Evaluation of EULAR-RAID Score in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

NCT ID: NCT00768053

Last Updated: 2011-07-29

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

108 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-10-31

Study Completion Date

2010-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Disease Activity Score (DAS) is a system of measurement developed in the 1980s that uses certain criteria, including joint counts and patient perceived disease activity, to measure disease activity in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis . More recently, the European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) has developed a new system of measurement known as the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score, or EULAR-RAID score. The EULAR-RAID score is a composite score based on patient reported outcomes, and includes such criteria as pain, functional disability, fatigue, sleep disturbances, coping, overall assessment of physical well being and overall assessment of psychological well being. The objective of this study is to evaluate the practical modalities and performance of the EULAR- RAID score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have been prescribed etanercept as part of usual medical practice.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

EULAR-RAID active rheumatoid arthritis etanercept

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Etanercept

Intervention Type DRUG

Etanercept 50 mg once a week

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Etanercept

Etanercept 50 mg once a week

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient aged up to or equal 18 years
* Meet the 1987 ACR Revised Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis.
* Active rheumatoid arthritis with a DAS greater than 3,2 and one of the two followings : Objective evidence of 4 clinical synovitis or CRP (plasma C-reactive protein) greater than 10 mg/l or ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) greater than 28 mm/h
* Failure of MTX, taken for at least 3 months and at least 15 mg/wk or maximal tolerated dosage . In patients with contraindications or intolerance to MTX, failure of another drug with structural efficacy (leflunomide or sulfasalazine), taken for at least 3 months at the optimal tolerated dosage Concomitant treatment for RA : DMARDs, corticosteroids, NSAIDs and analgesics are permitted. DMARDs and corticosteroids should be stable between screening and baseline visits.
* Functional status Class I, II or III as defined by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Revised Criteria.
* Negative serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-HCG) pregnancy test at screening for all women of childbearing potential. Sexually active women of childbearing potential must use a medically acceptable form of contraception. Medically acceptable forms of contraception include oral contraceptives, injectable or implantable methods, intrauterine devices, or properly used barrier contraception. Sexually active men must agree to use a medically accepted form of contraception during the study.
* Able and willing to self-inject ETN or have a designee who can do so.
* Able to store injectable test article at 2 Celcius degree to 8 Celcius degree

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior experience of biologic treatment for their RA including ETN.
* Sepsis or risk of sepsis.
* Current or recent infections, including chronic or localized.
* Planned orthopedic surgery within 3 months (for RA disease)
* History of orthopedic surgery 1 month before screening
* Latex sensitivity.
* Vaccination with live vaccine in the last 4 weeks, or expected to require such vaccination during the course of the study.
* Previous clinical trial involvement in the last 3 months.
* Patients with the following conditions or risk factors should only be entered into the study if the investigator has conducted and documented a full risk/benefit evaluation
* History of recurring or chronic infection, or underlying condition which may predispose patients to infections e.g. tuberculosis (TB) infection (Note: follow SmPC and French guidelines for appropriate screening and treatment of TB in the setting of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy. Patients with latent TB (contact with TB patients, history of primary TB, intradermal test with 5 IU of tuberculin greater than 5 mm, or radiographic lung density greater than 1 cm and consistent with TB) should receive appropriate prophylactic therapy as recommended by the French Agency for healthcare Product Safety (AFSSAPS, http//afassaps.sante.fr/), serious infection (infection associated with hospitalization and/or intravenous antibiotics) within 1 month of test article administration or active infection at screening, open cutaneous ulcers, known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), or hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive.
* Current or prior history of blood dyscrasias. Abnormal safety baseline blood test e.g. hemoglobin \<= 85 g/L; hematocrit less than 27 %; platelet count less than 125 x 109/L; white blood cell count less than 3.5 x 109/L; serum creatinine greater than 175 µmol/L; aspartate aminotransferase (AST \[SGOT\]) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT \[SGPT\]) greater than 2 times the laboratory's upper limit of normal.
* Pre-existing or recent onset central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating disease.
* Cardiovascular conditions, e.g., myocardial infarction within 12 months of the screening visit, unstable angina pectoris, class III or IV congestive heart failure as defined by the New York Heart Association classification or decompensated congestive heart failure.
* Uncontrolled conditions, e.g., diabetes mellitus, hypertension (defined as screening systolic blood pressure greater than 160 mm Hg or screening diastolic blood pressure greater than 100 mm Hg), severe pulmonary disease requiring hospitalization or supplemental oxygen.
* At increased risk of malignancy.
* Reasonable expectation that the subject will not be able to satisfactorily complete the study.
* History of or current psychiatric illness, alcohol or drug abuse that would interfere with the subject's ability to comply with protocol requirements or give informed consent.
* Employment by the investigator or reporting directly or indirectly to the investigator.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Umanis

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

SODIA

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

depolabo

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Wyeth is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Pfizer, Inc

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Pfizer

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pfizer Investigational Site

Amiens, , France

Site Status

Pfizer Investigational Site

Amiens, , France

Site Status

Pfizer Investigational Site

Belfort, , France

Site Status

Pfizer Investigational Site

Berck, , France

Site Status

Pfizer Investigational Site

Bonneville, , France

Site Status

Pfizer Investigational Site

Cahors, , France

Site Status

Pfizer Investigational Site

Corbeil-Essonnes, , France

Site Status

Pfizer Investigational Site

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Pfizer Investigational Site

Dijon, , France

Site Status

Pfizer Investigational Site

Lomme, , France

Site Status

Pfizer Investigational Site

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Pfizer Investigational Site

Mulhouse, , France

Site Status

Pfizer Investigational Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

Pfizer Investigational Site

Rodez, , France

Site Status

Pfizer Investigational Site

Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, , France

Site Status

Pfizer Investigational Site

Valenciennes, , France

Site Status

Pfizer Investigational Site

Monaco, , Monaco

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France Monaco

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Duarte C, Santos EJF, Ferreira RJO, Kvien TK, Dougados M, de Wit M, da Silva JAP, Gossec L. Validity and reliability of the EULAR instrument RAID.7 as a tool to assess individual domains of impact of disease in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study of 671 patients. RMD Open. 2021 Feb;7(1):e001539. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001539.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33547229 (View on PubMed)

Dougados M, Brault Y, Logeart I, van der Heijde D, Gossec L, Kvien T. Defining cut-off values for disease activity states and improvement scores for patient-reported outcomes: the example of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID). Arthritis Res Ther. 2012 May 30;14(3):R129. doi: 10.1186/ar3859.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22647431 (View on PubMed)

Dougados M, Ripert M, Hilliquin P, Brocq O, Brault Y, Logeart I. Onset of action of etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis based on patient-reported outcomes. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012 Mar-Apr;30(2):266-8. Epub 2012 Apr 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22325048 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

B1801019

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

0881X1-4508

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id