A Study of Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Using Oxaliplatin, Capecitabine With or Without Cetuximab
NCT ID: NCT00795301
Last Updated: 2014-01-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE2
74 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Secondary Objectives
1. To evaluate the incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities with each of the two neoadjuvant regimens and during the 30-day post-operative period.
2. To estimate the clinical tumour response rate and sphincter preservation rate with each of the two neoadjuvant regimens.
3. To correlate EGRF gene amplification with pathological response rate in those treated with cetuximab.
4. To estimate the pattern of failure.
5. To establish an annotated tissue library with samples being obtained prior to therapy and following therapy (at the time of surgery).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Oxaliplatin, Capecitabine, and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced Cancer of the Rectum
NCT00086931
S0713: Oxaliplatin, Capecitabine, Cetuximab, and RT Followed By Surgery in Pts W/Stage II or III Rectal Cancer
NCT00686166
Treatment of Patients With Advanced Rectum Cancer With Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin Before, Under and After Radiation and With Adding Cetuximab to K-RAS Wild-type Patients
NCT00964457
Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, and Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients Who Are Undergoing Surgery for Stage I Rectal Cancer
NCT00114231
A Phase 1-2 Trial of Cetuximab in Combination With Oxaliplatin, Capecitabine, and Radiation Therapy Followed by Surgery for Locally-advanced Rectal Cancer
NCT00226941
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hypothesis: Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeted against the EGF receptor, is active in metastatic colorectal cancer and a radio-sensitizer. In colorectal cancer, the presence of KRAS mutation has been associated with the absence of response to cetuximab. We hypothesise that the addition of cetuximab to CAPOX concurrent with neoadjuvant radiotherapy only benefited patients whose tumours do not have the KRAS mutation and therefore, personalizing cetuximab therapy based on tumour KRAS mutation status may yield a higher pathological response.
Methods: This study employed a standard 2-stage Phase II design to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens. The assignment of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy will be determined by the KRAS mutation status of the tumor. Subjects with KRAS mutation will receive CAPOX. Subjects with no KRAS mutation will be randomized to receive CAPOX +/- cetuximab.Definitive surgery is scheduled for 6-8 weeks after the completion of chemoradiotherapy. Surgical management will be a sphincter preservation approach whenever possible, using the total mesorectal excision technique.After the operation, pathologic evaluation of the surgical specimen will be performed.
Significance:In this proof-of-concept study, we aim to demonstrate that using an enriched patient cohort to test our hypothesis that the addition of cetuximab will yield a higher pathological response rate in KRAS mutation-negative rectal cancer. This approach can potentially identify a subset of patients that may benefit from cetuximab and spare those who may not benefit from unnecessary treatment toxicities and costs. Our study will help to prioritise novel targeted agents for a smaller, faster, and less expensive confirmatory phase III trials.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
TREATMENT
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Capecitabine, Cetuximab, Oxaliplatin
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients must have normal organ and marrow function as defined below:
leukocytes \>3,000/mcL absolute neutrophil count \>1,500/mcL platelets \>100,000/mcL total bilirubin within normal institutional limits AST(SGOT)/ALT(SGPT) greater than 2.5 X institutional upper limit of normal creatinine within normal institutional limits
3. Age \>21 years
4. Patients must have ECOG performance status of 0-2.
5. Patients must be 18 years old or greater.
6. The tumor must be considered by the surgeon to be amenable to curative resection.
7. Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
8. Women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry and for the duration of study participation. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients may not be receiving any other investigational agents.
3. Patients with stage I or IV cancer of the rectum.
4. History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to cetuximab, oxaliplatin or capecitabine.
5. Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
6. Inability to take oral medications.
7. Pregnant women are excluded from this study because agents use in the study may cause fetal harm.
8. HIV-positive patients on combination antiretroviral therapy are ineligible because of the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions with docetaxel. In addition, these patients are at increased risk of lethal infections when treated with marrow-suppressive therapy.
9. History of other malignancies within 5 years, except non-melanoma skin cancer, in situ carcinoma of the cervix or ductal carcinoma of the breast. Previous invasive cancer permitted if disease-free at least 5 years.
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National University Hospital, Singapore
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
National University Hospital
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wei Peng Yong, MRCP, MB ChB
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National University Hospital, Singapore
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National University Hospital
Singapore, , Singapore
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lievre A, Bachet JB, Le Corre D, Boige V, Landi B, Emile JF, Cote JF, Tomasic G, Penna C, Ducreux M, Rougier P, Penault-Llorca F, Laurent-Puig P. KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2006 Apr 15;66(8):3992-5. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0191.
Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rodel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, Martus P, Tschmelitsch J, Hager E, Hess CF, Karstens JH, Liersch T, Schmidberger H, Raab R; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 21;351(17):1731-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040694.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CR02/06/07
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.