Evaluation of Assessments of Motor Performance, Physical Impairments and Functional Abilities
NCT ID: NCT00747955
Last Updated: 2019-12-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
29 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2008-08-28
2017-04-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Children and adults of all ages with disabilities and healthy normal volunteers may be eligible for this study.
The following kinds of assessments are evaluated in this study:
Assessments of Impairments
Impairments are problems such as loss of movement, weakness or loss of sensation. Assessments may include measurements of range of motion, strength, sensation, pain, joint stability or mobility, joint angles, limb and girth, gait, exercise tolerance, stamina, or ultrasound imaging of muscle and swallowing function.
Assessments of Function and Performance
Functional and performance assessments look at how well subjects perform actions, such as walking or getting around, dressing, or preparing meals. They may include evaluations of activities of daily living, leisure activities, fatigue, vocational activity, school activity, coping skills, and quality of life. The assessments may be done by questionnaires or interviews and by watching subjects perform the activities.
Assessments of Treatment Techniques
Treatment techniques are assessed by evaluating methods and equipment used to treat patients with impairments or problems with function. They may evaluate, for example, the use of heat, cold, strengthening exercises, fitness exercises, TENS units, splinting and orthotics, or shoe modifications.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The objective of the protocol is to provide framework in which clinicians in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (RMD) can serve the clinical needs of patients and the intramural clinical research needs of NIH investigators by maintaining state of the art expertise in the functional assessment of persons with disabilities and investigating new equipment, methodologies and/or techniques for functional assessment.
Study Population
We intend to study a total of 500 healthy volunteers and 500 subjects with disabilities, including those enrolled in NIH intramural research protocols.
Design
The study will consist of individual projects designed designed by RMD staff including one or more of the associate investigators. The individual projects will be relatively small and designed to test the reliability, reproducibility, efficiency, feasibility, sensitivity, specificity, tolerability, validity and/or precision of physical medicine and rehabilitation assessment equipment, devices and clinical evaluations of impairment, disability, and/or function.
Outcome Measures
The specific outcome measure(s) will be chosen to meet the goals of the individual project and will generally include one or more of the following:
i. Subjective assessment by the participant of the test, device, or evaluation based on written evaluation tools.
ii. Comparisons to established evaluations or equipment designed to assess similar areas of function, including concurrent validity analyses.
iii. Subjective assessment by clinicians using the test, device or evaluation, based on written evaluation tools.
iv. Feasibility assessments, including the time required for participants to perform tests, time for clinicians to evaluate the results of the tests, and/or prepare reports of the results of tests.
v. Assessments of reliability and/or stability of the technique used, including statistical tests of coefficients of variability.
vi. Assessments of tolerance of tests, including measures such as vital signs or elements of a physical examination.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* have a disability appropriate to the measure being assessed
* be clinically stable and medically able to tolerate the measure to be evaluated in a specific project in which they are to be enrolled
* be an adult able to give informed consent or, if a minor, have a parent/guardian able to provide informed consent
* be at least 2 years of age, with no upper age limit
To participate in projects in this study, healthy volunteers must:
* be an adult able to provide informed consent or, if a minor, have a parent/guardian able to provide informed consent
* be in good general health and have no disability
* be able medically able to tolerate the measure to be evaluated in the specific project in which they are to be enrolled
* be at least 2 years of age, with no upper age limit
Exclusion Criteria
* Are unable to understand the instructions required to safely use the device or participate in the measure being evaluated
* Have a medical or other device in or on their body which may interfere the research assessments.
* Have a medical or other device in or on their body that places them at increased risk from use of any device to be evaluated, based on manufacturer s recommendations or accepted medical literature
* Have any medical condition which contraindicates use of the specific device to be evaluated, based on manufacturer s recommendations or accepted medical literature.
* Are discovered to have a previously undiagnosed impairment or disability in the domain to be evaluated by the device or measure to be used in the specific project in the study
* Are unable to understand the instructions required to safely use the device or participate in the measure being evaluated.
* Have a medical or other device in or on their body which may interfere the research assessments.
* Have a medical or other device in or on their body that places them at increased risk from use of any device to be evaluated, based on manufacturer s recommendations or accepted medical literature
* Have any medical condition which contraindicates use of the specific device to be evaluated, based on manufacturer s recommendations or accepted medical literature
* RMD special volunteers, employees and contractors will not be able to participate in this protocol.
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)
NIH
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Scott M Paul, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
08-CC-0205
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
080205
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id