The Effectiveness of the Logic Back™Support.

NCT ID: NCT00754585

Last Updated: 2010-11-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-08-31

Study Completion Date

2009-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Back pain and chair use are the second most important health factors for the aging workforce. Besides personal suffering, postural discomfort in the workplace reduces performance and productivity, both of which can be improved by raising comfort levels. In an attempt to improve comfort and reduce injury risk, ergonomic chairs are commonly equipped with lumbar supports in an attempt to support a "neutral" spine. However, people often alter their position when such a device is in place as they arch their back to conform to it. The Logic Back support offers a simple means to alter posture and reduce associated strain on the lower back during seated tasks by supporting the "Effortless Neutral Position" or the natural curvature of the low back. Although it has been used clinically by many practitioners, its effectiveness has yet to be shown by scientific study. The current work will help to understand if and why the Logic Back is effective and how it can become a low-cost solution to reduce the discomfort of those suffering from low back pain.

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the Logic Back and the "Effortless Neutral Position" in improving comfort and functional performance during seated tasks, as compared to a standard, ergonomic chair.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Seventeen of the top Canadian occupations typically have workers sitting a significant proportion of their work day. An average of 30% of Ontario WSIB lost time claims since 1996 involve low back injury. The return to work objective for twenty percent of these patients requires prolonged sitting in their work stations. While a number of these studies have claimed a relationship between sitting and LBP, the relationship is complex. Back pain and chair use are the second most important health factors for the aging workforce. The odds ratio for LBP is estimated for seated tasks at 1.9721. Prolonged and monotonous, low-level mechanical loads associated with a seated posture are thought to provoke pain.

Besides personal suffering, postural discomfort in the workplace reduces performance and productivity, both of which can be improved by raising comfort levels. According to Corlett (2006), other lumbar supports do not exert enough pressure on the spine to actually change its configuration. However, the patient often alters their posture when such a device is in place as they arch their back to conform to it. The Logic Back support offers a simple means to alter posture and reduce associated strain on the lower back during seated tasks by promoting the neutral standing lordotic posture. Clinically, it has been shown to support the ENP or the natural standing lordotic posture. Although its clinical applicability has been accepted by many practitioners, its effectiveness in improving seated comfort and functional task performance has yet to be quantified in LBP patients who perform seated tasks. This study will help to understand why the Logic Back or ENP must be considered when planning return-to-work goals and methods to reduce first-time injury incidence in the workplace.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain Posture

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

I

All participants will perform the five Chair Support tasks: (1) quiet standing, sitting, (2) upper back unsupported, (3) sitting, upper back unsupported with Logic Back in place, (4) sitting in a standard ergonomic chair, and (5) sitting in a standard ergonomic chair with Logic Back in place. Aside from the Quiet Standing trials which will be performed first, the order of Chair Support will be randomized. Participants will perform the Chair Support task for 30 minutes while quietly watching a movie DVD of their choice. The DVDs provided will the "light" in content without a lot of suspense or emotion. Data will be collected for the final two minutes of each 30-minute trial.

Logic Back Grahl Duo Back Model DB11-01

Intervention Type DEVICE

The device is placed against the back rest of a chair. The tension of the straps are adjusted for each participant to obtain the ENP.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Logic Back Grahl Duo Back Model DB11-01

The device is placed against the back rest of a chair. The tension of the straps are adjusted for each participant to obtain the ENP.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male
* Between ages of 20-55
* With or without lower back pain

Exclusion Criteria

* Participants currently experiencing neck, shoulder or arm pain
* Participants who have low back pain of non-musculoskeletal origin
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Logic Back

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

McMaster University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

McMaster University

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College

North York, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Grondin DE, Triano JJ, Tran S, Soave D. The effect of a lumbar support pillow on lumbar posture and comfort during a prolonged seated task. Chiropr Man Therap. 2013 Jul 4;21(1):21. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-21-21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23826832 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

082007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id