Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Clinical Comparison of Two Daily Disposable Contact Lenses. (NCT NCT00775021)
NCT ID: NCT00775021
Last Updated: 2018-06-19
Results Overview
Subjects rated study contact lens for overall comfort using the following scale: 5=excellent, 4=very good, 3=good, 2=fair, 1=poor.
COMPLETED
NA
123 participants
1 week
2018-06-19
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Etafilcon A/Nelfilcon A
etafilcon A contact lens worn first and nelfilcon A contact lens worn second
|
Nelfilcon A/Etafilcon A
nelfilcon A contact lens worn first and etafilcon A contact lens second.
|
|---|---|---|
|
First Intervention
STARTED
|
63
|
60
|
|
First Intervention
COMPLETED
|
62
|
60
|
|
First Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
0
|
|
Second Intervention
STARTED
|
62
|
60
|
|
Second Intervention
COMPLETED
|
62
|
59
|
|
Second Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Etafilcon A/Nelfilcon A
etafilcon A contact lens worn first and nelfilcon A contact lens worn second
|
Nelfilcon A/Etafilcon A
nelfilcon A contact lens worn first and etafilcon A contact lens second.
|
|---|---|---|
|
First Intervention
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
|
Second Intervention
Adverse Event
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Clinical Comparison of Two Daily Disposable Contact Lenses.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Total Participants
n=121 Participants
Total number of participants that completed the study.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
28.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5 • n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
80 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
41 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
121 participants
n=93 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 weekPopulation: Analysis includes all participants that completed the study.
Subjects rated study contact lens for overall comfort using the following scale: 5=excellent, 4=very good, 3=good, 2=fair, 1=poor.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etafilcon A
n=121 Participants
All subjects that wore etafilcon A contact lenses and completed the study.
|
Nelfilcon A
n=121 Participants
All subjects that wore nelfilcon A contact lenses and completed the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Comfort
|
3.6685 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1141
|
3.4352 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1148
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 weekPopulation: Analysis includes all participants that completed the study.
The investigator assessed abrasion to the lower portion of the cornea using the following scale:0 = None 1 = Slight micropunctate (1-10 spots) 2 = Moderate micropunctate (11-20 spots) 3 = Severe micropunctate (\>20 spots)4 = Slight macropunctate (1-5 spots) 5 = Moderate macropuntate (\>5-10 spots) 6 = Severe macropunctate (\>10 spots) 7 = Slight patch (1-2mm)8 = Moderate patch (\>2-4mm) 9 = Severe patch (\>4mm)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etafilcon A
n=121 Participants
All subjects that wore etafilcon A contact lenses and completed the study.
|
Nelfilcon A
n=121 Participants
All subjects that wore nelfilcon A contact lenses and completed the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Inferior Region Corneal Staining
|
0.7004 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0643
|
0.8085 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0643
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 weekPopulation: Analysis includes all participants that completed the study.
Subjects rated study contact lens comfort at the end of a day of lens wear using the following scale: 5=excellent, 4=very good, 3=good, 2=fair, 1=poor.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etafilcon A
n=121 Participants
All subjects that wore etafilcon A contact lenses and completed the study.
|
Nelfilcon A
n=121 Participants
All subjects that wore nelfilcon A contact lenses and completed the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
End of the Day Comfort
|
3.148 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.127
|
2.7479 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1274
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 WeekPopulation: Analysis includes all participants that completed the study.
Subjects rated study contact lens for comfort immediately when they first put the lenses on using the following scale: 5=excellent, 4=very good, 3=good, 2=fair, 1=poor.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etafilcon A
n=121 Participants
All subjects that wore etafilcon A contact lenses and completed the study.
|
Nelfilcon A
n=121 Participants
All subjects that wore nelfilcon A contact lenses and completed the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Initial Comfort
|
3.5694 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1229
|
3.6783 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1233
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 weekPopulation: Analysis includes all participants that completed the study.
Subjects rated study contact lens for overall ease of handling using the following scale: 5=excellent, 4=very good, 3=good, 2=fair, 1=poor.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etafilcon A
n=121 Participants
All subjects that wore etafilcon A contact lenses and completed the study.
|
Nelfilcon A
n=121 Participants
All subjects that wore nelfilcon A contact lenses and completed the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Lens Handling
|
3.546 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1189
|
3.2971 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1187
|
Adverse Events
Etafilcon A
Nelfilcon A
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Kurt Moody, Director Design R&D
Vistakon
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The PI may not publish, divulge, reveal, disclose, or use the data and or results of the study without prior written consent of Vistakon.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER