Vanguard™ Deep Dish Rotating Platform Knee Clinical Evaluation
NCT ID: NCT00753090
Last Updated: 2025-01-30
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
326 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-06-30
2022-07-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Evaluation of Vanguard DD RP
NCT04076202
Vanguard Complete Knee Versus Vanguard High Flex Rotating Platform (RP) Knee Study
NCT01010269
A Prospective, Clinical Investigation of the Vanguard 360 Revision Knee
NCT01542580
A Clinical Investigation of the Vanguard™ Complete Knee System
NCT00698854
Prospective Multi-Center Study on Vanguard With E1 Bearing
NCT02088372
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Implant loosening and polyethylene wear in fixed-bearing knee prostheses were recognized as major causes of late failure. The mobile bearing knee have the theoretical advantages of potentially minimizing the polyethylene wear and reducing implant to bone interface stress in order to reduce the incidence of implant loosening. Therefore, the aims of this study were to prove the Vanguard deep dish rotating platform knee is at least as effective in clinical outcome as the widely used current design of knee replacement and better in long term survivorship.
The efficacy of the device was determined by the relief of pain, restoration of function and range of motion. The durability of device was determined by the absence of revision/removal and radiological integrity. To assess the safety of the device, all post operative complications were recorded either device related or otherwise. Patient satisfaction was determined by answers to patient outcome questionnaires (Oxford Knee Score, WOMAC and Lower Extremity Activity Scale).
Between June 29, 2009 and March 5th 2012, 326 cases were enrolled in the study. In total 117 cases were implanted with the Vanguard fixed bearing cruciate retaining knee; the control arm, and 209 cases were implanted with the Vanguard DDRP. All of these patients fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria. From the 4 participating sites, 2 of them (both located in the Netherlands, Zuyderland Hospital and Bravis Hospital) performed a randomized controlled trial (RCT). In the RCT, 40 cases were assigned to the Trial Arm (Vanguard DDRP), and 51 to the control arm (Vanguard CR). The UK site enrolled cases only in the Vanguard DDRP arm and the French site enrolled in both arms, but non-randomized. Total 326 patients are enrolled in the study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
VG DDRP
This arm utilizes the Vanguard™ Deep Dish Rotating Platform Knee.
Vanguard™ Deep Dish Rotating Platform Knee
Total knee replacements with the Vanguard Deep Dish Rotating Platform Knee
VG CR
This arm utilizes the Vanguard™ Cruciate Retaining Knee.
Vanguard™ Cruciate Retaining Knee
Total knee replacements with the Vanguard Cruciate Retaining Knee
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vanguard™ Deep Dish Rotating Platform Knee
Total knee replacements with the Vanguard Deep Dish Rotating Platform Knee
Vanguard™ Cruciate Retaining Knee
Total knee replacements with the Vanguard Cruciate Retaining Knee
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients scheduled to undergo primary total knee replacement with any of the following indication: Painful and disabled knee joint resulting from osteoarthritis, Traumatic Arthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis; One or more compartments are involved
* Need to obtain pain relief and improve function
* Ability and willingness to follow instructions, including control of weight and activity level, and to return for follow-up evaluations
* A good nutritional state of the patient
* Full skeletal maturity of the patient, patients who are at least 18 years of age
* Patients of either sex
* Consent form read, understood, and signed by patient
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with a pre-operative Knee Society Score of \>= 70
* Infection
* Osteomyelitis
* Previous partial or total prosthetic knee replacement on the operative side
* Patients who are less than 18 years of age
* Sepsis
* Patients who had body mass index \>= 40
Relative contraindications include the following factors:
* Uncooperative patient or patient with neurological disorders who are incapable of following directions or who are predictably unwilling to return for follow-up examinations
* Osteoporosis or marked bone loss, which may preclude proper fixation of the prosthesis
* Metabolic disorders, which may impair bone formation
* Osteomalacia
* Distant foci of infections, which may spread to the implant site
* Rapid joint destruction, marked bone loss, or bone resorption apparent on roentgenogram
* Vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy, or neuromuscular disease in the affected limb.
* Incomplete or deficient soft tissue surrounding the knee
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Zimmer Biomet
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hassan Achakri, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Zimmer Biomet
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite, , France
Bravis Ziekenhuis
Roosendaal, , Netherlands
Zuyderland Medisch Centrum Sittard-Geleen
Sittard, , Netherlands
The Hillingdon Hospital NHS Trust
Middlesex, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BMETEU.CR.EU13B
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.