Cediranib in Combination With Lomustine Chemotherapy in Recurrent Glioblastoma

NCT ID: NCT00777153

Last Updated: 2016-12-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

423 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-10-31

Study Completion Date

2016-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to see how effective cediranib is in treating a brain tumour called recurrent glioblastoma. Two drugs are being tested in this study. Lomustine is an approved oral chemotherapy that belongs to the class of drugs called alkylating agents. Cediranib is a new drug that has not yet been approved for this disease. This study will compare the use of lomustine with cediranib, cediranib alone or lomustine with placebo ("inactive substance") to see whether the combination or cediranib alone will be more effective than the chemotherapy alone (lomustine) in preventing the growth of cancer cells.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Recurrent Glioblastoma

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Cancer Tumour Advanced Solid Tumour GBM Glioblastoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cediranib 30mg

Cediranib 30mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cediranib

Intervention Type DRUG

30 mg/day, oral, until progression

Cediranib 20mg + lomustine

Cediranib 20mg + lomustine

Group Type OTHER

Cediranib

Intervention Type DRUG

20 mg/day, oral, until progression

Lomustine Chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

110 mg/m2 / Q6W, oral, until progression

Lomustine and Placebo Cediranib

Lomustine and Placebo Cediranib

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lomustine Chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

110 mg/m2 / Q6W, oral, until progression

Placebo Cediranib

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral, until progression

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cediranib

30 mg/day, oral, until progression

Intervention Type DRUG

Cediranib

20 mg/day, oral, until progression

Intervention Type DRUG

Lomustine Chemotherapy

110 mg/m2 / Q6W, oral, until progression

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo Cediranib

Oral, until progression

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Confirmation of recurrent glioblastoma
* Life expectancy ≥ 12 weeks
* Received only one prior systemic chemotherapy regimen and this regimen must contain temozolomide

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients on enzyme-inducing anti-epileptic drugs within 3 weeks prior to randomisation
* Poorly controlled hypertension
* Previous anti-angiogenesis (eg bevacizumab, sorafenib, sunitinib) therapy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jane Robertson

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

AstraZeneca

Tracy Batchelor, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pheonix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Evanston, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Amherst, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Camperdown, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Heidelberg, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Nedlands, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Parkville, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

St Leonards, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Woodville, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Brussels (Anderlecht), , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Brussels (Jette), , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Brussels (Woluwé-St-Lambert), , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Liberec, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Bobigny, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Saint-Herblain, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Bielefeld, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Göttingen, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Nordhausen, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

The Hague, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Sutton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Belgium Canada Czechia France Germany Netherlands United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Batchelor TT, Mulholland P, Neyns B, Nabors LB, Campone M, Wick A, Mason W, Mikkelsen T, Phuphanich S, Ashby LS, Degroot J, Gattamaneni R, Cher L, Rosenthal M, Payer F, Jurgensmeier JM, Jain RK, Sorensen AG, Xu J, Liu Q, van den Bent M. Phase III randomized trial comparing the efficacy of cediranib as monotherapy, and in combination with lomustine, versus lomustine alone in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Sep 10;31(26):3212-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.2464. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23940216 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

D8480C00055

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id