A Study of the Safety, Tolerability and Effect on Glycemic Control of Taspoglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Insulin Naive Type 2 Diabetic Patients Inadequately Controlled With Metformin Plus Sulphonylurea.

NCT ID: NCT00755287

Last Updated: 2016-07-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1072 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-11-30

Study Completion Date

2010-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This 3-arm study will assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of taspoglutide compared to insulin glargine in patients with insulin-naive type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin and sulphonylurea combination therapy. Patients will be randomized to receive taspoglutide (10 mg once weekly, or 10mg once weekly for 4 weeks followed by 20mg once weekly) or insulin glargine (starting dose 10 IU/day) in a ratio of 1:1:1 in addition to continued prestudy metformin treatment. The anticipated time on study treatment is 2+ years, and the target sample size if 500+ individuals.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus Type 2

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

insulin glargine

insulin glargine starting dose 10 IU daily in addition to continued prestudy metformin treatment

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

insulin glargine

Intervention Type DRUG

starting dose 10 IU daily

metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

As prescribed

taspoglutide 10 mg

taspoglutide 10 mg once weekly in addition to continued prestudy metformin treatment

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

As prescribed

taspoglutide

Intervention Type DRUG

10 mg once weekly

taspoglutide 10 mg/20 mg

taspoglutide 20 mg once weekly (after 4 weeks of taspoglutide 10 mg once weekly) in addition to continued prestudy metformin treatment

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

As prescribed

taspoglutide

Intervention Type DRUG

20 mg once weekly (after 4 weeks of taspoglutide 10 mg once weekly)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

insulin glargine

starting dose 10 IU daily

Intervention Type DRUG

metformin

As prescribed

Intervention Type DRUG

taspoglutide

10 mg once weekly

Intervention Type DRUG

taspoglutide

20 mg once weekly (after 4 weeks of taspoglutide 10 mg once weekly)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* adult patients, 18-75 years of age;
* type 2 diabetes treated with a stable dose of metformin and sulphonylurea for at least 12 weeks;
* C-peptide (fasting) \>=1.0ng/mL;
* HbA1c \>=7.0% and \<=10.0% at screening;
* BMI \>=25 (\>23 for Asians) and \<=45kg/m2 at screening;
* stable weight +-5% for at least 12 weeks prior to screening.

Exclusion Criteria

* history of type 1 diabetes mellitus or acute metabolic diabetic complications such as ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar coma in the previous 6 months;
* evidence of clinically significant diabetic complications;
* symptomatic poorly controlled diabetes;
* clinically symptomatic gastrointestinal disease;
* myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery, post-transplantation cardiomyopathy or stroke within the previous 6 months;
* known hemoglobinopathy or chronic anemia.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hoffmann-La Roche

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Clinical Trials

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hoffmann-La Roche

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Searcy, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Concord, California, United States

Site Status

Huntington Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Los Gatos, California, United States

Site Status

Roseville, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Ana, California, United States

Site Status

Westlake Village, California, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Green Cove Springs, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ormond Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Oviedo, Florida, United States

Site Status

Palm Harbor, Florida, United States

Site Status

Trinity, Florida, United States

Site Status

Zephyrhills, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Quincy, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Avon, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Arkansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Crestview Hills, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Sunset, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Portland, Maine, United States

Site Status

North East, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Worchester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Saint Claire Shores, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Picayune, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Grand Island, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Blackwood, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Cherry Hill, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Moorestown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Toms River, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Toms River, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Flushing, New York, United States

Site Status

Mineola, New York, United States

Site Status

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Harrisburg, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Centerville, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Genoa, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Bensalem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Feasterville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Jefferson Hills, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Scranton, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Tipton, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Johnson City, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Waukesha, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Freemantle, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Arlon, , Belgium

Site Status

Bonheiden, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Campina Grande do Sul, Paraná, Brazil

Site Status

Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

Site Status

Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Havířov, , Czechia

Site Status

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Trutnov, , Czechia

Site Status

Helsinki, , Finland

Site Status

Jyväskylä, , Finland

Site Status

Tampere, , Finland

Site Status

Avignon, , France

Site Status

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Bois-Guillaume, , France

Site Status

Brest, , France

Site Status

Corbeil-Essonnes, , France

Site Status

La Rochelle, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Nîmes, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Vénissieux, , France

Site Status

Bad Lauterberg im Harz, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Bochum, , Germany

Site Status

Bosenheim, , Germany

Site Status

Dortmund, , Germany

Site Status

Falkensee, , Germany

Site Status

Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany

Site Status

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

Offenbach a.M., , Germany

Site Status

Reichenbach, , Germany

Site Status

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Larissa, , Greece

Site Status

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Guatemala City, , Guatemala

Site Status

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Balatonfüred, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Szekszárd, , Hungary

Site Status

Napoli, Campania, Italy

Site Status

Rome, Lazio, Italy

Site Status

Codogno, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Milan, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Milan, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Turin, Piedmont, Italy

Site Status

Aguascalientes, , Mexico

Site Status

Cuernavaca, , Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, , Mexico

Site Status

Tampico, , Mexico

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Arequipa, , Peru

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Trujillo, , Peru

Site Status

Grodzisk Mazowiecki, , Poland

Site Status

Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Rzeszów, , Poland

Site Status

Sobótka, , Poland

Site Status

Szczecin, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Guyanabo, San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Levittown, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Orocovis, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Ponce, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Trujillo Alto, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Barnaul, , Russia

Site Status

Chelyabinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Omsk, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Tomsk, , Russia

Site Status

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Kragujevac, , Serbia

Site Status

Niš, , Serbia

Site Status

Novi Sad, , Serbia

Site Status

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Incheon, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Almería, Almeria, Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Granada, Granada, Spain

Site Status

Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Seville, Sevilla, Spain

Site Status

Seville, Sevilla, Spain

Site Status

Alzira, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain

Site Status

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Atherstone, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Chesterfield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Dumfries, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Sheffield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Trowbridge, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Canada Czechia Finland France Germany Greece Guatemala Hong Kong Hungary Italy Mexico New Zealand Peru Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Russia Serbia South Korea Spain Thailand United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nauck M, Horton E, Andjelkovic M, Ampudia-Blasco FJ, Parusel CT, Boldrin M, Balena R; T-emerge 5 Study Group. Taspoglutide, a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue, vs. insulin glargine titrated to target in patients with Type 2 diabetes: an open-label randomized trial. Diabet Med. 2013 Jan;30(1):109-13. doi: 10.1111/dme.12003.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22937895 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008-001855-23

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

BC20965

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A Study for Type 2 Diabetic Patients
NCT00548808 COMPLETED PHASE4