Trial Outcomes & Findings for Varenicline for Cognitive Deficits and Cigarette Smoking in Schizophrenia - Efficacy and Predictors (NCT NCT00802919)

NCT ID: NCT00802919

Last Updated: 2017-12-02

Results Overview

plasma cotinine

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE4

Target enrollment

93 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks

Results posted on

2017-12-02

Participant Flow

Overall, 93 subjects were consented, 2 withdrew consent before randomization, and 87 provided evaluable data on at least one outcome measure. The number enrolled 93, is less than the number started 91, because 2 patients withdrew consent before randomization

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Varenicline
Varenicline 1-2 mg/day Varenicline: Varenicline 1-2 mg/day
Matched Placebo
placebo for varenicline Placebo for varenicline: Placebo
Overall Study
STARTED
45
46
Overall Study
COMPLETED
42
45
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
3
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Varenicline for Cognitive Deficits and Cigarette Smoking in Schizophrenia - Efficacy and Predictors

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Varenicline
n=42 Participants
Varenicline 1-2 mg/day Varenicline: Varenicline 1-2 mg/day
Matched Placebo
n=45 Participants
placebo for varenicline Placebo for varenicline: Placebo
Total
n=87 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
46.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9 • n=5 Participants
43.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 • n=7 Participants
44.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
39 Participants
n=7 Participants
74 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
white
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
black-AA
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
hispanic
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
chinese han
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
22 participants
n=5 Participants
27 participants
n=7 Participants
49 participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
China
8 participants
n=5 Participants
8 participants
n=7 Participants
16 participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
12 participants
n=5 Participants
10 participants
n=7 Participants
22 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks

Population: Data were available for cotinine analysis in mixed model analysis of co covariance on 34 participants in the varenicline arms and 36 participants in the placebo arm.

plasma cotinine

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Varenicline
n=34 Participants
Varenicline 1-2 mg/day Varenicline: Varenicline 1-2 mg/day
Matched Placebo
n=36 Participants
placebo for varenicline Placebo for varenicline: Placebo
Cotinine Level
baseline
257.9 cotinine ng/ml
Standard Error 15.9
258.6 cotinine ng/ml
Standard Error 18.4
Cotinine Level
week4
176.0 cotinine ng/ml
Standard Error 16.0
252.1 cotinine ng/ml
Standard Error 18.7
Cotinine Level
week8
147.0 cotinine ng/ml
Standard Error 17.9
264.6 cotinine ng/ml
Standard Error 18.9

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: basline and 8 weeks (or end of study iif patient ended participation before the 8-weeks)

Population: N's varied from 25-32 in varenicline group and 29-35 in placebo group because all subjects did not complete all parts of MATRICS battery.Maximum number of participants is entered for number of participants because this cell entry does not allow entry of variable number of participations ( e.g. 25-32). for different scores..

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB)(Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia) was used to measure cognitive performance. Six Domain scores and a Composite score are calculated by the proprietary MCCB Computer Scoring Program (modified beta version) from raw scores on 10 individually administered subtests. The social cognition test was not assessed in this study. The Domain T-scores are percentile-ranked and range from \<20 (\<0.1 percentile) to \>80 (\>99.9 percentile). The Composite scores are also percentile-ranked and range from \<213 (T\<20, \<0.1 percentile) to \>487 (T\>80, \>99.9 percentile). Higher scores after baseline represent better outcomes. Here we report difference scores from post-treatment and baseline with positive difference scores representing better outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Varenicline
n=32 Participants
Varenicline 1-2 mg/day Varenicline: Varenicline 1-2 mg/day
Matched Placebo
n=35 Participants
placebo for varenicline Placebo for varenicline: Placebo
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance
MATRICS composite score diff from baseline
-0.19 T scores from MATRICS battery
Standard Error 2.14
1.97 T scores from MATRICS battery
Standard Error 1.86
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance
MATRICS Speed of Processing diff from baseline
3.03 T scores from MATRICS battery
Standard Error 1.52
4.08 T scores from MATRICS battery
Standard Error 1.56
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance
MATRICS attention-vigilance diff from baseline
2.49 T scores from MATRICS battery
Standard Error 1.99
4.33 T scores from MATRICS battery
Standard Error 1.95
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance
MATRICS working memory diff from baseline
0.95 T scores from MATRICS battery
Standard Error 1.82
5.29 T scores from MATRICS battery
Standard Error 1.88
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance
MATRICS visual learning diff from baseline
4.75 T scores from MATRICS battery
Standard Error 2.26
7.85 T scores from MATRICS battery
Standard Error 2.30
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance
MATRICS reasoning-rob sol diff from baseline
0.38 T scores from MATRICS battery
Standard Error 0.78
2.79 T scores from MATRICS battery
Standard Error 0.81
Change From Baseline in Cognitive Performance
MATRICS verbal learning diff from baseline
0.94 T scores from MATRICS battery
Standard Error 1.00
0.01 T scores from MATRICS battery
Standard Error 1.04

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks

The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was used to measure psychiatric symptoms. Item scores ranged from 1 (Absent) to 6 (Severe) for symptoms on the Positive Scale (total subscale range: 7-42), the Negative Scale (total subscale range: 7-42), and the General Psychopathology Scale (total subscale range:16-96). All three subscales were summed for the PANSS total score (total scale range: 30-180). Scores closer to 30 after baseline represented better outcomes. Here we report difference scores from post-treatment and baseline with negative difference scores representing better outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Varenicline
n=39 Participants
Varenicline 1-2 mg/day Varenicline: Varenicline 1-2 mg/day
Matched Placebo
n=38 Participants
placebo for varenicline Placebo for varenicline: Placebo
Change From Baseline in Psychiatric Symptoms
PANSS Total wk4 -baseline diff
-3.56 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.29
-0.86 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.42
Change From Baseline in Psychiatric Symptoms
PANSS Total wk8-baseline diff
-3.05 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.35
-0.97 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.40
Change From Baseline in Psychiatric Symptoms
PANSS Depression Factor wk4-basline diff
-0.67 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.24
0.23 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.26
Change From Baseline in Psychiatric Symptoms
PANSS depressor factor wk8-baseline diff
-0.67 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.25
-0.10 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.25

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks

Population: Not all patients had relevant responses on Calgary Depression Scale. Data are analyzed for 36 subjects randomized to varenicline and 38 subjects randomized to placebo (total N=74).

The Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia. The scale has 9 items with ratings of 0 to 3 on each item. Total score can vary from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate more depression. Negative change scores indicate decreasing depression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Varenicline
n=36 Participants
Varenicline 1-2 mg/day Varenicline: Varenicline 1-2 mg/day
Matched Placebo
n=38 Participants
placebo for varenicline Placebo for varenicline: Placebo
Change From Basellne in Calgary Depression Scale Score
Calgrapy Dep totl wk4-baseline diff
-0.63 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.24
-0.72 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.27
Change From Basellne in Calgary Depression Scale Score
calgrapy dep wk8-baseline diff
-0.79 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.26
-0.88 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.26

Adverse Events

Varenicline

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Matched Placebo

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Varenicline
n=45 participants at risk
Varenicline 1-2 mg/day Varenicline: Varenicline 1-2 mg/day
Matched Placebo
n=46 participants at risk
placebo for varenicline Placebo for varenicline: Placebo
Psychiatric disorders
psychiatric decompensation not study drug related
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1
0.00%
0/46
Psychiatric disorders
auditory hallucination not study drug related
2.2%
1/45 • Number of events 1
0.00%
0/46
Psychiatric disorders
verbal agression
0.00%
0/45
2.2%
1/46 • Number of events 1

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Robert C. Smith MD

Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research

Phone: 845-398-6531

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place