Utility of Intravitreal Methotrexate in Diabetic Macular Edema Resistant to Conventional Therapies

NCT ID: NCT00779142

Last Updated: 2018-01-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

2 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-09-30

Study Completion Date

2012-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

It is well known that blindness is one of the most feared disabilities expressed by patients in the United States. Estimates of the economic impact of visual disability in the current population exceed 30 million US dollars in this country alone. The reasons for this figure are many; however age related macular degeneration (ARMD), diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma and uveitis are responsible for the majority of permanent visual disability and hence the costs in both quality of life and placing an economic burden on society. Research that may help reverse various abnormal biological responses that lead to or worsen clinical manifestations of diabetic retinopathy would be valuable.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The most common reason for decreased vision in diabetic retinopathy is macular edema. Current approaches to macular edema include FDA approved interventions such as laser and better underlying control of the disease and co morbid conditions. 'Off label' interventions include intravitreal triamcinolone and bevacizumab, both of which have been demonstrated to be efficacious; at least in the short term (weeks) but carry significant risks. Surgical approaches are still controversial and have not shown long term benefits. Unfortunately, there are subsets of patients resistant to any of the above therapies. Intravitreal therapies utilizing methotrexate 400 ug (MTX) have been used for other ophthalmologic conditions associated with inflammation driven macular edema. bevacizumab an anti VEGF agent has been utilized in diseases other than macular degeneration with a favorable effect. It is known that certain similar inflammatory mediators play a role in diabetic macular edema. It would be logical to evaluate the efficacy of MTX an anti inflammatory anti metabolite at low concentrations in diabetic patients with macular edema who have failed conventional FDA approved and well studied off label therapies that involve laser and/or intravitreal drugs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Macular Edema

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Methotrexate 25mg/ml

Methotrexate intravenous 25mg/ml: Methotrexate intravenous 25mg/ml delivered once or twice (based on the therapeutic response) over a period of 2 months maximum. Total dosage 400ug in each dose to subjects with diabetic macular edema resistant to conventional therapies.

Group Type OTHER

Methotrexate intravenous 25mg/ml

Intervention Type DRUG

Methotrexate intravenous 25mg/ml delivered once or twice (based on the therapeutic response) over a period of 2 months maximum. Total dosage 400ug in each dose. Statistical analysis would not be applicable in this small sample.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Methotrexate intravenous 25mg/ml

Methotrexate intravenous 25mg/ml delivered once or twice (based on the therapeutic response) over a period of 2 months maximum. Total dosage 400ug in each dose. Statistical analysis would not be applicable in this small sample.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Methotrexate

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients (18 years and older) with clinically significant macular edema (CSME) with visual acuity less than 20/60 to Hand motion in the study eye.
* Patients should have persistent CSME three months after laser therapy or three months after intraocular injection of Avastin or triamcinolone. These interventions could be multiple or combined.
* Optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan demonstrating more than 275 microns retinal thickness in central subfield of study eye.
* Ability to understand study instructions, interventions and potential complications.
* History of reasonably controlled Diabetes mellitus (DM), ≤ 8.5HbA1c that has been evaluated in the last 3 months.
* Ability to undergo contraceptive protection during and 3 months after intraocular injections.
* Clear demonstration (in female patients) of commitment to avoid pregnancy and a negative urine pregnancy test at baseline for women of childbearing potential.
* Clear understanding of teratogenic potential of MTX.

Exclusion Criteria

* History of allergy to MTX.
* An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity loss would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigment abnormalities, dense subfoveal hard exudates, nonretinal condition.
* An ocular condition is present (other than diabetes) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, epiretinal membrane, etc.).
* An eye treated for Glaucoma
* Eyes that underwent vitrectomy
* History of intraocular malignancies.
* Intraocular surgery with the prior 3 months.
* Recent significant change in diabetic medications.
* Insulin usage less than a year.
* Life threatening co morbidities such as cancer under therapy.
* Use of oral, intravenous, periocular or intraocular corticosteroids (steroids) in prior 3 months.
* Liver function that exceeds three times the upper limit of normal at baseline, or within 6 weeks of that appointment.
* Pregnant females.
* Vitreous hemorrhage (active) in study eye
* Anticipation of the need for laser pan retinal photocoagulation in the next 6 months.
* Media opacities
* Herpetic disease of cornea
* Corneal dystrophy with significant corneal edema.
* Any major surgery within the last 30 days
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wake Forest University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shree K Kurup, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Wake Forest Baptist Health Eye Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Wake Forest Baptist Health Eye Center

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rein DB, Zhang P, Wirth KE, Lee PP, Hoerger TJ, McCall N, Klein R, Tielsch JM, Vijan S, Saaddine J. The economic burden of major adult visual disorders in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Dec;124(12):1754-60. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.12.1754.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17159036 (View on PubMed)

Shimura M, Nakazawa T, Yasuda K, Shiono T, Iida T, Sakamoto T, Nishida K. Comparative therapy evaluation of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone acetonide on persistent diffuse diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 May;145(5):854-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.12.031. Epub 2008 Mar 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18328456 (View on PubMed)

Vasconcelos-Santos DV, Nehemy PG, Schachat AP, Nehemy MB. Secondary ocular hypertension after intravitreal injection of 4 mg of triamcinolone acetonide: incidence and risk factors. Retina. 2008 Apr;28(4):573-80. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31816079e8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18398360 (View on PubMed)

Hartley KL, Smiddy WE, Flynn HW Jr, Murray TG. Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling for diabetic macular edema. Retina. 2008 Mar;28(3):410-9. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31816102f2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18327132 (View on PubMed)

Hardwig PW, Pulido JS, Erie JC, Baratz KH, Buettner H. Intraocular methotrexate in ocular diseases other than primary central nervous system lymphoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Nov;142(5):883-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.06.002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17056381 (View on PubMed)

Ghajarnia M, Kurup S, Eller A. The therapeutic effects of intravitreal bevacizumab in a patient with recalcitrant idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Semin Ophthalmol. 2007 Apr-Jun;22(2):127-31. doi: 10.1080/08820530701421635.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17564935 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5865 Methotrexate

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.