Safety and Effectiveness Study of the MEL 80 Excimer Laser Using LASIK in the Treatment of Hyperopia

NCT ID: NCT00762281

Last Updated: 2012-08-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

189 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-07-31

Study Completion Date

2008-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the MEL 80 Excimer Laser is effective in the treatment of hyperopia, when used as part of the Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) procedure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

LASIK has become one of the most common refractive eye procedures performed in the country. In the hyperopia procedure, a steepening occurs on the corneal surface, rather than the flattening procedure (myopic treatment). The surgeon will produce a standard keratomileusis flap using a microkeratome, exposing the corneal stroma. Recontouring under the flap is then accomplished by the removal of tissue from the stroma with the laser. This recontouring results in an altering of effective lens power of the central cornea, measured in diopters (D). The MEL 80 Excimer Laser System will be evaluated for its ability to create accurate and stable hyperopic refractive correction results.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hyperopia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Hyperopia Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Laser Therapy Laser Corneal Surgery Refractive Surgical Procedures Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedure Operative Surgical Procedures Therapeutics

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment of Hyperopic LASIK

Treatment of Hyperopic corrections ≤ +6.0 D with or without Astigmatism of +0.50 to +3.50 D and MRSE ≤ +6.50 D.

Group Type OTHER

MEL 80 Hyperopic LASIK Treatment

Intervention Type DEVICE

Treatment of Hyperopic corrections ≤ +6.0 D with or without Astigmatism of +0.50 to +3.50 D and MRSE ≤ +6.50 D.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

MEL 80 Hyperopic LASIK Treatment

Treatment of Hyperopic corrections ≤ +6.0 D with or without Astigmatism of +0.50 to +3.50 D and MRSE ≤ +6.50 D.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Naturally occurring hyperopia up to +6.0 D, with or without astigmatism of +0.50 D to +3.50 D at the spectacle plane, and MRSE ≤ +6.50 D;
* Have ≤ 0.75 D of latent hyperopia as determined by the difference between the preoperative MRSE and CRSE;
* A stable refraction for at least the last 12 months as documented by previous clinical records, i.e., the spherical and cylindrical portions of the manifest refraction have not progressed at a rate of more than 0.50 D during the year prior to the baseline examination in the eye to be treated;
* Hard contact lens wearers must have two central keratometry readings and two manifest refractions taken at least one week apart that do not differ by more than 0.50 D;
* Visual acuity correctable to at least 20/40 in both eyes;
* Operative eye must be targeted for emmetropia;
* At least 21 years of age;
* Willing and able to return for scheduled follow up examinations for 24 months after surgery;
* Sign and be given a copy of the written Informed Consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

* A history of anterior segment pathology, including cataracts (in the operative eye);
* Severe dry eye syndrome unresolved by treatment;
* Residual, recurrent, active ocular or uncontrolled eyelid disease, corneal scars within the ablation zone or other corneal abnormality such as recurrent corneal erosion or severe basement membrane disease;
* Ophthalmoscopic signs of keratoconus (or keratoconus suspect);
* An ablation deeper than 250 microns from the corneal endothelium;
* Irregular or unstable (distorted/not clear) corneal mires on central keratometry readings;
* Blind in the fellow eye;
* Undergone previous intraocular or corneal surgery of any kind in the operative eye(s), including any type of excimer laser surgery for either refractive or therapeutic purposes;
* A history of ocular Herpes zoster or Herpes simplex keratitis;
* A history of steroid-responsive rise in intraocular pressure, glaucoma, or preoperative IOP \>21 mm Hg;
* Diabetes, diagnosed autoimmune disease, connective tissue disease, or clinically significant atopic syndrome;
* Immunocompromised or use chronic systemic corticosteroid or other immunosuppressive therapy;
* Pregnant, lactating, or be of childbearing potential and not practicing a medically approved method of birth control;
* A known sensitivity to planned study medications;
* Participating in any other ophthalmic drug or device clinical trial during the time of this clinical investigation;
* At risk for angle closure or for developing strabismus postoperatively.
* For Fellow (Second) Eyes in Simultaneous Bilateral Treatment Procedures
* 1\. Flap complications during the first eye's surgery such as a free cap, partial flap, thin flap, or irregular flap.
* 2\. Epithelial defect exceeding 2 mm x 2 mm in dimension, or clinically significant debris in the interface between the flap and underlying stroma for the first eye.
* 3\. Severe blepharospasm in the first eye that may have prevented or impeded the completion of the keratectomy and/or the laser ablation procedure.
* 4\. Poor subject cooperation with instructions for the first eye's surgery and/or poor subject fixation on the laser fixation target.
* 5\. Aborted LASIK procedure in the first eye or PRK was performed in the first eye because LASIK was not possible.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Steven Dell, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Texan Eye Care

John Doane, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Discover Vision Centers

Richard Hoffman, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fine, Hoffman, and Packer LLC

Howard Fine, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fine, Hoffman, and Packer LLC

Mark Packer, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

FIne, Hoffman, and Packer LLC

David Tanzer, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

US Navy Refractive Surgery Center, San Diego, CA

Steve Schallhorn, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

US Navy Refractive Surgery Center, San Diego, CA

John Vukich, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Davis Duehr Dean Eye Clinic

Jon Dishler, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dishler Laser Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

US Navy Refractive Surgery Center

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Dishler Laser Institute

Greenwood Village, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Discover Vision Centers

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Fine, Hoffman, and Packer

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Texan Eye Care

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Davis Duehr Dean Eye Clinic

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MEL 80-2004-2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id