Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of Low Level Laser Therapy and Word Recognition in Hearing Impaired Individuals (NCT NCT00787189)
NCT ID: NCT00787189
Last Updated: 2021-05-28
Results Overview
Participants were asked to repeat 50 words presented one at a time through headphones to each ear separately at a comfortable listening level to the participant. The 50 words were from a phonetically-balanced list of monosyllabic words called the Central Institute for the Deaf (CID) W-22 lists. For each ear, each word repeated correctly was scored '1'. The total number correct for each ear was summed and multiplied by 2 to attain the percent of total words repeated correctly for each ear. The change in this percent from baseline to one week after study treatment was referenced against a chart. If the change was equal to or greater than the corresponding value in the chart, the participant was considered to have a successful study outcome.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
baseline and one week
2021-05-28
Participant Flow
40 subjects (80 ears) were recruited across two hearing aid and evaluation test sites from May, 2007 to October, 2008.
4 subjects (8 ears) were disqualified because the word recognition score recorded for study qualification purposes exceeded the upper inclusive limit of 86% words correct. 4 subjects (8 ears) were disqualified because the subject's primary spoken language was not English, which was also a study exclusion criteria.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Active
Active laser device
|
Control
Placebo laser device
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
32
|
32
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
30
|
30
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Active
Active laser device
|
Control
Placebo laser device
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study of Low Level Laser Therapy and Word Recognition in Hearing Impaired Individuals
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Active
n=32 Participants
Active laser device
|
Control
n=32 Participants
Placebo laser device
|
Total
n=64 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
78.94 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.92 • n=5 Participants
|
76.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.86 • n=7 Participants
|
77.47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.265 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline and one weekParticipants were asked to repeat 50 words presented one at a time through headphones to each ear separately at a comfortable listening level to the participant. The 50 words were from a phonetically-balanced list of monosyllabic words called the Central Institute for the Deaf (CID) W-22 lists. For each ear, each word repeated correctly was scored '1'. The total number correct for each ear was summed and multiplied by 2 to attain the percent of total words repeated correctly for each ear. The change in this percent from baseline to one week after study treatment was referenced against a chart. If the change was equal to or greater than the corresponding value in the chart, the participant was considered to have a successful study outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active
n=32 Participants
Active laser device
|
Control
n=32 Participants
Placebo laser device
|
|---|---|---|
|
Participants Whose Change in Percent Correct Word Recognition Scores From Baseline to One Week After Study Treatment Equalled or Exceeded the Minimum Change in a Reference Chart.
|
15 participants
|
2 participants
|
Adverse Events
Active
Control
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Elvira Walls, Clinical Consultant
Regulatory Insight, Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place