Comparative Efficacy of Bifonazole Cream vs Placebo After Nail Ablation With Urea Paste

NCT ID: NCT00781820

Last Updated: 2013-06-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

693 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-10-31

Study Completion Date

2010-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study is focused to prove that the efficacy of a 1% Bifonazole cream is superior to a placebo cream after non-surgical nail ablation with a 40% urea paste.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Onychomycosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 2

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo cream

Intervention Type DRUG

1 squeeze of Placebo cream sufficient to cover the infected nail bed(s) with a thin layer once daily for 28 days after nail ablation with urea paste

Arm 1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bifonazole cream 1%

Intervention Type DRUG

1 squeeze of Bifonazole cream sufficient to cover the infected nail bed(s) with a thin layer once daily for 28 days after nail ablation with urea paste

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bifonazole cream 1%

1 squeeze of Bifonazole cream sufficient to cover the infected nail bed(s) with a thin layer once daily for 28 days after nail ablation with urea paste

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo cream

1 squeeze of Placebo cream sufficient to cover the infected nail bed(s) with a thin layer once daily for 28 days after nail ablation with urea paste

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age of at least 18 years;
* Positive clinical findings of onychomycosis according to the judgement of the investigator (e.g. thickening, discoloration, structural changes, misshaped nails);
* Positive mycological findings (positive microscopy and positive culture with identification of pathogen) in material taken from affected nail sites before the start of treatment;
* Nail mycosis with an affected nail area between 20% and 50% in the target nail,
* Nail mycosis in not more than 3 nails (each nail not more than 50% infected area)

Exclusion Criteria

* Doubtful or negative mycological findings;
* Proximal subungual onychomycosis (PSO);
* Topical antimycotic treatment of feet or hands within 4 weeks prior to screening, topical treatment of onychomycosis of feet or hands within 12 weeks prior to screening;
* Systemic antimycotic treatment within 12 weeks prior to screening;
* Failure to treat tinea pedis/manus (diagnosed at screening) successfully with topical treatment between screening visit and visit 1 (baseline);
* Tinea pedis/manus at visit 1 (baseline);
* Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
* Psoriasis
* Peripheral arterial disease
* Chronic venous insufficiency;
* Diabetic neuropathy;
* History of hypersensitivity to bifonazole, or any other similar pharmacological agents or components of the products;
* Known sensitivity to plasters.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bayer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bayer Consumer Care Inc.

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bayer Study Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Bayer

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chomutov, , Czechia

Site Status

Hlinsko, , Czechia

Site Status

Kutná Hora, , Czechia

Site Status

Louny, , Czechia

Site Status

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Rychnov nad Kněžnou, , Czechia

Site Status

Slaný, , Czechia

Site Status

Svitavy, , Czechia

Site Status

Ústí nad Labem, , Czechia

Site Status

Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Murnau am Staffelsee, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Oberschleißheim, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Straubing, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Potsdam, Brandenburg, Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, City state of Hamburg, Germany

Site Status

Frankenberg, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Marburg, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Northeim, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Wuppertal, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Chemnitz, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Dresden, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Dresden, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Leipzig, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Löbau, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Reichenbach, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany

Site Status

Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Gera, Thuringia, Germany

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Olsztyn, , Poland

Site Status

Pruszków, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Czechia Germany Poland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008-003215-13

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

12999

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.