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
7.7%
14/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
3/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.1%
2/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
8.5%
5/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
1/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
3.8%
7/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.1%
9/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.6%
10/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.4%
2/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
8.5%
5/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
8.2%
5/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
4.9%
9/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
4/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
7.8%
14/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.4%
2/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
1/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.3%
2/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
6.0%
11/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
10.1%
18/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
14.4%
26/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.1%
3/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.1%
3/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.6%
4/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
1.6%
3/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
4/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.6%
10/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.1%
3/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.4%
2/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
8.2%
5/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Fatigue
12.6%
23/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
10.7%
19/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
12.2%
22/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
11.9%
7/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
8.5%
5/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
13.1%
8/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Irritability
2.7%
5/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.1%
9/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.1%
2/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.4%
2/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
1/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
6.6%
12/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
4/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.3%
6/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
1/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.4%
2/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
1.6%
3/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
4/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
1/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
1/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.6%
4/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Influenza
4.9%
9/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
7.3%
13/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
3/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.8%
4/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
13.6%
8/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
11.5%
7/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
10.4%
19/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
11.2%
20/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.4%
17/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.1%
3/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.1%
3/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
14.8%
9/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
3.3%
6/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
3/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
4/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.8%
4/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.8%
4/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
3.3%
6/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.1%
2/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.3%
6/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.1%
3/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.1%
3/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.3%
2/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Investigations
Weight increased
8.8%
16/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.7%
12/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.7%
12/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.4%
2/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
11.9%
7/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.6%
4/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
3.8%
7/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.1%
9/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.4%
8/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
1/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.1%
3/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.6%
4/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
5.5%
10/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
8.4%
15/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
7.2%
13/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.4%
2/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.8%
4/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.6%
4/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
2.7%
5/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
4/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
4/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
1/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.1%
3/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.3%
2/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
3.8%
7/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.9%
7/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.9%
7/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.8%
4/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.4%
2/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Balance disorder
1.1%
2/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.1%
2/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.56%
1/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.8%
4/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
21.4%
39/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
8.4%
15/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.4%
17/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
16.9%
10/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
10.2%
6/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.9%
3/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
12.1%
22/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
16.9%
30/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
19.4%
35/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
15.3%
9/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
10.2%
6/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
19.7%
12/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
2.7%
5/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
4/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
3/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.1%
3/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
1/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
17.6%
32/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.7%
12/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
7.8%
14/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
11.9%
7/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.8%
4/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
8.2%
5/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
5.5%
10/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
4/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.9%
7/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.1%
3/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.4%
2/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.3%
2/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
2.2%
4/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.9%
7/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.9%
7/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.8%
4/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.6%
1/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
3.8%
7/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.4%
6/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
4/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.7%
1/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.1%
3/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.3%
2/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic hypotension
0.55%
1/182
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/178
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/180
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.1%
3/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/59
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/61
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.

Additional Information

Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center

Pfizer, Inc.

Phone: 1-800-718-1021

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER