Chemotherapy With or Without Enoxaparin in Pancreatic Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00785421

Last Updated: 2015-01-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

312 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-04-30

Study Completion Date

2009-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of chemotherapy with or without enoxaparin. This study is powered to decrease the DVT/ VTE events rate from 10% to 3% with enoxaparin in the experimental arm.

N=540pts, dropout-rate 15%, power 80 %, two sided, significant level 5%

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Approximately 20% of patients (pts) diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) develop venous thromboembolism, which may contribute to the dismal prognosis of PA. A small phase II trial suggested an improved survival by the addition of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to chemotherapy. We conducted a small pilot study which indicated that the addition of enoxaparin to chemotherapy GFFC chemotherapy is safe and feasible in pts with advanced PA. Furthermore, results of several phase III studies suggest that pts in good performance status may benefit from more intensive chemotherapy regimen (Riess et al; Heinemann et al; ASCO 2005). Based on these considerations we started the multicenter phase III study CONKO 004.

540 patients are to be recruited into this study. Primary stratification takes place according to Karnofsky performance status and kidney function. Patients with KPS \> 80% and normal kidney function receive GFFC +/- LMWH (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 (30 min), cisplatin 30 mg/m2 (90 min), 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 (24 h), folinic acid 200 mg/m2 (30 min), d1, 8; q3w +/- Enoxaparin 1mg/kg daily s.c.). Pts with KPS \< 80 % and increased creatinin plasma levels (\>1.3 mg/dl) receive the current standard therapy (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 (30 min), d1, 8, 15; q4w) +/- LMWM +/- Enoxaparin 1mg/kg daily s.c. After 12 weeks of initial chemotherapy all patients who have not progressed received the standard therapy (gemcitabine mono) +/- Enoxaparin 40mg/d s.c.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatic Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

Patients with KPS \> 80% and normal kidney function receive GFFC + LMWH (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 (30 min), cisplatin 30 mg/m2 (90 min), 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 (24 h), folinic acid 200 mg/m2 (30 min), d1, 8; q3w +/- Enoxaparin 1mg/kg daily s.c.).

Pts with KPS \< 80 % and increased creatinin plasma levels (\>1.3 mg/dl) receive the current standard therapy (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 (30 min), d1, 8, 15; q4w) + Enoxaparin 1mg/kg daily s.c.

After 12 weeks of initial chemotherapy all patients who have not progressed received the standard therapy (gemcitabine mono) + Enoxaparin 40mg/d s.c.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

enoxaparin

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients receive GFFC +/- LMWH (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 (30 min), cisplatin 30 mg/m2 (90 min), 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 (24 h), folinic acid 200 mg/m2 (30 min), d1, 8; q3w +/- Enoxaparin 1mg/kg daily s.c.). Pts with KPS \< 80 % and increased creatinin plasma levels (\>1.3 mg/dl) receive the current standard therapy (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 (30 min), d1, 8, 15; q4w) +/- LMWM +/- Enoxaparin 1mg/kg daily s.c. After 12 weeks of initial chemotherapy all patients who have not progressed received the standard therapy (gemcitabine mono) +/- Enoxaparin 40mg/d s.c.

chemotherapy with LMWH - enoxaparin

Intervention Type DRUG

1-12 weeks: enoxaparin 1g/m², s.c. 12-PD or event: enoxaparin 0,4g s.c.

B

Patients with KPS \> 80% and normal kidney function receive GFFC - LMWH (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 (30 min), cisplatin 30 mg/m2 (90 min), 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 (24 h), folinic acid 200 mg/m2 (30 min), d1, 8; q3w - Enoxaparin 1mg/kg daily s.c.).

Pts with KPS \< 80 % and increased creatinin plasma levels (\>1.3 mg/dl) receive the current standard therapy (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 (30 min), d1, 8, 15; q4w) - Enoxaparin 1mg/kg daily s.c.

After 12 weeks of initial chemotherapy all patients who have not progressed received the standard therapy (gemcitabine mono) - Enoxaparin 40mg/d s.c.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

only chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

observation, no treatment with LMWH

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

enoxaparin

Patients receive GFFC +/- LMWH (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 (30 min), cisplatin 30 mg/m2 (90 min), 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 (24 h), folinic acid 200 mg/m2 (30 min), d1, 8; q3w +/- Enoxaparin 1mg/kg daily s.c.). Pts with KPS \< 80 % and increased creatinin plasma levels (\>1.3 mg/dl) receive the current standard therapy (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 (30 min), d1, 8, 15; q4w) +/- LMWM +/- Enoxaparin 1mg/kg daily s.c. After 12 weeks of initial chemotherapy all patients who have not progressed received the standard therapy (gemcitabine mono) +/- Enoxaparin 40mg/d s.c.

Intervention Type DRUG

chemotherapy with LMWH - enoxaparin

1-12 weeks: enoxaparin 1g/m², s.c. 12-PD or event: enoxaparin 0,4g s.c.

Intervention Type DRUG

only chemotherapy

observation, no treatment with LMWH

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

gemcitabine cisplatin folinic acid 5-FU gemcitabine cisplatin folinic acid 5-FU gemcitabin cisplatin folinic acid 5-FU

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* histological or cytological pancreatic carcinoma, stage IV A, b
* no preceding radio or chemotherapy of the primarius or the reference lesions
* Karnofsky performance status ≥ 60%
* measurable tumor lesion by spiral CT or MRT not older than 14 days
* no deep venous thrombosis within the last 2 years
* patient compliance and geographical proximity of the residence, which make an adequate follow up possible
* sufficient bone marrow reserve: leukocyte ≥ 3.5 × 109 /l, thrombocyte ≥ 100 × 109 /l
* signed informed consent
* minimum age of 18 years
* women/men must provide sufficient pregnancy prevention

Exclusion Criteria

* preexisting indication for anti-coagulation of other reason
* bleeding in the last 2 weeks or increased bleeding risk (e.g. serious coagulating disturbance, active stomach or intestine ulzera, or had operational interferences in the last 2 weeks)
* body weight \< 45 kg and/or \> 100 kg
* pregnancy or insufficient preventing methods in the study process
* serious illness, which are incompatible with a study participation
* hypersensitivity to study drugs
* patients with serious kidney malfunction (Creatininclearance \< 30 ml/min)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sanofi

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Amgen

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Eli Lilly and Company

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

CONKO-Studiengruppe

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Uwe Pelzer MD

Dr. med. Uwe Pelzer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hanno Riess, PHD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

CONKO Study Group

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universitätsmedizin - Berlin - Charite

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rutjes AW, Porreca E, Candeloro M, Valeriani E, Di Nisio M. Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 18;12(12):CD008500. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008500.pub5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33337539 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CCT-NAPN-16752

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CONKO 004

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.