Does Pulmonary Rehabilitation Change Self-Selected And Maximum Sustainable Walking Speed In Patients With Lung Disease?

NCT ID: NCT00781183

Last Updated: 2012-12-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-01-31

Study Completion Date

2010-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Exercise training has been shown to reduce breathlessness and improve the exercise tolerance of people with lung disease. However, the effect of exercise training on the walking speed selected by these people during day-to-day life is unknown. Furthermore,the investigator do not know if exercise training changes the maximum speed that these people can walk at for a long period of time. This study will examine the relationship between walking speed and walking endurance before and following exercise training in people with lung disease and contribute importantly to our understanding of how patients choose to walk in relation to their capabilities.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is considered a standard of care for patients with symptomatic lung disease. It has achieved strong evidence for reducing symptoms and improving exercise tolerance. Walking is the most common form of physical activity and most individuals need to walk in the course of their daily activities. Chosen walking speed is a good indicator of the debilitating effects of disease and improvement in usual walk speed has been associated with a substantial reduction in mortality in elderly subjects. Therefore, it is important for clinicians to understand how patients choose to walk in relation to their capabilities as well as to know how this relationship changes with PR.

The main purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between walking speed and walking endurance before and after PR.

Primary aim: to estimate the maximum walking speed that can be sustained for \> 24 min (i.e. maximum sustainable walking speed; MSWS) from the relationship between walking speed and walking time in patients with symptomatic lung disease.

Secondary aims: (i) to determine if chosen speed during the endurance walk test is different from the MSWS, (ii) to determine if MSWS and speed chosen for the endurance walk test changes in response to PR and, (iii) to measure the repeatability of endurance walk time (EWT), defined as the duration a patient can walk at a self-selected pace before that first need to stop and rest.

Significance: Walking is the most common form of physical activity. Chosen walking speed and the capacity to endure walking at different speeds can help quantify disability. Also, studies that examine the effect of PR on survival are not available. However, indirect evidence suggests that PR improves many of the risk factors associated with mortality in patients with COPD. This study will examine the effect of PR on the usual walking speed selected by individuals with symptomatic lung disease, which has been demonstrated to be a predictor of mortality in elderly individuals. Therefore, our study may contribute to the indirect evidence for the effects of PR on survival.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

COPD Chronic Lung Disease

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

COPD rehabilitation walking

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

pulmonary rehabilitation

patients that are enrolled in pulmonary rehabilitation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

pulmonary rehabilitation

Intervention Type OTHER

6-weeks of in-patient pulmonary rehabilitation or 12-weeks of out-patient pulmonary rehabilitation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

pulmonary rehabilitation

6-weeks of in-patient pulmonary rehabilitation or 12-weeks of out-patient pulmonary rehabilitation

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients referred to pulmonary rehabilitation with symptomatic chronic lung disease

Exclusion Criteria

* Co-morbid conditions that adversely affect exercise capacity or participation in a pulmonary rehabilitation program; inability to provide written informed consent; weaning doses of oral corticosteroids or methylxanthines
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

West Park Healthcare Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Roger Goldstein

Directory Respiratory Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Roger S Goldstein, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

West Park Healthcare Centre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

West Park Healthcare Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dolmage TE, Evans RA, Hill K, Blouin M, Brooks D, Goldstein RS. The effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on critical walk speed in patients with COPD: a comparison with self-paced walks. Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2):413-419. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-1059. Epub 2011 Jul 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21778262 (View on PubMed)

Evans RA, Hill K, Dolmage TE, Blouin M, O'Hoski S, Brooks D, Goldstein RS. Properties of self-paced walking in chronic respiratory disease: a patient goal-oriented assessment. Chest. 2011 Sep;140(3):737-743. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-3104. Epub 2011 Mar 10.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21393393 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

D6255L00002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id