Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Clinical Comparison of Two Daily Disposable Contact Lenses. (NCT NCT00775021)

NCT ID: NCT00775021

Last Updated: 2018-06-19

Results Overview

Subjects rated study contact lens for overall comfort using the following scale: 5=excellent, 4=very good, 3=good, 2=fair, 1=poor.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

123 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

1 week

Results posted on

2018-06-19

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Etafilcon A/Nelfilcon A
etafilcon A contact lens worn first and nelfilcon A contact lens worn second
Nelfilcon A/Etafilcon A
nelfilcon A contact lens worn first and etafilcon A contact lens second.
First Intervention
STARTED
63
60
First Intervention
COMPLETED
62
60
First Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
1
0
Second Intervention
STARTED
62
60
Second Intervention
COMPLETED
62
59
Second Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
0
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Etafilcon A/Nelfilcon A
etafilcon A contact lens worn first and nelfilcon A contact lens worn second
Nelfilcon A/Etafilcon A
nelfilcon A contact lens worn first and etafilcon A contact lens second.
First Intervention
Lost to Follow-up
1
0
Second Intervention
Adverse Event
0
1

Baseline Characteristics

A Clinical Comparison of Two Daily Disposable Contact Lenses.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Total Participants
n=121 Participants
Total number of participants that completed the study.
Age, Continuous
28.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5 • n=93 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
80 Participants
n=93 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
41 Participants
n=93 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
121 participants
n=93 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 week

Population: Analysis includes all participants that completed the study.

Subjects rated study contact lens for overall comfort using the following scale: 5=excellent, 4=very good, 3=good, 2=fair, 1=poor.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Etafilcon A
n=121 Participants
All subjects that wore etafilcon A contact lenses and completed the study.
Nelfilcon A
n=121 Participants
All subjects that wore nelfilcon A contact lenses and completed the study.
Overall Comfort
3.6685 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1141
3.4352 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1148

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 week

Population: Analysis includes all participants that completed the study.

The investigator assessed abrasion to the lower portion of the cornea using the following scale:0 = None 1 = Slight micropunctate (1-10 spots) 2 = Moderate micropunctate (11-20 spots) 3 = Severe micropunctate (\>20 spots)4 = Slight macropunctate (1-5 spots) 5 = Moderate macropuntate (\>5-10 spots) 6 = Severe macropunctate (\>10 spots) 7 = Slight patch (1-2mm)8 = Moderate patch (\>2-4mm) 9 = Severe patch (\>4mm)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Etafilcon A
n=121 Participants
All subjects that wore etafilcon A contact lenses and completed the study.
Nelfilcon A
n=121 Participants
All subjects that wore nelfilcon A contact lenses and completed the study.
Inferior Region Corneal Staining
0.7004 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0643
0.8085 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0643

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 week

Population: Analysis includes all participants that completed the study.

Subjects rated study contact lens comfort at the end of a day of lens wear using the following scale: 5=excellent, 4=very good, 3=good, 2=fair, 1=poor.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Etafilcon A
n=121 Participants
All subjects that wore etafilcon A contact lenses and completed the study.
Nelfilcon A
n=121 Participants
All subjects that wore nelfilcon A contact lenses and completed the study.
End of the Day Comfort
3.148 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.127
2.7479 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1274

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 Week

Population: Analysis includes all participants that completed the study.

Subjects rated study contact lens for comfort immediately when they first put the lenses on using the following scale: 5=excellent, 4=very good, 3=good, 2=fair, 1=poor.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Etafilcon A
n=121 Participants
All subjects that wore etafilcon A contact lenses and completed the study.
Nelfilcon A
n=121 Participants
All subjects that wore nelfilcon A contact lenses and completed the study.
Initial Comfort
3.5694 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1229
3.6783 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1233

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 1 week

Population: Analysis includes all participants that completed the study.

Subjects rated study contact lens for overall ease of handling using the following scale: 5=excellent, 4=very good, 3=good, 2=fair, 1=poor.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Etafilcon A
n=121 Participants
All subjects that wore etafilcon A contact lenses and completed the study.
Nelfilcon A
n=121 Participants
All subjects that wore nelfilcon A contact lenses and completed the study.
Overall Lens Handling
3.546 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1189
3.2971 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1187

Adverse Events

Etafilcon A

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Nelfilcon A

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Kurt Moody, Director Design R&D

Vistakon

Phone: 904-443-3088

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The PI may not publish, divulge, reveal, disclose, or use the data and or results of the study without prior written consent of Vistakon.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER